Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The real reason incest Is taboo

Loliraider

Loliraider

agecucks are cucks
★★
Joined
Sep 1, 2025
Posts
1,177
Online time
3d 3h
Soyciety acts like it's purely about genetics or morality, but I think it's more about the dating market. Think about it- if fathers and brothers could fuck their daughters and sisters without consequences, chads would have a harder time getting access to them. The family guys would have first dibs since they're right there.

The incest taboo basically forces men to send their daughters out into the dating pool where chads and high status males can scoop them up. Meanwhile, you notice how the rules never really seem to apply to the elites anyway? Kings and royalty have been keeping it in the family for centuries while also collecting everyone else's daughters. Look at Trump or Biden, it's pretty obvious they fucked their daughters. It's one rule for the plebs and another for them.

And the taboo is actually gynocentric too, since it gives foids more options. It forces them to look outside the family instead of being limited to their dad or brother.

It's a cucked system, but most men are too conditioned to see it.
 
Incest is disgusting.
 
Whatever you say motherfucker
 
The reason is evolution, that's why there's an incest taboo.
 
The reason is evolution, that's why there's an incest taboo.
If evolution prevented incest, it'd be biologically impossible, not just a social taboo. Also, if we're wired to avoid it, why the hell do we need severe punishments to enforce it?
 
If evolution prevented incest, it'd be biologically impossible, not just a social taboo. Also, if we're wired to avoid it, why the hell do we need severe punishments to enforce it?
That's deep, ngl.
 
Soyciety acts like it's purely about genetics or morality, but I think it's more about the dating market. Think about it- if fathers and brothers could fuck their daughters and sisters without consequences, chads would have a harder time getting access to them. The family guys would have first dibs since they're right there.

The incest taboo basically forces men to send their daughters out into the dating pool where chads and high status males can scoop them up. Meanwhile, you notice how the rules never really seem to apply to the elites anyway? Kings and royalty have been keeping it in the family for centuries while also collecting everyone else's daughters. Look at Trump or Biden, it's pretty obvious they fucked their daughters. It's one rule for the plebs and another for them.

And the taboo is actually gynocentric too, since it gives foids more options. It forces them to look outside the family instead of being limited to their dad or brother.

It's a cucked system, but most men are too conditioned to see it.
I won't support incest or cousin diddling but elites who are still ruling over you practiced or still practice incest to maintain wealth and blood purity.
If grown ass family members are consenting to this relationship then who are we to judge?(This is a liberal argument not mine)
 
Based, prudes will never understand.
 
If evolution prevented incest, it'd be biologically impossible, not just a social taboo. Also, if we're wired to avoid it, why the hell do we need severe punishments to enforce it?
Incest would never be biologically impossible since all males and females would have the same reproductive systems, whether it's a sibling or not.

We have punishments because we were disgusted by incest. The repulsion came first, we found incest disgusting, so when someone else does it, we also feel disgusted, so we punished it. Many other mammals naturally avoid incest, how do you explain that?
 
True probably, but most familial relations traditionally happened with cousins not immediate family members.
 
Incest would never be biologically impossible since all males and females would have the same reproductive systems, whether it's a sibling or not.

We have punishments because we were disgusted by incest. The repulsion came first, we found incest disgusting, so when someone else does it, we also feel disgusted, so we punished it. Many other mammals naturally avoid incest, how do you explain that?
You're twisting my point. I'm not saying our reproduction systems would be different, I'm saying evolution would've made us not want to do it.

And the ''disgust'' argument is exactly what I'm talking about. It's not some magic feeling we're born with, it's something we learn. Why weren't Egyptian royals disgusted by marrying their siblings? Why are some people fine with cousin marriage and others find it disgusting? It's social, not biological.

As for animals, yeah some avoid it, but plenty don't. Many species will actually engage in incest when they can't find other mates, proving it's not a hard biological rule.
 
We have punishments because we were disgusted by incest. The repulsion came first, we found incest disgusting, so when someone else does it, we also feel disgusted, so we punished it. Many other mammals naturally avoid incest, how do you explain that?
All conditioned to the population by morality as a result of culture
 
And the ''disgust'' argument is exactly what I'm talking about. It's not some magic feeling we're born with, it's something we learn. Why weren't Egyptian royals disgusted by marrying their siblings? Why are some people fine with cousin marriage and others find it disgusting? It's social, not biological.
 
Family dynamics and values also comes into play basically it all boils down to cultural values (inherently flawed delusions) that are coerced onto us as children.
 
Man, dudes so down bad that they have to resort to incestmaxixng. Grim world we live in.
 
And the ''disgust'' argument is exactly what I'm talking about. It's not some magic feeling we're born with, it's something we learn. Why weren't Egyptian royals disgusted by marrying their siblings? Why are some people fine with cousin marriage and others find it disgusting? It's social, not biological.
Spot on.
 
Forgot to add that the fact close relatives like siblings, or even a parent and child, who were separated and meet as strangers often find each other attractive proves this is social, not evolutionary. If biology prevented incest, that attraction wouldn't exist regardless of whether they grew up together.
 
Forgot to add that the fact close relatives like siblings, or even a parent and child, who were separated and meet as strangers often find each other attractive proves this is social, not evolutionary. If biology prevented incest, that attraction wouldn't exist regardless of whether they grew up together.
This is the nail in the coffin.

The so called "natural disgust" is an aversion that only develops from the fact that you grew up together. But it is possible to get over that. If you didn't know that someone is your relative, there would be no disgust at all.

 
This is the nail in the coffin.

The so called "natural disgust" is an aversion that only develops from the fact that you grew up together. But it is possible to get over that. If you didn't know that someone is your relative, there would be no disgust at all.

Exactly
 

Similar threads

TheFinalFrontier
Replies
18
Views
915
TheFinalFrontier
TheFinalFrontier
shyguy096
Replies
13
Views
540
FastBlast
FastBlast
trrrrrsarescary
Replies
3
Views
658
jo_yugislayer08
jo_yugislayer08
andrewphillips25082
Replies
9
Views
280
nihilum
nihilum
darkpilledsoldier
Replies
60
Views
2K
darkpilledsoldier
darkpilledsoldier

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top