Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious The ultimate best argument for incels

i will find another "the one" then technically speaking

as she will do the same some time
can't, all of them are already taken.
 
I will not be her "the one"

and she will not be my "the one"

we will find different persons technically during our lifetime

maybe she will find sex more easy (from chads). but i dont think a relationship.
Well sure, but that's my point. I'm not argueing against you. I'm argueing against. I suppose a strawman. but it's not a strawman because I've seen normies argue this before.

Where they believe in this fantasy there is someone called "the one" out there for everbody.
I reject this fantasy and don't believe in it.
 
Well it does matter if it's at the same time, because for some amount of time atleast one man will be left out.
my point is though that even that one man techinically should be able to find someone to have a significant amount of sex, relationships and reproduction.

That competition element makes high tier men more available/common for foids.
they can only have casual sex at best with those high tier men that you refer to. I don't think that chad will settle.

But again like i stated previously I would consider a male surplus a multiplier of inceldom.
Because it creates more competition for women by simple supply and demand.
https://www.census.gov/library/stor...l#:~:text=Stats for Stories,February 15, 2024

https://ifstudies.org/blog/theres-no-huge-gender-gap-in-being-single-among-young-adults
 
can't, all of them are already taken.
but there will be always approximately the same amount of single men and single women

you hear that young single women are less single and thats because men date younger
 
my point is though that even that one man techinically should be able to find someone to have a significant amount of sex, relationships and reproduction.
yes technically, that's true.
they can only have casual sex at best with those high tier men that you refer to. I don't think that chad will settle.
Sure, and that makes them privileged picky cunts
 
Well sure, but that's my point. I'm not argueing against you. I'm argueing against. I suppose a strawman. but it's not a strawman because I've seen normies argue this before.

Where they believe in this fantasy there is someone called "the one" out there for everbody.
I reject this fantasy and don't believe in it.
there is no such a thing as "the one" forever

at least for the vast majority.

that applies to both foids and men
 
yes technically, that's true.

Sure, and that makes them privileged picky cunts
but if we make them inferior to men.

if we end feminism. abolish women's rights

if we make them depend to men financially.

if we support men financially.

that will increase fertility rates. (gender equality is strongly linked to serious fertility demographic crisis)

and will increase relationships and sex for the vast majority of men

and will also probably increase foid prostitution too

win win situtation
 
but there will be always approximately the same amount of single men and single women

you hear that young single women are less single and thats because men date younger
Most of the single women are older women. yes

Leaving most of the single men in the younger cohorts

adjusting for those discrepancies
even if there more single women most of them choose to anyway
whereas most single men don't
 
Most of the single women are older women. yes

Leaving most of the single men in the younger cohorts

adjusting for those discrepancies
even if there more single women most of them choose to anyway
whereas most single men don't
men are dating younger too though

thats why it shows less single women on the stat 18-29
 
Most of the single women are older women. yes

Leaving most of the single men in the younger cohorts

adjusting for those discrepancies
even if there more single women most of them choose to anyway
whereas most single men don't
my point is that all men should technically find some foids to fuck, some foids to have relationships and some foids for reproduction.
 
there is no such a thing as "the one" forever

at least for the vast majority.

that applies to both foids and men
that's my point
 
that's my point
yes but apply it to both genders.

the majority will not find "the one"

sex, relationships and reproduction does not mean you found "the one" forever

my mother never found "the one"

my father never found "the one"

they will never find "the one" forever

but they both had sex.

they both had relationships

and they both reproducted

and thats why i am on this planet here with you today writing in that this shitty forum anyway :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
but if we make them inferior to men.

if we end feminism. abolish women's rights

if we make them depend to men financially.

if we support men financially.

that will increase fertility rates. (gender equality is strongly linked to serious fertility demographic crisis)

and will increase relationships and sex for the vast majority of men

and will also probably increase foid prostitution too

win win situtation
one could dream
 
one could dream
in order to end the serious demographic fertility crisis in europe we need to actually end feminism because that is strongy linked with very low fertility rates.
 
men are dating younger too though

thats why it shows less single women on the stat 18-29
yes and also because young women are more in demand
 
yes and also because young women are more in demand
blame men for dating younger though.

still technically a man will be able to have a significant amount of sex, relationships and reproduction with both young foids of fertility age (even if he is 30+) and others

the gender ratio (almost 50-50) generally even about youth

its technically insignificant especially if you hear my arguments that a foid can have many relationships, sex and reproduction with different men during her foid lifetime.
 
Last edited:
yes and also because young women are more in demand
I know a lady for example who had three children with three different men from three different serious relationships. So these three men all had sex, a serious relationship and reproduction from one foid.

do you get my point?
 
Last edited:
in order to end the serious demographic fertility crisis in europe we need to actually end feminism because that is strongy linked with very low fertility rates.
true
 
I know a lady for example who had three children with three different men from three different serious relationships. So these three men all had sex, a serious relationship and reproduction from one foid.

do you get my point?
yes, but the reason that happened in the first place is because the foid probably chose to break up each time beacuse she had the privilege to monkey branch once she got bored of one guy.
The guys got in that relationship because it was their turn.

PART of what creates this privilge is male surplus, it makes relationships/sex etc. with women OVER TIME less accesible to men.
Inflating it's value, demand and indirectly contributing to inceldom, (that's what I mean when it's a multiplier) because now the bottom tier men are going to relatively be so unappealing they don't get a "turn". Now sure in a vacuum, a male surplus is not going to directly contribute to inceldom, but at a certain level (Insane amounts) it can, and with certain other conditons like hypergamy, even a little bit of gende ratio imbalance it absolutely contributes to inceldom.
 

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
3
Views
421
tired as fuck
tired as fuck
MonkeyInaT34
Replies
2
Views
369
MonkeyInaT34
MonkeyInaT34
Animecel2D
Replies
4
Views
1K
ColderManTruce
ColderManTruce
Mizerable
Replies
27
Views
1K
FiveThreeBlackCel
FiveThreeBlackCel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top