I’ll start with what I mean inhuman is; the lack of traits that make us human, not physical but mentally. Things such as empathy make us human. But in a whole, to be human and not inhuman, you must go against human nature.
I have watched two videos of a woman speaking on behalf of natural eugenics, with each video having thousands of views and likes.
This is disgusting for a number of reasons. While the idea of eugenics is grounded in scientific principles of genetics. It is something that is deeply inhuman and so self-interested that it’s psychopathic almost.
One point she made was this in a short explain
Religion = control over a women
Patriarchy = control over a women’s choice and body
Both of these things are made to stop female choice which in turn stopped natural eugenics.
Now that women do have a choice in the matter, eugenics is the first thing they should go for.
She had also brought up the point of animals in the wild, as if humans, who have the highest intelligence of any animal and who has the choice of good and evil, purity and sin, are in equal to a dog or a monkey.
This opinion is wrong too on so many levels.
One could also say that in the wild, wild males don’t need to court woman, they simply just rape them and most of the time never take care of the kids afterwards.
Using her argument stance of the wild, this opinion of rape, makes rape for humans fine because every other animals does it.
back to short explain of patriarchy and religion.
The reality:
Patriarchy = society having rules and stability for how people should be and act. This goes against human nature which human nature is inhuman as I said before.
Religion = the suppression of human wants for human dignity, rights and purity. All of which goes against human nature.
When these rules are applied to a society, eugenics are not needed for the progression of humanity. When human nature is removed from a society only good can could from it. . “But no, it’s bad because I don’t like it.” “It’s bad because I want to act like a degenerate and do only fun stuff”.
This is more than a case of “standards”. most men fit the standards to help protect and raise a family.
Even men who are weak and poor, given the thought of protecting their family and providing for them, they would work as hard as they could to do anything for them.
It’s just that they are too inhuman to have any respect for people. Most notably being men. And too inhuman to have any respect for themselves.
So much so that they refuse to accept that their opinions are never based with any thoughts of morality but much over emotions. Because they themselves don’t like to have morals or ethics. But are only guided by emotion and never Ethics which makes a society strong.
It’s as simply as ever, women will kill themselves before ever admitting directly that BP is right.
For all my truecell TLDRcells;
“I want to fuck Chad”
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8hBDV8u/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8hBAA98/
I have watched two videos of a woman speaking on behalf of natural eugenics, with each video having thousands of views and likes.
This is disgusting for a number of reasons. While the idea of eugenics is grounded in scientific principles of genetics. It is something that is deeply inhuman and so self-interested that it’s psychopathic almost.
One point she made was this in a short explain
Religion = control over a women
Patriarchy = control over a women’s choice and body
Both of these things are made to stop female choice which in turn stopped natural eugenics.
Now that women do have a choice in the matter, eugenics is the first thing they should go for.
She had also brought up the point of animals in the wild, as if humans, who have the highest intelligence of any animal and who has the choice of good and evil, purity and sin, are in equal to a dog or a monkey.
This opinion is wrong too on so many levels.
One could also say that in the wild, wild males don’t need to court woman, they simply just rape them and most of the time never take care of the kids afterwards.
Using her argument stance of the wild, this opinion of rape, makes rape for humans fine because every other animals does it.
back to short explain of patriarchy and religion.
The reality:
Patriarchy = society having rules and stability for how people should be and act. This goes against human nature which human nature is inhuman as I said before.
Religion = the suppression of human wants for human dignity, rights and purity. All of which goes against human nature.
When these rules are applied to a society, eugenics are not needed for the progression of humanity. When human nature is removed from a society only good can could from it. . “But no, it’s bad because I don’t like it.” “It’s bad because I want to act like a degenerate and do only fun stuff”.
This is more than a case of “standards”. most men fit the standards to help protect and raise a family.
Even men who are weak and poor, given the thought of protecting their family and providing for them, they would work as hard as they could to do anything for them.
It’s just that they are too inhuman to have any respect for people. Most notably being men. And too inhuman to have any respect for themselves.
So much so that they refuse to accept that their opinions are never based with any thoughts of morality but much over emotions. Because they themselves don’t like to have morals or ethics. But are only guided by emotion and never Ethics which makes a society strong.
It’s as simply as ever, women will kill themselves before ever admitting directly that BP is right.
For all my truecell TLDRcells;
“I want to fuck Chad”
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8hBDV8u/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8hBAA98/
. Modern soyciety = Cult of Ishtar and Moloch = feminism, troons, fags and abortion (child sacrifice)
