Serious Theory of Evolution

[Sir Silentium]

I have never believed in the whole concept. Not only from a biblical standpoint, but from a literal one as well.

I believe in adaptation, E.g finches on Galapagos island adapting overtime to suit their environment. But evolving and being transformed into something completely different, or even changing species is where I disagree with these so called scientists.

Like how they say we evolved from moluscs, to fish, to amphibians, to lizards, to apes, to then finally humans is ludicrous. I find it odd how we never see or have any proof of the in-between process either. Like what is in between a monkey and a human in evolution? They have 0 clue, because it never happened.


These same scientists believe that the Earth was formed 7 Billion years ago. They think they can Carbon date back millions of years. In fact, carbon dating only works up to 2000 years, anything past this is considered an estimate, or rather a guess. There is this guy who studied the topic for over 40 years and came to the conclusion that all of the modern day tools they use to work out how all of this evolution and carbon dating happened is all a hoax. The government silenced him and I can't find a single piece of his work now. Alan or Colin someone.



Back to the topic, I have more evidence of why it didn't happen then if it happened. Weighing up both sides has brought me to this conclusion.

Please comment if you believe otherwise.

 

[jackhanma]

provable in real time by use of bacteria colonies but okay

 

[Sir Silentium]

This is what they believe in.

 

[Sir Silentium]

provable in real time by use of bacteria colonies but okay

How does bacteria prove this? Are we going to test and experiment the bacteria for thousands of years? Are we going to speed up the rate until we can call it "true." Bacteria colonies have proved nothing, if anything it has proved the opposite

 

[nico]

low IQ fag

 

[FBI]

retards.is

 

[Sir Silentium]

low IQ fag

You leftists call names and labels, but never gives a logical argument. I knew when I was writing this there will be someone commenting this. This is normie behaviour.

 

[Sir Silentium]

retards.is

And the point behind this statement?

 

[FBI]

I believe in adaptation, E.g finches on Galapagos island adapting overtime to suit their environment. But evolving and being transformed into something completely different, or even changing species is where I disagree with these so called scientists.

What you are calling "adaptation" is literally the first step of speciation. If a population is isolated long enough, the small changes you accept as adaptation accumulate until members can no longer interbreed with the original group. That is the point where taxonomists call them a new species. You do not need to "believe" it, because the reproductive barrier is measurable in real populations!

 

[Shark]

There is a lot of scientific evidence for it being true, as far as I know at least.
Evolution doesn't happen over night obviously and there are inbetween species like amphibians being sort of like an intermediary between aquatic and land animals.

 

[Shark]

What you are calling "adaptation" is literally the first step of speciation. If a population is isolated long enough, the small changes you accept as adaptation accumulate until members can no longer interbreed with the original group. That is the point where taxonomists call them a new species. You do not need to "believe" it, because the reproductive barrier is measurable in real populations!

 

[FBI]

Like what is in between a monkey and a human in evolution? They have 0 clue, because it never happened.

There are thousands of intermediate fossils between ape-like ancestors and modern humans, from Australopithecus to Homo habilis to Homo erectus.

 

[nico]

You leftists call names and labels, but never gives a logical argument. I knew when I was writing this there will be someone commenting this. This is normie behaviour.

nothing wrong in being low IQ.
trucel trait.

 

[jackhanma]

How does bacteria prove this? Are we going to test and experiment the bacteria for thousands of years? Are we going to speed up the rate until we can call it "true." Bacteria colonies have proved nothing, if anything it has proved the opposite

bacteria reproduce very fast and individuals can develop mutations to survive in environmental circumstances that will kill their peers. These reproduce and their offspring carry this adaptation. Evolution works the same way but on a macro scale.

 

[FBI]

These same scientists believe that the Earth was formed 7 Billion years ago. They think they can Carbon date back millions of years. In fact, carbon dating only works up to 2000 years, anything past this is considered an estimate, or rather a guess.

No scientist believes the Earth is seven billion years old; the accepted figure is about four and a half billion. And carbon dating is reliable not just for two thousand years, but for tens of thousands. For older material, scientists use other radiometric methods such as uranium-lead or potassium-argon, which allow them to date rocks and fossils that are millions or even billions of years old.

 

[IWWorkER]

You leftists call names and labels, but never gives a logical argument

The irony

 

[FBI]

Where are you even finding this information? You are talking out of your ass.

 

[Quarantined]

ya fuck evolution

 

[8CbZA-kHFu6pFgE*]

nothing wrong in being low IQ.
trucel trait.

There is nothing wrong with being low IQ, but there is something wrong with being ignorant and refusing to learn

 

[Leon98]

retards.is

 

[Sir Silentium]

nothing wrong in being low IQ.
trucel trait.

If it's a trucel trait then I would say there is something relatively wrong with it.

 

[Sir Silentium]

Wow not a single person in the comments agree with this. This is worse than political posts on .org. Absolute normie behaviour, targeting an individual instead of targeting the information. Used to use this forum to cope too ... how I was wrong

 

[nico]

There is nothing wrong with being low IQ, but there is something wrong with being ignorant and refusing to learn

yes and he's wrong for not learning

 

[nico]

If it's a trucel trait then I would say there is something relatively wrong with it.

yea sure high IQ cuz ugly

 

[Rapistcel]

I have never believed in the whole concept. Not only from a biblical standpoint, but from a literal one as well.

I believe in adaptation, E.g finches on Galapagos island adapting overtime to suit their environment. But evolving and being transformed into something completely different, or even changing species is where I disagree with these so called scientists.

Like how they say we evolved from moluscs, to fish, to amphibians, to lizards, to apes, to then finally humans is ludicrous. I find it odd how we never see or have any proof of the in-between process either. Like what is in between a monkey and a human in evolution? They have 0 clue, because it never happened.


These same scientists believe that the Earth was formed 7 Billion years ago. They think they can Carbon date back millions of years. In fact, carbon dating only works up to 2000 years, anything past this is considered an estimate, or rather a guess. There is this guy who studied the topic for over 40 years and came to the conclusion that all of the modern day tools they use to work out how all of this evolution and carbon dating happened is all a hoax. The government silenced him and I can't find a single piece of his work now. Alan or Colin someone.



Back to the topic, I have more evidence of why it didn't happen then if it happened. Weighing up both sides has brought me to this conclusion.

Please comment if you believe otherwise.

I believe earth is much younger than science wants us to believe.

 

[Rapemaxxer]

retards.is

 

[Rapemaxxer]

Wow not a single person in the comments agree with this. This is worse than political posts on .org. Absolute normie behaviour, targeting an individual instead of targeting the information. Used to use this forum to cope too ... how I was wrong

Fuck off christcuck

 

[Zaraj11]

Evolution is real. Why is this still a debate in 2025?

 

[Rapemaxxer]

Evolution is real. Why is this still a debate in 2025?

Too many retarded schizo christfags here. Evolution is intrinsically linked to the blackpill and whoever denies it is coping hard.

 

[poorenglishcel]

Don't worry the only trucel will destroy this universe. No niggers are gonna evolve their way out of this.

 

[lnceI]

It doesnt matter

 

[lnceI]

nothing wrong in being low IQ.
trucel trait.

It is wrong because it's a trucel trait

 

[nico]

It is wrong because it's a trucel trait

ok incel

 

[Sir Silentium]

I believe earth is much younger than science wants us to believe.

I don't believe the Earth is older than 10,000 years, at absolute max.

 

[Sir Silentium]

Bumping the thread to add a few more points:

1. There has never been evidence or an archeological discovery that has shown the mid way point of the evolution of an animal - but rather only one of it's kind (after it's kind)- as stated in Genesis.

2. Adaptation has proven it's existence, not evolution - that is still a scientific theory.

3. Companies have falsified their data in order to 'prove' evolution - which does the complete opposite. Such as the Bureau.

 

[RandomGuy]

I don't believe the Earth is older than 10,000 years, at absolute max.

You have a lot to learn, buzz boi.

 

[goyim next door]

nothing wrong in being low IQ.
trucel trait.

>Insults someone for being low IQ
>Then backtracks and says there's nothing wrong with being low IQ?

How about you switch it with something like height.

Imagine I said:

>Fuck you manlet!
>But btw, there's nothing wrong with being short. That's a truecel trait

I don't agree with op's post, but you seem like a fag. Never talk shit while having a pfp of a man who bullied incels, you cuck.

 

[nico]

>Insults someone for being low IQ
>Then backtracks and says there's nothing wrong with being low IQ?

How about you switch it with something like height.

Imagine I said:

>Fuck you manlet!
>But btw, there's nothing wrong with being short. That's a truecel trait

I don't agree with op's post, but you seem like a fag. Never talk shit while having a pfp of a man who bullied incels, you cuck.

no, denying that ure short would and should be insulted in order for u to embrace ur true identity.

ER did a good thing by killing simps who would have and did contributed in inflating foid ego and constantly simp for them.

 

[RandomGuy]

low IQ fag

‘=,

 

[Sir Silentium]

‘=,

To who?

 

[deleted dude]

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/x7NwzYI0KFE?si=OlDyKIXpxStPPSrP

 

[Lo3e]

I have never believed in the whole concept. Not only from a biblical standpoint, but from a literal one as well.

I believe in adaptation, E.g finches on Galapagos island adapting overtime to suit their environment. But evolving and being transformed into something completely different, or even changing species is where I disagree with these so called scientists.

Like how they say we evolved from moluscs, to fish, to amphibians, to lizards, to apes, to then finally humans is ludicrous. I find it odd how we never see or have any proof of the in-between process either. Like what is in between a monkey and a human in evolution? They have 0 clue, because it never happened.


These same scientists believe that the Earth was formed 7 Billion years ago. They think they can Carbon date back millions of years. In fact, carbon dating only works up to 2000 years, anything past this is considered an estimate, or rather a guess. There is this guy who studied the topic for over 40 years and came to the conclusion that all of the modern day tools they use to work out how all of this evolution and carbon dating happened is all a hoax. The government silenced him and I can't find a single piece of his work now. Alan or Colin someone.



Back to the topic, I have more evidence of why it didn't happen then if it happened. Weighing up both sides has brought me to this conclusion.

Please comment if you believe otherwise.

Evolution is a funny concept to me because you have to constantly give out the atheist miracles. First of all the first miracle is, let's say, I believe this miracle of the Big Bang theory. I say I believe this story and the story is this is how it happened in reality: two rocks did collide together and they made a universe. Okay I believe that.

Okay so how did human life get into a spawn? Okay so now I have to grant you a miracle, the fact that somehow rocks collided and over millions of years human life randomly spawned with a heartbeat, lungs, organs, and everything. Oh monkeys, okay cool. Well how did the monkeys discover that they were able to breed? Okay I'll give you another miracle, the fact that monkeys somehow were spawned on to a world that was created by rocks with no creator but just an animal kingdom.

Oh okay great so now you have apes breeding together but they don't explain how. Now we have fish, dogs, cats. Why isn't my great-grandfather a fish? Why not? Because evolution should state that technically my dog should be my grandfather, right, because he comes from a version of me or it comes from a family history that's way before, way before me.

You have to constantly be granting them the atheist miracles because I don't know how the world could coexist, meanwhile still having life on this earth.

 

[TyroneChaddington]

View attachment 1560415 View attachment 1560416 This is what they believe in.

Both pics are BS.

left pic:
Evolution did not stop. It is ongoing. Great apes can't walk. WTF, spend $2 on a zoo ticket learn how apes look like.
right pic:
mammals did not evolve from reptilians.



Overall what's on these pics looks more like Lamarck's theory than modern evolution. He was catholic btw. So I generally don't see contradiction between scripture and evolution

 

[nihilum]

monke

 

[Sir Silentium]

Evolution is a funny concept to me because you have to constantly give out the atheist miracles. First of all the first miracle is, let's say, I believe this miracle of the Big Bang theory. I say I believe this story and the story is this is how it happened in reality: two rocks did collide together and they made a universe. Okay I believe that.

Okay so how did human life get into a spawn? Okay so now I have to grant you a miracle, the fact that somehow rocks collided and over millions of years human life randomly spawned with a heartbeat, lungs, organs, and everything. Oh monkeys, okay cool. Well how did the monkeys discover that they were able to breed? Okay I'll give you another miracle, the fact that monkeys somehow were spawned on to a world that was created by rocks with no creator but just an animal kingdom.

Oh okay great so now you have apes breeding together but they don't explain how. Now we have fish, dogs, cats. Why isn't my great-grandfather a fish? Why not? Because evolution should state that technically my dog should be my grandfather, right, because he comes from a version of me or it comes from a family history that's way before, way before me.

You have to constantly be granting them the atheist miracles because I don't know how the world could coexist, meanwhile still having life on this earth.

I don't have the faith to believe that everything was created from nothing. If someone has the faith to believe in Evolution, they have the faith to believe in God.

 

[deleted dude]

I don't have the faith to believe that everything was created from nothing. If someone has the faith to believe in Evolution, they have the faith to believe in God.

View attachment 1732248

To believe that live and all of creation is just pure coincidence is retarded af anyway. The creation is way too perfect to be a random chemical explosion or reaction

 

[Sir Silentium]

To believe that live and all of creation is just pure coincidence is retarded af anyway. The creation is way too perfect to be a random chemical explosion or reaction

Amen - and that reaction couldn't have occurred from 'nothing', something would have had to occur to cause it in the first place.

 

[Freixel]

ya fuck evolution

 

[Sir Silentium]

Both pics are BS.

left pic:
Evolution did not stop. It is ongoing. Great apes can't walk. WTF, spend $2 on a zoo ticket learn how apes look like.
right pic:
mammals did not evolve from reptilians.



Overall what's on these pics looks more like Lamarck's theory than modern evolution. He was catholic btw. So I generally don't see contradiction between scripture and evolution

Well there are many contradictions, in fact there is a book on Evolution vs God.

But the main one being that in Genesis it talks about God creating each animal of it's kind. There was no indication of a change between kinds ever occurring.

Also the animals/living creatures were all created on the same "day", with once again no indication of change.

Also, the bible indicates that the earth is less than 10 thousand years old, which would be impossible for scientific "evolution" to occur in this time frame. I could elaborate

 

[AutistKing]

“Deus Vult”