Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The Ugly Laws 1867 - 1974: Cruelty Imposed Upon Sub-5s

Esoteric7

Esoteric7

Volcel because I won’t fuck your mum
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2023
Posts
1,822
Introduction:
The Ugly Laws, prevalent in the United States between 1867 to 1974, reflected a society marred by discrimination and cruelty towards individuals deemed physically unattractive. These laws targeted people with visible disabilities, reinforcing prejudiced notions and subjecting them to profound injustices.

Origin and Evolution of Ugly Laws:
The Ugly Laws emerged in the late 1800s, gaining traction in several cities across the U.S. Designed to maintain public order, these laws disproportionately targeted individuals with disabilities, particularly those with visible deformities.

Portland, Oregon enacted an ugly law in 1881:

‘Any person who is diseased, maimed, mutilated, or in any way deformed, so as to be an unsightly or disgusting object, or an improper person to be allowed in or on the streets, highways, thoroughfares, or public places in the city, shall not therein or thereon expose himself or herself to public view, under the penalty of a fine of $1 for each offense (Chicago City Code 1881).’

The fine of $1 equates to more than $30 in 2023. Punishments for violating an ugly law ranged from incarceration to fines of up to $50 for each offense or sent to a poor house or work farm.

IMG 3151


Cruelty in Enforcement:
The enforcement of the Ugly Laws was characterized by heartless practices. Law enforcement officials, in collaboration with local authorities, would detain and penalize anyone perceived as unsightly, casting aside fundamental human rights in favor of an arbitrary and discriminatory aesthetic standard. Ugly people were seen as ruining the flow of life or disturbing the peace.

IMG 3152


Dehumanization of Ugly Individuals:
The laws not only barred individuals from public spaces but also contributed to the dehumanization of those deemed unattractive.

Forced to hide their appearance or face legal consequences, these individuals were stripped of their dignity and basic freedoms, perpetuating a cycle of isolation, marginalization, anxiety, depression, and a sense of worthlessness.

The Ugly Laws often led to public humiliation, as those deemed "ugly" were forced to wear badges or face other visible markers of their status.

IMG 3150


Impact on Employment and Economic Opportunities:
Ugly Laws impacted the economic prospects of affected individuals. Discrimination based on appearance hindered their ability to secure gainful employment, perpetuating cycles of poverty and reinforcing societal prejudices.

Legal Foundations and Prejudice:
Examining the legal foundations of these laws reveals a systemic bias against individuals with disabilities. The laws were built on misguided perceptions of normalcy and aesthetics, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and encouraging the exclusion of those who did not conform to narrow societal standards.

Some argue that the constraints placed on individuals with disabilities stem more from the imagined challenges and risks associated with disability than from the actual limitations posed by the disability itself.

IMG 3160


Challenging the Ugly Laws:
Some individuals and advocacy groups began to challenge the Ugly Laws. Their efforts contributed to a growing awareness of the inherent cruelty and injustice embedded in these regulations, eventually leading to their decline in the mid-20th century.

IMG 3157


The Importance of Historical Reflection:
The Ugly Laws serve as a stark reminder of the consequences of being ugly. By examining this dark chapter in history, we are reminded of the vile evilness of normies who marginalized and dehumanized sub-5s.
 
Last edited:
Normies wish they could implement this again so it's just Chad's on the street (women won't be affected as that would be seen as discriminatory)
 
Once again, normshits and foids just want eugenics and are completely oblivious to it
 
@Fat Link @SlayerSlayer @proudweeb
add this to must-read content
 
The laws might be removed but if you're ugly women still treat you like you're a criminal
 
Normies wish they could implement this again so it's just Chad's on the street (women won't be affected as that would be seen as discriminatory)
It kinda is happening now. No staring warning in London Underground train

IMG 3161
 
Those subjected to punishment under these laws just haven't worked on their personalities.
 
The eugenic states of america
 
@Esoteric7
@wereq
This is why large scale modern eugenisim (gene editing, CRISPR) should be improved and expanded
No matter what sub5s will always suffer whether there is a discrimination or not
Whether they will punish it by law or not

These people are the same normies who said looks dont matter
Hypocrite piece of shit

They punish people who born with that condition via law while At the same time they are against modern eugenism

It's actually normies with their hereditary bluepilled mindset that should be extreminated from the genepool
Only allow blackpiller as the one who have ability to procreate

Traditional eugenism = FISHERIAN RUNAWAY SELECTION
 
Last edited:
I would support if it meant i see less fat nigger women on the streets
 
Fake and gay.
 
Jim crow laws got repealed before the ugly laws :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek:
 
Excuse me??? Where are my reparations?
 
trucels are like jews in nazi germany,at least how they treated according to the mainstream media
 
Fucking brutal.

They called ugly people "disgusting objects" in an OFFICIAL document fucking lol :feelskek:
 
The laws might be gone but this still all applies. Funny thing is this law wouldn’t have applied to 99% of users on this sub as people back then looked way worse and you would be deemed normal
 
Introduction:
The Ugly Laws, prevalent in the United States between 1867 to 1974, reflected a society marred by discrimination and cruelty towards individuals deemed physically unattractive. These laws targeted people with visible disabilities, reinforcing prejudiced notions and subjecting them to profound injustices.

Origin and Evolution of Ugly Laws:
The Ugly Laws emerged in the late 1800s, gaining traction in several cities across the U.S. Designed to maintain public order, these laws disproportionately targeted individuals with disabilities, particularly those with visible deformities.

Portland, Oregon enacted an ugly law in 1881:

‘Any person who is diseased, maimed, mutilated, or in any way deformed, so as to be an unsightly or disgusting object, or an improper person to be allowed in or on the streets, highways, thoroughfares, or public places in the city, shall not therein or thereon expose himself or herself to public view, under the penalty of a fine of $1 for each offense (Chicago City Code 1881).’

The fine of $1 equates to more than $30 in 2023. Punishments for violating an ugly law ranged from incarceration to fines of up to $50 for each offense or sent to a poor house or work farm.

View attachment 1006485

Cruelty in Enforcement:
The enforcement of the Ugly Laws was characterized by heartless practices. Law enforcement officials, in collaboration with local authorities, would detain and penalize anyone perceived as unsightly, casting aside fundamental human rights in favor of an arbitrary and discriminatory aesthetic standard. Ugly people were seen as ruining the flow of life or disturbing the peace.

View attachment 1006486

Dehumanization of Ugly Individuals:
The laws not only barred individuals from public spaces but also contributed to the dehumanization of those deemed unattractive.

Forced to hide their appearance or face legal consequences, these individuals were stripped of their dignity and basic freedoms, perpetuating a cycle of isolation, marginalization, anxiety, depression, and a sense of worthlessness.

The Ugly Laws often led to public humiliation, as those deemed "ugly" were forced to wear badges or face other visible markers of their status.

View attachment 1006488

Impact on Employment and Economic Opportunities:
Ugly Laws impacted the economic prospects of affected individuals. Discrimination based on appearance hindered their ability to secure gainful employment, perpetuating cycles of poverty and reinforcing societal prejudices.

Legal Foundations and Prejudice:
Examining the legal foundations of these laws reveals a systemic bias against individuals with disabilities. The laws were built on misguided perceptions of normalcy and aesthetics, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and encouraging the exclusion of those who did not conform to narrow societal standards.

Some argue that the constraints placed on individuals with disabilities stem more from the imagined challenges and risks associated with disability than from the actual limitations posed by the disability itself.

View attachment 1006497

Challenging the Ugly Laws:
Some individuals and advocacy groups began to challenge the Ugly Laws. Their efforts contributed to a growing awareness of the inherent cruelty and injustice embedded in these regulations, eventually leading to their decline in the mid-20th century.

View attachment 1006495

The Importance of Historical Reflection:
The Ugly Laws serve as a stark reminder of the consequences of being ugly. By examining this dark chapter in history, we are reminded of the vile evilness of normies who marginalized and dehumanized sub-5s.
I aleredy posted this twice this year

The Joker GIF
 
The laws might be gone but this still all applies. Funny thing is this law wouldn’t have applied to 99% of users on this sub as people back then looked way worse and you would be deemed normal
Yeah brutal black pill
 
Normies wish they could implement this again so it's just Chad's on the street (women won't be affected as that would be seen as discriminatory)
sub3 women are normally ignored and not treated like humans, it wouldn't make any difference in their lives. We would receive severe punishments but they would continue to swim in the void
 
Fucking hell, and shit heads wonder why mass shootings happen. Then again thinkng about it. Despite women and blacks having equall rights to whites. You see democrats bitching about it non stop. But not about uncharismatic individuals. "Racism" and "sexism" is just a modern day cover story for people to still discriminate about us. Fraudulence is the greatest weapon used against the good people. Incels, normies who want to be good guys, mentally disabled people and more. Let this thread we all have seen be a reminder that somtimes, hystory never changes.
 
I would have never discovered this
 
I would have never discovered this
It's not as bad as it seems. It's not like you were Saint Black Ops II cel and fined. What it meant was for people with acid/fire burns, wartime disfigurements (if you haven't seen the post war facial prosthetics, it's horrific, but also a reminder of the importance of looks), and for unfortunate diseases like cherubim.

The Elephant man is not fiction, and he lived during when these laws were in action. The bag he wore over his head was little part a choice, because he would be fined and mocked without it.

Just being sub5 wouldn't get you fined.
 
It's not as bad as it seems. It's not like you were Saint Black Ops II cel and fined. What it meant was for people with acid/fire burns, wartime disfigurements (if you haven't seen the post war facial prosthetics, it's horrific, but also a reminder of the importance of looks), and for unfortunate diseases like cherubim.

The Elephant man is not fiction, and he lived during when these laws were in action. The bag he wore over his head was little part a choice, because he would be fined and mocked without it.

Just being sub5 wouldn't get you fined.
Good to know
 
Normies wish they could implement this again so it's just Chad's on the street (women won't be affected as that would be seen as discriminatory)
Not normies, women and honestly they already doing it, they discriminate ugly people all the times, except for the ugly girl in their group, they call her " beauty, honey " and all the name, until the day come she do something wrong and it become " ugly bitch, fat whales, pig " women are monster in disguise
 
It's not as bad as it seems. It's not like you were Saint Black Ops II cel and fined. What it meant was for people with acid/fire burns, wartime disfigurements (if you haven't seen the post war facial prosthetics, it's horrific, but also a reminder of the importance of looks), and for unfortunate diseases like cherubim.

The Elephant man is not fiction, and he lived during when these laws were in action. The bag he wore over his head was little part a choice, because he would be fined and mocked without it.

Just being sub5 wouldn't get you fined.
Elephant man is beyond the sub5 domain, he was the ultimate stage, i wonder if he had his chance with a prostitute or not and how she have felt after being fucked by him, did she had ptsd for a life long ? I really wonder.
 
Maybe that's the true reason why the media and soyciety is on full rampage againts incels, they don't have the ugly laws anymore and we are not used as slaves for the attractive. Many incels doing shitty wageslave jobs is not little enough for them and incels complaining about their sexlessness, lack of compassion, lack of physical affection and shitty treatment is considered as dangerous hate crime by soyciety. Sexhavers wish incels were castrated and hidden from their eyes. Sexhavers simply believe we shouldn't have sexuality, rights, humane treatment and freedom for being born ugly, short and autistic but they rarely admit that.
 
Last edited:
Incels are truly the oppressed.
 
Ok but did they actually really enforce these laws? I'd like to see proof of that
 
I don’t understand why incels don’t get gene therapy and free plastic surgery
It is just like any sort of racism. Freaking normies want a group to always feel better than
 
Normies wish they could implement this again so it's just Chad's on the street (women won't be affected as that would be seen as discriminatory)
 
This type of shit makes me feel like going ER on a bunch of normies, chads and foids (in COD)
 
It kinda is happening now. No staring warning in London Underground train

View attachment 1006505
where is the sign from? In Germany you can only be punished if you have evidence of a crime. If a crime cannot be proven, it is a matter of testimony against testimony.
 
where is the sign from? In Germany you can only be punished if you have evidence of a crime. If a crime cannot be proven, it is a matter of testimony against testimony.
This is in London
 
how is it a crime to look? here in germany people often stare at you.
Yeah exactly, UK is cucked

A British Transport Police spokesperson said: “Intrusive staring is where the person on the receiving end feels that the behaviour has a threatening or sexual element to it.”
 

Similar threads

svgmn1
Replies
1
Views
162
svgmn1
svgmn1
Lifeisbullshit95
Replies
2
Views
134
Efiliste
Efiliste
RealSchizo
Replies
7
Views
747
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
CircumcisedClown
Replies
6
Views
250
Minamoto
Minamoto
Redbeard7
Replies
13
Views
376
Redbeard7
Redbeard7

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top