COVID, election fraud, "Critical Race Theory"/BLM and guns/self-defense have been the main political issues of the 2020s, and this has been GREAT for the ability of "conservative", Trump supporting, or "libertarian" white women to fuck who they want, be degenerate, etc. and has even improved their value because of right-wing simps, for reasons I will explain here.
First of all, let me say that I am against the government mandating that anything go into anyone's body, unless in immediate defense of people or property, to secure arrests, or in war. That includes gene therapeutic mandates. My opinions on the COVID scamdemic lab leak can be summed up here (skip to the TL;DR if you want to skip it):
"We shouldn’t make a habit of insulating our immune systems from being able to handle pandemics. We are making sure that it will be far more disastrous in the event that modern technology fails us and we are unable to supply everyone with masks or other immune system coddling bullshit.
More pandemics will come. A frequently-masked population is one that, in the long term, is more susceptible to pandemics and will have more deaths from pandemics because it has much weaker immune systems due to frequent masking. Masking delays herd immunity and ensures that whatever pandemic occurs will last longer, and then since viruses mutate so fast, by the time “masking” is over a new strain will always be around than existed originally and thus it ensures that pandemics will not only last longer, but as soon as people “unmask” which they inevitably must to preserve any element of their immune system and lung capacity and oxygen to their brain and living life to its fullest in the long-term unhindered and independent, cases are pre-determined to spike anyway.
This means that any “masking” strategy is guaranteed to be a long time followed by a massive spike, all to achieve herd immunity anyway. Masking also creates super-viruses, as it means that diseases must adapt to having a harder time spreading by becoming MUCH more contagious, thus worsening the spike after masks must be inevitably removed.
“But the vaccine!” you say. There is no vaccine in the West, only a gene therapeutic, something which must be administered in multiple doses. Usually, when something has to be administered in multiple doses, it’s because it would kill you if it were just in one dose. Even if they were vaccines, they don’t justify mask-wearing. But they aren’t.
The truth is, the mouse antibodies in the gene therapeutics being marketed as vaccines are stifling our bodies’ ability to develop natural antibodies for ANYTHING, which is WHY YOU HAVE TO GET ANOTHER ONE EVERY SIX MONTHS.
This makes people dependent on whomever is delivering the gene therapeutics, as people are fine BEFORE they get the gene therapeutic, but after they get them, they have to KEEP getting them, and in the same style using the same algorithm in the same complex way they don’t understand (AKA from the same powerful provider) because their natural ability to produce antibodies has been so weakened and they are more susceptible and likely to suffer greater from all kinds of diseases now."
TL;DR
I agree that COVID masking and the gene therapeutics being marketed as vaccines are bad. However, THIS SHOULD BE COMMON SENSE. By allowing the "right" to be defined almost solely by their opposition to """vaccines""" (this is contributed to by left-wing cancel culture and gatekeeping, admittedly), "right-wing" white women (and even nonwhite "right-wing" women to an extent) no longer have to be "right-wing" in any meaningful sense (gender roles, natalism, marriage at a young age, modesty, anti-LGBTQ+, religion, etc.) to be not only accepted with open arms by the right, but also actively simped for.
This has been a problem basically since the '80s, but it has gotten MUCH worse in the 2020s for the reasons I am talking about. At least a woman used to have to oppose her "right" to have an abortion to be accepted as "right-wing" JFL
.
An important thing to note here is that no woman can truly be ideological, they merely pursue what is socially acceptable in whatever order or zeitgeist they're in coupled with pushing the envelope ever further towards breeding exclusively asshole men who make them feel dominated the most, either individually or as a group (I call these men bolgads). Thus, they are not ideological beings like men are.
"Right-wing" women in Western democracies are just the women who are more concerned with social acceptability and leeching off of the majority of successful provider men who lean against the left, or social status from their Evangelical/traditional-leaning church (increasingly irrelevant, but could be said to have some influence as recently as the '00s).
"Left-wing" women are just the women more concerned with pushing the envelope to fuck and on a societal level, increase the relative breeding success of, bolgads, and improve their social acceptability among massive global elite institutions. This is why younger and unmarried women tend to lean strongly "left", but as they age they get less "left", and if they get married, even less so.
Women as a whole still lean "left" politically, for obvious reasons. As churches become less and less influential, marriages become less and less common, right-wing ideas become increasingly less socially acceptable, and women become more and more genetically and socially degenerate, they will only become even more "left-wing", in the long run.
But in the short term, the "right" is doing slightly better than their trough in November 2020.
The George Floyd BLM riots and the Kyle Rittenhouse case have led to "guns/self-defense" being an important political issue in the 2020s, as more and more people, including leftists, buy guns for the first time (thanks in large part to the populist, collectivist uprising in youth political thought between 2015 and 2020 that increased the popularity of both revolutionary communism and revolutionary fascism among zoomers and to a lesser extent millennials dramatically over that time span) and believe strongly in self-defense against our increasingly late stage of neoliberalism.
While I fully oppose gun control (people should be allowed to own nukes or whatever weapons they please with ease so long as they don't damage others or their property), focusing on this issue without a backbone in anything else is silly. Right to fight- for what? Against what?
This is why "right-wing" women LOVE the right focusing on this issue as one of their main priorities- it doesn't require them to stick to any right-wing principles, or even economic ones such as abolishing welfare so as to not force betabux to indirectly against his will pay for bolgads' babies by paying single moms to do nothing. They literally can just be whores, but walk around with a gun strapped to their back and a MAGA hat and right-wing dudes will simp like there's no tomorrow.
This is why supporting gun rights without much of a platform or direction outside of that is, pardon the metaphor, like having a gun but not knowing what to aim at. Directionless- just the way suburban white Republican women like it.
Election fraud is another issue like that. I'm not even convinced that Biden wouldn't have won the electoral college vote did no fraud take place, ie that what fraud did take place was enough to change the electoral college victor. I've seen decent arguments on both sides, tbh. But this issue is not inherently "right-wing" at all- fraud could be accused by both sides, as we've seen. So this is a perfect issue for "right-wing" women to virtue signal support for "their side" with without actually combatting feminism or egalitarianism at all. The right is foolish to make this issue 1/4 of their whole platform.
And finally, Critical Race Theory and BLM. This is a perfect opportunity for white women (who are like 90+% of "right-wing" women in America anyway) to virtue signal that they're "sympathetic" to the plight of "poor black business owners" getting their businesses burned down in inner cities and the plight of themselves (self-victimization) to the "anti-white" left, who are the "real racists!" as an attention grab. On the further end of the spectrum, they can virtue signal anti-black racism directly to Stormfront wiggers and Lauren Southernmaxx.
In other words, the political climate of the 2020s allows the social pressures keeping "right-wing" women in "check" (they haven't been meaningfully in check since the '50s, but this is the only unique behavior-limiting mechanism we have here) to be completely ignored utterly, and will cause the Overton Window to shift leftwards over time as the right has allowed ideas more left-wing than ever before to seep into it's movement in its fight against the current bate of leftist retardation. The phenomenon of right-wingers becoming increasingly right-wing is only true for men.
TL; DR tradthots bad, women always win in the end, they can either get all the privileges of being a left-wing or feminist woman in the modern global order or they can virtue signal that they don't like Fauci and then they're worshipped by right-wing men with money.
First of all, let me say that I am against the government mandating that anything go into anyone's body, unless in immediate defense of people or property, to secure arrests, or in war. That includes gene therapeutic mandates. My opinions on the COVID scamdemic lab leak can be summed up here (skip to the TL;DR if you want to skip it):
"We shouldn’t make a habit of insulating our immune systems from being able to handle pandemics. We are making sure that it will be far more disastrous in the event that modern technology fails us and we are unable to supply everyone with masks or other immune system coddling bullshit.
More pandemics will come. A frequently-masked population is one that, in the long term, is more susceptible to pandemics and will have more deaths from pandemics because it has much weaker immune systems due to frequent masking. Masking delays herd immunity and ensures that whatever pandemic occurs will last longer, and then since viruses mutate so fast, by the time “masking” is over a new strain will always be around than existed originally and thus it ensures that pandemics will not only last longer, but as soon as people “unmask” which they inevitably must to preserve any element of their immune system and lung capacity and oxygen to their brain and living life to its fullest in the long-term unhindered and independent, cases are pre-determined to spike anyway.
This means that any “masking” strategy is guaranteed to be a long time followed by a massive spike, all to achieve herd immunity anyway. Masking also creates super-viruses, as it means that diseases must adapt to having a harder time spreading by becoming MUCH more contagious, thus worsening the spike after masks must be inevitably removed.
“But the vaccine!” you say. There is no vaccine in the West, only a gene therapeutic, something which must be administered in multiple doses. Usually, when something has to be administered in multiple doses, it’s because it would kill you if it were just in one dose. Even if they were vaccines, they don’t justify mask-wearing. But they aren’t.
The truth is, the mouse antibodies in the gene therapeutics being marketed as vaccines are stifling our bodies’ ability to develop natural antibodies for ANYTHING, which is WHY YOU HAVE TO GET ANOTHER ONE EVERY SIX MONTHS.
This makes people dependent on whomever is delivering the gene therapeutics, as people are fine BEFORE they get the gene therapeutic, but after they get them, they have to KEEP getting them, and in the same style using the same algorithm in the same complex way they don’t understand (AKA from the same powerful provider) because their natural ability to produce antibodies has been so weakened and they are more susceptible and likely to suffer greater from all kinds of diseases now."
TL;DR
I agree that COVID masking and the gene therapeutics being marketed as vaccines are bad. However, THIS SHOULD BE COMMON SENSE. By allowing the "right" to be defined almost solely by their opposition to """vaccines""" (this is contributed to by left-wing cancel culture and gatekeeping, admittedly), "right-wing" white women (and even nonwhite "right-wing" women to an extent) no longer have to be "right-wing" in any meaningful sense (gender roles, natalism, marriage at a young age, modesty, anti-LGBTQ+, religion, etc.) to be not only accepted with open arms by the right, but also actively simped for.
This has been a problem basically since the '80s, but it has gotten MUCH worse in the 2020s for the reasons I am talking about. At least a woman used to have to oppose her "right" to have an abortion to be accepted as "right-wing" JFL
.An important thing to note here is that no woman can truly be ideological, they merely pursue what is socially acceptable in whatever order or zeitgeist they're in coupled with pushing the envelope ever further towards breeding exclusively asshole men who make them feel dominated the most, either individually or as a group (I call these men bolgads). Thus, they are not ideological beings like men are.
"Right-wing" women in Western democracies are just the women who are more concerned with social acceptability and leeching off of the majority of successful provider men who lean against the left, or social status from their Evangelical/traditional-leaning church (increasingly irrelevant, but could be said to have some influence as recently as the '00s).
"Left-wing" women are just the women more concerned with pushing the envelope to fuck and on a societal level, increase the relative breeding success of, bolgads, and improve their social acceptability among massive global elite institutions. This is why younger and unmarried women tend to lean strongly "left", but as they age they get less "left", and if they get married, even less so.
Women as a whole still lean "left" politically, for obvious reasons. As churches become less and less influential, marriages become less and less common, right-wing ideas become increasingly less socially acceptable, and women become more and more genetically and socially degenerate, they will only become even more "left-wing", in the long run.
But in the short term, the "right" is doing slightly better than their trough in November 2020.
The George Floyd BLM riots and the Kyle Rittenhouse case have led to "guns/self-defense" being an important political issue in the 2020s, as more and more people, including leftists, buy guns for the first time (thanks in large part to the populist, collectivist uprising in youth political thought between 2015 and 2020 that increased the popularity of both revolutionary communism and revolutionary fascism among zoomers and to a lesser extent millennials dramatically over that time span) and believe strongly in self-defense against our increasingly late stage of neoliberalism.
While I fully oppose gun control (people should be allowed to own nukes or whatever weapons they please with ease so long as they don't damage others or their property), focusing on this issue without a backbone in anything else is silly. Right to fight- for what? Against what?
This is why "right-wing" women LOVE the right focusing on this issue as one of their main priorities- it doesn't require them to stick to any right-wing principles, or even economic ones such as abolishing welfare so as to not force betabux to indirectly against his will pay for bolgads' babies by paying single moms to do nothing. They literally can just be whores, but walk around with a gun strapped to their back and a MAGA hat and right-wing dudes will simp like there's no tomorrow
.This is why supporting gun rights without much of a platform or direction outside of that is, pardon the metaphor, like having a gun but not knowing what to aim at. Directionless- just the way suburban white Republican women like it.
Election fraud is another issue like that. I'm not even convinced that Biden wouldn't have won the electoral college vote did no fraud take place, ie that what fraud did take place was enough to change the electoral college victor. I've seen decent arguments on both sides, tbh. But this issue is not inherently "right-wing" at all- fraud could be accused by both sides, as we've seen. So this is a perfect issue for "right-wing" women to virtue signal support for "their side" with without actually combatting feminism or egalitarianism at all. The right is foolish to make this issue 1/4 of their whole platform.
And finally, Critical Race Theory and BLM. This is a perfect opportunity for white women (who are like 90+% of "right-wing" women in America anyway) to virtue signal that they're "sympathetic" to the plight of "poor black business owners" getting their businesses burned down in inner cities and the plight of themselves (self-victimization) to the "anti-white" left, who are the "real racists!"
as an attention grab. On the further end of the spectrum, they can virtue signal anti-black racism directly to Stormfront wiggers and Lauren Southernmaxx.In other words, the political climate of the 2020s allows the social pressures keeping "right-wing" women in "check" (they haven't been meaningfully in check since the '50s, but this is the only unique behavior-limiting mechanism we have here) to be completely ignored utterly, and will cause the Overton Window to shift leftwards over time as the right has allowed ideas more left-wing than ever before to seep into it's movement in its fight against the current bate of leftist retardation. The phenomenon of right-wingers becoming increasingly right-wing is only true for men.
TL; DR tradthots bad, women always win in the end, they can either get all the privileges of being a left-wing or feminist woman in the modern global order or they can virtue signal that they don't like Fauci and then they're worshipped by right-wing men with money.
Last edited:
