Serious The problem with Nazism

[Macrocephalus]

National-Socialism sounds pretty good in theory.
No Jooos, traditional values (aka no degeneracy), strong cohesiveness throughout the society due to it being really homogeneous. That's a key feature to enforce socialist policies because socialism requires wealth to be distributed and humans are usually only willing to do that for people they perceive as part of their own kind. Generally whenever a capitalist government wants to get rid of welfare policies they use race-baiting to divide people. Take Reagan's made-up "welfare queen" from Detroit who drove a Cadillac thanks to gubbmint-bux. Although he never clearly stated her race everybody assumed she was black and nobody likes to see his taxes used to finance a nigress's expensive habits.

So what's the problem with the way Hitler actually enforced his policies? Eugenics.
If you decide disabled people shouldn't get to reproduce, it's probably just a matter of time before no one is allowed to reproduce except Chad (or should we say Hans, or Fritz, or Karl-Heinz). See Lebensborn project for example.

Mengele was deeply fascinated by twins because he looked for a scientific way to induce multiple births in women.
Had he managed to pull that off, what would have stopped the Nazi government to let Chad/Hans impregnate one woman to have 4 babies from a single pregnancy, instead of having 4 genetically-mediocre normies impregnate 4 women? Probably nothing. That would be inconsistent with Nazi policies.

So while the concept of National-Socialism is appealing, its particular interpretation enforced by the NSDAP is not the answer for low-value men

 

[Govid_Dorious]

Incels need to be wiped, free us from our misery, my Fuhrer!

 

[nice_try]

Hitler, ER and myself have something in common: We hate incels.

 

[Asgard]

The problem with chads.is: there's too much wet water flooding the whole forum.

 

[mlcurrycel]

National-Socialism sounds pretty good in theory.
No Jooos, traditional values (aka no degeneracy), strong cohesiveness throughout the society due to it being really homogeneous. That's a key feature to enforce socialist policies because socialism requires wealth to be distributed and humans are usually only willing to do that for people they perceive as part of their own kind. Generally whenever a capitalist government wants to get rid of welfare policies they use race-baiting to divide people. Take Reagan's made-up "welfare queen" from Detroit who drove a Cadillac thanks to gubbmint-bux. Although he never clearly stated her race everybody assumed she was black and nobody likes to see his taxes used to finance a nigress's expensive habits.

So what's the problem with the way Hitler actually enforced his policies? Eugenics.
If you decide disabled people shouldn't get to reproduce, it's probably just a matter of time before no one is allowed to reproduce except Chad (or should we say Hans, or Fritz, or Karl-Heinz). See Lebensborn project for example.

Mengele was deeply fascinated by twins because he looked for a scientific way to induce multiple births in women.
Had he managed to pull that off, what would have stopped the Nazi government to let Chad/Hans impregnate one woman to have 4 babies from a single pregnancy, instead of having 4 genetically-mediocre normies impregnate 4 women? Probably nothing. That would be inconsistent with Nazi policies.

So while the concept of National-Socialism is appealing, its particular interpretation enforced by the NSDAP is not the answer for low-value men

Nazism and Social Darwinism is Chad Worship

 

[ElTruecel]

Eugenics isn’t necessarily exclusive to it. The idea of eugenics should be to prevent these issues from occurring in the place.

 

[Robespierre]

Hitler, ER and myself have something in common: We hate incels.

Do you hate yourself?

 

[Repulsive123]

The problem with chads.is: there's too much wet water flooding the whole forum.

 

[proudweeb]

The problem is they would have euthanized people like us, or at least, we wouldn't have been reproducing anyway

But then again, in a generation or two, there wouldn't be any incel-tier men. Kind of a catch 22

 

[Macrocephalus]

Nazism and Social Darwinism is Chad Worship

"Nazism is female sexuality as an ideology"

 

[nice_try]

Do you hate yourself?

ofc, how can you be incel and not hate yourself? lol

 

[lifefuel]

ofc, how can you be incel and not hate yourself? lol

Because you realize the injustice that has been visited upon you.

 

[mlcurrycel]

The problem is they would have euthanized people like us, or at least, we wouldn't have been reproducing anyway

But then again, in a generation or two, there wouldn't be any incel-tier men. Kind of a catch 22

You have to understand, Nazis believed in Social Darwinism, they would keep killing off the bottom men. There would be no endpoint to their eugenics.

Hypergamy floats anyways.

 

[mlcurrycel]

"Nazism is female sexuality as an ideology"

Exactly, you're right

 

[mlcurrycel]

ofc, how can you be incel and not hate yourself? lol

Why would I hate myself when it is the world that is wrong?

 

[CRASH THE CUCK]

The idea of eugenics should be to prevent these issues from occurring in the first place.

 

[LeFrenchCel]

Hitler was a chad worshipper and organized the killings of what he considered to be subhumans
He did what current society is doing with us, I don't see how incels can consider nazism as based

 

[Maikowski]

National Socialism is the only legitimate revolutionary movement, if you don't support NSism you are a bootlicker

 

[nice_try]

Why would I hate myself when it is the world that is wrong?

It's difficult to tell what's right and what's wrong. Different people have different oppinions on what is right or wrong, so there's no definitive answer to it. The world is what it is and you're just unable to adapt to it, which makes you weak and I hate myself for being weak.

 

[TouhouMathcel]

National-Socialism sounds pretty good in theory.
No Jooos, traditional values (aka no degeneracy), strong cohesiveness throughout the society due to it being really homogeneous. That's a key feature to enforce socialist policies because socialism requires wealth to be distributed and humans are usually only willing to do that for people they perceive as part of their own kind. Generally whenever a capitalist government wants to get rid of welfare policies they use race-baiting to divide people. Take Reagan's made-up "welfare queen" from Detroit who drove a Cadillac thanks to gubbmint-bux. Although he never clearly stated her race everybody assumed she was black and nobody likes to see his taxes used to finance a nigress's expensive habits.

So what's the problem with the way Hitler actually enforced his policies? Eugenics.
If you decide disabled people shouldn't get to reproduce, it's probably just a matter of time before no one is allowed to reproduce except Chad (or should we say Hans, or Fritz, or Karl-Heinz). See Lebensborn project for example.

Mengele was deeply fascinated by twins because he looked for a scientific way to induce multiple births in women.
Had he managed to pull that off, what would have stopped the Nazi government to let Chad/Hans impregnate one woman to have 4 babies from a single pregnancy, instead of having 4 genetically-mediocre normies impregnate 4 women? Probably nothing. That would be inconsistent with Nazi policies.

So while the concept of National-Socialism is appealing, its particular interpretation enforced by the NSDAP is not the answer for low-value men

In fact the Nazis actually killed many so-called "subhumans" among whom there could be incels

 

[mlcurrycel]

It's difficult to tell what's right and what's wrong. Different people have different oppinions on what is right or wrong, so there's no definitive answer to it. The world is what it is and you're just unable to adapt to it, which makes you weak and I hate myself for being weak.

There's no adapting your face my nigga. There's no adapting your genes. No epigenetics for your face.

What we need to do is make society adapt to give us wives.

 

[Macrocephalus]

The problem is they would have euthanized people like us, or at least, we wouldn't have been reproducing anyway

But then again, in a generation or two, there wouldn't be any incel-tier men. Kind of a catch 22

I don't think you can ever achieve that. First of all ugly/mediocre looking women would still get to reproduce thus passing their genes. I guess you could restrict reproduction to a tiny minority of selected specimens not only among men but even among women, i.e. only top 20% of men and top 20% of women get to reproduce. I don't think you could get the birthrate you need to keep the population stable only from such a tiny minority of people but even in that case, genetics still remains somewhat of a lottery.

And even if you do succeed in eradicating ugly people, normies would become the new ugly and so on.

I reckon in any case each generation would have his fair share of men deemed undesirable

 

[mlcurrycel]

I don't think you can ever achieve that. First of all ugly/mediocre looking women would still get to reproduce thus passing their genes. I guess you could restrict reproduction to a tiny minority of selected specimens not only among men but even among women, i.e. only top 20% of men and top 20% of women get to reproduce. I don't think you could get the birthrate you need to keep the population stable only from such a tiny minority of people but even in that case, genetics still remains somewhat of a lottery.

And even if you do succeed in eradicating ugly people, normies would become the new ugly and so on.

I reckon in any case each generation would have his fair share of men deemed undesirable

Precisely, I'm so thankful that at least some people on this forum have thought this through

RIP Paul Proteus, we stand on the shoulders of giants