SuicideFuel The more I think about the lesbianpill and to some extent chadsexuality, the more depressed I get.

[caineturbat2003]

I think I now understand @BPJ when it comes to the depressing aspect of the lesbianpill.

Most of us wouldn't even be incels and would have ascended and even have loving loyal GFs (or wives) if they were actually attracted to men. You wouldn't even have to betabuxx to get in bed with them only to then cheat on you and cuck you with chad.

Ascension is pretty brutal if you think about it. You do all this hard work, all the pain and sweat to have a chance to even go for low average and then you find out that the cumdumpster you saw as your other half, either used you, cucked you with another man, OR WORSE, with a foid. I even remember years ago about this news report where a foid tried to murder (or successfully did it, I don't remember the details) her husband and run away with another semen leech, jfl , so imagine all that ascension and hard work only to end up like this. How more brutal can that even get?

I know for a fact that this nigga @Left4DeadBPDvictim didn't ascend because he still lurks in here. A true ascension would be when he doesn't have the time to even take a peak here, so obviously something went wrong. And even other users here mentioned there were similar cases where the user claims to have ascended only to end up LDARing here again.

So yea, the fact that the foids' sexuality is fucked up is the reason why we even rot in here in the first place when we could actually live better than this. So we have to suffer because the leeches are freaks of nature. It's beyond over.

 

[ThisSongGoesVerHard]

The fact that, biologically, women barely are attracted to men and on top of that are pseudolesbians, made me realize that the game is completely rigged from the start. The attraction gap and how different our sexualities work, make male/female relationships too one sided and unstable, and even if you manage to get a gf through chasing and courting and self improving, her "love" is just a temporary exchange for whatever you can do for her.

After understanding that women consider the vast majority of men to be unattractive, barely approach men, take much longer to fall in love, fall out of love much more easily, initiate the vast majority of divorces and breakups, move on from relationships quicker, place massive importance on money and status, have much lower libidos, have a sexuality that's basically autogynephilic (aroused by their own bodies), are sexually fluid, and have strong homosexual tendencies, I feel genuinely repelled by them, and I abhor the idea of even attempting to have a romantic relationship with them. I'd have a relationship with an idealized woman that doesn't have those characteristics, but they're so rare (if they even exist) that's not even worth considering, and of course they wouldn't even be interested in me.

So I've moved on from romanticizing them and I even try to avoid any media and content with any relationship themes. Now I just hate them (and actually it's mainly due to their misandry) but being resentful to half of the world's population isn't healthy, so I'll try to move on from that too.

 

[caineturbat2003]

The fact that, biologically, women barely are attracted to men and on top of that are pseudolesbians, made me realize that the game is completely rigged from the start. The attraction gap and how different our sexualities work, make male/female relationships too one sided and unstable, and even if you manage to get a gf through chasing and courting and self improving, her "love" is just a temporary exchange for whatever you can do for her.

After understanding that women consider the vast majority of men to be unattractive, barely approach men, take much longer to fall in love, fall out of love much more easily, initiate the vast majority of divorces and breakups, move on from relationships quicker, place massive importance on money and status, have much lower libidos, have a sexuality that's basically autogynephilic (aroused by their own bodies), are sexually fluid, and have strong homosexual tendencies, I feel genuinely repelled by them, and I abhor the idea of even attempting to have a romantic relationship with them. I'd have a relationship with an idealized woman that doesn't have those characteristics, but they're so rare (if they even exist) that's not even worth considering, and of course they wouldn't even be interested in me.

So I've moved on from romanticizing them and I even try to avoid any media and content with any relationship themes.

Nature did an amazing job to fuck us over with foids. It's like one sick joke where we are genetically programmed to feel attracted to the leeches and the FUCKING PUNCHLINE is that they, not only they don't reciprocate our attraction, they outright feel disgusted by our own very existence.

That line that Arthur Fleck says "my life is nothing more than a comedy" starts to become more relatable the more I think about this topic.

What a fucking joke!

 

[GrandWizard_137]

The fact that, biologically, women barely are attracted to men and on top of that are pseudolesbians, made me realize that the game is completely rigged from the start. The attraction gap and how different our sexualities work, make male/female relationships too one sided and unstable, and even if you manage to get a gf through chasing and courting and self improving, her "love" is just a temporary exchange for whatever you can do for her.

After understanding that women consider the vast majority of men to be unattractive, barely approach men, take much longer to fall in love, fall out of love much more easily, initiate the vast majority of divorces and breakups, move on from relationships quicker, place massive importance on money and status, have much lower libidos, have a sexuality that's basically autogynephilic (aroused by their own bodies), are sexually fluid, and have strong homosexual tendencies, I feel genuinely repelled by them, and I abhor the idea of even attempting to have a romantic relationship with them. I'd have a relationship with an idealized woman that doesn't have those characteristics, but they're so rare (if they even exist) that's not even worth considering, and of course they wouldn't even be interested in me.

So I've moved on from romanticizing them and I even try to avoid any media and content with any relationship themes. Now I just hate them (and actually it's mainly due to their misandry) but being resentful to half of the world's population isn't healthy, so I'll try to move on from that too.

I never understood why foids are attracted to each other so much. As a male, homosexuality between other men absolutely disgusts me. But I see foids claiming to be friends literally rubbing over each other and kissing and I dont understand. What's the biological motivation behind this? They're literally repelled at the sight of not just sub5's, but just about any man (except Chad ofc). Hell, even Chad has begun to transition from stereotypical alpha jacked guys over to pretty boys with increasing feminine traits. Is this a massive brainwashing by the government to feminize men to control them? I'm so confused, bros.

 

[fullofchagrin]

I never understood why foids are attracted to each other so much. As a male, homosexuality between other men absolutely disgusts me. But I see foids claiming to be friends literally rubbing over each other and kissing and I dont understand. What's the biological motivation behind this? They're literally repelled at the sight of not just sub5's, but just about any man (except Chad ofc). Hell, even Chad has begun to transition from stereotypical alpha jacked guys over to pretty boys with increasing feminine traits. Is this a massive brainwashing by the government to feminize men to control them? I'm so confused, bros.

FYI it's mostly in western society that 2 men being close to each other is seen as "gay". In Mediterranean and middle eastern cultures it's normal, or at least used to be normal for men to hug and kiss each other (not on the lips). But that's changed in the last generation due to western influence and global homosexualization

 

[Eternalifeofdoom]

High IQ. This sumps up foids pretty much.

The fact that, biologically, women barely are attracted to men and on top of that are pseudolesbians, made me realize that the game is completely rigged from the start. The attraction gap and how different our sexualities work, make male/female relationships too one sided and unstable, and even if you manage to get a gf through chasing and courting and self improving, her "love" is just a temporary exchange for whatever you can do for her.

After understanding that women consider the vast majority of men to be unattractive, barely approach men, take much longer to fall in love, fall out of love much more easily, initiate the vast majority of divorces and breakups, move on from relationships quicker, place massive importance on money and status, have much lower libidos, have a sexuality that's basically autogynephilic (aroused by their own bodies), are sexually fluid, and have strong homosexual tendencies, I feel genuinely repelled by them, and I abhor the idea of even attempting to have a romantic relationship with them. I'd have a relationship with an idealized woman that doesn't have those characteristics, but they're so rare (if they even exist) that's not even worth considering, and of course they wouldn't even be interested in me.

So I've moved on from romanticizing them and I even try to avoid any media and content with any relationship themes. Now I just hate them (and actually it's mainly due to their misandry) but being resentful to half of the world's population isn't healthy, so I'll try to move on from that too.

 

[ThisSongGoesVerHard]

High IQ. This sumps up foids pretty much.

Nature did an amazing job to fuck us over with foids. It's like one sick joke where we are genetically programmed to feel attracted to the leeches and the FUCKING PUNCHLINE is that they, not only they don't reciprocate our attraction, they outright feel disgusted by our own very existence.

That line that Arthur Fleck says "my life is nothing more than a comedy" starts to become more relatable the more I think about this topic.

What a fucking joke!

I never understood why foids are attracted to each other so much. As a male, homosexuality between other men absolutely disgusts me. But I see foids claiming to be friends literally rubbing over each other and kissing and I dont understand. What's the biological motivation behind this? They're literally repelled at the sight of not just sub5's, but just about any man (except Chad ofc). Hell, even Chad has begun to transition from stereotypical alpha jacked guys over to pretty boys with increasing feminine traits. Is this a massive brainwashing by the government to feminize men to control them? I'm so confused, bros.

FYI it's mostly in western society that 2 men being close to each other is seen as "gay". In Mediterranean and middle eastern cultures it's normal, or at least used to be normal for men to hug and kiss each other (not on the lips). But that's changed in the last generation due to western influence and global homosexualization

Nature came up with the brilliant idea of having a very unbalanced reproductive strategy between the genders. It varies from species to species, but generally, the female is much less interested in the male because pregnancy is costly and impregnating is easy, and on top of that, a male has a very high ceiling as he can very easily keep fathering offspring nonstop, while a female can only get pregnant from 1 male at a time.

Evolution is extremely complex and the result of counterforces and balances, and when it comes to sexuality, many factors are at play. For humans, females need to be extremely picky to ensure that the male is worth the effort of getting pregnant, that he'll stuck around to take care of the child, and that he can provide enough resources. Therefore, being too attracted to men would be a bad strategy because the guy can just pump and dump her and leave her pregnant, and because no matter how many guys she has sex with, she can only get pregnant by one at a time. Meanwhile, for males, the reverse happens, as technically the best strategy would be to be a horndog and a simp who's obsessed with females and spends his life trying to court and fuck one, making him more likely to get one pregnant and pass on his genes.

Now, these strategies are at odds with each other, but there are counterbalances. For example, a female who's too picky will end up not reproducing, or being pumped and dumped by Chad, leaving her alone with the child. Likewise, a male who doesn't stick around and just wants to fuck, won't take care of his children, making them less likely to survive. That's why we're mostly monogamous, because having both parents taking care of the children was the most successful tactic.

Of course that's not the whole story. Harems in which a dominant male impregnates multiple females existed, and in that case, the females will be competing with each other. There's a theory that proposes that bisexuality in females was selected for, as having sex with each other is a way to reduce tensions, and on top of that also makes Chad happy. But even in non harem contexts, having a pseudo romantic and sexual relationship with a close female friend also reduces tensions and it makes it more likely that they'll help each other when it comes to raising their children. At the same time, they can't be too attracted to each other, as that would distract them from finding a worthy male to reproduce with.

In reference to this previous point, there's also a theory that links female bisexuality with faster life reproduction strategies, which, in essence, consists of priorizing earlier reproduction, higher quantity of offspring with minimized parental care, and engaging in risky behaviors that provide an immediate reward, over longer term, more quality focused behaviors. This is particularly interesting, because females with increased bisexuality do have higher libidos, higher rates of teen pregnancies, score higher in dark triad traits, invest less in parental care, have higher criminality rates, are more likely to abuse and be abused by their partners, have addictions (they even are more likely to spend more time on the internet, so whenever you read some outrageous misandrist hot take, it's likely to be made by some trashy bisexual cunt). Therefore, they could be the result of following a reproductive strategy which consists of getting pregnant by as many Chads as possible, engage in risky behaviors to get by, and carpet munch with their bestie to more or less take care of the children of the Chad that pumped and dumped her.


To summarize, moderate levels of bisexuality can be a way of enabling a closer alliance with one's one gender, which will help reducing tensions or raising the children. Male bisexuality is probably less common and our friendships are way less intimate because the males have to compete for the females, as they're too picky to afford to diverge any attention from them. As a result, female sexuality is an absolute mess: they can't be too attracted to men, they need to be picky but be able to settle, they must be obsessed with their mate's status and resources, they can be bisexual but not too much, they need to be able to quickly move on from relationships in case the male dies or she finds another male of higher status, etc.

Another very possible issue is that endocrine disruptors, which are chemicals that alter our hormones and are ubiquitous in modern civilization, could be significantly altering human sexuality (particularly due to their effects on the development of the brain during the fetal stages) making females more bisexual and less attracted to men, and the males to be less masculine and possibly be more bisexual as well.

 

[GrandWizard_137]

Nature came up with the brilliant idea of having a very unbalanced reproductive strategy between the genders. It varies from species to species, but generally, the female is much less interested in the male because pregnancy is costly and impregnating is easy, and on top of that, a male has a very high ceiling as he can very easily keep fathering offspring nonstop, while a female can only get pregnant from 1 male at a time.

Evolution is extremely complex and the result of counterforces and balances, and when it comes to sexuality, many factors are at play. For humans, females need to be extremely picky to ensure that the male is worth the effort of getting pregnant, that he'll stuck around to take care of the child, and that he can provide enough resources. Therefore, being too attracted to men would be a bad strategy because the guy can just pump and dump her and leave her pregnant, and because no matter how many guys she has sex with, she can only get pregnant by one at a time. Meanwhile, for males, the reverse happens, as technically the best strategy would be to be a horndog and a simp who's obsessed with females and spends his life trying to court and fuck one, making him more likely to get one pregnant and pass on his genes.

Now, these strategies are at odds with each other, but there are counterbalances. For example, a female who's too picky will end up not reproducing, or being pumped and dumped by Chad, leaving her alone with the child. Likewise, a male who doesn't stick around and just wants to fuck, won't take care of his children, making them less likely to survive. That's why we're mostly monogamous, because having both parents taking care of the children was the most successful tactic.

Of course that's not the whole story. Harems in which a dominant male impregnates multiple females existed, and in that case, the females will be competing with each other. There's a theory that proposes that bisexuality in females was selected for, as having sex with each other is a way to reduce tensions, and on top of that also makes Chad happy. But even in non harem contexts, having a pseudo romantic and sexual relationship with a close female friend also reduces tensions and it makes it more likely that they'll help each other when it comes to raising their children. At the same time, they can't be too attracted to each other, as that would distract them from finding a worthy male to reproduce with.

In reference to this previous point, there's also a theory that links female bisexuality with faster life reproduction strategies, which, in essence, consists of priorizing earlier reproduction, higher quantity of offspring with minimized parental care, and engaging in risky behaviors that provide an immediate reward, over longer term, more quality focused behaviors. This is particularly interesting, because females with increased bisexuality do have higher libidos, higher rates of teen pregnancies, score higher in dark triad traits, invest less in parental care, have higher criminality rates, are more likely to abuse and be abused by their partners, have addictions (they even are more likely to spend more time on the internet, so whenever you read some outrageous misandrist hot take, it's likely to be made by some trashy bisexual cunt). Therefore, they could be the result of following a reproductive strategy which consists of getting pregnant by as many Chads as possible, engage in risky behaviors to get by, and carpet munch with their bestie to more or less take care of the children of the Chad that pumped and dumped her.


To summarize, moderate levels of bisexuality can be a way of enabling a closer alliance with one's one gender, which will help reducing tensions or raising the children. Male bisexuality is probably less common and our friendships are way less intimate because the males have to compete for the females, as they're too picky to afford to diverge any attention from them. As a result, female sexuality is an absolute mess: they can't be too attracted to men, they need to be picky but be able to settle, they must be obsessed with their mate's status and resources, they can be bisexual but not too much, they need to be able to quickly move on from relationships in case the male dies or she finds another male of higher status, etc.

Another very possible issue is that endocrine disruptors, which are chemicals that alter our hormones and are ubiquitous in modern civilization, could be significantly altering human sexuality (particularly due to their effects on the development of the brain during the fetal stages) making females more bisexual and less attracted to men, and the males to be less masculine and possibly be more bisexual as well.

genius level iqmogger. read every word and it makes perfect sense.

 

[NDManlet173]

I never understood why foids are attracted to each other so much. As a male, homosexuality between other men absolutely disgusts me. But I see foids claiming to be friends literally rubbing over each other and kissing and I dont understand. What's the biological motivation behind this? They're literally repelled at the sight of not just sub5's, but just about any man (except Chad ofc). Hell, even Chad has begun to transition from stereotypical alpha jacked guys over to pretty boys with increasing feminine traits. Is this a massive brainwashing by the government to feminize men to control them? I'm so confused, bros.