Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The way women evolved is stupid from evolutionary standpoint

R

Rockerfella

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Posts
86
Forget about single mothers for a minute.

Women have sex with chad till their late 30s

Settle with a betabux. Betabux has weak genes. Kids have his weak genes.

How is this good from an evolutionary standpoint?
 
There is nothing 'good' or 'bad' in evolution.
"Evolution is an endless series of beautiful forms"(Prob Dobzhansky)

Anyhow,Assuming that our comfortable and relatively wealthy society survives for another century,then women will settle woth beta providers and our world will slowly evolved into a matriarchy that purposefully weaken its males.
If our society collapses(which is highly probable) then women will be forced to seek out physically powerful 'chads'(or gymcels for that matter) because these people are the only ones able to gather resources in case of a societal collapse.
If you don't want women having kids with betabuxxers then you must fight for the collapse of Western society.There is no other way.
 
kids have chad genes , the beta gets cucked
 
Women make children with Chads, that's where the single mom meme comes from.

Betabux are just meant to provide for Chad's offspring and finance the mother's high life. Meanwhile Chad lives the dream MGTOW life the way it was meant to be : have sex indefinitely with as many prime JB he can until his death, without having to ever pay for it.
 
sub 5 should not be allowed to reproduce.
 
In the past they would have had chads kid and no self respecing man would raise other mans kid.
The woman would be called a whore and would be rejected by the society.

Women had to commit to men who could provide and who would contribute to society.

Now we have birth control so women can fuck chad without getting pregnant.
We have the government providing women so they don't have to commit to ugly men who can provide for them.
Then there's the society telling this is how things should be and if you say anything about it, you hate women
 
Forget about single mothers for a minute.

Women have sex with chad till their late 30s

Settle with a betabux. Betabux has weak genes. Kids have his weak genes.

How is this good from an evolutionary standpoint?
That's the point. Evolutionary actually worked here, but it doesn't account for pregeant prevention technology Like condoms.
 
It’s ridiculous, an absolute atrocity.
 
That's the point. Evolutionary actually worked here, but it doesn't account for pregeant prevention technology Like condoms.

If condoms didn't exist maybe women would pick a beta she knows she can keep and won't leave her
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top