Experiment [Theory][Encore]You have your perfect, idealized woman who's loyal and loves you for life, but...
Absolutely not
cucks need to be run over by a freight train and set on fire
this situation would genuinely be worse than death
this situation would genuinely be worse than death
I didn't read past the second sentence.
No way. Morality, principles and self respect aside, I'm sure that that would cause me more suffering than just being alone.
On second thought, can I spend a year with her and then plant a bomb inside her before her birthday?
Couldn't I just tie her up during those 24 hours and wait until it ends?
It's not a paradox, if you change the setup of the hypothetical even just a little bit.
Suppose that your ideal woman isn't like the woman in the OP's description. Suppose that this ideal woman (your version of ideal) comes into your life as the result of a Faustian bargain, and, as part of the contract's conditions (lifelong loyalty etc. etc.), she must be subjected to that Day of Degeneracy on her birthday as a stipulation. It doesn't even need to be her will to do so.
You can't mentally cartwheel, back flip and somersault your way out of this one, boyo.
In that case my answer would simply be no.
In the scenario you described I would effectively be guilty of sexual assault by proxy, and against my ideal woman at that. I'm far from a moralfag but even I have my limits.
Hell, i'm not even entirely sure I'd want my impossibly perfect, ideal woman to even exist in this shithole world. When I fantasize about such a woman, I also fantasize about everything taking place in another universe. In an idyllic utopia. One where sexuality itself doesn't even exist, much less the degeneracy you're describing.
Nope, pure disgust
Lol man, i would watch as long as i can treat her like a filthy bitch and destroy her holes for the next 364 days of the year.
Do you accept?
Yes.
Votes: 46.9%- Blackpill Monk
- SociallyStupid
- NeverGetUp
- Maocel
No.
Votes: 5493.1%- Ryo_Hazuki
- Saigon Depression
- Animecel2D
- tayhrdl
- zerozerozero
- PersonalityChad
- Dregster
- FinnCel
- based_meme
- LeFrenchCel
- SocialzERo
- I want to believe
- AsakangaHalo
- ezio6
- Undervalued
- Todd Thundercock
- blackpillednigga
- Shrek
- gymletethnicel
- TheCatMan
- Riinku
- unlucky guy
- Diddy
- KillNiggers
- Just say NIGGER!
- OwariDa
- BasedMistercel
- Ernst22
- Mistake
- CuntHater
- daydreamER
- VideoGameCoper
- Runt171
- Sewer Sloth
- Scatius Deletus
- stranger
- Solid
- Miercoles
- veryrare
- user
- Horatio NiggER bird
- Skelly
- kaijicel
- AtrociousCitizen
- IronGuard27
- orgcel
- chudjak
- AntoCel
- fullofchagrin
- oddneg
- Diocel96
- kcarrots
- ERpill
- 4 eyes nolife
So be a cuck? No
Didn't even have to read the whole thing to say it's a no
Are any of us THAT lonely to settle for this cuckery?
B
Three people, apparently. @NeverGetUp says he misclicked, so I'm just adding his vote to the no pile.
60 vs 3.
Fixed
Fuck that bro
Assuming she's the 0.0001% fictional soulmate who truly loves me and wouldn't ever leave me for anything else and has all the features that I'm attracted to and is the most compatible with me, then yes I'd take getting NTR'd for that.
I would just forget it by 1 week anyway, and she wouldn't fuck anything or anyone else in 1 whole year. Meanwhile I'd have something that most normies don't have: A non-transactional romantic relationship. Who's the cuck now, normies?
I would just forget it by 1 week anyway, and she wouldn't fuck anything or anyone else in 1 whole year. Meanwhile I'd have something that most normies don't have: A non-transactional romantic relationship. Who's the cuck now, normies?
Bruh
wtf
real
No. Not wanting to be a cuck is quite a justifiable demand, wouldn't you agree?
B
My vote should answer that question, tbhngl.
Fuck kind of question is that
B
I thought it'd be obvious, but not to worry, I'll explain it once it gets enough votes.
Explain it pls
B
Needs about 100 votes, like the other version of this thread.
What was the other version and what was the explanation for that one
B
[Theory]You have your perfect, idealized woman who's loyal and loves you for life, but...
She demands to peg you every single time before doing anything sexual with her (once per session). Kissing, hugging, cuddling, and all of that sappy shit is peg-free, but not oral and more. What say you?
incels.is
I didn't really give an explanation (because nobody asked), but it's the same reason as this thread.
So explain the last one then it got enough votes[Theory]You have your perfect, idealized woman who's loyal and loves you for life, but...
She demands to peg you every single time before doing anything sexual with her (once per session). Kissing, hugging, cuddling, and all of that sappy shit is peg-free, but not oral and more. What say you?
I didn't really give an explanation (because nobody asked), but it's the same reason as this thread.
you basically describe homeless chicks who got thrown out by their BF for cheating.
NevER.
I don't want to get aids
I don't want to get aids
F
I don't know, I don't think you'll be able to give her a few weeks to a month after the orgy to let her holes cool off since shes so degen. I'd probably have to say no
soulmate whos completely perfect and supports me forever but she cheats once a year is a fair deal.
shes not even emotionally cheating.
in this hypothetical i have a life long friend and gf
....i accept the deal and will make the sacrifice because she'd do it for me (as shes perfect)
shes not even emotionally cheating.
in this hypothetical i have a life long friend and gf
....i accept the deal and will make the sacrifice because she'd do it for me (as shes perfect)
I would probably kill myself or her and the lovers in the room during their orgy
I would rather die
Absolutely not.
If shes rich , hot and truly loving / caring , sure . ( with the condition im allowed to get drunk / high on that day )
If shes just hot but brings not much else then no .
If shes just hot but brings not much else then no .
da fuck is the point of this post. when normies find out their spouse cheated on them even once that's grounds for a divorce. what's the difference in her having 1 or 100 orgies? infidelity in any form and of any magnitude communicates extreme lack of loyalty and respect (both of which are extremely vital for a successful relationship). a perfect, idealized wife doesn't even look at other men (including celebrities and gigachads at the grocery store) with lustful eyes let alone make plans for a scandalous holiday.
Sounds too gross for me. Reminds me of this hentai manga I read called the Oharami Maiden.
Why would you even think this, lol. ❝[Theory]❞ It's such a bad hypothetical. The fact one is forced to watch it is an immediate deal-breaker. Anyone would agree, unless they're a masochistic cuck fetishist turned on by the thought of that. But even if that wasn't the case I wouldn't be down, I wouldn't want to go near her after that, knowing she did it. It would utterly break any intimacy in the rest of the 364 days. You could never look at her the same way. And you said it would repeat every year, so you'd know next time would come around.
It would actually be a more interesting hypothetical if the question was would you agree to this but you did not have to watch the orgy. In that case, it would be more about the idea that she did it, even if it did not have any immediate effect on your life, either during the orgy, or for the remaining 364 days of the year. By saying you'd be forced to watch it, this interesting aspect is removed.
What's psychologically interesting to me is, for instance, the idea that your partner was promiscuous in the past, or would cheat on you if certain criteria was met, and how much this does or does not affect how you are to them in the present given the fact it has no immediately apparent effect or implication in the relationship. That's interesting. In practice, people's awareness and inclination to think about such things varies. It seems many simps to women who settled down in their 30's for them are genuinely clueless to how promiscuous they were in the past. (they must know she's had multiple partners, but convince themselves it was much less than it really was.)
Actually the most messed up possible thing is that she does the orgy you described the 1 day of the year, and you have no knowledge of it. It's entirely different for someone to cheat on you once in such a way that you immediately find out and can choose to break up with them. Versus doing it behind your back without your knowledge, still sleeping with you the whole time and the person they're cheating with. That's worse, obviously.
Last edited:
Exactly. Obviously she's hardly "perfect, idealized" if she'd even think to do this. And hardly "loyal, loves you for life" either. A completely self-defeating "hypothetical."
Not even sexual to you?
I don't see how not being sexual whatsoever is idyllic. The ideal is to have the sexual desires you presumably have fulfilled with an attractive woman who wants to have sex with you, and for that to be possible she has to be sexual. Assuming you'd want to have sex with her, wouldn't you want her to have sexual inclination provided that this was directed to you? The alternative is she's just a passive actor during sex, right?
I don't want to assume anything about you, but I would be curious to hear your thoughts on asexuality. I don't even know if mods have a position on this forum as to whether self-identified asexual men are allowed here, provided they are 18 or over and aren't something other than heterosexual. I think this should be allowed, it doesn't break the LGBT rule (which I completely agree with) because asexuality need not be associated with LGBT, it's just that certain LGBTists decided to do that. I don't agree with their framing of asexuality, for reasons I can explain later.
Similar threads
SuicideFuel
at 26yo, I finally and once and for all, gave up
- La-Z-Ryder
- Inceldom Discussion
turbosperg
Users who are viewing this thread
