Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The Workweek Should Be Increased to 104 Hours

four1298

four1298

pro-immigration activist
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 27, 2023
Posts
1,989
Online time
2d 16h
The workweek should be increased to 104 hours. According to the Fraser Institute, it costs $3,000 to $4,500 each year to raise a child. This means to increase the birth rate, so that people feel financially able to raise children, they need to earn more money, which can be accomplished by working more hours. Six(the days of the week minus church day) multiplied by sixteen(sixteen because it's eight, the average number of hours worked in a weekday, and another eight, the average number of free time) is 104. That leaves you with eight hours you can spend on commuting and sleep. You don't need eight hours of sleep. Donald Trump only sleeps four to five hours a day. If he can do it, so can you. (That also shows he's a very hardworking president that cares about the country). As the Bible says, "He who does not work, neither shall he eat"(2 Thessalonians 3:10). Vladimir Lenin also quoted this line. And yes, people should work on the weekends. Even Jesus Christ frequently worked on the Sabbath, which is Saturday. For example here's one quote from Mark 3:3, "Then he spoke to the people: 'What kind of action suits the Sabbath best? Doing good or doing evil? Helping people or leaving them helpless?' No one said a word." We live in a clown world where workers are allowed 8 hours of free time.


The only problem with this idea is where will the work come from especially since we want to tax people so they can't eat out, go to the theater, and do other degenerate things - which will result in people losing jobs? Perhaps by increasing the birth rate, we can create more jobs like daycare work, school work(though I think people should homeschool), and perhaps pediatrician. No jobs will be lost. Some will be lost and as much new ones will be made when we ban degeneracy. To increase work we may need to increase the birth rate. They will also become consumers of food, but I don't think that'd create enough jobs. Of course immigrants are taking our jobs and there should be an immigration moratorium, that will help, but I don't think that'd allow men to work 104 hours a week. And yeah perhaps only men should be allowed to work, unless if the foid is working to take care of a child. Raising the birth rate will make women quit their jobs to take care of their children, so there'd be more jobs men can get. Although I don't know how we can increase work, by banning women from work, we can double men's worktime and income. That's 80 hours of work per man. And no man would then have the right to complain about unemployment since not all men would work 80 hours. Some would still work 40 hours. I do think mothers should be allowed to work if they're single(or their man is disabled and can't work) and are doing it to raise a large family though. If she doesn't have children after working though, she should be fired. We can also create jobs by building skyscrapers, which I've advocated for.


In Japan there is something called karoshi, 'which can be translated into :overwork death.'" But when I googled it, it seems to be a hoax. Google AI says, "The average Japanese man works approximately 46.7 hours per week, according to Japan's Statistics Bureau. This is considerably higher than the average for Japanese women, who work around 36.3 hours per week, according to Japan's Statistics Bureau. " This goes to show men just work harder and that's why there's a wage gap, not because of discrimination.

Working hard is the manly way. That's what men are supposed to do. They're supposed to be breadwinners. Some incels disagree, but the implication of that is that women are supposed to be allowed to work. That's feminism which I'm against.
 
Last edited:
Just be slave theory
 
@Scatius Deletus agrees.
 
I’m a NEET and I agree
 
i agree but only for everyone else whilst i live off their taxes
 
This thread becomes debunkable after the literal first sentence, High Wealth and birth rate do not have a positive correlation at all. Poverty in america was higher hundreds of years ago and so was the birth rate.
 
This thread becomes debunkable after the literal first sentence, High Wealth and birth rate do not have a positive correlation at all. Poverty in america was higher hundreds of years ago and so was the birth rate.
I said a similar thing in this thread:


But the problem is that there haven't been massive baby bonuses as I've proposed. All the pro-natalist incentives have failed to lift countries above replacement level because they're small. Perhaps if they were bigger, it'd work. I said they should be big. Even if these policies by themselves don't work, they represent a desire to want a higher birth rate. The motivation behind these policies are a part of culture, which I guess is what you say is the cause of low birth rates. However, people are saying they're too poor to have children. Here's one example:

Alina Rzhanova, a 33-year-old who lives in Yaroslavl, 250 km northeast of Moscow, was once determined not to have children but now has an eight-month-old son
"People want children, but there's no money," she said. "That's why people are not having children..."
 
@Misogynist Vegeta How would you increase the birth rate?
 
@Misogynist Vegeta How would you increase the birth rate?
The main issue that causes low birth rates is a culture that promotes the short term pleasures of promiscuity over the long term pleasure of raising a family. The only way to increase birth rates is to destroy that culture and all the forces that make it so prevalent in modern societies such as hedonism and feminism.

Abortion also must be banned as millions upon millions of potential babies are terminated every year before they can escape the womb. This genocide of fetuses is not only cruel but also helps keep the birth rate as low as it is, In places where abortion is not so accessible (such as many African countries) the birth rate is much higher.
 
The main issue that causes low birth rates is a culture that promotes the short term pleasures of promiscuity over the long term pleasure of raising a family. The only way to increase birth rates is to destroy that culture and all the forces that make it so prevalent in modern societies such as hedonism and feminism.

Abortion also must be banned as millions upon millions of potential babies are terminated every year before they can escape the womb. This genocide of fetuses is not only cruel but also helps keep the birth rate as low as it is, In places where abortion is not so accessible (such as many African countries) the birth rate is much higher.
I made a thread saying abortion bans might not be enough to raise the birth rate:

 
I made a thread saying abortion bans might not be enough to raise the birth rate:

Well that's why you need to change culture as well.
 
Another "conservative" think tank led by people with finance background
 
If citizens started to work 104 hours a week, that would fill the labor shortage and no longer would anybody have a right to say we should bring in more immigrants to fill a labor shortage.
 
Money is not the reason the birth rates are so low
 
I can't tell if it's a well elaborated troll or an advanced state of brain tumor
 
Here's verses from the book of Mark where Jesus or his disciples work on the Sabbath:

One Sabbath day he was walking through a field of ripe grain. As his disciples made a path, they pulled off heads of grain...

Then Jesus said, “The Sabbath was made to serve us; we weren’t made to serve the Sabbath. The Son of Man is no lackey to the Sabbath. He’s in charge!”


Then he went back in the meeting place where he found a man with a crippled hand. The Pharisees had their eyes on Jesus to see if he would heal him, hoping to catch him in a Sabbath infraction...

Then he spoke to the people: “What kind of action suits the Sabbath best? Doing good or doing evil? Helping people or leaving them helpless?” No one said a word.

... He said to the man, “Hold out your hand.” He held it out—it was as good as new


Verses from the book of Luke:

He was teaching in one of the meeting places on the Sabbath. There was a woman present, so twisted and bent over with arthritis that she couldn’t even look up... When Jesus saw her, he called her over. “Woman, you’re free!” He laid hands on her and suddenly she was standing straight and tall, giving glory to God.

The meeting-place president, furious because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, said to the congregation, “Six days have been defined as work days. Come on one of the six if you want to be healed, but not on the seventh, the Sabbath.”

But Jesus shot back, “You frauds! Each Sabbath every one of you regularly unties your cow or donkey from its stall, leads it out for water, and thinks nothing of it. So why isn’t it all right for me to untie this daughter of Abraham and lead her from the stall where Satan has had her tied these eighteen years?”


One time when Jesus went for a Sabbath meal with one of the top leaders of the Pharisees, all the guests had their eyes on him, watching his every move. Right before him there was a man hugely swollen in his joints...

So he took the man, healed him, and sent him on his way. Then he said, “Is there anyone here who, if a child or animal fell down a well, wouldn’t rush to pull him out immediately, not asking whether or not it was the Sabbath?”
 
Yes, but make it double and build beds at work they don't ever need to live their work place
 
NPNW is just suicide. It's pretending to hurt the system by not contributing to it, but you're only hurting yourself.
Perhaps so. Sadly, one person can not make any signiticant difference.
 

Similar threads

CRASH THE CUCK
Replies
14
Views
536
AutistSupremacist
AutistSupremacist
WadeAbuSufyan
Replies
7
Views
417
nihilum
nihilum
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
9
Views
547
nihilum
nihilum

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top