Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The True Meaning Behind the 3rd Most Grossed Film of All Time - JBW Always Has a Higher Probability of Winning At the End

  • Thread starter CopingForBrutality
  • Start date
C

CopingForBrutality

Captain
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Posts
1,984
This post was inspired from one of @SlayerSlayer ‘s posts where he explores the use of JBW through sitcoms, it dives into how liberalism is actually just a far more efficient way of purporting JBW because it possesses the duality of acting like holy creatures that care about shitskin ethnics whilst making JBW seem law at the same time, afterall it makes sense, promoting your views through masquerading it by any means necessary and using a shielded approach is far more efficient than outwardly going in there and promoting your beliefs out in brute force. Check it out here -

https://incels.is/threads/do-white-supremacists-watch-romcoms.572511/

Now onto the matter of this post. This film is relevant to discuss because it is the 3rd largest film ever grossed adjusting for inflation and the most popular movie amongst foids. But WHY do foids love it so much? Is it because it promotes themes of feminism such as rebellion and freedom which foids desire, or is it simply Chad worship as we are far more familiar with here. If you have been here long enough, the latter is of course the main reason but it is far more specific than simple Chad worship.

1709994011541


There is something more subtle and not so obvious here, the REAL meaning behind this movie is that JBW always has a higher probability of winning at the end. Think about it for a moment.

Why in the world would some rich foid abandon the richer, taller and better looking husband for someone who is poor and gets facemogged by him? This would make sense IF JBW wasn’t real and the film was universally hated by foids. JBW is the only variable Leonardo Di Caprio has over the Chad plus the film was not hated by any means, it gained popularity all across the globe, not only the Western World. The Chad/Chadlite in question here -

1709994114285


So what's going on here? The truth is, the Chad she is engaged to looks like an ethnic and thats why he lost to Leonardo Di Caprio, I’ve seen more sandniggers that look the Chad than Europeans. I’m not going to argue about genetics and the likes here because only the application of the real world matters when it comes to topics like this. Anyways what is happening in this film is that she replaces her Chad husband and cheats on him with a poor, worse looking blond hair blue eyed Leonardo Di Caprio. The only difference, the only upper hand Leonardo has on the Chad is that he is WHITER so it must've been the sole reason she decided to cheat on him, there is no other variable where he has an edge or another possibility on why it happened unless the deniers can point it out to me.

Clearly as you can see here the Chad facemogs Leonardo and is taller than him.

x6xieo02eH1PiQVhGYfzAdvpvPCevhjFNzz-uIapLVeX47ITm6qg0Ta4V6qNz9eX-bZVMCyU0gQmp6NqkU12okkBXQEz_ABG2bX7PHDq05jlfUb6eorVVXMZTwIcx-aRRTzb_O-GSGc2Pw10VVr2zoc


Foids love this movie because it is promoting JBW, whether they subconsciously know it or not, they love seeing the ethnic Chad getting cucked by some poor bum. In their eyes he is less worthy due to not being as white as Leonardo Di Caprio. Otherwise it makes logical sense for foids to hate this movie because which foid would want to see a taller, richer and better looking guy get cucked? But they don’t hate it because the whiteness of Leonardo Di Caprio was enough to be more worthy to foids than ALL of the Chad’s traits.

Furthermore, there is not a single nigger in the entire movie, there were some Arabs towards the end that appeared for 2 seconds but that’s it. Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing to blame for this as it's historically accurate that almost everyone who went aboard the Titanic was White. But they seriously tried to keep this as accurate as possible for a reason, unlike other films released in similar times that tried to put a Black or Chinese actor even if it were to be in the background shots. They made this film in a way so it could be visually appealing as possible to the target audience (foids), this way the producers can maximise the target audience’s enjoyment of the film and that means don’t put any ethnics. Even adding one or two ethnics for a couple of minutes into the film would subconsciously put the rating down, especially as it's on the romance genre.

This entire film is a JBW recount and promotion, this is the true reason why foids all across the globe enjoy this piece and got it to the 3rd most grossing film of all time, their enjoyment of the story serves as evidence of JBW.
 
@Destroyed lonely @tehgymcel420 @gymletethnicel @BlackCel_from_ZA
 
number 1 is this
1709995113169
 
It's a stretch
 
It's a stretch
Why do you think the Chad from the film got cucked despite him having an edge over every characteristic (apart from the fact that he wasn't whiter than Leonardo)?
 
This post was inspired from one of @SlayerSlayer ‘s posts where he explores the use of JBW through sitcoms, it dives into how liberalism is actually just a far more efficient way of purporting JBW because it possesses the duality of acting like holy creatures that care about shitskin ethnics whilst making JBW seem law at the same time, afterall it makes sense, promoting your views through masquerading it by any means necessary and using a shielded approach is far more efficient than outwardly going in there and promoting your beliefs out in brute force. Check it out here -

https://incels.is/threads/do-white-supremacists-watch-romcoms.572511/

Now onto the matter of this post. This film is relevant to discuss because it is the 3rd largest film ever grossed adjusting for inflation and the most popular movie amongst foids. But WHY do foids love it so much? Is it because it promotes themes of feminism such as rebellion and freedom which foids desire, or is it simply Chad worship as we are far more familiar with here. If you have been here long enough, the latter is of course the main reason but it is far more specific than simple Chad worship.

View attachment 1085300

There is something more subtle and not so obvious here, the REAL meaning behind this movie is that JBW always has a higher probability of winning at the end. Think about it for a moment.

Why in the world would some rich foid abandon the richer, taller and better looking husband for someone who is poor and gets facemogged by him? This would make sense IF JBW wasn’t real and the film was universally hated by foids. JBW is the only variable Leonardo Di Caprio has over the Chad plus the film was not hated by any means, it gained popularity all across the globe, not only the Western World. The Chad/Chadlite in question here -

View attachment 1085302

So what's going on here? The truth is, the Chad she is engaged to looks like an ethnic and thats why he lost to Leonardo Di Caprio, I’ve seen more sandniggers that look the Chad than Europeans. I’m not going to argue about genetics and the likes here because only the application of the real world matters when it comes to topics like this. Anyways what is happening in this film is that she replaces her Chad husband and cheats on him with a poor, worse looking blond hair blue eyed Leonardo Di Caprio. The only difference, the only upper hand Leonardo has on the Chad is that he is WHITER so it must've been the sole reason she decided to cheat on him, there is no other variable where he has an edge or another possibility on why it happened unless the deniers can point it out to me.

Clearly as you can see here the Chad facemogs Leonardo and is taller than him.

x6xieo02eH1PiQVhGYfzAdvpvPCevhjFNzz-uIapLVeX47ITm6qg0Ta4V6qNz9eX-bZVMCyU0gQmp6NqkU12okkBXQEz_ABG2bX7PHDq05jlfUb6eorVVXMZTwIcx-aRRTzb_O-GSGc2Pw10VVr2zoc


Foids love this movie because it is promoting JBW, whether they subconsciously know it or not, they love seeing the ethnic Chad getting cucked by some poor bum. In their eyes he is less worthy due to not being as white as Leonardo Di Caprio. Otherwise it makes logical sense for foids to hate this movie because which foid would want to see a taller, richer and better looking guy get cucked? But they don’t hate it because the whiteness of Leonardo Di Caprio was enough to be more worthy to foids than ALL of the Chad’s traits.

Furthermore, there is not a single nigger in the entire movie, there were some Arabs towards the end that appeared for 2 seconds but that’s it. Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing to blame for this as it's historically accurate that almost everyone who went aboard the Titanic was White. But they seriously tried to keep this as accurate as possible for a reason, unlike other films released in similar times that tried to put a Black or Chinese actor even if it were to be in the background shots. They made this film in a way so it could be visually appealing as possible to the target audience (foids), this way the producers can maximise the target audience’s enjoyment of the film and that means don’t put any ethnics. Even adding one or two ethnics for a couple of minutes into the film would subconsciously put the rating down, especially as it's on the romance genre.

This entire film is a JBW recount and promotion, this is the true reason why foids all across the globe enjoy this piece and got it to the 3rd most grossing film of all time, their enjoyment of the story serves as evidence of JBW.
low iq.Foids love this movie because of Prettyboy Leo Decaprio not because of some race or skin colour shit.Besides leo's face looks rounded like the east slavic phenotype nothing like the square chiseled jaw of Dolph lundgreen type
 
Is this why Edward was more liked than Jacob by Twilight fans? While Jacob was stronger, Edward was lighter. Jacob was Native American and Edward was European. But a lot of women thirst for Jason Momoa, who is ethnic. Perhaps they would like him a lot more if he were lighter. I believe race impacts one's physical attractiveness, but face and height are more important.
 
'this film is about JBW because the white fiancé isn't white because idk'

ok
 
It's true, Hollywood is extremely white supremacist behind its make of diversity, another great proof of this is that they rarely show same-race ethnic couples, they always gotta pair up the ethnic whether male or female with a white, on surface it might look like race mixing propaganda, well it is but it's basically saying ethnics are low life animals that need to "level up", some are "worthy" of having a white partner
 
The best way you can be NOT racist is to simply ignore race, but hollywood has been doing the exact opposite, by ultra-highlighting race they say it's "empowering" but deep down it's really just alienation, WOW looks at the NIGGER, isn't he such a good boy? :)
 
Is this why Edward was more liked than Jacob by Twilight fans? While Jacob was stronger, Edward was lighter. Jacob was Native American and Edward was European. But a lot of women thirst for Jason Momoa, who is ethnic. Perhaps they would like him a lot more if he were lighter. I believe race impacts one's physical attractiveness, but face and height are more important.
dude, Ed Cullen is a gigachad, and Jacob is a manlet
 
This post was inspired from one of @SlayerSlayer ‘s posts where he explores the use of JBW through sitcoms, it dives into how liberalism is actually just a far more efficient way of purporting JBW because it possesses the duality of acting like holy creatures that care about shitskin ethnics whilst making JBW seem law at the same time, afterall it makes sense, promoting your views through masquerading it by any means necessary and using a shielded approach is far more efficient than outwardly going in there and promoting your beliefs out in brute force. Check it out here -

https://incels.is/threads/do-white-supremacists-watch-romcoms.572511/

Now onto the matter of this post. This film is relevant to discuss because it is the 3rd largest film ever grossed adjusting for inflation and the most popular movie amongst foids. But WHY do foids love it so much? Is it because it promotes themes of feminism such as rebellion and freedom which foids desire, or is it simply Chad worship as we are far more familiar with here. If you have been here long enough, the latter is of course the main reason but it is far more specific than simple Chad worship.

View attachment 1085300

There is something more subtle and not so obvious here, the REAL meaning behind this movie is that JBW always has a higher probability of winning at the end. Think about it for a moment.

Why in the world would some rich foid abandon the richer, taller and better looking husband for someone who is poor and gets facemogged by him? This would make sense IF JBW wasn’t real and the film was universally hated by foids. JBW is the only variable Leonardo Di Caprio has over the Chad plus the film was not hated by any means, it gained popularity all across the globe, not only the Western World. The Chad/Chadlite in question here -

View attachment 1085302

So what's going on here? The truth is, the Chad she is engaged to looks like an ethnic and thats why he lost to Leonardo Di Caprio, I’ve seen more sandniggers that look the Chad than Europeans. I’m not going to argue about genetics and the likes here because only the application of the real world matters when it comes to topics like this. Anyways what is happening in this film is that she replaces her Chad husband and cheats on him with a poor, worse looking blond hair blue eyed Leonardo Di Caprio. The only difference, the only upper hand Leonardo has on the Chad is that he is WHITER so it must've been the sole reason she decided to cheat on him, there is no other variable where he has an edge or another possibility on why it happened unless the deniers can point it out to me.

Clearly as you can see here the Chad facemogs Leonardo and is taller than him.

x6xieo02eH1PiQVhGYfzAdvpvPCevhjFNzz-uIapLVeX47ITm6qg0Ta4V6qNz9eX-bZVMCyU0gQmp6NqkU12okkBXQEz_ABG2bX7PHDq05jlfUb6eorVVXMZTwIcx-aRRTzb_O-GSGc2Pw10VVr2zoc


Foids love this movie because it is promoting JBW, whether they subconsciously know it or not, they love seeing the ethnic Chad getting cucked by some poor bum. In their eyes he is less worthy due to not being as white as Leonardo Di Caprio. Otherwise it makes logical sense for foids to hate this movie because which foid would want to see a taller, richer and better looking guy get cucked? But they don’t hate it because the whiteness of Leonardo Di Caprio was enough to be more worthy to foids than ALL of the Chad’s traits.

Furthermore, there is not a single nigger in the entire movie, there were some Arabs towards the end that appeared for 2 seconds but that’s it. Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing to blame for this as it's historically accurate that almost everyone who went aboard the Titanic was White. But they seriously tried to keep this as accurate as possible for a reason, unlike other films released in similar times that tried to put a Black or Chinese actor even if it were to be in the background shots. They made this film in a way so it could be visually appealing as possible to the target audience (foids), this way the producers can maximise the target audience’s enjoyment of the film and that means don’t put any ethnics. Even adding one or two ethnics for a couple of minutes into the film would subconsciously put the rating down, especially as it's on the romance genre.

This entire film is a JBW recount and promotion, this is the true reason why foids all across the globe enjoy this piece and got it to the 3rd most grossing film of all time, their enjoyment of the story serves as evidence of JBW.
I like this post a lot, but you are coping when you say sandnigger Billy Zane facemogs Leo in his prime. Prime prettyboy Leo was one of the GOAT moggers
 
Why do you think the Chad from the film got cucked despite him having an edge over every characteristic (apart from the fact that he wasn't whiter than Leonardo)?
Leonardo was younger and more pretty boy ish
 
Blonde / blue eyed worship is the #1 fetishization from women, Zane was 30+ and Leo 21 so he had the upper hand particularly for the younger foid crowd, but compared to young Zane Leo looked like a weak slack jawed faggot in comparison, more proof that regardless of race, ethnicity or background all foids want the same thing and poor meds can't stop lucking out despite being better looking on average, here they are the same age:

16884982838657

HpcwPazF8tZOCkllDMh Zn01hpjGOYTU7U6DZd mQZs
 
Why do you think the Chad from the film got cucked despite him having an edge over every characteristic (apart from the fact that he wasn't whiter than Leonardo)?
Because it's just a movie in real life that cucked Chad would be probably some average guy with money but with movies you always cast best looking people out there. You are overanalizing everything in your wrong bias. Besides European foids like dark skinned chads more than white chads i dunno about usa but probably the same especially with pro-nigger propaganda.
 

Similar threads

Iranianoldcel
Replies
24
Views
676
MoggedByALoli
MoggedByALoli
N
Replies
4
Views
249
SteelCentaur
SteelCentaur
LostSoulUK
Replies
54
Views
2K
straww577
straww577
Nagger
Replies
20
Views
335
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
Spice
Replies
30
Views
764
Spice
Spice

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top