Is the fact that at least one whore will die alone. Knowing this helps me sleep easy. Sure she will probably fuck a bunch of dudes but once she hits old age and everybody else is married, she will probably be a weird cat lady or some shit
Cope. Gender ratios are fucked up in first world countries. 105 men for 100 holes
She will still find a beta, even if she does not marry him.
Moron. There are 108 men born for 100 women globally.
105 (actually 106 or some years even 107) in Europe is the normal, natural sex ratio AT BIRTH. Globally it is higher, because China, India etc. abort girls. It is natural phenomen, not artificially "fucked up". I've argued for a long time that the natural ratio at birth should be altered using modern means so that more girls are born. What is fucked up is that Finland (as a whole, big regional differences also!) for example has 108-109 men for every 100 women in many middle-aged age cohorts, because of immigration and emigration.
Moron. In most developed countries like USA the overall sex ratio is more women (more men under the age of 55), except Sweden etc. because of massive immigration. In most countries of the world even the overall sex ratio is more men (because younger median age), even if in every country has more women in old age, because big difference in life expectancy.
105 (actually 106 or some years even 107) in Europe is the normal, natural sex ratio AT BIRTH. Globally it is higher, because China, India etc. abort girls. It is natural phenomen, not artificially "fucked up". I've argued for a long time that the natural ratio at birth should be altered using modern means so that more girls are born. What is fucked up is that Finland (as a whole, big regional differences also!) for example has 108-109 men for every 100 women in many middle-aged age cohorts, because of immigration and emigration.
Last edited:
cope
whores don't die, they multiply
D
This is why I unironically think that a moderate level of homosexual acceptance might be good for us. That is, male-male homosexual acceptance but more of a stigma towards female homosexuality (which, women who fuck other women are normally just bandwagoning anyway). To go back to my point though, since the sex ratio is fucked from birth, the only way to really balance things out again is for a decent percentage of men to simply fuck other men. Let's say you have a day where 105 men are born and 100 women are born. If 6% of the men end up being homosexual while only 1% of the women do, then it works out evenly. For most of history, homosexuality was almost always associated with men. I wonder if homosexuality is possibly a genetic trait put in men during ancient times to cope with highly polygamous societies where huge percentages of women ended up in harems. Its possible that it makes sense, purely from a happiness standpoint, that there be some kind of environmental trigger for homosexuality. Then again though, nature only cares about what traits help a person reproduce and being gay obviously doesn't help that at all, so it is really strange.
Either way, I think some homosexual acceptance is actually good for us. The main problem with today though is that gayness and bisexuality is considered cool in today's progressive world so it seems all the normies are doing it.
Fags are incels in denial
she will easily find a sextoy in tinder until she is 60+
In Finland the are roughly triple the amount of woman-woman marriages compared to man-man marriages. I've never seen a male couple IRL with my own eyes, while I see lesbian couples hand-in-hand a few times a month. Much bigger proportion of women are bisexual or homosexual than men.
Sorry, massive cope. Even for the weird cat ladies, atleast they had a good romantic life in the past
They can rely on that experience. Meanwhile ugly men still waiting for a kiss
They can rely on that experience. Meanwhile ugly men still waiting for a kiss
Homosexuality is just a guy falling in love with a guy instead of a foid. That's all, it's purely instinctive and it obeys the laws of human attractiveness and affection. It has existed since the beginning of humankind and will still be there 'til the end of times. There's a genetic trait but it also requires to meet a guy who feels the same. Human species is both influenced by its genetics and its environment conditions. It's true that nature favors reproduction among a species, but humankind doesn't follows nature all the time. We're, in many aspects, supernatural, because we no longer adapt to the nature ; in fact, we adapt the nature to us.
Homosexuality has nothing to do with inceldom. Inceldom is about men who do not find foids to be in couple with. Inceldom is not about sex but about affection. Encouraging or hating gays has no effect on our individual fates. And on the opposite side, gays don't care about us at all. I do not favor accepting gays among our incel community because it just has nothing to do with us. It would be like inviting communists or jews or car manufacturers to come here.
Fags are disgusting.
Exactly.
It says cope in the title
D
No argument from me here. In progressive countries, the amount of bisexual behavior among girls is absolutely outrageous. I swear we are getting to a point where I think girls might be fucking each other more then they are fucking guys. That being said, I think the reason we are seeing this is because women have a more flexible sexuality. Their sexuality is more influenced by social norms then male sexuality is.
I didn't say we should accept faggots into the incel community. I'm saying that some level of male homosexual acceptance by wider society is actually good for us because it essentially takes a small percentage of men out of the dating pool. I think most societies got it wrong, female homosexuality is the one that should be stigmatized. Male homosexuality doesn't really effect us unless it gets out of control (like it is in progressive countries today).
No argument here. But manipulating social norms in a way that makes it possible for every guy to get their looks-match matters more to me then my repulsion at the idea of gay sex. I think ideally though, it should be an underground thing that a small minority of people do. It shouldn't be like it is right now.
I get what you mean and agree of course. In the past homosexual men had to marry a woman for show, taking one woman away from a real heterosexual incel, unnecessary!
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
