Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

There are no arguments for universal and inalienable freedoms

Flagellum_Dei

Flagellum_Dei

Rаpe is the new idea of europe
★★
Joined
Mar 24, 2024
Posts
2,643
Online time
17h 4m
Every writing that support those is based either on christian morality or other moralist madness. There is no logical basis to support that kind of inherited value for all people (or foids). Even if you assume they're right and every human have same inherited value, value of 2 people would still be higher than value of one and thus it's reasonable to give it a higher priority. If every human value is based upon something (productivity for example), then the result remain the same. You have to assume that this value is infinite and it's prohibited to try to measure it, what's absurd. This concept doesn't make sense.
 
Last edited:
Utilitarianism is the only moral framework that makes sense to me
 

Similar threads

Sir Silentium
Replies
14
Views
943
hly_thmst
hly_thmst
A
Replies
15
Views
567
ANTAGONIST
ANTAGONIST
Cybersex is our hope
Replies
33
Views
1K
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top