Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The United States is Already less than 50% White

Kanga Caveman

Kanga Caveman

Recruit
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 27, 2025
Posts
244
So I added up minorites and noticed that the claim of White americans making up 57% of the population makes absolutely no sense.
Makes perfect sense when you think most cities are White minority already and 45- 50% of people live in in urban areas and even suburbs are a third brown at this point.
If we exclude Jews, Italian and MENA (for obvious reasons) we get a population of 115 milion White Americans(33%) if we add back Italians it rises to 133 milion(40%).
I'm 100% sure the 57% figure includes mexican mutts identifiying as White aswell.
 
@Clavicus Vile @X.9
 
@Kanga Kiwi Koala @kangaroo @BIG DADDY KANGA @Sewer Kanga @Rainbow Kanga I would like to know your thoughts on this
 
@Kanga Kiwi Koala @kangaroo @BIG DADDY KANGA @Sewer Kanga @Rainbow Kanga I would like to know your thoughts on this
Italians are whiter than the amerimuttant who made this thread btw
 
So I added up minorites and noticed that the claim of White americans making up 57% of the population makes absolutely no sense.
Makes perfect sense when you think most cities are White minority already and 45- 50% of people live in in urban areas and even suburbs are a third brown at this point.
If we exclude Jews, Italian and MENA (for obvious reasons) we get a population of 115 milion White Americans(33%) if we add back Italians it rises to 133 milion(40%).
I'm 100% sure the 57% figure includes mexican mutts identifiying as White aswell.
The great replacement
 
You must be fapping to the fact that america is getting more ethnic everyday in that case
"Let's include every brown person as White so the census is different"
 
"Let's include every brown person as White so the census is different"
how tf are Italians brown? using your logic all french people are niggers and all swedes are arabs just because their countries are flooded with deathnics smh
 
how tf are Italians brown? using your logic all french people are niggers and all swedes are arabs just because their countries are flooded with deathnics smh
Sweden could be 85% brown but the native swede is still an Aryan, Italians are near Eastern at their core
 
Sweden could be 85% brown but the native swede is still an Aryan, Italians are near Eastern at their core
Northern italians are like swiss and austrian people wdym

there are also whites in the center. maybe the south isn't white but that's it.
 
Northern italians are like swiss and austrian people wdym

there are also whites in the center. maybe the south isn't white but that's it.
The center isn't White and it doesn't matter, 85% of Italian Americans came from the South
 
85% of Italian Americans came from the South
Well shit I forgot that, then it makes sense. It's kind of ironic how white Northern Italians went to South America while brown Southern ones went to North America.
 
Sweden could be 85% brown but the native swede is still an Aryan, Italians are near Eastern at their core
Not true, since Southern Italy and the near east have very different genetic origins. They do share some common ancestry (mainly from Neolithic farmers from Anatolia) but overall predominantly have distinct population histories.

The Mediterranean Sea has also acted as a strong barrier between them and actual near eastern populations. They are genetically very close to Peloponneseans and other Southern Europeans from Iberia, the Balkans and Greece. Read this breakdown: https://italianthro.blogspot.com/2014/06/mediterranean-sea-as-genetic-barrier.html

Here's another good visualization in PCA space:
image.png
 
Last edited:
Over for murica
 
Not true, since Southern Italy and the near east have very different genetic origins. They do share some common ancestry (mainly from Neolithic farmers from Anatolia) but overall predominantly have distinct population histories.

The Mediterranean Sea has also acted as a strong barrier between them and actual near eastern populations. They are genetically very close to Peloponneseans and other Southern Europeans from Iberia, the Balkans and Greece. Read this breakdown: https://italianthro.blogspot.com/2014/06/mediterranean-sea-as-genetic-barrier.html

Here's another good visualization in PCA space:
image.png
Italy is a transition region between the near east and Europe slightly leaning towards the latter, apart from the farmer DNA the Romans imported large amounts of slaves from the levant, ashkenazi Jews are most closely related to southern Italians.
 
Not true, since Southern Italy and the near east have very different genetic origins. They do share some common ancestry (mainly from Neolithic farmers from Anatolia) but overall predominantly have distinct population histories.

The Mediterranean Sea has also acted as a strong barrier between them and actual near eastern populations. They are genetically very close to Peloponneseans and other Southern Europeans from Iberia, the Balkans and Greece. Read this breakdown: https://italianthro.blogspot.com/2014/06/mediterranean-sea-as-genetic-barrier.html

Here's another good visualization in PCA space:
image.png
Interesting, do you know how balkanic/slavic Italians are?
 
Italy is a transition region between the near east and Europe slightly leaning towards the latter,
It is a Mediterranean European population with some historical Near Eastern influences. Geographically it is in Europe. Here is a map of Europe since you've made it clear you have never seen a map of Europe before:
image.png


The Bosphorus is the border of Europe and a genetic definition must follow the ancient geographical one. In my previous reply there's a PCA that defined Europe based on the geographic and historical fact of what it is.

apart from the farmer DNA the Romans imported large amounts of slaves from the levant,
They were eastern Mediterranean Greeks and most of them clustered no farther than Cyprus. The population collapsed to almost 0 and the city was repopulated by Italians from other regions, along with some possible influx from elsewhere in Europe.
During the Imperial period (n = 48 individuals), the most prominent trend is an ancestry shift toward the eastern Mediterranean and with very few individuals of primarily western European ancestry (Fig. 3C). The distribution of Imperial Romans in PCA largely overlaps with modern Mediterranean and Near Eastern populations, such as Greek, Maltese, Cypriot, and Syrian (Figs. 2A and 3C).
The average ancestry of the Late Antique individuals (n = 24) shifts away from the Near East and toward modern central European populations in PCA (Fig. 3D).
This ancestry shift is also reflected in ChromoPainter results by the drastic shrinkage of the Near Eastern cluster (C4), maintenance of the two Mediterranean clusters (C5 and C6), and marked expansion of the European cluster (C7) (Fig. 4C).
Source: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aay6826

So, we’d see Near Eastern components persist into later periods if these "Levantine" slaves had a big impact but instead Late Antique and Medieval DNA shifts away from the Near East and back toward Central and Southern Europe.

Population of Rome over time:
image.png


ashkenazi Jews are most closely related to southern Italians.
Ashkenazim and South Italians have different origins and population structures. Ashkenazim formed during the late Roman/early Byzantine period and have origins in the Levant. South Italians on the other hand, whose ethnogenesis predates the formation of the Ashkenazim, are actually native to Europe.

Anyway, genetic distance isn’t as simple as "A is closer to B than C is to A" and genetic similarity involves many kinds of ancestry, so being close to something in 1 way doesn’t mean you’re close to it overall.
 
Interesting, do you know how balkanic/slavic Italians are?
Not very, the component is minor and localized to the northeast and Apulia.

Apulia is actually the most northern shifted of the southern region due to the Albanian/Balkan immigration during the medieval times
 
It is a Mediterranean European population with some historical Near Eastern influences. Geographically it is in Europe. Here is a map of Europe since you've made it clear you have never seen a map of Europe before:
image.png


The Bosphorus is the border of Europe and a genetic definition must follow the ancient geographical one. In my previous reply there's a PCA that defined Europe based on the geographic and historical fact of what it is.


They were eastern Mediterranean Greeks and most of them clustered no farther than Cyprus. The population collapsed to almost 0 and the city was repopulated by Italians from other regions, along with some possible influx from elsewhere in Europe.



Source: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aay6826

So, we’d see Near Eastern components persist into later periods if these "Levantine" slaves had a big impact but instead Late Antique and Medieval DNA shifts away from the Near East and back toward Central and Southern Europe.

Population of Rome over time:
image.png



Ashkenazim and South Italians have different origins and population structures. Ashkenazim formed during the late Roman/early Byzantine period and have origins in the Levant. South Italians on the other hand, whose ethnogenesis predates the formation of the Ashkenazim, are actually native to Europe.

Anyway, genetic distance isn’t as simple as "A is closer to B than C is to A" and genetic similarity involves many kinds of ancestry, so being close to something in 1 way doesn’t mean you’re close to it overall.
You're a massive retard, transitional region as in genetic not geographic, are Africans in Paris or Tatars in Kazan White? Most of the slaves worked on farms in the countryside. Litteraly southern Italy has mostly J2 y Dna, it's really funny how You need to come up with those complicated copes to prove that Italians are White while Swedes simply pass. Ofcourse it shifts away because slavery is abolished and those slaves start mixxing with locals creating a mutted population. No denying, Luigi Mangione litteraly passes as Syrian, Italians look like brown people and the economics of southern Italy and the Italian mafia further supports my claim
 
You're a massive retard, transitional region as in genetic not geographic
Nice petty ad hominem.
Litteraly southern Italy has mostly J2 y Dna
Haplogroups are a literal meme. They're deterined by a TINY portion of your genome, literally less than 1%.
, it's really funny how You need to come up with those complicated copes to prove that Italians are White while Swedes simply pass.
Phenotype does not determine race either. That was our understanding of taxonomy back when racial theories first developed, but now we know that autosomal DNA and genetic clustering are far more important
 
Nice petty ad hominem.

Haplogroups are a literal meme. They're deterined by a TINY portion of your genome, literally less than 1%.

Phenotype does not determine race either. That was our understanding of taxonomy back when racial theories first developed, but now we know that autosomal DNA and genetic clustering are far more important
Kys faggot, J2 being a majority proves it's continous reinforcement. Bluepill science right there, I guess Gambia has an iq of 100 and women and men are the same, JFL why don't we call every gook or pajeet swedish, your genes determine the way You look just like they determine your height, holy fucking idiot
 
Left that shithole many years ago, no longer my problem.
 

Similar threads

SrutalBeggs
Replies
10
Views
1K
sadly_inc1l
S
Shitskin=Shitlife
Replies
30
Views
2K
ogrecuck
ogrecuck
The Notorious SLAV
Replies
4
Views
630
The Notorious SLAV
The Notorious SLAV
tired as fuck
Replies
21
Views
1K
tired as fuck
tired as fuck

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top