Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious The New Zealand government asked Incels.is to remove a video of a mass shooting from our website. We will not.

How based of a response.
 
Because they somehow believe that they should be able to control what shows up on the Internet. This is, of course, silly. I suppose every Kiwi feminist should get off of Reddit because what they post could offend the Saudi or Iranian governments.
You know this is a fucking piece of shit planet where incel forums have more free media than supposedly good governance.
 
New Zealand has people or bots browsing and reporting shit.
IMG 1010
 
What gives them the right to enforce their laws on an American website when the shooting did not even take place in New Zealand? Libtards are insane
 
good job!!!!

show these cucks how much we piss and shit on them!

just lol those SJW are coming with a list of demands from an incel forum :feelsclown: :feelshaha:
 
Why did he not shoot the last guy and even told him sorry?
I think he was white. The part was kinda funny when he says sorry.
 
Two weeks ago, the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs sent us a notice that we were hosting a video considered "Objectionable" in their country. They gave us three days to "take down" or prevent New Zealanders from accessing the video.


The video in question is a 40-second clip from the 2022 mass shooting in Buffalo, NY, which you can view here:
View attachment 613938

We have decided that we will not comply with New Zealand's demands. This is our response to their Take-Down Notice:
View attachment 861115View attachment 861116

Anyway, a reminder that we do have a Twitter account:

View: https://twitter.com/IncelsCo/status/1695371174526533680


Do let us know your thoughts on this development.

lol why dont they ask hoodsite and worldstarhiphop too?
 
Reminds me of their letter to Kiwifarms to take down Christchurch shooting video. They are delusional.
 
Reminds me of their letter to Kiwifarms to take down Christchurch shooting video. They are delusional.
I know. But we decided on a more polite approach.
 
he killed at least one white person that woman in front of the market was definately white so i dont understand what they mean by killing only blacks
 
the dude that he said sorry to is probably some light skinned rice and the shooter thought it was a white person

everything happened so fast
he killed at least one white person that woman in front of the market was definately white so i dont understand what they mean by killing only blacks
fat + white + old + female + live with niggers = coal burner 100%
 
damn, who firstly posted this video in the forum?
i bet he's some on some dark list now
 
the dude that he said sorry to is probably some light skinned rice and the shooter thought it was a white person

everything happened so fast

fat + white + old + female + live with niggers = coal burner 100%

nothing of value was lost then.
 
damn, who firstly posted this video in the forum?
i bet he's some on some dark list now
by that logic everyone who saw it right after it happened must be as well:feelsjuice:
 
No pussy no remove lol
 
Why do they care so much about a video of a shooting? Are they fucking stupid like what are they gaining from doing this?
 
are there even any kiwis here?
 
It's good that US citizens have guaranteed their right to freedom of expression, unfortunately I live in a country where this is very relativized and which is experiencing an authoritarian escalation where our Supreme Court judges can decide what people can say.
 
Two weeks ago, the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs sent us a notice that we were hosting a video considered "Objectionable" in their country. They gave us three days to "take down" or prevent New Zealanders from accessing the video.


The video in question is a 40-second clip from the 2022 mass shooting in Buffalo, NY, which you can view here:
View attachment 613938

We have decided that we will not comply with New Zealand's demands. This is our response to their Take-Down Notice:
View attachment 861115View attachment 861116

Anyway, a reminder that we do have a Twitter account:

View: https://twitter.com/IncelsCo/status/1695371174526533680


Do let us know your thoughts on this development.

Your response is beautiful. Thank you for doing this.

We in New Zillund have endured 6 years of a hard left SJW crim-cuddling, LGBTQ boosting government that has maliciously damaged our petrochemical industry, inflamed racial disharmony by introducing "positive discrimination" / reverse racism policies everywhere it can think of, destroyed the domestic economy with covid lockdowns propped up by welfare funded by overseas borrowing, shut down our natural gas extraction to save the planet and then imported low-grade coal from Indonesia to keep the electricity grid running, and tried to force the jew Vax on everyone, producing unprecedented social division and mistrust in the process. Basically every indigenous person in our government is distributing millions of dollars to fake govt consulting jobs for their relatives.

I'm glad you laughed in the faces of these utter fucking faggots and told them to go FUCK THEMSELVES, somebody had to.


Why do they give a shit about a shooting that happened on the other side of the planet?
Because they somehow believe that they should be able to control what shows up on the Internet. This is, of course, silly. I suppose every Kiwi feminist should get off of Reddit because what they post could offend the Saudi or Iranian governments.
Have you seen our ex prime Minister Jacinda Ardern? Her proudest career moment was when she went on Colbert and called Trump a :foidSoy::foidSoy:professional asshole LOL!:foidSoy::foidSoy:
She's the smiling face of a vacuous SJW libtard but with a nasty police state bully streak underneath.

After the Chch shooting she made it her mission to enforce "kindness" throughout the land. "Kindness" meant disarming all of the honest people, Making it illegal to possess Brenton Tarrant's manifesto or his body cam footage, and trying to persuade the rest of the world to buy into this shit as well.

Meanwhile her boyfriend won't marry her and he's fucking their kid's nanny. They also hang out with some wannabe DJs who are also small-time coke importers, because everybody needs a hobby I guess?

The new Zealand government should rope themselves.
Yes.

What gives them the right to enforce their laws on an American website when the shooting did not even take place in New Zealand? Libtards are insane
You answered your own question. I emphasized the right part.

are there even any kiwis here?
There are a couple of us.
 
Do you pronounce six as “sex”?

No.

There was a whole snob thing where kids who'd traveled and worked in London for a few years, loved to say "fush & chups" (fish & chips) as though they think that's how less worldly kiwis talk and they're somehow a bit above all of that. I actually said to one of them once, if you're so much cooler than us why did you come back?
 
Why isn't cheese pizza covered under first amendment? It's just a depiction of a crime brah
 
Why isn't cheese pizza covered under first amendment? It's just a depiction of a crime brah
Good question. I take it that you are referring to child pornography.

Child pornography is not "just a depiction of a crime," its existence is a crime in and of itself. There are multiple legal reasons why the U.S. Supreme Court has categorically excluded child pornography from First Amendment protection, but the one that most significantly distinguishes videos of child rape from videos of murder more generally is the economic one. As Justice White wrote in New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982):
[T]he advertising and selling of child pornography provide an economic motive for, and are thus an integral part of, the production of such materials, an activity illegal throughout the Nation.

If you substitute "child pornography" with "videos of murder," the analogy doesn't hold:
[T]he advertising and selling of [videos of murder] provide an economic motive for, and are thus an integral part of, the production of such materials, an activity illegal throughout the Nation;

There is no market for videos of murder that even remotely resembles the (very large) market for child pornography, and the sale of videos of murder do not "provide an economic motive" for nor are "an integral part of" the filming or murder. Criminalizing even the possession of videos of murder by the general public will not deter murderers from murdering anyone, especially mass attackers who often do not plan to survive their attack. And as I have mentioned, it will not deter even one murderer from filming their actions. And as I mentioned earlier--many videos of murder have political value, unlike child pornography.

I am on mobile so can't give you an answer more detailed than this but this should be a good start.
 
Good question. I take it that you are referring to child pornography.

Child pornography is not "just a depiction of a crime," its existence is a crime in and of itself. There are multiple legal reasons why the U.S. Supreme Court has categorically excluded child pornography from First Amendment protection, but the one that most significantly distinguishes videos of child rape from videos of murder more generally is the economic one. As Justice White wrote in New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982):


If you substitute "child pornography" with "videos of murder," the analogy doesn't hold:


There is no market for videos of murder that even remotely resembles the (very large) market for child pornography, and the sale of videos of murder do not "provide an economic motive" for nor are "an integral part of" the filming or murder. Criminalizing even the possession of videos of murder by the general public will not deter murderers from murdering anyone, especially mass attackers who often do not plan to survive their attack. And as I have mentioned, it will not deter even one murderer from filming their actions. And as I mentioned earlier--many videos of murder have political value, unlike child pornography.

I am on mobile so can't give you an answer more detailed than this but this should be a good start.
Why is the viewing of CP without paying for it illegal though? How does that exactly create a demand if money is not given?
 
All these videos of mass shootings, no matter how offensive they may be, are reminders that we need more guns in this world. Every sane, sober, moral and adult man should concealed carry.
 
All these videos of mass shootings, no matter how offensive they may be, are reminders that we need more guns in this world. Every sane, sober, moral and adult man should concealed carry.
no they're a reminder that normies shouldn't oppress incels and import imnigrants
 
There are multiple legal reasons why the U.S. Supreme Court has categorically excluded child pornography from First Amendment protection
Can the U.S. Supreme Court categorically exclude circumcision from First Amendment protection as-well?
 
Funny how these nigwis are from... from where again... Is that still a british colony or a real country when King Charls is head of state there... whatever... funny that they get upset while the country in which Buffalo is located don't give a fuck
 
Last edited:
Why is the viewing of CP without paying for it illegal though? How does that exactly create a demand if money is not given?
By looking for it, you're contributing to the existence of the overall market.

I mentioned just one of the multiple reasons why CP isn't protected by the 1A.
Can the U.S. Supreme Court categorically exclude circumcision from First Amendment protection as-well?
Circumcision is not a 1A issue.
 
By looking for it, you're contributing to the existence of the overall market.
I don’t understand, market means money is exchanged for products. If there is no money or products, how does it contribute to market?
I mentioned just one of the multiple reasons why CP isn't protected by the 1A.
That seemed to me to be about the creation of it, which makes sense to be illegal.
 
Honestly, it is a very disturbing video, kind of made me sick in the stomach.

I sort of see why they want this video taken down off the internet...
 
a reminder that we do have a Twitter account:
I would love to follow you but people irl know my twitter and i don’t want then seeing me follow/like incel content
 
Also that response is beautiful
 
time to post some gore
 
Circumcision is not a 1A issue.
Isn't it fall under "establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise" portion of 1A?

A San Francisco judge has struck a proposed male circumcision ban from a November ballot, ruling that the city cannot regulate medical procedure and citing religious freedom protections.
On Thursday, Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi ruled that the proposed ban violated the US constitution's guarantee of religious freedom.

Child pornography is not "just a depiction of a crime," its existence is a crime in and of itself. There are multiple legal reasons why the U.S. Supreme Court has categorically excluded child pornography from First Amendment protection, but the one that most significantly distinguishes videos of child rape from videos of murder more generally is the economic one. As Justice White wrote in New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982):
Minor circumcision is a giant global business. It can be argued in the same way that one of the aspects that distinguishes circumcision from other religious practices is also an economic one.
 
Last edited:
Why do they give a shit about a shooting that happened on the other side of the planet?

What a stupid law.
it's an anglo thing
 
Why would anyone outside of New Zealand give a shit about what they have to say, especially when this site is not hosted there?
angloid world police mentality
 
Man Body GIF

Fuck Jew Zealand!
 
I think the admins have taken the right course. Only remove content which is explicitly illegal under U.S. jurisdiction.
 
To be fair, I was here before and had like 200 posts from memory. Then I deleted my account and came back, but I am 'new' again.
 

Similar threads

SecularNeo-Khazar
Replies
17
Views
492
Therapywasawaste
Therapywasawaste
Racial-Identitarian
Replies
9
Views
517
illumizoldyck
illumizoldyck
Anarcho Nihilist
Replies
5
Views
589
Jailbaitmaxxer
Jailbaitmaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top