Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The universal nature of the dogpill (and how it explains why some ethnics mog mayos)

Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Mentally destroyed by reality
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
46,152
A long time ago (in a galaxy far far away), a god tier user by the name of @chudurbudur made a legendary post about the universality of the curryness. In honour of that, I will talk about something else that I noticed that isn’t really universal as in it applies to all situations, but it is an interesting behaviour that can be found across the globe. It is an extension of one of the most controversial blackpills on this forum: the dogpill.

There was a brutal post I saw a while ago linking a reddit post where a mayo foid said she can’t orgasm unless it’s a non-white man fucking her. She says that even though she is not racist (JFL), she subconsciously sees deathnics as inferior and dirty, and fucking them turns her on so much. However, even though she says she finds white males as attractive as well (of course), she feels nothing with them because it’s not as taboo and dirty.

I’ve also seen some curry foids say this about low caste curry males, and how them being inferior turned them on sexually. Although many foids would want to end up marrying a high caste curry male due to hypergamy, many will want to get down and fuck dalit/shudra males for fun.

In fact, it’s even present among black people themselves. Black whores are more attracted to the animalistic ghetto blacks compared to the normal acting blacks. This causes many black males to steer their behaviour to become more like the ones from the ghettos because the behaviours that help women to want to fuck them become more widespread throughout the culture.

The meme one is BBC maxxers, where some white women are sexually attracted to black males. This one sounds like a Jewish psyop created by the porn industry, but this racist stereotype of the animalistic black male wanting to rape white woman goes back over a century. I was first notified of this connection with the dogpill by our friend bummerdrummer (may he RIP).

The dogpill was the ultimate extension of this behaviour, where foids needed to seek more and more animalistic things to have sex with. Although you could argue that the wolfpill and the horsepills are even deeper manifestations of this. Regardless, it just goes to show you how over it is for the human race.

Some of you might think this is against the blackpill in some way. However, it falls perfectly within the parameters of the blackpill. This is because all of the names I mentioned before are a Chad version of themselves. For example, the mayo foid who was ethnic only was actually ethnic chad only (instead of white chad). The curry foids who wanted low caste curries wanted low caste chadpreets. The BBC meme is simply foids preferring tyrone over chad. The example of black foids is them wanting thug maxxed tyrone over regular tyrone. This takes into account males of equal looks to be compared.

@Ika-Sama our discussion a while ago inspired me to write about this.
 
Link to the universality of curryness? :shock:
 
Maybe she just has a mental disorder like most women do today
 
There was a brutal post I saw a while ago linking a reddit post where a mayo foid said she can’t orgasm unless it’s a non-white man fucking her. She says that even though she is not racist (JFL), she subconsciously sees deathnics as inferior and dirty, and fucking them turns her on so much. However, even though she says she finds white males as attractive as well (of course), she feels nothing with them because it’s not as taboo and dirty.
Nice post. Any chance you've got a link to this part?
 
Animalpill is brutal
 
:feelsokman: Np
What are your thoughts on it?
I agree with this. Generally my own thought process on the dogpill that I concluded on years ago was that there exists a certain percentage of women who have more sexual inclinations towards more disgusting and extreme behavior because, as an evolutionary mechanism it indirectly turns men on.

For example, a decent amount of women don't have a problem eating out another girls snatch or sucking a dick that was just in her ass or getting railed by two guys at the same time. I think that this is because this type of low sexual disgust behavior can actually sexually attract men who might have been otherwise out of her league. For example, there could be "chad" tier men who might get bored sexually with the girl who is a 10 but a complete sexual prude, and get more turned on by a basic bitch 5 who has absolutely no sexual hang ups whatsoever.

This type of sexual wildcard exists within a fair amount of women and is there because it can allow her to outcompete other women who might be more attractive than her. So, it manifests itself in different ways. Sometimes it involves threesomes with chad and his best friend giving her the eiffel tower, sometimes it involves taking it up the ass and sucking the shit off of chad's dick, and sometimes it involves taking the knot. Women don't really question the "why do I enjoy this", they just go with their intuition that gives them tingles. The programming is just wired to have her be sexually aroused with degrading sex in general.

Of course, this type of extreme sexual behavior doesn't turn every man on, in some cases it manages to turn men off and disgust them. Because this is such an unpredictable mechanism in terms of individual reactions it becomes more of a gamble which is why women keep their sexual fantasies and desires entirely hidden from sight and protect their reputation with their life. They only want to show this side of themselves to people that they can trust and have an innate biological urge to stop their deepest urges from being known publicly. These desires could pay off and help them land a superior man's cum, but it can also backfire and cost them a relatively good relationship partner. The system in their heads urges them to be cautious with the truth about who they are.
 
Last edited:
I agree with this. Generally my own thought process on the dogpill that I concluded on years ago was that there exists a certain percentage of women who have more sexual inclinations towards more disgusting and extreme behavior because, as an evolutionary mechanism it indirectly turns men on.

For example, a decent amount of women don't have a problem eating out another girls snatch or sucking a dick that was just in her ass or getting railed by two guys at the same time. I think that this is because this type of low sexual disgust behaviour can actually sexually attract men who might have been otherwise out of her league. For example, there could be "chad" tier men who might get bored sexually with the girl who is a 10 but a complete sexual prude, and get more turned on by a basic basic 5 who has absolutely no sexual hang ups whatsoever.

This type of sexual wildcard exists within a fair amount of women and is there because it can allow her to outcompete other women who might be more attractive than her. So, it manifests itself in different ways. Sometimes it involves threesomes with chad and his best friend giving her the eiffel tower, sometimes it involves taking it up the ass and sucking the shit off of chad's dick, and sometimes it involves taking the knot. Women don't really question the "why do I enjoy this", they just go with their intuition that gives them tingles. The programming is just wired to have her be sexually aroused with degrading sex in general.

Of course, this type of extreme sexual behavior doesn't turn every man on, in some cases it manages to turn men off and disgust them. Because this is such an unpredictable mechanism in terms of the reaction it becomes more of a gamble which is why women keep their sexual fanatasies and desires entirely hidden from sight and protect their reputation with their life. They only want to show this side of themselves to people that they can trust and have an innate biological urge to stop their deepest urges from being known publicly. These disires could pay off and help them land a superior man's cum, but it can also backfire and cost them a relatively good relationship partner. The system in their heads urges them to be cautious with the truth about who they are.
Fuck, at this rate it’s not worth even trying to go for a woman below 10/10 as a wife. Jfl at this clown world, chad just gets the best of ALL worlds.
 
white cum dumpsters are the worst
 
:yes::yes::yes:
Wanting to fuck blacks is on par of beastiality. Their degenerate sexual transcends onto dogs.
 
white cum dumpsters are the worst
True, although some might argue other foids are the worst in whatever way. But fucking dogs seems it takes the cake.

:yes::yes::yes:
Wanting to fuck blacks is on par of beastiality. Their degenerate sexual transcends onto dogs.
Yet black normies mog us. What does that say about us? It’s over.
 

Similar threads

Foremostfiend
Replies
17
Views
397
Regenerator
Regenerator
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
8
Views
249
lazy_gamer_423
lazy_gamer_423

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top