1. Your argument is retarded, its like saying because one inevitable cause of a problem exists, another cause that exacerbates it to a worse degree does not matter
Even if we accept your logic the fact that feminism greatly exacerbates the issue by letting women be even more selective based on looks is still a huge issue
Its like if someone cut you with poison dagger and then they keep stabbing you over and over with it
Only a retard would say - "Those stab wounds are cope bro, its the poison killing you"
No shit the poison is killing me but those stab wounds are doing much worse currently and speeding up my death
Even if we accept your logic feminism is still an issue, because if incels are inevitable, then its best that we minimize the the amount of men that face inceldom as much us possible
That's common sense right?
If demographics will always inevitably cause inceldom shouldn't feminism be stopped to lower those numbers?
2. As long as the train keeps chugging everybody will get a chance
For example lets say eveybody magically paired up (everybody of "legal age" like 18), there would still be some extra men without a partner because more men are born than women, but that guy would probably only have to wait a few years before his partner is "of age" so he'd get a partner, and so on
So long as people keep reproducing every guy will get a chance even if we all magically paired up
Plus some women become widows
True we need a higher birthrate. However feminism is not 100% the culprilt, (for example its impossible for most young people to move out due to soaring rent, too much corporate power,corporate welfare/loopholes and america is not very pro family despite touting "muh family values" how the fuck are you supposed to afford a family if you rush to automate everything and work in a "service economy")
Plus the jihadi stuff takes too much energy compared to EASIER solutions. (like you need militant groups to force women into slavery, have them cover up, being angry all the time etc).
Why not just do what hispanics do? They don't need militaries, slaves, and seem happy. (have you ever seen happy muslims? they always seem angry and always babbling obscenities!
) while on the other hand hispanics are partying, dancing, street racing, and just look happy.
Go to a hispanic neighborhood. you don't see women chained up/in burkas. Women still hold jobs, and even go to school in some cases however their is a light match-making culture and a high birth rate. (plus some hispanics get the relationships out of the way THEN go to school. Plus unlike whites where you are supposed to move out, hispanic parents help their kids raise families and even live under the same roof. A woman with a child at home will be less likely to thot it up at a frat house than a woman without a kid ESPECIALLY if her parents are helping her care for the child). Hispanics are actively paired up by the community. (Abuelita MAKES DAMN SURE her grandson is not incel and pairs him up with a girl she knows from mexico or church). in fact many sisters help their little brothers get partners. No point putting a lot of energy into putting women into slavery when you can have women WORK FOR YOU. (ie pair bonding, and even SHAMING other women who thot it up. when the parents are helping the daughter raise her kid they make DAMN sure she does not thot it up. No slavery required just the community to enforce a soft-patriarchy rather than using expensive jihadi militaries).
-sadly us whites and blacks don't have this. we are forced to use a homosexual dating app (look it up this documentary explains the homosexual origins of tinder
- in a nutshell, soy/liberal is crap, jihadism is too resource intensive. But the hispanic match-making culture is the perfect goldly locks zone. women are happy. (hispanic women in my neighborhood are partying but look happy, are married, and have kids
-i just think the whole jihadi larp is too much energy to achieve what you want when their is a MUCH EASIER way to do it!