The one to blame

[Angry_runt]

Meet Whitney Wolfe.

She is one of the founders of Tinder. She was a marketing exec and is credited with popularizing Tinder on college campuses.
After a couple of years she quit the company, sued the other execs for sexual harassment and got a payoff.
Then she founded Bumble, which is like Tinder on steroids. On Tinder you can't send a message until the other person likes your pic. On Bumble only foids can send photos, because what if a foid swipes on an ugly guy by accident and gets a message from him? Can't have that.

Anyway, Ms Wolfe's net worth is now, at age 29, around $250 million. Her blood money for ruining the lives of hundreds of millions of men and who knows how many more in the future.

Fuck this world, fuck this life, there's no justice, there is no hope.

 

[tooth monster]

You forgot to mention one important detail. (((Wolfe))).
gas the kikes race war now

 

[Deleted member 8206]

After a couple of years she quit the company, sued the other execs for sexual harassment and got a payoff.

 

[NeetSupremacist]

“My mother’s family is Catholic, and my father’s family is Jewish,” Wolfe says. “I think I benefited from that because I grew up with such an understanding of everybody. I went to a Jewish preschool but then a private Catholic high school. I grew up with a cultural understanding of different people, traditions, ways of life.”

https://atxwoman.com/whitney-wolfe/

She is Jewish...... It wasn't a meme after all!

 

[Insomniac]

Meet the Jewish founders of Tinder

Finding dates used to require approaches such as hiring matchmakers, signing up for dancing and cooking classes, attending synagogue, asking friends for help, or, for the least energetic, merely creating a cursory profile on sites such as JDate.

jewishjournal.com

 

[Deleted member 17889]

Hope she gets ER'd

or at least kneecapped

 

[YungCell]

It's in (((her))) blood to profit off of the misery of others

 

[Deleted member 15752]

It's in (((her))) blood to profit off of the misery of others

 

[Angry_runt]

You forgot to mention one important detail. (((Wolfe))).
gas the kikes race war now

She went to a Catholic high school and the Southern Methodist University. Fuck off with your Jew conspiracies, she did everything because she's a foid and like all foids she despises ugly men.

 

[YungCell]

She went to a Catholic high school and the Southern Methodist University. Fuck off with your Jew conspiracies, she did everything because she's a foid and like all foids she despises ugly men.

“My mother’s family is Catholic, and my father’s family is Jewish,” Wolfe says. “I think I benefited from that because I grew up with such an understanding of everybody. I went to a Jewish preschool but then a private Catholic high school. I grew up with a cultural understanding of different people, traditions, ways of life.”

https://atxwoman.com/whitney-wolfe/

She is Jewish...... It wasn't a meme after all!

Thanks @NeetSupremacist

 

[Angry_runt]

She is Jewish...... It wasn't a meme after all!

Half Jewish... and irrelevant. By focusing on her ancestry you are absolving her gender and its nature, basically whiteknighting.

 

[tooth monster]

She went to a Catholic high school and the Southern Methodist University. Fuck off with your Jew conspiracies, she did everything because she's a foid and like all foids she despises ugly men.

Look at her nose dumbass

 

[Angry_runt]

Look at her nose dumbass

Again, irrelevant and stop whiteknighting.

 

[PotatoTomato]

It's in (((her))) blood to profit off of the misery of others

 

[YungCell]

Half Jewish... and irrelevant. By focusing on her ancestry you are absolving her gender and its nature, basically whiteknighting.

What kind if elementary school argument is this? I am not absolving her or her gender of anything, her ancestry just happens to fall in line with the same ancestral lineage as the group of people with the broadest and most consistent history of causing misery and profiting off of it, and i think its valid to point that out. Stop with the slippery reverse psychology strawman arguments, jew.

 

[jerrycan dan]

Whitney Wolfe Herd


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




Jump to navigation Jump to search

Whitney Wolfe Herd
Born	Whitney Wolfe July 1, 1989 (age 29)[1] Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.
Residence	Austin, Texas
Nationality	American
Education	Southern Methodist University
Occupation	Entrepreneur, Business executive
Known for	Founder and CEO of Bumble
Net worth	$250 million[2]
Spouse(s)	Michael Herd

Whitney Wolfe Herd (born July 1, 1989) is an American entrepreneur. She is founder and CEO of Bumble, and a co-founder of the dating app Tinder. The founder of Badoo contacted Wolfe Herd about creating a dating platform and partnered with her on a new company in 2014, launching Bumble that year.[3] Bumble is launching into new verticals such as BumbleBizz, and launched BumbleBFF for finding friends. According to Forbes, the company is valued at more than $1 billion.[4]
Wolfe Herd was named one of Business Insider's 30 Most Important Women Under 30 In Tech in 2014. In 2016, she was named as one of Elle's Women in Tech.[5] Wolfe Herd was named as one of 2017's and 2018's Forbes 30 Under 30.[6][7] Wolfe Herd was also named one of Inc's 15 Female Entrepreneurs to Watch Out For in 2017.[8] She has been featured on the covers of Forbes,[4] Fast Company,[9] and Wired UK.[10] In April 2018 she was named in the TIME 100 List.[11]
Contents

• 1 Early life and education
• 2 Career
  • 2.1 Tinder
  • 2.2 Bumble
  • 2.3 Chappy
• 3 Personal life
• 4 See also
• 5 References
• 6 External links

Early life and education
Wolfe Herd was born in Salt Lake City, Utah, to property developer Michael Wolfe and his wife Kelly. Wolfe Herd attended Judge Memorial Catholic High School. When she was in 4th grade the family did a sabbatical in Paris, France, and she became fluent in French as a result. Wolfe Herd attended Southern Methodist University, where she majored in International Studies. She was a member of the Kappa Kappa Gamma sorority.[12][13] Her junior year she studied abroad at Sorbonne University in Paris.[14] While in college and at the age of 19, she started a business selling bamboo tote bags benefiting areas affected by the BP oil spill. Wolfe Herd partnered with celebrity stylist Patrick Aufdenkamp to launch the non-profit organization called the "Help Us Project." The bags received national press after celebrities such as Rachel Zoe and Nicole Richie were photographed with them.[15][16] After graduating, Wolfe Herd traveled to Southeast Asia where she worked with orphanages.[17][18]
Career
Tinder
At age 22, Wolfe Herd joined Hatch Labs. Through Hatch, she became involved with the startup Cardify, a project led by Sean Rad through Hatch Labs IAC incubator. The project was later abandoned, but Wolfe Herd joined the dating app Tinder with Rad, Chris Gulczynski in 2012 within the IAC startup incubator.[1][19][20]
Wolfe Herd became vice president of marketing for Tinder[13][18][14] and was reportedly behind the name of the app, taking the idea from the flame logo and having used tinder (small sticks) to start the fireplace at her father's cabin in Montana. She has also been credited with fueling its popularity on college campuses and growing its user base.[21] Wolfe Herd left the company in 2014. Her departure from Tinder was in part due to growing tensions with other company executives. After leaving the company, Herd filed a lawsuit against Tinder for sexual harassment.[22] Wolfe Herd reportedly received a more than $1 million settlement in addition to stock in the company.[13]
Bumble
Andrey Andreev, founder of Badoo, contacted Wolfe Herd about creating a dating platform and partnered with Wolfe Herd,[23][12][13] and the company remains majority owned by Badoo.[24] Wolfe Herd moved to Austin, Texas and founded Bumble, a dating app that gives women more control than traditional dating apps, in December 2014.[22][18] By December 2015, the app had reached over 15 million unique conversations and 80 million matches.[22]
As of April 2016, Tinder and Bumble are the first and fourth most popular dating apps respectively, according to monthly user base. As of November 2017, Bumble had amassed over 22 million registered users.[25] In January 2018, CNBC reported that Badoo was seeking a sale that could value the company at about $1.5 billion.[26]
Wolfe Herd was named one of Business Insider's 30 Most Important Women Under 30 In Tech in 2014. In 2016, she was named as one of Elle's Women in Tech.[5] She was named to Forbes 30 under 30 in 2017 and 2018.[4][7]
In December 2017, she was listed in a TechCrunch feature on 42 women succeeding in tech that year.[27]
In March 2019, Wolfe Herd testified before the Texas House Criminal Jurisprudence committee about an issue of unsolicited explicit photos sent to female users on dating applications.[28]
Chappy
Chappy was co-founded by Jack Rogers, Max Cheremkin and Ollie Locke. Its funding comes from dating giant Bumble and its CEO Whitney Wolfe Herd.
Wolfe Herd, impressed by the team's unique approach, led a seed round investment in Chappy.[29] In 2016, TechCrunch wrote: “The company is not disclosing the details of the investment, but they did say that Bumble is the sole investor in the round and will take an equity stake. In exchange, Bumble will be offering product development and marketing support.”[30]
Similarly to Bumble, Chappy is majority owned by Andrey Andreev and is being developed under umbrella of Badoo Group.[31]
Personal life
She is married to Michael Herd.[32]
See also

• Comparison of online dating services

References

• Josie Ensor (May 23, 2015). "Tinder co-founder Whitney Wolfe: 'The word 'feminist' seemed to put guys off, but now I realise, who cares?'". Telegraph.
• 
  
• "Whitney Wolfe: 10 Things You Didn't Know About the CEO of Bumble". Money Inc. Retrieved February 14, 2018.
• 
  
• "How I Built This".
• 
  
• Clare O'Connor (November 14, 2017). "Billion-Dollar Bumble: How Whitney Wolfe Herd Built America's Fastest-Growing Dating App". Forbes. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
• 
  
• Molly Langmuir (May 13, 2016). "Meet Elle's 2016 Women in Tech". Elle.
• 
  
• "Meet The Consumer Technology 30 Under 30 Class Of 2017".
• 
  
• "Forbes Releases 2018 Edition of the 30 Under 30 List". Forbes. November 14, 2017. Retrieved December 31, 2017.
• 
  
• "15 Female Entrepreneurs to Watch Out For in 2017".
• 
  
• Valby, Karen (August 28, 2017). "Bumble's CEO Takes Aim at LinkedIn". Fast Company. Retrieved December 31, 2017.
• 
  
• Tait, Amelia (August 30, 2017). "Swipe Right for Equality: How Bumble is Taking on Sexism". Wired UK. Retrieved December 31, 2017.
• 
  
• "Whitney Wolfe Herd: The World's 100 Most Influential People". Time. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
• 
  
• Charlotte Alter (May 15, 2015). "Whitney Wolfe Wants to Beat Tinder at Its Own Game". Time.
• 
  
• Hannah Ellis-Petersen (April 12, 2015). "WLTM Bumble – A dating app where women call the shots". The Guardian.
• 
  
• Suzannah Ramsdale. "Does Tinder empower women? This woman thinks so…". Marie Claire.
• 
  
• Hilary Hirschfeld (November 3, 2010). "SMU senior Whitney Wolfe launches second business, clothing line Tender Heart". Daily Campus.
• 
  
• "Meet Bumble chief executive Whitney Wolfe". The Washington Post. October 23, 2015.
• 
  
• Sarah Thurmond (August 2, 2015). "Queen Bee". Austin Monthly.
• 
  
• Kimya Kavehkar (March 7, 2016). "Whitney Wolfe: The Matchmaker". Paper Mag.
• 
  
• Melissah Yang (January 29, 2015). "Whitney Wolfe Says Goodbye Tinder, Hello Bumble". Los Angeles Business Journal.
• 
  
• Shontell, Alyson. "What It's Like To Found A $750 Million Startup, Go Through A Sexual-Harassment Lawsuit, And Start All Over By Age 25". Business Insider.
• 
  
• Tucker Cummings (July 1, 2014). "Tinder's Whitney Wolfe: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know". Heavy.
• 
  
• Todd C. Frankel (December 2, 2015). "Whitney Wolfe, founder of dating app Bumble, has had quite the year. She just can't discuss parts of it". The Washington Post.
• 
  
• Leora Yashari (August 7, 2015). "Meet the Tinder Co-Founder Trying to Change Online Dating Forever". Vanity Fair.
• 
  
• Ryan Mac (January 3, 2017). "2017 30 Under 30: Consumer Technology – 28 of 30". Forbes.
• 
  
• Clare O'Connor (November 14, 2017). "Billion-Dollar Bumble: How Whitney Wolfe Herd Built America's Fastest-Growing Dating App". Forbes.
• 
  
• Alex Sherman, Leslie Picker (January 23, 2018). "Badoo, the majority owner of the dating app Bumble, is seeking a sale that could value the company at $1.5 billion". CNBC.
• 
  
• "A look at 42 women in tech who crushed it in 2017". TechCrunch. December 22, 2017. Retrieved January 15, 2018.
• 
  
• "Texas May Outlaw Unsolicited Sexual Images. Would That Be Enforceable—and Does It Even Matter?". Texas Monthly. March 28, 2019. Retrieved April 5, 2019.
• 
  
• Bumble invests in gay dating app Chappy
• 
  
• Techcrunch December 14, 2016
• 
  
• "Report: Grindr's Chinese owner Kunlun is selling the dating app after CFIUS raised personal data concerns". TechCrunch. Retrieved April 5, 2019.

1. Macon, Alexandra (October 5, 2017). "Bumble Founder Whitney Wolfe's Whirlwind Wedding Was a True Celebration of Southern Italy". Vogue. Retrieved January 7, 2019.

External links

• How I Built This: Bumble (audio interview)

Categories:

• 1989 births
• Living people
• Businesspeople from Salt Lake City
• American Jews
• American computer businesspeople
• Southern Methodist University alumni
• American technology company founders
• American technology chief executives
• Women corporate executives
• American women chief executives

Do you see what I see?

 

[Deleted member 15752]

so much endless pain at the hand of one..

 

[Angry_runt]

I am not absolving her or her gender of anything

She either did what she did because she's a Jew or because she's a foid. If you think the former then you're absolving her gender. If you think the latter then her ancestry is irrelevant.

This site is filled with retarded nazicels who cuck themselves for their race. You were rejected by your own race first, by those closest and most similar to you. Not hating them the most is worse than any other form of cuckoldry.

 

[FrothySolutions]

A site where men, just for being men, can't speak unless spoken to. And somehow feminism is about "equality?" Why does this sound familiar?

 

[ihaveno1]

She is Jewish

no surprise here and she has the nose

 

[YungCell]

She either did what she did because she's a Jew or because she's a foid. If you think the former then you're absolving her gender. If you think the latter then her ancestry is irrelevant.

This site is filled with retarded nazicels who cuck themselves for their race. You were rejected by your own race first, by those closest and most similar to you. Not hating them the most is worse than any other form of cuckoldry.

No you fucking moron, the two are not mutually exclusive and even if they were and she did it soley because of her ancestry then that still doesnt absolve her gender of anything whatsoever. This isnt the place to try and cuck out of an argument by calling people Nazis, but for the sake of honesty being a "Nazicel" is relatively hypocritical unless you believe you should be euthanized.

 

[Deleted member 16455]

I think there is a curry behind tinder too JFL

 

[Blacktarpill]

She has our blood on her hands.

 

[Deleted member 10531]

You forgot to mention one important detail. (((Wolfe))).
gas the kikes race war now

Imagine still, after discovering the blackpill, thinking that other men are the problem.

 

[Deleted member 6470]

The real loser.

• Whitney Wolfe, 24, was awarded an undisclosed sum of money just two months after filing a lawsuit against Tinder
• Miss Wolfe had claimed she was subjected to sexual harassment, and then ultimately fired, after breaking up with co-founder Justin Mateen
• Mr. Mateen is now no longer with Tinder or parent company IAC, according to a source

 

[Angry_runt]

No you fucking moron, the two are not mutually exclusive

So what were her motives then?

and even if they were and she did it soley because of her ancestry then that still doesnt absolve her gender of anything whatsoever.

If you believe she made Tinder and Bumble because she's a Jew, then you're saying her being a woman had nothing to do with it = absolving her gender of what her gender has evolved to do.

This isnt the place to try and cuck out of an argument by calling people Nazis, but for the sake of honesty being a "Nazicel" is relatively hypocritical unless you believe you should be euthanized.

Jew conspiracy theories are retarded as is everyone who keeps falling for them. Here you have a foid with 100% foid motives to have done what she had done and you're excusing her gender so you could shoehorn your Jew conspiracy theories.
Keep whiteknighting faggot.

 

[YungCell]

So what were her motives then?



If you believe she made Tinder and Bumble because she's a Jew, then you're saying her being a woman had nothing to do with it = absolving her gender of what her gender has evolved to do.



Jew conspiracy theories are retarded as is everyone who keeps falling for them. Here you have a foid with 100% foid motives to have done what she had done and you're excusing her gender so you could shoehorn your Jew conspiracy theories.
Keep whiteknighting faggot.

Her motives were to make money and promote degeneracy. Where the fuck are you making the connection that her making it because shes a jew absolves her gender of anything whatsoever, it doesnt. Foids are still all emotionless shallow whores, just so happens that one of them also happened to be smart enough to apply her Jewry and make use of her connection to accommodate her genders desires and make a new market of degenerate hook ups and one night stands for the best looking men permanently skewing social dynamics. I dont follow a single jew conspiracy theory, I just recognize patterns so I guess the last part doesnt apply to me.

Side note: From the river to the sea Palastein shall be free.

 

[Hikikomori]

She has 250 million in savings for ruining a society, while we ask our parents for lunch money. The black pill is oh so bitter to digest. What a fucking world we live in, what a fucking world.

 

[Napoleon de Nascar]

How much of chad's cock she sucked?..

 

[StaroRavager]

Tinder’s influence has been blown out of proportion here

 

[incels.REEEE]

Meet Whitney Wolfe.

She is one of the founders of Tinder. She was a marketing exec and is credited with popularizing Tinder on college campuses.
After a couple of years she quit the company, sued the other execs for sexual harassment and got a payoff.
Then she founded Bumble, which is like Tinder on steroids. On Tinder you can't send a message until the other person likes your pic. On Bumble only foids can send photos, because what if a foid swipes on an ugly guy by accident and gets a message from him? Can't have that.

Anyway, Ms Wolfe's net worth is now, at age 29, around $250 million. Her blood money for ruining the lives of hundreds of millions of men and who knows how many more in the future.

Fuck this world, fuck this life, there's no justice, there is no hope.

Women like her make poopies on incels. This one is grossly influential with power to strike. High class low class she will stamp us with her feet!

Buga buga doing these thing... fortune cookie always wrong!

Btw tbh tbh you should heed these message buddy boyo.

 

[Angry_runt]

Tinder’s influence has been blown out of proportion here

If not for Tinder, some other dating app would have been the culprit.
But what it does is exert an upward pressure on the dating market and creates a feedback loop, sort of a virtuous/vicious cycle reinforcing itself.

Amazon slaughtered mom & pop stores and retail chains alike even though it's just one website. Tinder is doing the same to lower tiered men. Even foids who don't use Tinder benefit from it and even men who don't use Tinder suffer because of it.

 

[Lifeisbullshit95]

I think there is a curry behind tinder too JFL

tbh

 

[Enlightened_Alien]

About a hundred years ago you had to actually be producing something to be worth that much. There were no, or very few, people who were rich by social media or things of that nature.

 

[StaroRavager]

If not for Tinder, some other dating app would have been the culprit.
But what it does is exert an upward pressure on the dating market and creates a feedback loop, sort of a virtuous/vicious cycle reinforcing itself.

Amazon slaughtered mom & pop stores and retail chains alike even though it's just one website. Tinder is doing the same to lower tiered men. Even foids who don't use Tinder benefit from it and even men who don't use Tinder suffer because of it.

Given the fact that a majority foids have no need for online dating and have a plethora of males to choose from IRL, I fail to see how these sites are doing any significant or lasting damage. We’ve already come to the conclusion that only a small amount of foids actually use Tinder through estimations originally, but now with this 9:1 statistic the numbers have proven to be even smaller than what was initially assumed

 

[Angry_runt]

Given the fact that a majority foids have no need for online dating and have a plethora of males to choose from IRL, I fail to see how these sites are doing any significant or lasting damage. We’ve already come to the conclusion that only a small amount of foids actually use Tinder through estimations originally, but now with this 9:1 statistic the numbers have proven to be even smaller than what was initially assumed

It creates a self-reinforcing upward pressure on the foids' sexual market value and lowers the males' SMV the same way. You know this graph, right?

Let's say you have a 2/10 hambeast who uses Tinder and holds out a few weeks for a 4/10 guy and finally hooks up with him. Then their friends, who don't necessarily use Tinder, see this and it affects their behavior and the perception of male and female value. When they act on those perceptions (guys hooking up with below their looksmatch and foids hooking up with guys above) it will create a cascade effect that goes only one way: net lowering of male SMV and inflation of female SMV.
Add to that the decline of real-life interactions and hookups (nightlife industry is dying because of this - this and every other article about this kind of thing namedrops Tinder) and the concerns about sexual harrassment and we're seeing the entire society going the way of that graph.

Given the fact that a majority foids have no need for online dating and have a plethora of males to choose from IRL

Yeah, but they have to endure attempts of unattractive (80%) of men, whereas on Tinder the guy can't even say hi to her unless she likes his pic first. And she doesn't even have to go on a date with any of those guys to receive massive validation and confidence which she will then apply in real life. Foids are just beginning to realize how powerful they are. Every above average foid is a celebrity in her world, with dozens of guys vying for her attention and affection. For the guys the effect is precisely opposite.

 

[StaroRavager]

It creates a self-reinforcing upward pressure on the foids' sexual market value and lowers the males' SMV the same way. You know this graph, right?

Let's say you have a 2/10 hambeast who uses Tinder and holds out a few weeks for a 4/10 guy and finally hooks up with him. Then their friends, who don't necessarily use Tinder, see this and it affects their behavior and the perception of male and female value. When they act on those perceptions (guys hooking up with below their looksmatch and foids hooking up with guys above) it will create a cascade effect that goes only one way: net lowering of male SMV and inflation of female SMV.

You’re mixing up correlation and causation. If said 2/10 hambeast can find someone to fuck her on Tinder then it stands to reason that she can do so IRL. Hypergamy and juggernaut law are simply side effects of sexual reproduction and selection. Most foids will have at least 1-3 orbiters unless they’re absolutely deformed or 200 lbs overweight and that’s simply natural. At worst Tinder exacerbates these inequalities in the sexual marketplace but only to a small degree. If the 9:1 ratio is legit then that would mean that only 5.5 million foids are on it and that doesn’t even account for bots, catfishers, and foids who don’t seriously use it. Then you take that number and distribute it between all 1st world and several 2nd world countries and it’s effect in any given area plummets. From my observations it seems that only men take online dating seriously and draw conclusions based on sexual marketplace trends which makes sense given how much harder it is for males to attract a female

Add to that the decline of real-life interactions and hookups (nightlife industry is dying because of this - this and every other article about this kind of thing namedrops Tinder) and the concerns about sexual harrassment and we're seeing the entire society going the way of that graph.

If face to face interactions between males and females are diminishing than that would imply that online dating has exploded in popularity. However, the gradual fall of bars and nightclubs (as stated by your article) can also be attributed to overpopulation and several forms of business complications. Social circle, school, and workplace game still dominate most venues when it comes to the origins of a relationship and this is in fact where most people spend their time interacting with others. What your seeing here is a nonessential being replaced by a more efficient nonessential, the majority of the market still remains unchanged

Yeah, but they have to endure attempts of unattractive (80%) of men, whereas on Tinder the guy can't even say hi to her unless she likes his pic first. And she doesn't even have to go on a date with any of those guys to receive massive validation and confidence which she will then apply in real life. Foids are just beginning to realize how powerful they are. Every above average foid is a celebrity in her world, with dozens of guys vying for her attention and affection. For the guys the effect is precisely opposite.

Foids aren’t the ones dropping out of society however. Most of them are not adverse to immersing themselves in the society at large. As a result they will be forced to interact with others and they will meet males who will meet the looks standard (which flies in the face of the 80/20 rule) and then things will “fall into place”. It’s true that social media is inflating the ego of many a foid but that doesn’t mean they use as their only channel for the reception of validation. These same foids who get hundreds of likes online also has a horde of orbiters IRL who would drop almost everything to to get a chance with her. Unless a majority of foids go NEET and begin living in their rooms, most relatioships will spring from real life interactions

 

[Angry_runt]

If said 2/10 hambeast can find someone to fuck her on Tinder then it stands to reason that she can do so IRL.

To find someone to fuck her on Tinder all she has to do is join Tinder, take a few photos and wait. She'll have a dozen takers within a few days or a few hours, depending. To find someone to fuck her IRL (by the way, Tinder is real life now), she has to go out and interact with people. It doesn't matter if a guy who sees her at a bar wants to fuck her if he doesn't approach for whatever reason. Go to a club and watch how often a 2/10 warpig gets approached. Then do the same with her pics on Tinder. Then realize she has to be at a club at a specific time to get approached by the specific guys that happen to be there at the same time.
No, the quantity and quality of men she'll have available on Tinder isn't even comparable. Note that "available" in real life means a guy that approached her and nothing less than that.

Most foids will have at least 1-3 orbiters unless they’re absolutely deformed or 200 lbs overweight and that’s simply natural.

Sure, but on Tinder she'll have 30 guys who want to fuck her. Or 300, depending on the time she puts in. That's not a small small difference. In fact the abundance of sexual opportunities the average foid enjoys thanks to Tinder and similar platforms (though Tinder is dominant) is greater than that of most celebrated beauties 60-70 years ago.

If the 9:1 ratio is legit then that would mean that only 5.5 million foids are on it and that doesn’t even account for bots, catfishers, and foids who don’t seriously use it. Then you take that number and distribute it between all 1st world and several 2nd world countries and it’s effect in any given area plummets. From my observations it seems that only men take online dating seriously and draw conclusions based on sexual

As I already said, you don't have to use Tinder to be affected by Tinder. When a 2/10 foid finds out she can hook up with any number of 4/10 guys she wants on Tinder, good luck being a 3/10 guy who's interested in her, on or off Tinder.

If face to face interactions between males and females are diminishing than that would imply that online dating has exploded in popularity.

Online dating has exploded in popularity. Here's some older data with a nice graph: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/...ine-dating-is-changing-the-nature-of-society/

Here's some newer data with shittier graphs:

Around 40% of American couples now first meet online

It is one of the most profound changes in life in the US.

qz.com

Social circle, school, and workplace game

Workplace game? Have you been spending time on TheRedPill?

Unless a majority of foids go NEET and begin living in their rooms, most relatioships will spring from real life interactions

There's no longer a solid divide between "real life" and online. Online is real life now and social media and social interactions are now inseparable. Foids have embraced social media (and its extension online dating) because it gives them power like nothing else in history. And guys follow where foids go.

 

[StaroRavager]

To find someone to fuck her on Tinder all she has to do is join Tinder, take a few photos and wait. She'll have a dozen takers within a few days or a few hours, depending. To find someone to fuck her IRL (by the way, Tinder is real life now), she has to go out and interact with people. It doesn't matter if a guy who sees her at a bar wants to fuck her if he doesn't approach for whatever reason. Go to a club and watch how often a 2/10 warpig gets approached. Then do the same with her pics on Tinder. Then realize she has to be at a club at a specific time to get approached by the specific guys that happen to be there at the same time.
No, the quantity and quality of men she'll have available on Tinder isn't even comparable. Note that "available" in real life means a guy that approached her and nothing less than that.

My point is that Tinder didn’t give her the ability to find males who are willing to fuck her. It’s like comparing paying with cash or debit. She can still find a male IRL it just takes more effort

Sure, but on Tinder she'll have 30 guys who want to fuck her. Or 300, depending on the time she puts in. That's not a small small difference. In fact the abundance of sexual opportunities the average foid enjoys thanks to Tinder and similar platforms (though Tinder is dominant) is greater than that of most celebrated beauties 60-70 years ago.

I’ll grant you that they get more exposure than they would’ve several decades ago but it’s essentially a moot point for all intents and purposes. My numbers were very conservative but my point still stands. Foids don’t rely on online dating because they have no need to do so. This stuff happens naturally for them

As I already said, you don't have to use Tinder to be affected by Tinder. When a 2/10 foid finds out she can hook up with any number of 4/10 guys she wants on Tinder, good luck being a 3/10 guy who's interested in her, on or off Tinder.

If a 2/10 can get a 4/10 it would have been self evident that that would be the case. Foids don’t need an app to tell them that they can date up. The ability to do so is natural and championed by society

Online dating has exploded in popularity. Here's some older data with a nice graph: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/...ine-dating-is-changing-the-nature-of-society/

Here's some newer data with shittier graphs:

Around 40% of American couples now first meet online

It is one of the most profound changes in life in the US.

qz.com

I won’t make a big deal about this but your graph contradicts your earlier statements about nightlife dying off

Workplace game? Have you been spending time on TheRedPill recently?

Not recently, no. That was over a year ago when I was into the self improvement meme and attempted looksmaxxing along with a plethora of other futile attempts at attaining a relationship and respect from peers. Back to my statement however, workplace game works the same as school and social circle game. If normie tier men can pull it off then foids should have no problem with it

There's no longer a solid divide between "real life" and online. Online is real life now and social media and social interactions are now inseparable. Foids have embraced social media (and its extension online dating) because it gives them power like nothing else in history. And guys follow where foids go.

If that were the case I wouldn’t have seen many relationships form IRL. I won’t deny that social media has a large sphere of influence but the basic laws of nature haven’t been changed by them. You’re equating correlation to causation. Also if males flock to where foids go then why are dating apps and site such as Tinder overwhelmingly male. Why are the clubs and bars packed with men fighting for the attention of a dozen foids

 

[Angry_runt]

My point is that Tinder didn’t give her the ability to find males who are willing to fuck her. It’s like comparing paying with cash or debit. She can still find a male IRL it just takes more effort

That's like saying having a gun doesn't give you the ability to kill because you can kill people with a rock. Yeah, but one option is dramatically more effective than the other. The difference is that severe.

Foids don’t rely on online dating because they have no need to do so. This stuff happens naturally for them.

They are increasingly relying on it. Besides, online dating is only about finding and meeting people, it's pure convenience. The natural part happens (or doesn't in my case) once they meet in real life.

If a 2/10 can get a 4/10 it would have been self evident that that would be the case. Foids don’t need an app to tell them that they can date up. The ability to do so is natural and championed by society

Not necessarily. Go to a club/bar and watch how often a 2/10 (or a 4/10 for that matter) gets approached. Then take her pics and try her out on Tinder. The approach is all that matters, it happens much more easily online even for foids of all levels of attractiveness.

I won’t make a big deal about this but your graph contradicts your earlier statements about nightlife dying off

The line in the graph is the proportion of relationships that start in nightlife venues and it's relative to the other categories (all but one of which have cratered). The proportion could rise even if there's a smaller number of people in nightclubs or even if there's a smaller number of hookups in nightclubs overall.

I won’t deny that social media has a large sphere of influence but the basic laws of nature haven’t been changed by them.

It's just the new soon-to-be dominant way of finding and meeting people for sex, but it's not cyber sex or anything unnatural.

Also if males flock to where foids go then why are dating apps and site such as Tinder overwhelmingly male.

Because men are overwhelmingly the ones who are looking for sex. For a foid it takes a few days on Tinder and she's set for months if that's what she wants.
It's for the same reason that good looking women get paid to hang out in new nightclubs. Men go where the women are. Women are on Tinder, so men go on Tinder. If there's more men than women on Tinder, it's because more men than women are actively looking for sex.

 

[StaroRavager]

That's like saying having a gun doesn't give you the ability to kill because you can kill people with a rock. Yeah, but one option is dramatically more effective than the other. The difference is that severe.

It’s more like shooting fish in a barrel with a G17 vs a G18 but my point still stands. Sure Tinder is easier but I doubt you use an E-Z Reacher to turn out the lights or grab your keys. At a certain point things become unnecessary and foids realize this wether consciously or not. That’s why the user base of every given dating site is mail. It’s because foids have no need for it. Most of them never put in the effort to bother with such things when men are falling at their feet IRL

They are increasingly relying on it. Besides, online dating is only about finding and meeting people, it's pure convenience. The natural part happens (or doesn't in my case) once they meet in real life.

You missed my point. Most men try online dating for 2 reasons: lols and desperation. I’d say over 90% of foids aren’t desperate and those that bother to use these sites aren’t taking it seriously because they don’t have to. For most foids they see no reason to bother touching Tinder because while desperate males are swipping right on anything in vain, said foid is hooking up with one of the several men waiting in line for her at whatever place she happens to frequent

Not necessarily. Go to a club/bar and watch how often a 2/10 (or a 4/10 for that matter) gets approached. Then take her pics and try her out on Tinder. The approach is all that matters, it happens much more easily online even for foids of all levels of attractiveness.

So are you denying the fact that ugly girls can get laid and aren’t going out with guys who they met. It’s just something that happens and if males are willing to meet up with her and fuck her then clearly there are men she interacts with IRL that would be willing to do the same and they’d make themselves known. The only thing Tinder would give them is more exposure. Does exposure guarantee an incel dates? No, and it’s been proven time and time again and the same reverse goes for foids. They can get men IRL, therefor they can get one online

The line in the graph is the proportion of relationships that start in nightlife venues and it's relative to the other categories (all but one of which have cratered). The proportion could rise even if there's a smaller number of people in nightclubs or even if there's a smaller number of hookups in nightclubs overall.

Well if the line is going up than that would mean that IRL meet ups are still happening and are not being made obsolete as you claim. If Tinder was such a game changer, you’d see a massive drop on all of the other categories but the only ones that have taken huge dives are churches and lower levels of education both of which can be explained by a shift in culture over time rather than the advent of online dating

Because men are overwhelmingly the ones who are looking for sex. For a foid it takes a few days on Tinder and she's set for months if that's what she wants.
It's for the same reason that good looking women get paid to hang out in new nightclubs. Men go where the women are. Women are on Tinder, so men go on Tinder. If there's more men than women on Tinder, it's because more men than women are actively looking for sex.

It sounds like you’re proving my point here

 

[Michael15651]

Whitney Wolfe is a whore.

 

[Angry_runt]

It’s more like shooting fish in a barrel with a G17 vs a G18 but my point still stands.

Nope, it's like the difference between a gun and a rock. This particular example deals with a 2/10 warpig. In real life she'd get 3-4 guys approach her (if she went to a club and made herself available), whereas on Tinder she'd have 30-40 or more. That's a big difference, ten times bigger choice thanks to Tinder.

said foid is hooking up with one of the several men waiting in line for her at whatever place she happens to frequent

Again, several is less than a hundred. Hundred means more choice of higher quality men than several. Doesn't matter how many guys want to fuck her, only how many guys try to fuck her. On-line that number will be 10x higher or more.

So are you denying the fact that ugly girls can get laid and aren’t going out with guys who they met.

She can get laid, but if she's a warpig her choice is 2-3 guys a night at best - the guys that approach her. And she has to make an effort, and if she has a job she can do it only a couple of nights a week.
With Tinder her choice is 20-30 guys a day. More choice means more chance to snagging a higher-tier guy and all she has to do is sit on her ass in her sweatpants and wait.

The only thing Tinder would give them is more exposure.

Uh, yeah. That's why advertising is a thing. You advertise and you get better sales. Advertising on Tinder is free.

Well if the line is going up than that would mean that IRL meet ups are still happening and are not being made obsolete as you claim.

They are still happening and they are being made obsolete. The two trends are not mutually exclusive.

If Tinder was such a game changer, you’d see a massive drop on all of the other categories but the only ones that have taken huge dives are churches and lower levels of education

Nope, all except online and nightlife venues have taken a dive, through friends the biggest dive of all. Relative number could have risen even if the absolute number had fallen. How is this incomprehensible?

It sounds like you’re proving my point here

If your point is that men are more interested in sex than women, I couldn't agree more. It applies on-line and in nightclubs and just walking down the street. The fact that there's more men than women on dating sites doesn't mean women don't like dating sites (they like them better than they like real life because ugly guys can't even talk to them on-line) but that women are not looking for sex as often as guys are.

 

[Wonder]

After a couple of years she quit the company, sued the other execs for sexual harassment and got a payoff.

This would be funny in a way if it wasn't so unfair.

 

[FinnCel]

Women ruin everything, they are the opposite of men
Yin and Yang

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

Meet Whitney Wolfe.

She is one of the founders of Tinder. She was a marketing exec and is credited with popularizing Tinder on college campuses.
After a couple of years she quit the company, sued the other execs for sexual harassment and got a payoff.
Then she founded Bumble, which is like Tinder on steroids. On Tinder you can't send a message until the other person likes your pic. On Bumble only foids can send photos, because what if a foid swipes on an ugly guy by accident and gets a message from him? Can't have that.

Anyway, Ms Wolfe's net worth is now, at age 29, around $250 million. Her blood money for ruining the lives of hundreds of millions of men and who knows how many more in the future.

Fuck this world, fuck this life, there's no justice, there is no hope.

A fucking incel Mafia should legit target her

No you fucking moron, the two are not mutually exclusive and even if they were and she did it soley because of her ancestry then that still doesnt absolve her gender of anything whatsoever. This isnt the place to try and cuck out of an argument by calling people Nazis, but for the sake of honesty being a "Nazicel" is relatively hypocritical unless you believe you should be euthanized.

Jew+female= a lying walking bastard manipulative subhuman.

Also I'm nat-soc because I believe in that national and economic system. Stop this bluepill retardation that wants you to believe nazzisssss were basically cruel and mad people who just enjoyed being cruel and mad

 

[StaroRavager]

Nope, it's like the difference between a gun and a rock. This particular example deals with a 2/10 warpig. In real life she'd get 3-4 guys approach her (if she went to a club and made herself available), whereas on Tinder she'd have 30-40 or more. That's a big difference, ten times bigger choice thanks to Tinder.

And that’s made things so much worse for us how? We were never an option wether we made attempts IRL or online

Again, several is less than a hundred. Hundred means more choice of higher quality men than several. Doesn't matter how many guys want to fuck her, only how many guys try to fuck her. On-line that number will be 10x higher or more.

The numbers are larger but the result is the same and she doesn’t have to bother with online venues in order to get sex and validation

She can get laid, but if she's a warpig her choice is 2-3 guys a night at best - the guys that approach her. And she has to make an effort, and if she has a job she can do it only a couple of nights a week.
With Tinder her choice is 20-30 guys a day. More choice means more chance to snagging a higher-tier guy and all she has to do is sit on her ass in her sweatpants and wait.

Any males who would actually meet up for sex with a 2/10 hambeast would be a low quality male himself maybe at around .5-1.5 points higher than her and these types of males will flock while she just goes through her daily routine. Absolutely no though or effort is required to do this

Uh, yeah. That's why advertising is a thing. You advertise and you get better sales. Advertising on Tinder is free.

My point is that Tinder doesn’t drastically skew the sexual marketplace it simply proves how skewed it already was for all to see

They are still happening and they are being made obsolete. The two trends are not mutually exclusive.

So are people going to stop going to school, work, or just anyplace outside? I fail to see your reasoning here. These activities are things that 90% of the population are forced to do so they will take place regardless. Even if Tinder actually had a staggering number of foids on it, each and every one of them would have personal interactions with people everyday and unless we as a species start living in our house spending all of our waking hours online these interactions will never become obsolete

Nope, all except online and nightlife venues have taken a dive, through friends the biggest dive of all. Relative number could have risen even if the absolute number had fallen. How is this incomprehensible?

A few of these dives occurred before the rise of online dating in the mid 90s and can be attirbuted to a changing culture throughout the 20th century as I’ve stated earlier. As for the significant drop in the social circle venue it seemed to have plateaued in during the mid 80s, long before online dating made its big jump. And even when it did the friends venue was only gradually declining instead of plummeting as one would assume it would after the advent of online dating

If your point is that men are more interested in sex than women, I couldn't agree more. It applies on-line and in nightclubs and just walking down the street. The fact that there's more men than women on dating sites doesn't mean women don't like dating sites (they like them better than they like real life because ugly guys can't even talk to them on-line) but that women are not looking for sex as often as guys are.

My point is that the preferences of women couldn’t have been have shifted over a few points as a result of Tinder and online dating and that’s because they as a collective have no need for it. All online venues are overwhelmingly male which suggests that foids are snagging their lays elsewhere instead of obsessing over a convenient but unecessary service

 

[Angry_runt]

And that’s made things so much worse for us how? We were never an option wether we made attempts IRL or online

Some of us were. I'm taller and I look better than my dad when he was my age, yet he has had a bunch of girlfriends. Before women had the ability to summon attractive men out of thin air, many of them made compromises by hooking up with less attractive guys. Then the lower tier girls who would have gladly hooked up with those guys had to go lower and so on.
Tinder has reversed this trend in only 5 years.

The numbers are larger but the result is the same and she doesn’t have to bother with online venues in order to get sex and validation

How is it a bother to be on one more social network among so many? She's already on Facebook and Instagram, what's one more? She doesn't have to get dressed up or spend any money or do anything, so it's not a bother, it's a convenience that also offers a superior choice.

Any males who would actually meet up for sex with a 2/10 hambeast would be a low quality male himself maybe at around .5-1.5 points higher than her and these types of males will flock while she just goes through her daily routine. Absolutely no though or effort is required to do this

Nope, hambeasts or even just below average girls don't get approached that often in real life. Go to a club or a bar and count. She'll have a much higher number of higher quality guys on Tinder and she doesn't have to go anywhere or do anything. More guys = more chance of higher quality guys = better outcome for her.

My point is that Tinder doesn’t drastically skew the sexual marketplace it simply proves how skewed it already was for all to see

Tinder is like Amazon in how it absolutely wrecked male SMV and inflated female SMV. Even people who have never been on the internet are affected by it.

So are people going to stop going to school, work, or just anyplace outside? I fail to see your reasoning here. These activities are things that 90% of the population are forced to do so they will take place regardless. Even if Tinder actually had a staggering number of foids on it, each and every one of them would have personal interactions with people everyday and unless we as a species start living in our house spending all of our waking hours online these interactions will never become obsolete

They'll go to school or to work, but they won't have nearly as many high quality guys trying to fuck them. And when a guy does try at work, she'll mentally compare him to the best looking guy she's had try to fuck her on Tinder and the result is easily predictable.

My point is that the preferences of women couldn’t have been have shifted over a few points as a result of Tinder and online dating

Their preferences haven't shifted, their standards have.

"Women hit the wall at 40 bro" is the biggest cope ever, MGTOWcels GTFIH

50 Years Old Jenny decided to use tinder, and this is what happened just in THREE HOURS... Her profile Total Matches: 25 (and MUCH MORE because I have swiped until I hit the limit. I swiped within 5 minutes of creating this profile.) Matches that have messaged her first: 16 Below you can see...

incels.is

Once a foid sees how many high tier thirsty guys want them, they won't ever lower their standards. That's the effect of Tinder.

and that’s because they as a collective have no need for it.

I have no need for takeout but I order it anyway. From any place in the city, without even having to put on pants, without having to talk to anyone. It's not just convenience but also a much larger choice. That's why dating apps are becoming more popular.

All online venues are overwhelmingly male which suggests that foids are snagging their lays elsewhere instead of obsessing over a convenient but unecessary service

They are overwhelmingly male because males are overwhelmingly the ones looking for sex. A foid is on Tinder for a week and then she's off for months while riding Chad. When she's bored with him, she dumps him and goes on Tinder for another week.
And even those foids not on Tinder benefit from Tinder because it has inflated female SMV and reduced male SMV.

 

[StaroRavager]

Some of us were. I'm taller and I look better than my dad when he was my age, yet he has had a bunch of girlfriends. Before women had the ability to summon attractive men out of thin air, many of them made compromises by hooking up with less attractive guys. Then the lower tier girls who would have gladly hooked up with those guys had to go lower and so on.
Tinder has reversed this trend in only 5 years.

Judging by your post history I assume you’re in your early to late 30s. If that’s the case what were you doing all those years before Tinder, were you actually getting lays or are you still a virgin

How is it a bother to be on one more social network among so many? She's already on Facebook and Instagram, what's one more? She doesn't have to get dressed up or spend any money or do anything, so it's not a bother, it's a convenience that also offers a superior choice.

Why take the time to sit around on sites when you attract new orbiters just by walking to work or school or even simply posting pictures on social media

Nope, hambeasts or even just below average girls don't get approached that often in real life. Go to a club or a bar and count. She'll have a much higher number of higher quality guys on Tinder and she doesn't have to go anywhere or do anything. More guys = more chance of higher quality guys = better outcome for her.

So if they don’t get approached IRL, what makes them get approached online and by high quality males no less

Tinder is like Amazon in how it absolutely wrecked male SMV and inflated female SMV. Even people who have never been on the internet are affected by it.

Because hypergamy and juggernaut law are new developments that haven’t been around since the dawn of sexual selection

They'll go to school or to work, but they won't have nearly as many high quality guys trying to fuck them. And when a guy does try at work, she'll mentally compare him to the best looking guy she's had try to fuck her on Tinder and the result is easily predictable.

Why do you assume this would that scenario be the most likely to occur. We’ve already established that relatively minuscule amount of foids actually bother with these sites. They are always getting orbiters and validation just by going about their day, men use online dating because they either have no social circle or because they think that online dating somehow gives them a huge advantage

Their preferences haven't shifted, their standards have.

"Women hit the wall at 40 bro" is the biggest cope ever, MGTOWcels GTFIH

50 Years Old Jenny decided to use tinder, and this is what happened just in THREE HOURS... Her profile Total Matches: 25 (and MUCH MORE because I have swiped until I hit the limit. I swiped within 5 minutes of creating this profile.) Matches that have messaged her first: 16 Below you can see...

incels.is

Once a foid sees how many high tier thirsty guys want them, they won't ever lower their standards. That's the effect of Tinder.

JFL if you think foids don’t know about their ability to attract men who are out of their league. The imperative has always been fuck up, marry up low quality males only got married because of betabuxxing

have no need for takeout but I order it anyway. From any place in the city, without even having to put on pants, without having to talk to anyone. It's not just convenience but also a much larger choice. That's why dating apps are becoming more popular.

Do you order take out exclusively? I highly doubt you do

They are overwhelmingly male because males are overwhelmingly the ones looking for sex. A foid is on Tinder for a week and then she's off for months while riding Chad. When she's bored with him, she dumps him and goes on Tinder for another week.
And even those foids not on Tinder benefit from Tinder because it has inflated female SMV and reduced male SMV.

Once again, Tinder hasn’t changed anything it’s simply made already existing trends more observable for everyone