Right. Let's fucking go. I am so fucking excited about this.
I've been waiting for this since I was in high school, when Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, and after almost eight years, this case has finally reached the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Court will decide, in SFFA v. Harvard and a similar case against the University of North Carolina, whether to overturn Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), and Fisher v. University of Texas (2016). These cases held that considering race in university admissions was legal under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
SCOTUS argument schedule for October 31st, 2022
It's obvious where I stand on this. Legally, these precedents are unworkable and are grievously wrong. From a moral standpoint, affirmative action as it exists today is disgusting. Leftist administrators in American higher education justify discrimination against Asian-Americans—hard-working ricecels and currycels—by stereotyping them as cold, test-taking automatons whose academic accomplishments and life stories are somehow less valuable than that of African-Americans.
This is a brutal racepill in and of itself: ricecels and currycels are low SMV, so discrimination against them is socially accepted.
So it's time for the Justices to hold these SJWs' feet to the fire. I will most likely write another thread after these arguments are over, discussing anything that I think is noteworthy and/or is related to the blackpill.
An audio-only livestream of oral arguments will be available on the website of the U.S. Supreme Court:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
I've been waiting for this since I was in high school, when Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, and after almost eight years, this case has finally reached the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Court will decide, in SFFA v. Harvard and a similar case against the University of North Carolina, whether to overturn Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), and Fisher v. University of Texas (2016). These cases held that considering race in university admissions was legal under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
SCOTUS argument schedule for October 31st, 2022
It's obvious where I stand on this. Legally, these precedents are unworkable and are grievously wrong. From a moral standpoint, affirmative action as it exists today is disgusting. Leftist administrators in American higher education justify discrimination against Asian-Americans—hard-working ricecels and currycels—by stereotyping them as cold, test-taking automatons whose academic accomplishments and life stories are somehow less valuable than that of African-Americans.
This is a brutal racepill in and of itself: ricecels and currycels are low SMV, so discrimination against them is socially accepted.
So it's time for the Justices to hold these SJWs' feet to the fire. I will most likely write another thread after these arguments are over, discussing anything that I think is noteworthy and/or is related to the blackpill.
An audio-only livestream of oral arguments will be available on the website of the U.S. Supreme Court:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Last edited:
