The European Management Forum (EMF) was designed to introduce Euro-centric economic stakeholders to modern American economic practices and to formulate “fresh” business approaches for the continent. In 1987, the EMF became the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the rest, as they say, is history. More specifically, history steeped in controversy.
In 1996, long before the unelected globalists were predicting a future where we would own nothing and be happy, they were working on ways to get the unpopular then-Russian president Boris Yeltsin re-elected for a second term.
Some 25 years on, Putin is still in power. But, as he admits himself, without Yeltsin’s blessing, none of that would have been possible.
And, without the WEF’s blessing, Yeltsin would have never had a second term in office.
By interfering in the Russian electoral system, “Davos Man” paved the way for Putin.
In the decades since 1996, the WEF has continued to erode democratic principles. Interestingly, in 1999, the year Yeltsin stepped down, the WEF launched the Global Redesign Initiative, advocating for a “fresh” global governance system that sought to make nation states a thing of the past.
The initiative envisioned a “multi-stakeholder” approach to policy making and governance. Ultimately it gave rise to the Great Reset, a form of “corporate socialism” that puts more power in the hands of the elites and less in the hands of European citizens.
One needn’t be a tin-foil-hat-wearing lunatic to question the WEF’s motives. In truth, one only needs to examine the Davos Pact to see just how influential Schwab and his colleagues have been – and continue to be.
