The moral panic and hysteria about "child sexual abuse" "pedophilia" and "sex offenders" is the result of feminism

[Extra-Samsaric]

We all know how much normgroids hate "pedophiles", "nonces", etc- at this point I think most normgroids would be fine with seeing Nazi-style medical experiments on then.

What's even more amusing is the so-called conservatives have hopped on the anti-pedo bandwagon- the modern moral hysteria and moral panic concerning "pedophiles" "sex offenders" and "child sexual abuse" has nothing whatsoever to do with conservativism or traditionalism, and it is in fact the product of a matriarchal, feminized, and atomized culture. Show me a single pre-20th century culture where this nonsense hysteria and moral panic existed. You can't- this was all started in the late 70s to early 80s, not by hardline conservatives, but by feminist activists and their allies in the mainstream media. All of you incels who are fiercely anti-pedo are simply playing right into the hands of the gynocentric, matriarchal order.

 

[Deleted member 26242]

GrAYcel thread.

 

[Lv99_BixNood]

Hoes mad men want to fuck women younger than them, more news at 11.

 

[Deleted member 24529]

GrAYcel thread.

Oh the irony. Imagine calling someone graycel when they are right.

100% right OP, aoc was created and consequently rised by feminism. Fucking a 13 yo causes no psychological damage to her that was ever proven to be the case. Grooming was a norm 80 years ago and through millenia, because foids can only behave well if an older guy takes them for their osn in their young days. But that means healthy, normal strong families so of course its a nono.

 

[Detro]

Anyone else find it funny how there's a pedo hysteria, womens rights movements, gay rights, modern social movements in general,
but when you reference the bible you don't see anything about an age of consent. You instead see a lot about how women are supposed to submit to men, homosexuality is a sin, slavery isn't a sin, slaves should obey their masters etc.
It's so wild how western Christian civilization has done a 180 like that.

 

[Greyjediincel]

Yes. Yes. Playing right into their hands because I don't think it's okay for you to fuck children. Whatever. If locking up sickos like you is because of feminism, well, what's the saying? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

 

[radishman]

I don't remember nearly as many teachers raping kids as I have in the past 10 or so years when feminism seemed to be at it's peak. And honestly all those old gen stories of a male teacher doing it... I'm willing to bet the foid was the instigator.

 

[Extra-Samsaric]

Anyone else find it funny how there's a pedo hysteria, womens rights movements, gay rights, modern social movements in general,
but when you reference the bible you don't see anything about an age of consent. You instead see a lot about how women are supposed to submit to men, homosexuality is a sin, slavery isn't a sin, slaves should obey their masters etc.
It's so wild how western Christian civilization has done a 180 like that.

Exactly. That's why I say there can be no reconciliation whatsoever between the modern mentality and the genuine religious spirit- to strengthen one is to weaken the other.

Yes. Yes. Playing right into their hands because I don't think it's okay for you to fuck children. Whatever. If locking up sickos like you is because of feminism, well, what's the saying? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

I don't condone having sex with children, but this modern hysteria/moral panic is ironically doing far more harm to children than "pedophiles/nonces." Because of this moral panic/hysteria, it is highly risky for men to interact with children who they are not related to- but kids need close relationships with men other than their fathers.

 

[Deleted member 20207]

High IQ. You nailed it.

Yes. Yes. Playing right into their hands because I don't think it's okay for you to fuck children. Whatever. If locking up sickos like you is because of feminism, well, what's the saying? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Why do you care? Imagine being a white knight moralfag on a blackpilled incel forum…

GrAYcel thread.

Worthless comment.

 

[sora]

low iq post and copes in the replies who support this im against feminism 100000% but let's stop this cope about pedophilia there are endless studies on how adults having even consensual sex with children or anything relating to that creates psychological trauma among other mental illnesses this isn't even up for discussion

 

[Greyjediincel]

High IQ. You nailed it.


Why do you care? Imagine being a white knight moralfag on a blackpilled incel forum…


Worthless comment.

Not wanting kids raped isn't being a moral fat. It's just a basic standard of any moral system.

 

[THE TRUE HONKLER]

Oh the irony. Imagine calling someone graycel when they are right.

100% right OP, aoc was created and consequently rised by feminism. Fucking a 13 yo causes no psychological damage to her that was ever proven to be the case. Grooming was a norm 80 years ago and through millenia, because foids can only behave well if an older guy takes them for their osn in their young days. But that means healthy, normal strong families so of course its a nono.

Anyone else find it funny how there's a pedo hysteria, womens rights movements, gay rights, modern social movements in general,
but when you reference the bible you don't see anything about an age of consent. You instead see a lot about how women are supposed to submit to men, homosexuality is a sin, slavery isn't a sin, slaves should obey their masters etc.
It's so wild how western Christian civilization has done a 180 like that.

Not wanting kids raped isn't being a moral fat. It's just a basic standard of any moral system.

kids are too coddled these days and end up being pussies, rape is a meme crime that people over react to anyway.

 

[Deleted member 20207]

Not wanting kids raped isn't being a moral fat. It's just a basic standard of any moral system.

low iq post and copes in the replies who support this im against feminism 100000% but let's stop this cope about pedophilia there are endless studies on how adults having even consensual sex with children or anything relating to that creates psychological trauma among other mental illnesses this isn't even up for discussion

Having any morals is just a mental limitation, especially as an incel, because then you basically cater to a system upheld by normies in order to oppress you. It is normal for men with healthy testosterone levels to be attracted to prepubescent females:

Scientific Blackpill

incels.wiki

Being against pedophilia (or, at least, hebephilia) is therefore nothing but an anti-male, feminist opinion. Caring about female validation, such as whether female children like having sex or not, is cucked. Female children are inevitably only going to grow up to become like every other whore who has rejected you. Defending them, is therefore illogical.

Also, why do prepubescent females dress like whores, if they are completely asexual beings?

As an incel, females will always hate you and never have sex with you voluntarily, so the only sex you can get then, is non-consensual sex. Being against pedophilia, is like being against rape of roasties who only fuck Chads and sadistically reject incels. AWALT, no matter the age.

 

[sora]

Having any morals is just a mental limitation, especially as an incel, because then you basically cater to a system upheld by normies in order to oppress you. It is normal for men with healthy testosterone levels to be attracted to prepubescent females:

View attachment 387367

Scientific Blackpill

incels.wiki

Being against pedophilia (or, at least, hebephilia) is therefore nothing but an anti-male, feminist opinion. Caring about female validation, such as whether female children like having sex or not, is cucked. Female children are inevitably only going to grow up to become like every other whore who has rejected you. Defending them, is therefore illogical.

Also, why do prepubescent females dress like whores, if they are completely asexual beings?

As an incel, females will always hate you and never have sex with you voluntarily, so the only sex you can get then, is non-consensual sex. Being against pedophilia, is like being against rape of roasties who only fuck Chads and sadistically reject incels. AWALT, no matter the age.

i never said there's anything wrong with being born a pedophile, as in, being attracted to children but NOT ACTING on it, at that point, there's literally nothing u can do because it's biological... but there's a distinct difference between being sexually attracted to children and not acting on it vs acting on it, as i said already, people who have been sexually abused as children develop mental illnesses, many of these children grow up to be addicted to drugs and live extremely miserable lives, the top degenerates in this world tend to be the ones who were abused sexually as children, children are inherently innocent that's why i defend them whether they're a boy or a girl, when they grow up to be adults is when i will judge them for their actions, not when they are kids... stop coping this is actually so embarrassing and extremely low iq

 

[Greyjediincel]

Having any morals is just a mental limitation, especially as an incel, because then you basically cater to a system upheld by normies in order to oppress you. It is normal for men with healthy testosterone levels to be attracted to prepubescent females:

View attachment 387367

Scientific Blackpill

incels.wiki

Being against pedophilia (or, at least, hebephilia) is therefore nothing but an anti-male, feminist opinion. Caring about female validation, such as whether female children like having sex or not, is cucked. Female children are inevitably only going to grow up to become like every other whore who has rejected you. Defending them, is therefore illogical.

Also, why do prepubescent females dress like whores, if they are completely asexual beings?

As an incel, females will always hate you and never have sex with you voluntarily, so the only sex you can get then, is non-consensual sex. Being against pedophilia, is like being against rape of roasties who only fuck Chads and sadistically reject incels. AWALT, no matter the age.

Muh dick hard so screw morality. You're a sad little person.

 

[DeepSea]

low iq post and copes in the replies who support this im against feminism 100000% but let's stop this cope about pedophilia there are endless studies on how adults having even consensual sex with children or anything relating to that creates psychological trauma among other mental illnesses this isn't even up for discussion

It's not a cope, it's the cold hard truth. There's lots of research showing that most of the trauma from "child sexual abuse" is the result of modern society conditioning people to see it as horrible, and that if it happens to them, it's super bad. People not exposed to that cultural conditioning rarely suffer from damage or trauma if the incident wasn't overtly violent. Read, for example, Susan Clancy's book "The Trauma Myth", Bruce Rind et al's Meta Study, and Allie Kilpatric's research (findings summarised in 'Long-range effects of child and adolescent sexual experiences'.)

Wikipedia is a horrible source of information on the topic because of rampant censorship. They immediately ban anyone who questions the feminist narrative. Their article about pedophilia is as bad or worse than their article about incels.

Being against pedophilia (or, at least, hebephilia) is therefore nothing but an anti-male, feminist opinion. Caring about female validation, such as whether female children like having sex or not, is cucked. Female children are inevitably only going to grow up to become like every other whore who has rejected you. Defending them, is therefore illogical.

Exactly, well said.

 

[Deleted member 20207]

Muh dick hard so screw morality. You're a sad little person.

It's not a cope, it's the cold hard truth. There's lots of research showing that most of the trauma from "child sexual abuse" is the result of modern society conditioning people to see it as horrible, and that if it happens to them, it's super bad. People not exposed to that cultural conditioning rarely suffer from damage or trauma if the incident wasn't overtly violent. Read, for example, Susan Clancy's book "The Trauma Myth, Bruce Rind et al's Meta Study, and Allie Kilpatric's research (findings summarised in 'Long-range effects of child and adolescent sexual experiences'.)

Wikipedia is a horrible source for information on the topic because of rampant censorship. They immediately ban anyone who questions the feminist narrative. Their article about pedophilia is as bad or worse than their article about incels.

High IQ. “Trauma” is a taught feeling. A lot of people claim to have been traumatized (by, for instance, “child sexual abuse”) first when they later read about that they should be traumatized, not when it actually occured. It thus has no legitimacy.

 

[curryboy420]

GrAYcel thread.

please, you are barely out of grey, stfu fag

 

[sora]

High IQ. “Trauma” is a taught feeling. A lot of people claim to have been traumatized (by, for instance, “child sexual abuse”) first when they later read about that they should be traumatized, not when it actually occured. It thus has no legitimacy.

there is absolutely no evidence that it's a taught feeling, you are coping and this is embarrassing, anyone who sympathizes with people who commit evil on the purest form of innocence, children, is ridiculous, u are no better and actually worse than a cuck or a foid for having such a viewpoint

It's not a cope, it's the cold hard truth. There's lots of research showing that most of the trauma from "child sexual abuse" is the result of modern society conditioning people to see it as horrible, and that if it happens to them, it's super bad. People not exposed to that cultural conditioning rarely suffer from damage or trauma if the incident wasn't overtly violent. Read, for example, Susan Clancy's book "The Trauma Myth", Bruce Rind et al's Meta Study, and Allie Kilpatric's research (findings summarised in 'Long-range effects of child and adolescent sexual experiences'.)

Wikipedia is a horrible source of information on the topic because of rampant censorship. They immediately ban anyone who questions the feminist narrative. Their article about pedophilia is as bad or worse than their article about incels.


Exactly, well said.

taking advantage of a child sexually is disgusting, it's actually funny to see people on here coping about polygamy and promiscuity (which i couldn't be more against) but then sympathize with child rapists, the cope is too strong

 

[Deleted member 20207]

there is absolutely no evidence that it's a taught feeling, you are coping and this is embarrassing, anyone who sympathizes with people who commit evil on the purest form of innocence, children, is ridiculous, u are no better and actually worse than a cuck or a foid for having such a viewpoint

taking advantage of a child sexually is disgusting, it's actually funny to see people on here coping about polygamy and promiscuity (which i couldn't be more against) but then sympathize with child rapists, the cope is too strong

1) “Good” and “evil” do not exist. They are only concepts invented by elites for the use of manipulation, by mentally limiting the masses. By following any moral system, you show that you are a normie without independent thought who wants to feel superior by being a “good” person, as the elite wants.
2) No one is innocent, not even children. Female children are going to grow up to become whores like every other female.
3) There is evidence that “trauma” is a taught feeling. Read the post I replied to. Also, think logically about it. There is absolutely no reason to be traumatized by anything that does not physically hurt you, such as rape or pedophilia. Claiming to be “traumatized”, is only a manipulation tactic.
4) There is nothing morally wrong about female hypergamy. Female power is naturally wrong though, because men are stronger than females.

 

[Dr. Dicklet]

There is evidence that “trauma” is a taught feeling

That's why so many women are coming out of the woodwork saying they've been abused, because society is making them feel like the victim. If nobody said anything, they wouldn't give it a second thought

 

[Insanitycel]

sex offender = ugly male

 

[Deleted member 24529]

Yes. Yes. Playing right into their hands because I don't think it's okay for you to fuck children. Whatever. If locking up sickos like you is because of feminism, well, what's the saying? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

I will rape your child if you ever have one (in Postal 2). How about that, you triggered litteral SJW?

 

[DeepSea]

there is absolutely no evidence that it's a taught feeling, you are coping and this is embarrassing, anyone who sympathizes with people who commit evil on the purest form of innocence, children, is ridiculous, u are no better and actually worse than a cuck or a foid for having such a viewpoint

I already provided the evidence, you just won't accept it due to your cucked mentality.

Even a foid like Susan Clancy who spend years trying to prove that pedophilia is harmful had to acknowledge that child-adult sex will only cause trauma if society brainwashes the child into believing they were abused.

Childhood innocence is a modern construct - children is the past were treated like miniature adults and were basically adults in terms of expectations once they hit puberty - women married young. In the U.S. we allow children to be indoctrinated into religious institutions; consume unhealthy diets; play harmful contact sports, such as the brain-destroying tackle football; watch movies involving emotionally sensitive and complex topics such as death, war, etc; train exhaustively for emotionally demanding competitions such as spelling bees, gymnastics tournaments, etc.; slaughter innocent animals during hunting trips, fishing, and daily meals; and so on.

Children are unable to fully understand the life-long implications of any of these activities, yet they are all legal and socially acceptable while sex is not. There is no rational basis for this discrepancy. When you consider the fact that in societies such as ancient Greece or modern day Afghanistan there is little psychological damage observed in sexually active children, the decision to engage in adult-child sex seems inconsequential, making it even more difficult to rationalize the notion that children cannot consent to sex yet are able to engage in variety of other, non-sexual activities that are infinitely more dangerous than pedophilia.

taking advantage of a child sexually is disgusting, it's actually funny to see people on here coping about polygamy and promiscuity (which i couldn't be more against) but then sympathize with child rapists, the cope is too strong

Foids derive their value from their sexuality. When patriarchy is restored and females are are made the property of men, as they should be, you can be sure that their husbands/owners will do their utmost to take care of them and that they will view them as their most valuable and prized possessions. It's not exploitation to expect your wife to provide you with sex if you are taking care of her and letting her live with you. Both young girls and adult foids can and should satisfy their husbands/owners' need for sex and intimacy. If they don't want to, they should be forced. If a girl is too young to be penetrated vaginally, she should perform other sex acts on her husband/owner.

 

[sora]

I already provided the evidence, you just won't accept it due to your cucked mentality.

Even a foid like Susan Clancy who spend years trying to prove that pedophilia is harmful had to acknowledge that child-adult sex will only cause trauma if society brainwashes the child into believing they were abused.

Childhood innocence is a modern construct - children is the past were treated like miniature adults and were basically adults in terms of expectations once they hit puberty - women married young. In the U.S. we allow children to be indoctrinated into religious institutions; consume unhealthy diets; play harmful contact sports, such as the brain-destroying tackle football; watch movies involving emotionally sensitive and complex topics such as death, war, etc; train exhaustively for emotionally demanding competitions such as spelling bees, gymnastics tournaments, etc.; slaughter innocent animals during hunting trips, fishing, and daily meals; and so on.

Children are unable to fully understand the life-long implications of any of these activities, yet they are all legal and socially acceptable while sex is not. There is no rational basis for this discrepancy. When you consider the fact that in societies such as ancient Greece or modern day Afghanistan there is little psychological damage observed in sexually active children, the decision to engage in adult-child sex seems inconsequential, making it even more difficult to rationalize the notion that children cannot consent to sex yet are able to engage in variety of other, non-sexual activities that are infinitely more dangerous than pedophilia.


Women derive their value from their sexuality. When patriarchy is restored and females are are made the property of men, as they should be, you can be sure that their husbands/owners will do their utmost to take care of them and that they will love them as their most valuable and prized possesions. It's not exploitation to expect your wife to provide you with sex if you are taking care of her and letting her live with you. Both young girls and adult women can and should satisfy their husbands/owners' need for sex and intimacy. If they don't want to, they should be forced. If a girl is too young to be penetrated vaginally, she should perform other sex acts on her husband/owner.

not reading this wall of text after u called my mentality cucked when i haven't said anything that's remotely cucked, u can keep coping by sympathizing with child rapists if u want ur just delusional

 

[Greyjediincel]

I will rape your child if you ever have one (in Postal 2). How about that, you triggered litteral SJW?

No. I doubt you're capable of rape. You're just a bundle of impotent rage. So insecure, out of touch and twisted that you think being against pedophilia is radical.

 

[Deleted member 24529]

No. I doubt you're capable of rape. You're just a bundle of impotent rage. So insecure, out of touch and twisted that you think being against pedophilia is radical.

Imagine being that openly anti incel on a incel forum by incel shaming. Found the infiltrator.

 

[Greyjediincel]

Imagine being that openly anti incel on a incel forum by incel shaming. Found the infiltrator.

Inceldom doesn't have anything to do with raping kids. You're the one making us look like monsters. If there's an infiltrator between the two of us, it ain't me.

 

[Deleted member 24529]

Inceldom doesn't have anything to do with raping kids. You're the one making us look like monsters. If there's an infiltrator between the two of us, it ain't me.

GTFO of here. You reek of feminine energy. I already blocked you anyways.

 

[Deleted member 20207]

Inceldom doesn't have anything to do with raping kids. You're the one making us look like monsters. If there's an infiltrator between the two of us, it ain't me.

Just lol at caring about how we “look like”. Being a moralfag will not get you any pussy. If you were blackpilled, you would know this.

 

[Deleted member 26242]

please, you are barely out of grey, stfu fag

Cope harder you cucks are too high inhib to wanna fuck lolis anyway.

Oh the irony. Imagine calling someone graycel when they are right.

100% right OP, aoc was created and consequently rised by feminism. Fucking a 13 yo causes no psychological damage to her that was ever proven to be the case. Grooming was a norm 80 years ago and through millenia, because foids can only behave well if an older guy takes them for their osn in their young days. But that means healthy, normal strong families so of course its a nono.

COPE HARDER pussy. I highly doubt any of you are low inhib enough to do what nathan larson is doing. All talk and no bite.

 

[Greyjediincel]

Just lol at caring about how we “look like”. Being a moralfag will not get you any pussy. If you were blackpilled, you would know this.

I'm an incel. Why would anything I don't believe have to do with getting laid? It's already over. That isn't even something I consider.

GTFO of here. You reek of feminine energy. I already blocked you anyways.

You don't get to tell me what to do. Have to block me because you can't handle negative feedback. Just another ineffectual chapter in your sad life.

 

[nazianime]

Yes. Yes. Playing right into their hands because I don't think it's okay for you to fuck children. Whatever. If locking up sickos like you is because of feminism, well, what's the saying? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

low iq post and copes in the replies who support this im against feminism 100000% but let's stop this cope about pedophilia there are endless studies on how adults having even consensual sex with children or anything relating to that creates psychological trauma among other mental illnesses this isn't even up for discussion

Please read,

https://incels.is/threads/the-true-...inimal-marriage-age-laws.204517/#post-4572642

Has all the information to refute your argument. Also teens are not kids by any standard. You should use language that describes age groups accurately instead of grouping everyone that is under 18 as kids. There are pedophiles (preteens), hebephiles (13-15 tweens) and epbephiles 16+).

 

[Dotrinfobe]

Just lol at caring about how we “look like”. Being a moralfag will not get you any pussy. If you were blackpilled, you would know this.

this is true 100%. i just cant understand those idiots who think like "huuu durrr you make us look bad", normies gonna demonize us no matter what. same apply to those who obsesse over IT. i dont understand why some incels think ITs opinion even matter.

There is absolutely no reason to be traumatized by anything that does not physically hurt you, such as rape or pedophilia. Claiming to be “traumatized”, is only a manipulation tactic.

what? trauma definately can exist when its not physical. are you saying acts like bullying dont result in trauma? negative reinforcements is a receipe for giga mental-cels.

you going on the other extreme by claiming trauma doesnt exist unless its physicall violence

 

[MountainGorilla]

We all know how much normgroids hate "pedophiles", "nonces", etc- at this point I think most normgroids would be fine with seeing Nazi-style medical experiments on then.

What's even more amusing is the so-called conservatives have hopped on the anti-pedo bandwagon- the modern moral hysteria and moral panic concerning "pedophiles" "sex offenders" and "child sexual abuse" has nothing whatsoever to do with conservativism or traditionalism, and it is in fact the product of a matriarchal, feminized, and atomized culture. Show me a single pre-20th century culture where this nonsense hysteria and moral panic existed. You can't- this was all started in the late 70s to early 80s, not by hardline conservatives, but by feminist activists and their allies in the mainstream media. All of you incels who are fiercely anti-pedo are simply playing right into the hands of the gynocentric, matriarchal order.

Water is wet thread. Lurk moar newfag.

 

[Neggr]

Hoes mad men want to fuck women younger than them, more news at 11.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Yes. Yes. Playing right into their hands because I don't think it's okay for you to fuck children. Whatever. If locking up sickos like you is because of feminism, well, what's the saying? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

1. Depends on what you mean by child, pedophilia is thrown around a lot at guys trying to date even 16 year olds

2. If the "children" are already fucking eachother at "that age" (whatever that age group may be), then its completely illogical to treat an "adult" trying to fuck them as some kind of aberration, some kind of gross abnormality that is inconceivable

Its ridiculous that a 15 year old female can literally walk out of a room just giving a 15 year old Chad a blowjob, choking on his dick and swallowing his cum, but if I was standing outside of that door not knowing what just happened and asked her out on a date, I'd be called a "sexual predator" for trying to "take advantage" of an "innocent girl"

All I'm saying is it has to be logical, the rules have to follow some kind of consistent logic else its nothing but personal bias and prejudice guiding the collective decisions of society

Having any morals is just a mental limitation, especially as an incel, because then you basically cater to a system upheld by normies in order to oppress you. It is normal for men with healthy testosterone levels to be attracted to prepubescent females:

View attachment 387367

Scientific Blackpill

incels.wiki

Being against pedophilia (or, at least, hebephilia) is therefore nothing but an anti-male, feminist opinion. Caring about female validation, such as whether female children like having sex or not, is cucked. Female children are inevitably only going to grow up to become like every other whore who has rejected you. Defending them, is therefore illogical.

Also, why do prepubescent females dress like whores, if they are completely asexual beings?

As an incel, females will always hate you and never have sex with you voluntarily, so the only sex you can get then, is non-consensual sex. Being against pedophilia, is like being against rape of roasties who only fuck Chads and sadistically reject incels. AWALT, no matter the age.

High IQ. “Trauma” is a taught feeling. A lot of people claim to have been traumatized (by, for instance, “child sexual abuse”) first when they later read about that they should be traumatized, not when it actually occured. It thus has no legitimacy.

Agreed

Your posts are sounding weirdly similar to the way I think, especially that last one about trauma, this is something I have talked about that I rarely see people mention, trauma is something that is learnt, and it is a fact that a lot of children only react negatively to what is called "abuse" because they are told it is negative and they should feel that way about it

There are girls in Africa that are married at 13 to guys in their 40's and 50's (in villages), and they don't see it as "abuse" or see it as "traumatic", its just part of life, its only if exposed to western values would they start to think anything of it

 

[solblue]

Hoes mad men want to fuck women younger than them, more news at 11.

Basically regulatory capture

 

[Mainländer]

True. @Edmund_Kemper once sent me an amazing article about it: https://thingstotellmankind.blogspot.com/2019/12/the-history-of-pedophilia-and-sex.html?m=1

And I made a thread about it: https://incels.is/threads/the-true-face-of-unnaturally-high-aoc-minimal-marriage-age-laws.204517/