RandomBroCel
Voicecel
★
- Joined
- May 8, 2021
- Posts
- 1,597
where is the video?
Because he claims to be targeting niggers but literally the first person he kills is white LMAO
ikrrr lmfaoooooThe way he said "sorry!" to the white guy just cracked me up
You know this is a fucking piece of shit planet where incel forums have more free media than supposedly good governance.Because they somehow believe that they should be able to control what shows up on the Internet. This is, of course, silly. I suppose every Kiwi feminist should get off of Reddit because what they post could offend the Saudi or Iranian governments.
I think he was white. The part was kinda funny when he says sorry.Why did he not shoot the last guy and even told him sorry?
Two weeks ago, the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs sent us a notice that we were hosting a video considered "Objectionable" in their country. They gave us three days to "take down" or prevent New Zealanders from accessing the video.
The video in question is a 40-second clip from the 2022 mass shooting in Buffalo, NY, which you can view here:
View attachment 613938
We have decided that we will not comply with New Zealand's demands. This is our response to their Take-Down Notice:
View attachment 861115View attachment 861116
Anyway, a reminder that we do have a Twitter account:
View: https://twitter.com/IncelsCo/status/1695371174526533680
Do let us know your thoughts on this development.
thank you brocelAbsolutely based response. A fitting bitch slap.
politicslol why dont they ask hoodsite and worldstarhiphop too?
I know. But we decided on a more polite approach.Reminds me of their letter to Kiwifarms to take down Christchurch shooting video. They are delusional.
fat + white + old + female + live with niggers = coal burner 100%he killed at least one white person that woman in front of the market was definately white so i dont understand what they mean by killing only blacks
the dude that he said sorry to is probably some light skinned rice and the shooter thought it was a white person
everything happened so fast
fat + white + old + female + live with niggers = coal burner 100%
by that logic everyone who saw it right after it happened must be as welldamn, who firstly posted this video in the forum?
i bet he's some on some dark list now
You should allow a video of the Christchurch shooting on this website in protest against New Zealand LOL
Not sure lol. Think there might be several but can't recall any of them.are there even any kiwis here?
Two weeks ago, the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs sent us a notice that we were hosting a video considered "Objectionable" in their country. They gave us three days to "take down" or prevent New Zealanders from accessing the video.
The video in question is a 40-second clip from the 2022 mass shooting in Buffalo, NY, which you can view here:
View attachment 613938
We have decided that we will not comply with New Zealand's demands. This is our response to their Take-Down Notice:
View attachment 861115View attachment 861116
Anyway, a reminder that we do have a Twitter account:
View: https://twitter.com/IncelsCo/status/1695371174526533680
Do let us know your thoughts on this development.
Why do they give a shit about a shooting that happened on the other side of the planet?
Have you seen our ex prime Minister Jacinda Ardern? Her proudest career moment was when she went on Colbert and called Trump a professional asshole LOL!Because they somehow believe that they should be able to control what shows up on the Internet. This is, of course, silly. I suppose every Kiwi feminist should get off of Reddit because what they post could offend the Saudi or Iranian governments.
Yes.The new Zealand government should rope themselves.
You answered your own question. I emphasized the right part.What gives them the right to enforce their laws on an American website when the shooting did not even take place in New Zealand? Libtards are insane
There are a couple of us.are there even any kiwis here?
Do you pronounce six as “sex”?There are a couple of us.
Do you pronounce six as “sex”?
Good question. I take it that you are referring to child pornography.Why isn't cheese pizza covered under first amendment? It's just a depiction of a crime brah
[T]he advertising and selling of child pornography provide an economic motive for, and are thus an integral part of, the production of such materials, an activity illegal throughout the Nation.
[T]he advertising and selling of [videos of murder] provide an economic motive for, and are thus an integral part of, the production of such materials, an activity illegal throughout the Nation;
Why is the viewing of CP without paying for it illegal though? How does that exactly create a demand if money is not given?Good question. I take it that you are referring to child pornography.
Child pornography is not "just a depiction of a crime," its existence is a crime in and of itself. There are multiple legal reasons why the U.S. Supreme Court has categorically excluded child pornography from First Amendment protection, but the one that most significantly distinguishes videos of child rape from videos of murder more generally is the economic one. As Justice White wrote in New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982):
If you substitute "child pornography" with "videos of murder," the analogy doesn't hold:
There is no market for videos of murder that even remotely resembles the (very large) market for child pornography, and the sale of videos of murder do not "provide an economic motive" for nor are "an integral part of" the filming or murder. Criminalizing even the possession of videos of murder by the general public will not deter murderers from murdering anyone, especially mass attackers who often do not plan to survive their attack. And as I have mentioned, it will not deter even one murderer from filming their actions. And as I mentioned earlier--many videos of murder have political value, unlike child pornography.
I am on mobile so can't give you an answer more detailed than this but this should be a good start.
no they're a reminder that normies shouldn't oppress incels and import imnigrantsAll these videos of mass shootings, no matter how offensive they may be, are reminders that we need more guns in this world. Every sane, sober, moral and adult man should concealed carry.
Can the U.S. Supreme Court categorically exclude circumcision from First Amendment protection as-well?There are multiple legal reasons why the U.S. Supreme Court has categorically excluded child pornography from First Amendment protection
Do you live in Asia?no they're a reminder that normies shouldn't oppress incels and import imnigrants
By looking for it, you're contributing to the existence of the overall market.Why is the viewing of CP without paying for it illegal though? How does that exactly create a demand if money is not given?
Circumcision is not a 1A issue.Can the U.S. Supreme Court categorically exclude circumcision from First Amendment protection as-well?
I don’t understand, market means money is exchanged for products. If there is no money or products, how does it contribute to market?By looking for it, you're contributing to the existence of the overall market.
That seemed to me to be about the creation of it, which makes sense to be illegal.I mentioned just one of the multiple reasons why CP isn't protected by the 1A.
I would love to follow you but people irl know my twitter and i don’t want then seeing me follow/like incel contenta reminder that we do have a Twitter account:
which you can view here:
Isn't it fall under "establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise" portion of 1A?Circumcision is not a 1A issue.
A San Francisco judge has struck a proposed male circumcision ban from a November ballot, ruling that the city cannot regulate medical procedure and citing religious freedom protections.
On Thursday, Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi ruled that the proposed ban violated the US constitution's guarantee of religious freedom.
Minor circumcision is a giant global business. It can be argued in the same way that one of the aspects that distinguishes circumcision from other religious practices is also an economic one.Child pornography is not "just a depiction of a crime," its existence is a crime in and of itself. There are multiple legal reasons why the U.S. Supreme Court has categorically excluded child pornography from First Amendment protection, but the one that most significantly distinguishes videos of child rape from videos of murder more generally is the economic one. As Justice White wrote in New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982):
it's an anglo thingWhy do they give a shit about a shooting that happened on the other side of the planet?
What a stupid law.
angloid world police mentalityWhy would anyone outside of New Zealand give a shit about what they have to say, especially when this site is not hosted there?
To be fair, I was here before and had like 200 posts from memory. Then I deleted my account and came back, but I am 'new' again.Posts: 1
Nice avi.You need to spread the black pill don’t be ashamed of it