The truth behind false rape accusations

[Ap0calypse]

Since there aren't enough handsome, tall, and hung top 20% males around, females are in a continuous state of denying their own shallowness to preserve their reputation. For some schizophrenic reason, females tend to get into relationships with males they arent sexually attracted to, for social, emotional, or financial reasons. They may tolerate sex with their unattractive male partner uncommonly if they deem that he has "earned" pity sex.

If the female is pressured into sex by the unattractive male partner, she might give in to the partners demand. In her mind, she has just been raped, since she derives literally no pleasure from the male due to the female perceiving his genetic traits as inferior.

 

[TheProphetMuscle]

If she just don’t like a guy in general, that’s enough for a rape accusation and she knows he will get killed in prison by the nigger ape simp

 

[nice_try]

female privilege: accuse anybody

 

[Deleted member 35110]

female privilege: accuse anybody

 

[Rhaast]

Well put.

female privilege: accuse anybody

 

[Mainländer]

That's one of the possible scenarios for that type of thing, but it gets much worse than just that sometimes. Men who never did anything at all get accused for some petty reason.

Women feel no empathy for grown men, I want to be wrong but don't think I am.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

For some schizophrenic reason, females tend to get into relationships with males they arent sexually attracted to, for social, emotional, or financial reasons.
They may tolerate sex with their unattractive male partner uncommonly if they deem that he has "earned" pity sex.
If the female is pressured into sex by the unattractive male partner, she might give in to the partners demand.
In her mind, she has just been raped, since she derives literally no pleasure from the male due to the female perceiving his genetic traits as inferior.

It's a bit more complex than this.

It doesn't have to be "literally no pleasure". It is possible for a foid to SLIGHTLY enjoy sex w/ a male while perceiving him as inferior.
Kind of like we could coom inside a landwhale while still feeling gross about it.
Your self esteem would also be harmed by fucking an escort even though you enjoy the sex because it doesn't feel like an idealized situation you want to be in.

Basically the "this feels wrong, it feels like rape" response can happen even if she does derive pleasure from it, so long as she still has misgivings which outweigh any possible coexisting pleasure.

- -

This is also going to apply even in situations where she is not "pressured into" it. She may even feel "raped" if she is the one who initiates sex w/ her beta partner.

On some level she will feel (even if she is the sex-initiator) that she was 'compelled' through expectations in some way, and blame the man for not picking up on her hesitancy and turning her down.

IE if he has having a bad day, seems depressed, she starts sucking his cock w/o request, he still "raped" her by "manipulating" her w/ his emotions.

He is (in her mind) obligated to be stoic, not express sadness/neediness, so that she doesn't feel motherly instincts to soothe him w/ a blowjob.

Daring to be vulnerable (to her subconscious hamster brain) is in effect RAPING her by compelling her via manipulating her empathy/sympathy into giving sexual pleasure to him.

Men should (foid logic) only be super-confident super-happy not 'needing' sex or attention from her in the slightest: only then can she give it without being 'coerced' ("raped") into providing the sexual attention.

 

[SparkLight]

Women feel no empathy for grown men, I want to be wrong but don't think I am.

Yeah toilets can only emphasize with children and other toilets because they see grown men as disposable waste and then manipulate a man’s empathy to get out of a cheating scandal

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Yeah toilets can only emphasize with children and other toilets because they see grown men as disposable waste and then manipulate a man’s empathy to get out of a cheating scandal

I think it's more complicated than this.

I think women are CAPABLE of empathizing with men, however they RESIST it.

Part of this is due to inherent programming (she needs to circumstantially dismiss men's feelings when instinct pressures her to prioritize herself or prioritize children)

Another part is I think due to social conditioning.

Ironically women are being programmed by feminism to perceive men as fake manipulators, embellishing their own suffering to capitalize upon female sympathies.

Do some men do that? Yes, of course. Women also do this.

Whatever the reality happens to be of "which sex does this more" I think the truth is nobody really knows for sure.

I think a minority are humble enough to admit to the confusion.

A majority have varying levels of suspicion/confidence about that reality because it helps them define their reality and make choices. They don't want to feel out of control, as if they do not understand reality.

This ultimately leads to competing sexisms leading us to prioritize who we empathize with to a greater degree when there are competing narratives or limited attention resources.

 

[Ap0calypse]

It's a bit more complex than this.

It doesn't have to be "literally no pleasure". It is possible for a foid to SLIGHTLY enjoy sex w/ a male while perceiving him as inferior.
Kind of like we could coom inside a landwhale while still feeling gross about it.
Your self esteem would also be harmed by fucking an escort even though you enjoy the sex because it doesn't feel like an idealized situation you want to be in.

Basically the "this feels wrong, it feels like rape" response can happen even if she does derive pleasure from it, so long as she still has misgivings which outweigh any possible coexisting pleasure.

- -

This is also going to apply even in situations where she is not "pressured into" it. She may even feel "raped" if she is the one who initiates sex w/ her beta partner.

On some level she will feel (even if she is the sex-initiator) that she was 'compelled' through expectations in some way, and blame the man for not picking up on her hesitancy and turning her down.

IE if he has having a bad day, seems depressed, she starts sucking his cock w/o request, he still "raped" her by "manipulating" her w/ his emotions.

He is (in her mind) obligated to be stoic, not express sadness/neediness, so that she doesn't feel motherly instincts to soothe him w/ a blowjob.

Daring to be vulnerable (to her subconscious hamster brain) is in effect RAPING her by compelling her via manipulating her empathy/sympathy into giving sexual pleasure to him.

Men should (foid logic) only be super-confident super-happy not 'needing' sex or attention from her in the slightest: only then can she give it without being 'coerced' ("raped") into providing the sexual attention.

I disagree. If females were capable of deriving any pleasure from sex with an unattractive male, they wouldn't charge so much for prostitution, they wouldn't friendzone unattractive males, and the "dead bedroom" phenomenon wouldn't even exist. Their overall behavior points to the conclusion that they are biologically programmed to despise every cell in an unattractive male's body.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

If females were capable of deriving any pleasure from sex with an unattractive male, they wouldn't charge so much for prostitution

Why turn down money if you can get it?

they wouldn't friendzone unattractive males

foids know on some level that anticipation could be better than reality

if she fucks the guy and he witnesses her mixed feelings of revulsion/disgust compromising her limited pleasure it will break him and he'll stop orbiting her and doing things for her

if however she leads him on, he can anticipate she'll more thoroughly enjoy the experience all dere-dere for him

refusing to have a semi-enjoyable fuck with the guy is not proof that she couldn't derive slight enjoyment

it's jsut proof she perceives she would have mixed feelings and that the guy would perceive her underwhelming enjoyment and hate her/himself for that

it would result in him not having oneitis/pedestol once he witnessed her disgust, and this doesn't serve her ends

IE she sacrifices "I'd feel moderately good if he licked my pussy" for "he'll come over and take out my garbage and drive me places"

and the "dead bedroom" phenomenon wouldn't even exist

that phenom doesn't exist because of "zero pleasure" it exists because "revulsion and disappointment outweigh pleasure"

Their overall behavior points to the conclusion that they are biologically programmed to despise every cell in an unattractive male's body.

now you're waxing on extremes in emotional fashion like foids are wont to

they can appreciate our cells, they're just always comparing that formation to more ideal formations she knows exist

IE "it kinda feels good to have this small cock of this ugly man inside me, but I'd feel better if it was the Chad Thundercock's, and Iam jealous of the women he's fucking right now"

this distracts her from minor pleasures giving her a 'violated' feeling like "I'm Becky and I'm settling for munching on bologna while Stacy is enjoying filet mignon... this bologna is ashes in my mouth!"

If she had the right perspective she could still enjoy the bologna. On some level she still IS (she's still eating it) but she isn't enjoying it as much as she could have if she'd get out of her own head.

 

[SparkLight]

I think it's more complicated than this.

I think women are CAPABLE of empathizing with men, however they RESIST it.

Part of this is due to inherent programming (she needs to circumstantially dismiss men's feelings when instinct pressures her to prioritize herself or prioritize children)

Another part is I think due to social conditioning.

Ironically women are being programmed by feminism to perceive men as fake manipulators, embellishing their own suffering to capitalize upon female sympathies.

Do some men do that? Yes, of course. Women also do this.

Whatever the reality happens to be of "which sex does this more" I think the truth is nobody really knows for sure.

I think a minority are humble enough to admit to the confusion.

A majority have varying levels of suspicion/confidence about that reality because it helps them define their reality and make choices. They don't want to feel out of control, as if they do not understand reality.

This ultimately leads to competing sexisms leading us to prioritize who we empathize with to a greater degree when there are competing narratives or limited attention resources.

I agree although I wish the term manipulation is not used almost exclusively as a negative term since as humans we all have a degree of manipulation by of means of rewarding good/“correct” behavior.

As for the women are capable of empathizing with men but they resist I agree but then again it’s a very minuscule number of foids willing to go against that instinctual nature.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

I agree although I wish the term manipulation is not used almost exclusively as a negative term since as humans we all have a degree of manipulation by of means of rewarding good/“correct” behavior.

Correct, just as there is good stress (eustress) and bad stress (distress) there is good manipulation (symbiosis) and bad manipulation (parasitism)

As for the women are capable of empathizing with men but they resist I agree
but then again it’s a very minuscule number of foids willing to go against that instinctual nature.

Everyone is willing to go against their instinctual nature, the question is to what degree they are: how does that weigh against other objectives, and how capable are they of knowing their instincts and discerning them from higher contemplations?

Giving in to instinct often distresses people so when they end up doing it they rationalize they're following some other narrative whose outcome just so happens to coincide with pursuit of the instinct they refuse to acknowledge