four1298
pro-immigration activist
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2023
- Posts
- 1,989
- Online time
- 2d 16h
The workweek should be increased to 104 hours. According to the Fraser Institute, it costs $3,000 to $4,500 each year to raise a child. This means to increase the birth rate, so that people feel financially able to raise children, they need to earn more money, which can be accomplished by working more hours. Six(the days of the week minus church day) multiplied by sixteen(sixteen because it's eight, the average number of hours worked in a weekday, and another eight, the average number of free time) is 104. That leaves you with eight hours you can spend on commuting and sleep. You don't need eight hours of sleep. Donald Trump only sleeps four to five hours a day. If he can do it, so can you. (That also shows he's a very hardworking president that cares about the country). As the Bible says, "He who does not work, neither shall he eat"(2 Thessalonians 3:10). Vladimir Lenin also quoted this line. And yes, people should work on the weekends. Even Jesus Christ frequently worked on the Sabbath, which is Saturday. For example here's one quote from Mark 3:3, "Then he spoke to the people: 'What kind of action suits the Sabbath best? Doing good or doing evil? Helping people or leaving them helpless?' No one said a word." We live in a clown world where workers are allowed 8 hours of free time.
The only problem with this idea is where will the work come from especially since we want to tax people so they can't eat out, go to the theater, and do other degenerate things - which will result in people losing jobs? Perhaps by increasing the birth rate, we can create more jobs like daycare work, school work(though I think people should homeschool), and perhaps pediatrician. No jobs will be lost. Some will be lost and as much new ones will be made when we ban degeneracy. To increase work we may need to increase the birth rate. They will also become consumers of food, but I don't think that'd create enough jobs. Of course immigrants are taking our jobs and there should be an immigration moratorium, that will help, but I don't think that'd allow men to work 104 hours a week. And yeah perhaps only men should be allowed to work, unless if the foid is working to take care of a child. Raising the birth rate will make women quit their jobs to take care of their children, so there'd be more jobs men can get. Although I don't know how we can increase work, by banning women from work, we can double men's worktime and income. That's 80 hours of work per man. And no man would then have the right to complain about unemployment since not all men would work 80 hours. Some would still work 40 hours. I do think mothers should be allowed to work if they're single(or their man is disabled and can't work) and are doing it to raise a large family though. If she doesn't have children after working though, she should be fired. We can also create jobs by building skyscrapers, which I've advocated for.
In Japan there is something called karoshi, 'which can be translated into :overwork death.'" But when I googled it, it seems to be a hoax. Google AI says, "The average Japanese man works approximately 46.7 hours per week, according to Japan's Statistics Bureau. This is considerably higher than the average for Japanese women, who work around 36.3 hours per week, according to Japan's Statistics Bureau. " This goes to show men just work harder and that's why there's a wage gap, not because of discrimination.
Working hard is the manly way. That's what men are supposed to do. They're supposed to be breadwinners. Some incels disagree, but the implication of that is that women are supposed to be allowed to work. That's feminism which I'm against.
The only problem with this idea is where will the work come from especially since we want to tax people so they can't eat out, go to the theater, and do other degenerate things - which will result in people losing jobs? Perhaps by increasing the birth rate, we can create more jobs like daycare work, school work(though I think people should homeschool), and perhaps pediatrician. No jobs will be lost. Some will be lost and as much new ones will be made when we ban degeneracy. To increase work we may need to increase the birth rate. They will also become consumers of food, but I don't think that'd create enough jobs. Of course immigrants are taking our jobs and there should be an immigration moratorium, that will help, but I don't think that'd allow men to work 104 hours a week. And yeah perhaps only men should be allowed to work, unless if the foid is working to take care of a child. Raising the birth rate will make women quit their jobs to take care of their children, so there'd be more jobs men can get. Although I don't know how we can increase work, by banning women from work, we can double men's worktime and income. That's 80 hours of work per man. And no man would then have the right to complain about unemployment since not all men would work 80 hours. Some would still work 40 hours. I do think mothers should be allowed to work if they're single(or their man is disabled and can't work) and are doing it to raise a large family though. If she doesn't have children after working though, she should be fired. We can also create jobs by building skyscrapers, which I've advocated for.
In Japan there is something called karoshi, 'which can be translated into :overwork death.'" But when I googled it, it seems to be a hoax. Google AI says, "The average Japanese man works approximately 46.7 hours per week, according to Japan's Statistics Bureau. This is considerably higher than the average for Japanese women, who work around 36.3 hours per week, according to Japan's Statistics Bureau. " This goes to show men just work harder and that's why there's a wage gap, not because of discrimination.
Working hard is the manly way. That's what men are supposed to do. They're supposed to be breadwinners. Some incels disagree, but the implication of that is that women are supposed to be allowed to work. That's feminism which I'm against.
Last edited:





