Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory The "soy / incel" spectrum: The mind of pro-feminist cuck / simp vs "misogynistic incel"

ResidentHell

ResidentHell

Veteran
★★
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Posts
1,167
Normies seem to have their own definition of "incel". They dont exactly use "incel" to refer to "loser males" who are virgin or experience hardship in sex / dating world. They mostly use "incel" on males who are anti-feminist and blame external forces (e.g. social structure, women with hypergamic traits) for the unfavourble sex / dating market conditions for modern men. But they never use "incel" to describe a male who "respects women's wishes", "believes he must improve his personality to become fit to be a woman's partner" and blames only themself for their failures in the sex / dating world, even if they're virgin

To be an "incel" by normie standards, you don't have to be a virgin or celibate for more than a year. You just have to not be cucked and not be pro-gynocentric about views on sex / dating. It's like a spectrum: From pure bluepilled simp / cuck on the far left, to pure blackpilled incel on the far right, while the redpill is around the middle

_________________________________________________________

|:bluepill::bluepill: ------ (( :bluepill::redpill: ------- :redpill::blackpill: )) ------ :blackpill::blackpill:|
|____________________________________________________________|

The :bluepill: ones (pro-feminists and cucks) are the easiest for women to control. Women like control in their relationship and sex life, they like to have the edge in the power dynamic of their sexual relations. That's why women will never call the :bluepill: ones "incel", even if the :bluepill: one is virgin or multi-year celibacy. The :bluepill::bluepill: ones are also the most submissive to women. If they had the opportunity to, they would happily participate in open relationship where the female partner gets all the extra action. They would also not mind being a step-father to the children of a post-wall, ran-thru 304. They would also be content with letting the women dictate the times when they have sex, and they would let the woman peg them --- Women never call these :bluepill::bluepill: ones "incel", even if they're virgins or celibate for years

The :redpill: ones are basically a mix of :bluepill: and :blackpill:; they are a mix of cope and anti-feminist / anti-cucked ideas. But :redpill:-ers aren't exactly in the middle, it's a
mixed area. Some :redpill:-ers may lean more towards the :bluepill: side (e.g. PUA grifters), and some :redpill:-ers may lean more towards the :blackpill: side (e.g. Fresh&Fit, Andrew Tate). Like :bluepill: ones, :redpill: ones don't have a defeatist view about their sex / dating situation. But as women don't like men who don't submit to their wishes, they may call :redpill:-ers "incel" if they lean more to :blackpill: side, even if the :redpill:-er has sex frequently

The :redpill::blackpill: ones and :blackpill::blackpill: ones are most likely to be assertive & controlling or anti-submissive to women. They are the hardest to control in a relationship, and women don't like it when they don't have control.
So they'll call anyone who's against the idea of "respecting women's wishes" as "incel", including non-celibate normies and Chads who are :redpill::blackpill: or :blackpill::blackpill:

Most people in Western society fall in the :bluepill::bluepill: and :bluepill::redpill: section. For the misandrist, pro-gynocentric conditions of the sex / dating market to continue, women and :bluepill: men must prevent a majority of men from falling into the :redpill::blackpill: zone. Otherwise women will lose control of the sex / dating market situation, and either you'll see too many men go MGTOW & "check out" of dating market (or even society), OR you'll see too many men calling for retreat to a more patriachal standard of sex / dating. As part of their effort to prevent men from leaning to :blackpill: side of spectrum, women will obviously stigmatize or insult men (including HTNs and Chads) who fall into the :redpill::blackpill: or :blackpill::blackpill: zone (e.g. call them "misogynistic incel", anti-progressive, miserable & unpleasant to be around, "bad personality", "toxic personality")
 
Last edited:
read some of it
 
Nice breakdown of self aware incels vs ones who aren't or are less so. Also good points with motives behind who gets called "stinky inky" and who not. :feelsstudy:

I suppose our job then is to have as many fall into the right-side of the spectrum as we can, to end the gynocentric state of things we have now.
 
:whitepill::whitepill: spectrum mogs
 
Interesting concept, I think there is some truth to it
 
This was a good thread :yes:
 
stratospheric multi-coloured tic tac spillage IQ thread
 
not worth a reading
 
Nice breakdown of self aware incels vs ones who aren't or are less so. Also good points with motives behind who gets called "stinky inky" and who not. :feelsstudy:

I suppose our job then is to have as many fall into the right-side of the spectrum as we can, to end the gynocentric state of things we have now.
:yes::yes::yes:

stratospheric multi-coloured tic tac spillage IQ thread
 

Similar threads

Nordicel94
Replies
9
Views
554
lifeisfucked215
lifeisfucked215
Albertopenheimer
Replies
10
Views
609
TFDinGTA
TFDinGTA
cripplecel
Replies
47
Views
1K
jetmech2001
jetmech2001
Rapistcel
Replies
65
Views
1K
glutty
glutty

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top