I went down a rabbit hole of pinkpill content after another user posted about it here, initially I was skeptical of it but then after constantly seeing comments about how they're essentially mirror versions of us even using the same terminologies and metanarratives I began to investigate what the hell was going on here.
My guess is that the Pinkpill is what happens when you put toilets into echo chambers, where no men are allowed, of Feminists telling toilets that men are evil and Conservatives telling toilets that men are dangerous and out to get them. It's toilets internalising the societal misandric messages to create toilets that are perpetually suspicious of all and any "m*les".
I saw a post criticising "boymoms" (mothers who gave birth to sons)*, some posts were talking about how "men are incapable of loving", the vibe was overal very similar to FDS but still very different.
* = interestingly enough mothers with sons actually DO change, a part of their son's DNA stays behind and the hormones her body releases actually change her mental make-up forever, a lot more so than the already familiar hormones produced for female offspring. Plus having a son actually makes toilets empathetic for a male in their lives, probably the only males they are actually capable of feeling empathy towards.
My guess is that because these toilets have been going into toilet-only echo chambers where toilets bad-mouth men all the time that they developed a very strong social aversion towards men. I don't think that lookism plays a strong part in the Pinkpill, their hatred is towards all men, it's what happens when they only talk to other toilets about men and never actually have a conversation with a man. No wonder they ban men from their spaces, they don't want their delusional thoughts challenged by a man to point out the flaws of their arguments.
These toilets have essentially turned men into this evil "other" made up of opportunitistic creatures that only use toilets for their own pleasure and dump them after they're bored with them... Wait, no, these men exist, they're called Chad's. One even said that she thought "ugly men are the way to go" but that ugly men are the same as attractive men, in other words she went for a disgusting Chadlite or a Chadlet.
These toilets are so disconnected from men that they started making up the worst possible things about men to paint us in a bad light, their own lack of empathy towards men and the projecting of female nature (monkey-branching, incapable of loving "low value" partners, pickiness, Etc.) onto men.
They remind me a lot about the Radfems of the days of yore but I haven't seen some call for the outright extermination of "scrotes", yet (something that Radfems love to do).
I would describe the Pinkpill as essentially being "Female Dating Strategy for low self-esteem toilets". The thing about Toilet Dating Strategy is that it's similar but without all the unearned self-pity (unlike us Incels who actually have earned our self-pity).
TL;DR
The Pinkpill is what you get if you overdose on misandry to the point where you can't interact with the complimentary sex without only inferring bad motivations from any action undertaken by a male.
In other words their misandry is so bad that it made them unable to actually Interact with men as fellow human beings.
My guess is that the Pinkpill is what happens when you put toilets into echo chambers, where no men are allowed, of Feminists telling toilets that men are evil and Conservatives telling toilets that men are dangerous and out to get them. It's toilets internalising the societal misandric messages to create toilets that are perpetually suspicious of all and any "m*les".
I saw a post criticising "boymoms" (mothers who gave birth to sons)*, some posts were talking about how "men are incapable of loving", the vibe was overal very similar to FDS but still very different.
* = interestingly enough mothers with sons actually DO change, a part of their son's DNA stays behind and the hormones her body releases actually change her mental make-up forever, a lot more so than the already familiar hormones produced for female offspring. Plus having a son actually makes toilets empathetic for a male in their lives, probably the only males they are actually capable of feeling empathy towards.
My guess is that because these toilets have been going into toilet-only echo chambers where toilets bad-mouth men all the time that they developed a very strong social aversion towards men. I don't think that lookism plays a strong part in the Pinkpill, their hatred is towards all men, it's what happens when they only talk to other toilets about men and never actually have a conversation with a man. No wonder they ban men from their spaces, they don't want their delusional thoughts challenged by a man to point out the flaws of their arguments.
These toilets have essentially turned men into this evil "other" made up of opportunitistic creatures that only use toilets for their own pleasure and dump them after they're bored with them... Wait, no, these men exist, they're called Chad's.
One even said that she thought "ugly men are the way to go" but that ugly men are the same as attractive men, in other words she went for a disgusting Chadlite or a Chadlet. These toilets are so disconnected from men that they started making up the worst possible things about men to paint us in a bad light, their own lack of empathy towards men and the projecting of female nature (monkey-branching, incapable of loving "low value" partners, pickiness, Etc.) onto men.
They remind me a lot about the Radfems of the days of yore but I haven't seen some call for the outright extermination of "scrotes", yet (something that Radfems love to do).
I would describe the Pinkpill as essentially being "Female Dating Strategy for low self-esteem toilets". The thing about Toilet Dating Strategy is that it's similar but without all the unearned self-pity (unlike us Incels who actually have earned our self-pity
).TL;DR
The Pinkpill is what you get if you overdose on misandry to the point where you can't interact with the complimentary sex without only inferring bad motivations from any action undertaken by a male.
In other words their misandry is so bad that it made them unable to actually Interact with men as fellow human beings.
