Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum
Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.
All the findings in that study are water IMO. But at least there are now hard numbers to support as evidence for the rise in sexual deviances and coercive practices of women in younger generations (Gen Z, Millennial). This could be included for Must-Read Section, because it presents what might be considered as surprising data that contradicts the normie consesus on modern woman's attitudes towards sexual relations (though it doesn't surprise me)
It's not actually that they have powers that allow them to Jedi Mind Trick their way to sex at will, it's that they might as well be capable of that, because what they have is even better, they are attractive and the moment they appear in somebody's field of vision, that person is immediately attracted to them, immediately wants to have sex with them, and they need to just give that woman the tiniest excuse that she's looking for to go wild with them.
This is also water. A woman’s sexual attraction to a male is usually determined at first sight. This is a fundamental facet of Blackpill 101. If a woman does not declare her sexual interest to you within a week of meeting her, you’ve most likely already been rejected, even if you haven’t propositioned her yet. A modern woman will have sexual interactions with a man that she’s physically attracted to within the first two weeks of meeting him
TBH I think stats for foid sexual aggression will only increase more over the next coming generations. The tables are turning in the sex market; women are becoming the alphas, normies are becoming the betas. The increased rates of child sex abuse by adult female perpetrators in Gen Z and Millennial in western countries, are also another indicator to sexual aggressiveness of women in younger generations
Give women enough power and privileges, and in due course, they’ll start to abuse it. If females of underage generations eventually become adults (alpha females, beta females), they’ll probably exhibit the same behaviors at a similar rate or higher. There is a reason behind the rise in this kind of behavior among modern women
If this is actually real and legit, Mouse Utopia is what will happen to civilization everywhere. The women orbit Chads and become aggressive, incels become socially disconnected and reclusive. It's probably due to population and technology.
Title. Remember the two studies on rape tactics I've talked about a few times here, which show that the most common sexual coercion/rape tactics are seduction and emotional manipulation, and that it is those tactics that men are much more likely to use than women, while both genders are roughly equally likely to use physical force and other violent coercion?
We've actually gotten another rape tactics study a few years ago, but I didn't notice just how insane it is before TheTinMen blog took a look at it:
Basically, the study was looking at whether there is a so-called "Millenial Shift" in sexual aggression/coercion, with men being less aggressive than before and women being more so, because of feminism and so on.
Overall, the study has confirmed this, by showing that millenial men and women are much closer when it comes to various male-dominated rape tactics than boomer men and women, and that women now straight up are the majority of people using forceful tactics:
And not only have they done this, they've also, like one of the previous studies I've posted at the beginning, looked at the various sub-tactics of each, and those are quite something.
For my claim that Chads pretty much have "mind control powers", look at the arousal and emotional coercion tactic sets. For boomers, 12.05% of men and 11.31% of women said they took off their clothes to arouse someone to coerce them into sex, while for millenials, it was 8.38% for men and 14.95% for women. Now, already here we can see that sexual aggression shift, but let's talk about the important thing, just how absolutely insane it is to see, as an incel, that the rate here for men is any higher than 0%. Seriously, just imagine yourself, you don't even needto imagine some idealized 5'2 Indian janitor, just imagine yourself trying this, wanting to have sex with a chick and your way to doing that being just taking your clothes off and letting the sight of your body do all the work as she gets so aroused that she can't resist you. how do you think that would work out for anyone on this forum, and hell, any normie man? Just imagine how animalistic and crazy you would become if you were on the opposite side of that and a woman took off her clothes to seduce you just by the sight of her body. Imagine how, 100%, you would completely lose your mind and wouldn't be able to control yourself if that had happened (let's not lie to ourselves, that's what we'd be like in that situation), and now realize that we share the world with guys who can do that to women and whose bodies have that exact same effect on women.
Same with those who had removed the other person's clothes to arouse them, which is still male-dominated even (13.33% of boomer and 11.75% of millenial men having done so, while 7.76% and 10.26% of boomer and millenial women, respectively, having done so.) Just imagine having such power over women, being so genuinely attractive to them, that just the realization and mental image of her being naked or half-naked in a room with you is enough to get her turned on and incapable of resisting having sex with you. Just imagine how you'd feel if a woman done that to you, and now realize that there are men out there who have that exact effect on women.
Then you look at emotional coercion, and it gets even worse. Look at how few people used threatening a break-up (4.2 and 5.1% of men, 2.31 and 5.31% of women) compared with simply talking someone into sex by repeatedly asking or just telling them that they like or love them. That to me heavily implies that, althouh it's obviously the first thing you'd think, that those tactics in fact aren't used mostly by people who want more sex from their spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend, but that those people are actually using it on friends, acquiatances, and actual strangers. Imagine being able to get sex just by asking for it or giving someone an excuse by saying that you like them, imagine being attractive. Because that's what this is actually about. It's not actually that they have powers that allow them to Jedi Mind Trick their way to sex at will, it's that they might as well be capable of that, because what they have is even better, they are attractive and the moment they appear in somebody's field of vision, that person is immediately attracted to them, immediately wants to have sex with them, and they need to just give that woman the tiniest excuse that she's looking for to go wild with them.
And just jfl at the last two items there:
"Used your authority or position" = 4.32% for millenial women, nobody else is over 2%.
"Been an adut at least 5 years older and they were younger than 16" = 4.32% for millenial women again, but this time millenial men also get through 2% with 2.22% of them doing this.
Hello #MeToo? Hello agecucks and pedobashers? Hello everyone that likes to gang up on unattractive men and relishes every opportunnity to attack those unfortunate guys whenever they remind the world that they are healthy, sexual human beings, where's you fucking outrage now?!
And finally, the very best part, the force tactics, where millenial women are head and shoulders above the other groups:
Blocking someone's retreat so they can't get away = 4.63% for millenial women, nobody else is even above 3%
Restraining someone by sitting at them or holding them down = 4.3% or millenial women, nobody else is at even half of that
Tying someone up = 3.64% for millenial women, which once again is over twice the figure for anyone else
Threatening physical harm = 2.98% of millenial women, while the second biggest figure is 1.11% for millenial men and the boomers are both under 1%.
Actually physically harming someone to force them into sex = 4.65% of millenial women have done this. The second biggest figure is 1.2% for boomer men, which is almost four times smaller (and very close to the remaining two figures.)
Threatening someone with a weapon = 2.33% for millenial women, which is just over twice the figure 1.12% figure for millenial men, while boomers are under 1%.
Women are more sexually aggressive than ever in recent history (if shifts like this can happen in such a short time, no way it hadn't already happened thousands of times in more distant history), they are literally hunting Chads with ropes and weapons more than men have ever done in the last few decades, even underage Chads as we can see, Chads and women can automatically seduce each other into sex just by asking for it and showing off their bodies to each other... and we are completely denied participation in any of this because of few millimeters of bone. Fucking OVER.
Must read for anyone new to this forum. Very choking pill as others have mentioned. I think pinned threads have a lethal dosage of blackpill at this time of the month. Mad respect brocel.
Title. Remember the two studies on rape tactics I've talked about a few times here, which show that the most common sexual coercion/rape tactics are seduction and emotional manipulation, and that it is those tactics that men are much more likely to use than women, while both genders are roughly equally likely to use physical force and other violent coercion?
We've actually gotten another rape tactics study a few years ago, but I didn't notice just how insane it is before TheTinMen blog took a look at it:
Basically, the study was looking at whether there is a so-called "Millenial Shift" in sexual aggression/coercion, with men being less aggressive than before and women being more so, because of feminism and so on.
Overall, the study has confirmed this, by showing that millenial men and women are much closer when it comes to various male-dominated rape tactics than boomer men and women, and that women now straight up are the majority of people using forceful tactics:
And not only have they done this, they've also, like one of the previous studies I've posted at the beginning, looked at the various sub-tactics of each, and those are quite something.
For my claim that Chads pretty much have "mind control powers", look at the arousal and emotional coercion tactic sets. For boomers, 12.05% of men and 11.31% of women said they took off their clothes to arouse someone to coerce them into sex, while for millenials, it was 8.38% for men and 14.95% for women. Now, already here we can see that sexual aggression shift, but let's talk about the important thing, just how absolutely insane it is to see, as an incel, that the rate here for men is any higher than 0%. Seriously, just imagine yourself, you don't even needto imagine some idealized 5'2 Indian janitor, just imagine yourself trying this, wanting to have sex with a chick and your way to doing that being just taking your clothes off and letting the sight of your body do all the work as she gets so aroused that she can't resist you. how do you think that would work out for anyone on this forum, and hell, any normie man? Just imagine how animalistic and crazy you would become if you were on the opposite side of that and a woman took off her clothes to seduce you just by the sight of her body. Imagine how, 100%, you would completely lose your mind and wouldn't be able to control yourself if that had happened (let's not lie to ourselves, that's what we'd be like in that situation), and now realize that we share the world with guys who can do that to women and whose bodies have that exact same effect on women.
Same with those who had removed the other person's clothes to arouse them, which is still male-dominated even (13.33% of boomer and 11.75% of millenial men having done so, while 7.76% and 10.26% of boomer and millenial women, respectively, having done so.) Just imagine having such power over women, being so genuinely attractive to them, that just the realization and mental image of her being naked or half-naked in a room with you is enough to get her turned on and incapable of resisting having sex with you. Just imagine how you'd feel if a woman done that to you, and now realize that there are men out there who have that exact effect on women.
Then you look at emotional coercion, and it gets even worse. Look at how few people used threatening a break-up (4.2 and 5.1% of men, 2.31 and 5.31% of women) compared with simply talking someone into sex by repeatedly asking or just telling them that they like or love them. That to me heavily implies that, althouh it's obviously the first thing you'd think, that those tactics in fact aren't used mostly by people who want more sex from their spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend, but that those people are actually using it on friends, acquiatances, and actual strangers. Imagine being able to get sex just by asking for it or giving someone an excuse by saying that you like them, imagine being attractive. Because that's what this is actually about. It's not actually that they have powers that allow them to Jedi Mind Trick their way to sex at will, it's that they might as well be capable of that, because what they have is even better, they are attractive and the moment they appear in somebody's field of vision, that person is immediately attracted to them, immediately wants to have sex with them, and they need to just give that woman the tiniest excuse that she's looking for to go wild with them.
And just jfl at the last two items there:
"Used your authority or position" = 4.32% for millenial women, nobody else is over 2%.
"Been an adut at least 5 years older and they were younger than 16" = 4.32% for millenial women again, but this time millenial men also get through 2% with 2.22% of them doing this.
Hello #MeToo? Hello agecucks and pedobashers? Hello everyone that likes to gang up on unattractive men and relishes every opportunnity to attack those unfortunate guys whenever they remind the world that they are healthy, sexual human beings, where's you fucking outrage now?!
And finally, the very best part, the force tactics, where millenial women are head and shoulders above the other groups:
Blocking someone's retreat so they can't get away = 4.63% for millenial women, nobody else is even above 3%
Restraining someone by sitting at them or holding them down = 4.3% or millenial women, nobody else is at even half of that
Tying someone up = 3.64% for millenial women, which once again is over twice the figure for anyone else
Threatening physical harm = 2.98% of millenial women, while the second biggest figure is 1.11% for millenial men and the boomers are both under 1%.
Actually physically harming someone to force them into sex = 4.65% of millenial women have done this. The second biggest figure is 1.2% for boomer men, which is almost four times smaller (and very close to the remaining two figures.)
Threatening someone with a weapon = 2.33% for millenial women, which is just over twice the figure 1.12% figure for millenial men, while boomers are under 1%.
Women are more sexually aggressive than ever in recent history (if shifts like this can happen in such a short time, no way it hadn't already happened thousands of times in more distant history), they are literally hunting Chads with ropes and weapons more than men have ever done in the last few decades, even underage Chads as we can see, Chads and women can automatically seduce each other into sex just by asking for it and showing off their bodies to each other... and we are completely denied participation in any of this because of few millimeters of bone. Fucking OVER.
Title. Remember the two studies on rape tactics I've talked about a few times here, which show that the most common sexual coercion/rape tactics are seduction and emotional manipulation, and that it is those tactics that men are much more likely to use than women, while both genders are roughly equally likely to use physical force and other violent coercion?
We've actually gotten another rape tactics study a few years ago, but I didn't notice just how insane it is before TheTinMen blog took a look at it:
Basically, the study was looking at whether there is a so-called "Millenial Shift" in sexual aggression/coercion, with men being less aggressive than before and women being more so, because of feminism and so on.
Overall, the study has confirmed this, by showing that millenial men and women are much closer when it comes to various male-dominated rape tactics than boomer men and women, and that women now straight up are the majority of people using forceful tactics:
And not only have they done this, they've also, like one of the previous studies I've posted at the beginning, looked at the various sub-tactics of each, and those are quite something.
For my claim that Chads pretty much have "mind control powers", look at the arousal and emotional coercion tactic sets. For boomers, 12.05% of men and 11.31% of women said they took off their clothes to arouse someone to coerce them into sex, while for millenials, it was 8.38% for men and 14.95% for women. Now, already here we can see that sexual aggression shift, but let's talk about the important thing, just how absolutely insane it is to see, as an incel, that the rate here for men is any higher than 0%. Seriously, just imagine yourself, you don't even needto imagine some idealized 5'2 Indian janitor, just imagine yourself trying this, wanting to have sex with a chick and your way to doing that being just taking your clothes off and letting the sight of your body do all the work as she gets so aroused that she can't resist you. how do you think that would work out for anyone on this forum, and hell, any normie man? Just imagine how animalistic and crazy you would become if you were on the opposite side of that and a woman took off her clothes to seduce you just by the sight of her body. Imagine how, 100%, you would completely lose your mind and wouldn't be able to control yourself if that had happened (let's not lie to ourselves, that's what we'd be like in that situation), and now realize that we share the world with guys who can do that to women and whose bodies have that exact same effect on women.
Same with those who had removed the other person's clothes to arouse them, which is still male-dominated even (13.33% of boomer and 11.75% of millenial men having done so, while 7.76% and 10.26% of boomer and millenial women, respectively, having done so.) Just imagine having such power over women, being so genuinely attractive to them, that just the realization and mental image of her being naked or half-naked in a room with you is enough to get her turned on and incapable of resisting having sex with you. Just imagine how you'd feel if a woman done that to you, and now realize that there are men out there who have that exact effect on women.
Then you look at emotional coercion, and it gets even worse. Look at how few people used threatening a break-up (4.2 and 5.1% of men, 2.31 and 5.31% of women) compared with simply talking someone into sex by repeatedly asking or just telling them that they like or love them. That to me heavily implies that, althouh it's obviously the first thing you'd think, that those tactics in fact aren't used mostly by people who want more sex from their spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend, but that those people are actually using it on friends, acquiatances, and actual strangers. Imagine being able to get sex just by asking for it or giving someone an excuse by saying that you like them, imagine being attractive. Because that's what this is actually about. It's not actually that they have powers that allow them to Jedi Mind Trick their way to sex at will, it's that they might as well be capable of that, because what they have is even better, they are attractive and the moment they appear in somebody's field of vision, that person is immediately attracted to them, immediately wants to have sex with them, and they need to just give that woman the tiniest excuse that she's looking for to go wild with them.
And just jfl at the last two items there:
"Used your authority or position" = 4.32% for millenial women, nobody else is over 2%.
"Been an adut at least 5 years older and they were younger than 16" = 4.32% for millenial women again, but this time millenial men also get through 2% with 2.22% of them doing this.
Hello #MeToo? Hello agecucks and pedobashers? Hello everyone that likes to gang up on unattractive men and relishes every opportunnity to attack those unfortunate guys whenever they remind the world that they are healthy, sexual human beings, where's you fucking outrage now?!
And finally, the very best part, the force tactics, where millenial women are head and shoulders above the other groups:
Blocking someone's retreat so they can't get away = 4.63% for millenial women, nobody else is even above 3%
Restraining someone by sitting at them or holding them down = 4.3% or millenial women, nobody else is at even half of that
Tying someone up = 3.64% for millenial women, which once again is over twice the figure for anyone else
Threatening physical harm = 2.98% of millenial women, while the second biggest figure is 1.11% for millenial men and the boomers are both under 1%.
Actually physically harming someone to force them into sex = 4.65% of millenial women have done this. The second biggest figure is 1.2% for boomer men, which is almost four times smaller (and very close to the remaining two figures.)
Threatening someone with a weapon = 2.33% for millenial women, which is just over twice the figure 1.12% figure for millenial men, while boomers are under 1%.
Women are more sexually aggressive than ever in recent history (if shifts like this can happen in such a short time, no way it hadn't already happened thousands of times in more distant history), they are literally hunting Chads with ropes and weapons more than men have ever done in the last few decades, even underage Chads as we can see, Chads and women can automatically seduce each other into sex just by asking for it and showing off their bodies to each other... and we are completely denied participation in any of this because of few millimeters of bone. Fucking OVER.
Title. Remember the two studies on rape tactics I've talked about a few times here, which show that the most common sexual coercion/rape tactics are seduction and emotional manipulation, and that it is those tactics that men are much more likely to use than women, while both genders are roughly equally likely to use physical force and other violent coercion?
We've actually gotten another rape tactics study a few years ago, but I didn't notice just how insane it is before TheTinMen blog took a look at it:
Basically, the study was looking at whether there is a so-called "Millenial Shift" in sexual aggression/coercion, with men being less aggressive than before and women being more so, because of feminism and so on.
Overall, the study has confirmed this, by showing that millenial men and women are much closer when it comes to various male-dominated rape tactics than boomer men and women, and that women now straight up are the majority of people using forceful tactics:
And not only have they done this, they've also, like one of the previous studies I've posted at the beginning, looked at the various sub-tactics of each, and those are quite something.
For my claim that Chads pretty much have "mind control powers", look at the arousal and emotional coercion tactic sets. For boomers, 12.05% of men and 11.31% of women said they took off their clothes to arouse someone to coerce them into sex, while for millenials, it was 8.38% for men and 14.95% for women. Now, already here we can see that sexual aggression shift, but let's talk about the important thing, just how absolutely insane it is to see, as an incel, that the rate here for men is any higher than 0%. Seriously, just imagine yourself, you don't even needto imagine some idealized 5'2 Indian janitor, just imagine yourself trying this, wanting to have sex with a chick and your way to doing that being just taking your clothes off and letting the sight of your body do all the work as she gets so aroused that she can't resist you. how do you think that would work out for anyone on this forum, and hell, any normie man? Just imagine how animalistic and crazy you would become if you were on the opposite side of that and a woman took off her clothes to seduce you just by the sight of her body. Imagine how, 100%, you would completely lose your mind and wouldn't be able to control yourself if that had happened (let's not lie to ourselves, that's what we'd be like in that situation), and now realize that we share the world with guys who can do that to women and whose bodies have that exact same effect on women.
Same with those who had removed the other person's clothes to arouse them, which is still male-dominated even (13.33% of boomer and 11.75% of millenial men having done so, while 7.76% and 10.26% of boomer and millenial women, respectively, having done so.) Just imagine having such power over women, being so genuinely attractive to them, that just the realization and mental image of her being naked or half-naked in a room with you is enough to get her turned on and incapable of resisting having sex with you. Just imagine how you'd feel if a woman done that to you, and now realize that there are men out there who have that exact effect on women.
Then you look at emotional coercion, and it gets even worse. Look at how few people used threatening a break-up (4.2 and 5.1% of men, 2.31 and 5.31% of women) compared with simply talking someone into sex by repeatedly asking or just telling them that they like or love them. That to me heavily implies that, althouh it's obviously the first thing you'd think, that those tactics in fact aren't used mostly by people who want more sex from their spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend, but that those people are actually using it on friends, acquiatances, and actual strangers. Imagine being able to get sex just by asking for it or giving someone an excuse by saying that you like them, imagine being attractive. Because that's what this is actually about. It's not actually that they have powers that allow them to Jedi Mind Trick their way to sex at will, it's that they might as well be capable of that, because what they have is even better, they are attractive and the moment they appear in somebody's field of vision, that person is immediately attracted to them, immediately wants to have sex with them, and they need to just give that woman the tiniest excuse that she's looking for to go wild with them.
And just jfl at the last two items there:
"Used your authority or position" = 4.32% for millenial women, nobody else is over 2%.
"Been an adut at least 5 years older and they were younger than 16" = 4.32% for millenial women again, but this time millenial men also get through 2% with 2.22% of them doing this.
Hello #MeToo? Hello agecucks and pedobashers? Hello everyone that likes to gang up on unattractive men and relishes every opportunnity to attack those unfortunate guys whenever they remind the world that they are healthy, sexual human beings, where's you fucking outrage now?!
And finally, the very best part, the force tactics, where millenial women are head and shoulders above the other groups:
Blocking someone's retreat so they can't get away = 4.63% for millenial women, nobody else is even above 3%
Restraining someone by sitting at them or holding them down = 4.3% or millenial women, nobody else is at even half of that
Tying someone up = 3.64% for millenial women, which once again is over twice the figure for anyone else
Threatening physical harm = 2.98% of millenial women, while the second biggest figure is 1.11% for millenial men and the boomers are both under 1%.
Actually physically harming someone to force them into sex = 4.65% of millenial women have done this. The second biggest figure is 1.2% for boomer men, which is almost four times smaller (and very close to the remaining two figures.)
Threatening someone with a weapon = 2.33% for millenial women, which is just over twice the figure 1.12% figure for millenial men, while boomers are under 1%.
Women are more sexually aggressive than ever in recent history (if shifts like this can happen in such a short time, no way it hadn't already happened thousands of times in more distant history), they are literally hunting Chads with ropes and weapons more than men have ever done in the last few decades, even underage Chads as we can see, Chads and women can automatically seduce each other into sex just by asking for it and showing off their bodies to each other... and we are completely denied participation in any of this because of few millimeters of bone. Fucking OVER.
Great thread, very blackpilling & also highlights to us just how skewed & fucked our modern society has become.
As always, these studies further confirm our beliefs & worldview: I have yet to see a single legitimate one that offers conflicting information, which would prove any bluepill or redpill views outright.
What surprises -and also greatly disappoints & concerns me- is the seeming lack of uproar, backlash, or any kind of response from anyone: Redpillers, grifters, mens-rights activists, "Right-Wingers," Conservatives, etc. or anyone at all who is deemed somewhat "out of the mainstream" mentioning this, when they claim to allegedly "speak for males"
The fact that in just around two generations(more one, I consider Gen-X to be "boomerlites") the tables shifted completely, and as another user here pointed out in this thread, Millenawhore foids are more likely to SA someone than a literal Boomer male.
Not just focusing on this specific phenomena, but in general this simply serves to reflect the overall factor of behavioral sink in society: It details to us how foids have asserted themselves as the new effective dominant gender, as indicated through this study.
Unsurprisingly, this would also correlate heavily with the rise of feminism, which seemed to very coincidentally just also tie in with out diets becoming filled with more estrogenic additives, LGBTQ+, etc.
But hey, "muh correlation doesn't equal causation inkwell!"
Well perhaps, it is a reason for us to take a look at the "broader perspective" & see what could be tying these together, in some way.
Another thing which was brutal, was how Chad can quite literally get away with it & coerce others just by simply just having a good physique & face. It shows just unfair life is, literally.
Honestly, I would love to see someone do this for Gen-Z: Now that, would be extremely blackpilling.
What surprises -and also greatly disappoints & concerns me- is the seeming lack of uproar, backlash, or any kind of response from anyone: Redpillers, grifters, mens-rights activists, "Right-Wingers," Conservatives, etc. or anyone at all who is deemed somewhat "out of the mainstream" mentioning this, when they claim to allegedly "speak for males"
Yup. Even the MRAs who actually do notice this kind of stuff, those types of studies and talk about them have mostly only started noticing those in the last couple of years. Innate gynocentrism + genuine non-understanding that women can do stuff like this because they've never done it to the non-Chad guys talking about this on the internet is a nasty combination. That, plus, for leftists, general female worship and internalized feminism and male self-hatred is also a factor, while for the rightists, they, at least from what I've seen, seem to not only want the society to move back a couple of decades, but they also seem to be unable to actually mentally move from those decades past.
The fact that in just around two generations(more one, I consider Gen-X to be "boomerlites") the tables shifted completely, and as another user here pointed out in this thread, Millenawhore foids are more likely to SA someone than a literal Boomer male.
True. Which is what makes me genuinely curious, just how many times had such a "reversal" happened in the past? Can it even be called a reversal if it had happened multiple times?
women are more physically aggressive than men.if men were smaller and weaker than women on average, we would get constantly abused.the only thing stopping them is that they physically can't do it.
If this is actually real and legit, Mouse Utopia is what will happen to civilization everywhere. The women orbit Chads and become aggressive, incels become socially disconnected and reclusive. It's probably due to population and technology.
Title. Remember the two studies on rape tactics I've talked about a few times here, which show that the most common sexual coercion/rape tactics are seduction and emotional manipulation, and that it is those tactics that men are much more likely to use than women, while both genders are roughly equally likely to use physical force and other violent coercion?
We've actually gotten another rape tactics study a few years ago, but I didn't notice just how insane it is before TheTinMen blog took a look at it:
Basically, the study was looking at whether there is a so-called "Millenial Shift" in sexual aggression/coercion, with men being less aggressive than before and women being more so, because of feminism and so on.
Overall, the study has confirmed this, by showing that millenial men and women are much closer when it comes to various male-dominated rape tactics than boomer men and women, and that women now straight up are the majority of people using forceful tactics:
And not only have they done this, they've also, like one of the previous studies I've posted at the beginning, looked at the various sub-tactics of each, and those are quite something.
For my claim that Chads pretty much have "mind control powers", look at the arousal and emotional coercion tactic sets. For boomers, 12.05% of men and 11.31% of women said they took off their clothes to arouse someone to coerce them into sex, while for millenials, it was 8.38% for men and 14.95% for women. Now, already here we can see that sexual aggression shift, but let's talk about the important thing, just how absolutely insane it is to see, as an incel, that the rate here for men is any higher than 0%. Seriously, just imagine yourself, you don't even needto imagine some idealized 5'2 Indian janitor, just imagine yourself trying this, wanting to have sex with a chick and your way to doing that being just taking your clothes off and letting the sight of your body do all the work as she gets so aroused that she can't resist you. how do you think that would work out for anyone on this forum, and hell, any normie man? Just imagine how animalistic and crazy you would become if you were on the opposite side of that and a woman took off her clothes to seduce you just by the sight of her body. Imagine how, 100%, you would completely lose your mind and wouldn't be able to control yourself if that had happened (let's not lie to ourselves, that's what we'd be like in that situation), and now realize that we share the world with guys who can do that to women and whose bodies have that exact same effect on women.
Same with those who had removed the other person's clothes to arouse them, which is still male-dominated even (13.33% of boomer and 11.75% of millenial men having done so, while 7.76% and 10.26% of boomer and millenial women, respectively, having done so.) Just imagine having such power over women, being so genuinely attractive to them, that just the realization and mental image of her being naked or half-naked in a room with you is enough to get her turned on and incapable of resisting having sex with you. Just imagine how you'd feel if a woman done that to you, and now realize that there are men out there who have that exact effect on women.
Then you look at emotional coercion, and it gets even worse. Look at how few people used threatening a break-up (4.2 and 5.1% of men, 2.31 and 5.31% of women) compared with simply talking someone into sex by repeatedly asking or just telling them that they like or love them. That to me heavily implies that, althouh it's obviously the first thing you'd think, that those tactics in fact aren't used mostly by people who want more sex from their spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend, but that those people are actually using it on friends, acquiatances, and actual strangers. Imagine being able to get sex just by asking for it or giving someone an excuse by saying that you like them, imagine being attractive. Because that's what this is actually about. It's not actually that they have powers that allow them to Jedi Mind Trick their way to sex at will, it's that they might as well be capable of that, because what they have is even better, they are attractive and the moment they appear in somebody's field of vision, that person is immediately attracted to them, immediately wants to have sex with them, and they need to just give that woman the tiniest excuse that she's looking for to go wild with them.
And just jfl at the last two items there:
"Used your authority or position" = 4.32% for millenial women, nobody else is over 2%.
"Been an adut at least 5 years older and they were younger than 16" = 4.32% for millenial women again, but this time millenial men also get through 2% with 2.22% of them doing this.
Hello #MeToo? Hello agecucks and pedobashers? Hello everyone that likes to gang up on unattractive men and relishes every opportunnity to attack those unfortunate guys whenever they remind the world that they are healthy, sexual human beings, where's you fucking outrage now?!
And finally, the very best part, the force tactics, where millenial women are head and shoulders above the other groups:
Blocking someone's retreat so they can't get away = 4.63% for millenial women, nobody else is even above 3%
Restraining someone by sitting at them or holding them down = 4.3% or millenial women, nobody else is at even half of that
Tying someone up = 3.64% for millenial women, which once again is over twice the figure for anyone else
Threatening physical harm = 2.98% of millenial women, while the second biggest figure is 1.11% for millenial men and the boomers are both under 1%.
Actually physically harming someone to force them into sex = 4.65% of millenial women have done this. The second biggest figure is 1.2% for boomer men, which is almost four times smaller (and very close to the remaining two figures.)
Threatening someone with a weapon = 2.33% for millenial women, which is just over twice the figure 1.12% figure for millenial men, while boomers are under 1%.
Women are more sexually aggressive than ever in recent history (if shifts like this can happen in such a short time, no way it hadn't already happened thousands of times in more distant history), they are literally hunting Chads with ropes and weapons more than men have ever done in the last few decades, even underage Chads as we can see, Chads and women can automatically seduce each other into sex just by asking for it and showing off their bodies to each other... and we are completely denied participation in any of this because of few millimeters of bone. Fucking OVER.
Females will become more sexually aggressive towards beta males but become more sexually submissive towards alpha males. Sexuality will get more extreme between feminine females and masculine alpha males. You see it in porn, erotica, movies. It's because their instincts are completely liberated now. Great for porn and the gene pool but bad for beta males. Beta males, as in average men, will become invisible. 100% of females will chase the top 10% of males.
Foids also use shaming tactics to convince a guy to sleep with them, like are you gay? Do you even like women? Are you even a man? Also blackmailing that they will gossip.
Personally I think women are more physically aggressive than men. The only thing that is stopping them is the fact that men are much stronger and imposing than them.
Knives, guns, weapons exist. There are plenty of male victim domestic violence incidents where the foid used a frying pan, knife, pistol or other weapon to horrifically injure their cohabitant, and 9/10 the male victims are physically stronger.
Title. Remember the two studies on rape tactics I've talked about a few times here, which show that the most common sexual coercion/rape tactics are seduction and emotional manipulation, and that it is those tactics that men are much more likely to use than women, while both genders are roughly equally likely to use physical force and other violent coercion?
We've actually gotten another rape tactics study a few years ago, but I didn't notice just how insane it is before TheTinMen blog took a look at it:
Basically, the study was looking at whether there is a so-called "Millenial Shift" in sexual aggression/coercion, with men being less aggressive than before and women being more so, because of feminism and so on.
Overall, the study has confirmed this, by showing that millenial men and women are much closer when it comes to various male-dominated rape tactics than boomer men and women, and that women now straight up are the majority of people using forceful tactics:
And not only have they done this, they've also, like one of the previous studies I've posted at the beginning, looked at the various sub-tactics of each, and those are quite something.
For my claim that Chads pretty much have "mind control powers", look at the arousal and emotional coercion tactic sets. For boomers, 12.05% of men and 11.31% of women said they took off their clothes to arouse someone to coerce them into sex, while for millenials, it was 8.38% for men and 14.95% for women. Now, already here we can see that sexual aggression shift, but let's talk about the important thing, just how absolutely insane it is to see, as an incel, that the rate here for men is any higher than 0%. Seriously, just imagine yourself, you don't even needto imagine some idealized 5'2 Indian janitor, just imagine yourself trying this, wanting to have sex with a chick and your way to doing that being just taking your clothes off and letting the sight of your body do all the work as she gets so aroused that she can't resist you. how do you think that would work out for anyone on this forum, and hell, any normie man? Just imagine how animalistic and crazy you would become if you were on the opposite side of that and a woman took off her clothes to seduce you just by the sight of her body. Imagine how, 100%, you would completely lose your mind and wouldn't be able to control yourself if that had happened (let's not lie to ourselves, that's what we'd be like in that situation), and now realize that we share the world with guys who can do that to women and whose bodies have that exact same effect on women.
Same with those who had removed the other person's clothes to arouse them, which is still male-dominated even (13.33% of boomer and 11.75% of millenial men having done so, while 7.76% and 10.26% of boomer and millenial women, respectively, having done so.) Just imagine having such power over women, being so genuinely attractive to them, that just the realization and mental image of her being naked or half-naked in a room with you is enough to get her turned on and incapable of resisting having sex with you. Just imagine how you'd feel if a woman done that to you, and now realize that there are men out there who have that exact effect on women.
Then you look at emotional coercion, and it gets even worse. Look at how few people used threatening a break-up (4.2 and 5.1% of men, 2.31 and 5.31% of women) compared with simply talking someone into sex by repeatedly asking or just telling them that they like or love them. That to me heavily implies that, althouh it's obviously the first thing you'd think, that those tactics in fact aren't used mostly by people who want more sex from their spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend, but that those people are actually using it on friends, acquiatances, and actual strangers. Imagine being able to get sex just by asking for it or giving someone an excuse by saying that you like them, imagine being attractive. Because that's what this is actually about. It's not actually that they have powers that allow them to Jedi Mind Trick their way to sex at will, it's that they might as well be capable of that, because what they have is even better, they are attractive and the moment they appear in somebody's field of vision, that person is immediately attracted to them, immediately wants to have sex with them, and they need to just give that woman the tiniest excuse that she's looking for to go wild with them.
And just jfl at the last two items there:
"Used your authority or position" = 4.32% for millenial women, nobody else is over 2%.
"Been an adut at least 5 years older and they were younger than 16" = 4.32% for millenial women again, but this time millenial men also get through 2% with 2.22% of them doing this.
Hello #MeToo? Hello agecucks and pedobashers? Hello everyone that likes to gang up on unattractive men and relishes every opportunnity to attack those unfortunate guys whenever they remind the world that they are healthy, sexual human beings, where's you fucking outrage now?!
And finally, the very best part, the force tactics, where millenial women are head and shoulders above the other groups:
Blocking someone's retreat so they can't get away = 4.63% for millenial women, nobody else is even above 3%
Restraining someone by sitting at them or holding them down = 4.3% or millenial women, nobody else is at even half of that
Tying someone up = 3.64% for millenial women, which once again is over twice the figure for anyone else
Threatening physical harm = 2.98% of millenial women, while the second biggest figure is 1.11% for millenial men and the boomers are both under 1%.
Actually physically harming someone to force them into sex = 4.65% of millenial women have done this. The second biggest figure is 1.2% for boomer men, which is almost four times smaller (and very close to the remaining two figures.)
Threatening someone with a weapon = 2.33% for millenial women, which is just over twice the figure 1.12% figure for millenial men, while boomers are under 1%.
Women are more sexually aggressive than ever in recent history (if shifts like this can happen in such a short time, no way it hadn't already happened thousands of times in more distant history), they are literally hunting Chads with ropes and weapons more than men have ever done in the last few decades, even underage Chads as we can see, Chads and women can automatically seduce each other into sex just by asking for it and showing off their bodies to each other... and we are completely denied participation in any of this because of few millimeters of bone. Fucking OVER.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
. Remember the two studies on rape tactics I've talked about 
