Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The moment you realize that you will never ascend, ever, and that you need to deal with the rest of your life

K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Wizard
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
4,365
One way to do that is to rope. But there is another way.

The other way is to make sense of what happened, i.e. why there are so many incels now while there were very few just a six decades ago, or so.

This is the only way not to rope and this is basically what all oldcels have done (more or less). To summarize, there are only two possibilities:
  1. Rope
  2. Make sense of the situation and become an oldcel.
Option 2. is extremely hard because you get no help. In the past, you could count on priests to make sense of your life. Don't scoff at that. Priests were well integrated into their respective cultures and these cultures had 1000s of years of experience dealing with human problems. Within the parameters of these cultures, priests were effective at helping you make sense of your situation, whatever it was.

Today, we have shrinks instead of priests. These are charlatans. They do not understand their own culture (they even explicitly reject cultural issues as a cause of mental illness :feelsohh:) and have no more than a few decades of past experience to work with. That short period is far below the minimum to make any sense. As a result, they are far inferior to priests as far as it comes to helping you make sense of things. The only thing they can do is turn you into a drooling vegetable with drugs. Often, they make your mental pain worse.

So, coming back to option 2, you have to work it out on your own.

For this, you need to be familiar with how human culture developed in the last 6000 years (that is about how long civilization existed). In other words, you need to be familiar with:
  1. History
    1. The agricultural revolution
    2. Mesopotamian ancient history
    3. Ancient Egyptian history
    4. The Persian Achaemenid empire
    5. The Greeks
    6. The Romans
    7. Late antiquity
    8. Early India
    9. The rise of Islam
    10. Byzantine History
    11. Medieval European history
    12. Early modern history
    13. The industrial revolution
    14. XIXth and XXth century history
  2. Philology
    1. Sumerian language (basics)
    2. Semitic Philology (Akkadian, Aramean, Hebrew, Arabic)
    3. Indo-European philology (Ur-Heimat theory, reconstructed PIE, cognates derivation)
  3. Literature
    1. 17th century Theatre (Shakespeare, Moliere)
    2. 18th century philosophical literature (Voltaire, Rousseau)
    3. The novel (Cervantes, Stendhal, Flaubert, Dostoyevski, Proust)
    4. Existentialist literature in the XXth century
    5. Bullshit XXth century stuff: Dada, Surrealism, Lettrism, etc ...
  4. Religion
    1. Ancient Indo-European religion (Dumezil)
    2. Ancient paganism (Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Greek, Roman, Indian)
    3. Indian early Shramanic movements (Yoga, Buddhism, Vanaprashthas, Jains)
    4. Judaism (before and after the Exile in Babylon)
    5. Christianity
      1. Pauline Christianity and possible Essene origins
      2. Probable non-historicity of JC
      3. Evangelic Christianity
      4. Early theologians (Origen, Tertullian)
      5. Heresies (Gnosticism, Marcionism, Marchaeism)
      6. Conversion of Constantine
      7. Councils (Nicea to Chalcedon)
      8. Early monastic movement (Egyptian Desert Fathers, Basil, John Cassian)
      9. Medieval Western Monasticism (Ireland, Benedict, Citeaux, Clervaux, etc.)
      10. The Reformation
      11. Theological debates since the reformation (Calvinism vs. Arminianism)
    6. Islam
      1. Non-historicity of Muhammad and the early development of Islam (Olig, Puin, Luxenberg)
      2. Shias and the establishment of the Abbasids
      3. Legalists vs. Sufis
    7. Philosophy (under "Religion", this is on purpose)
      1. Greek ancient philosophy (Aristotle, Plato)
      2. Indian Philosophy (The Upanishads, Ramanuja, Shankara)
      3. Christian philosophy (Augustine, Thomas Aquinas)
      4. Neo-Platonic revival (Marcilio Ficino, Pico)
      5. 17th century debate btw. Rationalism and Empiricism + Kant
      6. Hegel, Marx, etc
      7. Max Stirner, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche
      8. The linguistic turn in early XXth century (B. Russell, The Vienna Circle)
      9. Wittgenstein
      10. Girard and the relationship between literature, philosophy and religion
I am not saying that you should have a PhD in each of these subjects, but you need to have a reasonable familiarity with all of them. You don't need to know everything because Wikipedia is there to supply the missing bits (it is an excellent source for these non-controversial topics), but you need to have an overall mental map of all this field and understand the relationship between the different topics (in particular the interplay between history and religion)

Either you are able to make sense of where Inceldom fits in all of this, or you rope.

In other words, you have to be your own priest.
 
wr
One way to do that is to rope. But there is another way.

The other way is to make sense of what happened, i.e. why there are so many incels now while there were very few just a six decades ago, or so.

This is the only way not to rope and this is basically what all oldcels have done (more or less). To summarize, there are only two possibilities:
  1. Rope
  2. Make sense of the situation and become an oldcel.
Option 2. is extremely hard because you get no help. In the past, you could count on priests to make sense of your life. Don't scoff at that. Priests were well integrated into their respective cultures and these cultures had 1000s of years of experience dealing with human problems. Within the parameters of these cultures, priests were effective at helping you make sense of your situation, whatever it was.

Today, we have shrinks instead of priests. These are charlatans. They do not understand their own culture (they even explicitly reject cultural issues as a cause of mental illness :feelsohh:) and have no more than a few decades of past experience to work with. That short period is far below the minimum to make any sense. As a result, they are far inferior to priests as far as it comes to helping you make sense of things. The only thing they can do is turn you into a drooling vegetable with drugs. Often, they make your mental pain worse.

So, coming back to option 2, you have to work it out on your own.

For this, you need to be familiar with how human culture developed in the last 6000 years (that is about how long civilization existed). In other words, you need to be familiar with:
  1. History
    1. The agricultural revolution
    2. Mesopotamian ancient history
    3. Ancient Egyptian history
    4. The Persian Achaemenid empire
    5. The Greeks
    6. The Romans
    7. Late antiquity
    8. Early India
    9. The rise of Islam
    10. Byzantine History
    11. Medieval European history
    12. Early modern history
    13. The industrial revolution
    14. XIXth and XXth century history
  2. Philology
    1. Sumerian language (basics)
    2. Semitic Philology (Akkadian, Aramean, Hebrew, Arabic)
    3. Indo-European philology (Ur-Heimat theory, reconstructed PIE, cognates derivation)
  3. Literature
    1. 17th century Theatre (Shakespeare, Moliere)
    2. 18th century philosophical literature (Voltaire, Rousseau)
    3. The novel (Cervantes, Stendhal, Flaubert, Dostoyevski, Proust)
    4. Existentialist literature in the XXth century
    5. Bullshit XXth century stuff: Dada, Surrealism, Lettrism, etc ...
  4. Religion
    1. Ancient Indo-European religion (Dumezil)
    2. Ancient paganism (Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Greek, Roman, Indian)
    3. Indian early Shramanic movements (Yoga, Buddhism, Vanaprashthas, Jains)
    4. Judaism (before and after the Exile in Babylon)
    5. Christianity
      1. Pauline Christianity and possible Essene origins
      2. Probable non-historicity of JC
      3. Evangelic Christianity
      4. Early theologians (Origen, Tertullian)
      5. Heresies (Gnosticism, Marcionism, Marchaeism)
      6. Conversion of Constantine
      7. Councils (Nicea to Chalcedon)
      8. Early monastic movement (Egyptian Desert Fathers, Basil, John Cassian)
      9. Medieval Western Monasticism (Ireland, Benedict, Citeaux, Clervaux, etc.)
      10. The Reformation
      11. Theological debates since the reformation (Calvinism vs. Arminianism)
    6. Islam
      1. Non-historicity of Muhammad and the early development of Islam (Olig, Puin, Luxenberg)
      2. Shias and the establishment of the Abbasids
      3. Legalists vs. Sufis
    7. Philosophy (under "Religion", this is on purpose)
      1. Greek ancient philosophy (Aristotle, Plato)
      2. Indian Philosophy (The Upanishads, Ramanuja, Shankara)
      3. Christian philosophy (Augustine, Thomas Aquinas)
      4. Neo-Platonic revival (Marcilio Ficino, Pico)
      5. 17th century debate btw. Rationalism and Empiricism + Kant
      6. Hegel, Marx, etc
      7. Max Stirner, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche
      8. The linguistic turn in early XXth century (B. Russell, The Vienna Circle)
      9. Wittgenstein
      10. Girard and the relationship between literature, philosophy and religion
I am not saying that you should have a PhD in each of these subjects, but you need to have a reasonable familiarity with all of them. You don't need to know everything because Wikipedia is there to supply the missing bits (it is an excellent source for these non-controversial topics), but you need to have an overall mental map of all this field and understand the relationship between the different topics (in particular the interplay between history and religion)

Either you are able to make sense of where Inceldom fits in all of this, or you rope.

In other words, you have to be your own priest.
wtf
 
There are goodlooking hookers out there, you just have to accept the fact that not only you're ugly. But you're also poor :feelsUgh:
 
There are goodlooking hookers out there, you just have to accept the fact that not only you're ugly. But you're also poor :feelsUgh:
Loool very relatable
 
It’s not easy man
 
So, based on that map of information from history to philosophy, what have you worked out?
 
I always was?ted to have knowledge in those subjects but I'm too lazy and dumb and ADHD.
 
The most fundamental of all our errors is that, with reference to one another, we are not-I. And, we are not meant to be happy in this world.
 
So, based on that map of information from history to philosophy, what have you worked out?
I have concluded that:
  1. You have to practice a form of daily mental cleansing routine (what Indians call "a yoga"). Otherwise, your mental health is quickly compromised.
  2. The filth you need to cleanse from your brain are the result of "idolatry" (a concept from Judaism, much extended by Rene Girard)
  3. The biggest examples of idolatry today are foid worship and Chad worship
  4. The best ever mental cleansing routine was Christianity (although it pretended it was not a yoga, but a "free gift" from God)
  5. You have to practice the equivalent of Christianity without believing in God or Jesus Christ (who is most likely an invented character)
Please don't try to argue these points if you do not have the requisite level of familiarity with all the above subjects. If you try, we will be talking past each other.
 
I always was?ted to have knowledge in those subjects but I'm too lazy and dumb and ADHD.
One of the things that kills us today is that all these subjects are no longer taught in High School; at least, not really.

The reason is that left-wingers have taken over education. As soon as you get a passing familiarity with the humanities, the first thing you realize is that left-wing thinking is complete nonsense. So of course they don't want to teach you that ...
 
I have concluded that:
  1. You have to practice a form of daily mental cleansing routine (what Indians call "a yoga"). Otherwise, your mental health is quickly compromised.
  2. The filth you need to cleanse from your brain are the result of "idolatry" (a concept from Judaism, much extended by Rene Girard)
  3. The biggest examples of idolatry today are foid worship and Chad worship
  4. The best ever mental cleansing routine was Christianity (although it pretended it was not a yoga, but a "free gift" from God)
  5. You have to practice the equivalent of Christianity without believing in God or Jesus Christ (who is most likely an invented character)
Please don't try to argue these points if you do not have the requisite level of familiarity with all the above subjects. If you try, we will be talking past each other.
After sustained mental cleansing, what happens?
 
After sustained mental cleansing, what happens?
You can face anything. Loneliness, hardships, whatever ...

Mental hygiene is the condition for sustained resilience
 
You can face anything. Loneliness, hardships, whatever ...

Mental hygiene is the condition for sustained resilience
Hmmm, I don't know if it's similar, but apparently entering this state of no body consciousness allows one to remain supremely unperturbed even in the midst of brutal beatings and bitten by vicious insects!

In this profound state of dhyana-samadhi, the Master wiped out all feelings of suffering and happiness. In the past, when they were arrested, beaten and tortured, Masters Han-shan (1546- 1623) and Zi-bai (1543-1604) entered the same state of samadhi which is beyond the reach of those who have not realized the Dharma.

The Master dictated his life story up to his 112th year, after which his attendants recorded subsequent events as they occurred until the time of his death. (At this time, the Communist Revolution had taken place and the first shudders of ideological change were beginning to make themselves felt.)

About ten tall men entered roughly and ordered the Master to surrender gold, silver and arms. When he said that he had none, they struck him - first with wooden sticks - and then with iron bars until his head and face bled profusely and his ribs broke. He was interrogated while being attacked, but sat in the meditation posture to enter the state of dhyana. As the blows rained down mercilessly, he closed his eyes and mouth and seemed to be in the state of samadhi. That day they beat him brutally four times and, finally, they threw him to the ground. Seeing that he was badly hurt, they thought he was dead and left the room. A little later the guards also left and the Master’s attendants carried him to a bed and helped him sit in the meditation posture.

On the fifth day, when they heard that the Master was still alive, they came again; and seeing that he was sitting in the meditation posture as before, they were furiously angry and stuck him with wooden sticks. Dragging him to the ground, they kicked and trampled on him with their heavy leather boots. As he lay there with blood streaming from his head, they thought he was dead, laughed brutally, and left. At night, his attendants again carried him to the bed and helped him to sit in the meditation posture. On the tenth day, early in the morning, he slowly reclined on his right side (in a position similar to that of the Buddha at his Parinirvana). As he was motionless for a whole day and night, his attendant took a lamp-wick and held it close to his nostrils; he was found to be breathless and was thought to have died. However, the Master’s mien was fresh as usual and his body was still warm. His attendants, Fa-yun and Kuan-shan, kept watch by his bedside. Early in the morning of the eleventh, the Master was heard to groan feebly. His attendants helped him sit up and told him how long he had sat in dhyana and lain on the bed. Slowly, the Master said: ‘I thought it was just a few minutes.’

Empty Cloud, The Autobiography of Chinese Master Xu Yun (thezensite.com)

The young renunciate Ramana Maharshi sought out places inside the temple where he could sit in spiritual absorption (dhyana-samadhi). He withdrew into a dark pit in an underground cave. Here his body was ravaged by vermin and poisonous insects viciously feeding on his blood. He sat for some weeks on a floor which was always infested by ants and, despite their constant crawling and biting, he sat for hours with eyes closed, leaning against the wall in samadhi (contemplation), which receieved the imprint of his back. The visitors could not endure for even a few minutes the ants which he endured for hours, days and weeks, losing his body consciousness. Further details about his life can be found in several excellent biography on his life.

Devotees – Sri Ramana Maharshi
 
Hmmm, I don't know if it's similar, but apparently entering this state of no body consciousness allows one to remain supremely unperturbed even in the midst of brutal beatings and bitten by vicious insects!

In this profound state of dhyana-samadhi, the Master wiped out all feelings of suffering and happiness. In the past, when they were arrested, beaten and tortured, Masters Han-shan (1546- 1623) and Zi-bai (1543-1604) entered the same state of samadhi which is beyond the reach of those who have not realized the Dharma.

The Master dictated his life story up to his 112th year, after which his attendants recorded subsequent events as they occurred until the time of his death. (At this time, the Communist Revolution had taken place and the first shudders of ideological change were beginning to make themselves felt.)

About ten tall men entered roughly and ordered the Master to surrender gold, silver and arms. When he said that he had none, they struck him - first with wooden sticks - and then with iron bars until his head and face bled profusely and his ribs broke. He was interrogated while being attacked, but sat in the meditation posture to enter the state of dhyana. As the blows rained down mercilessly, he closed his eyes and mouth and seemed to be in the state of samadhi. That day they beat him brutally four times and, finally, they threw him to the ground. Seeing that he was badly hurt, they thought he was dead and left the room. A little later the guards also left and the Master’s attendants carried him to a bed and helped him sit in the meditation posture.

On the fifth day, when they heard that the Master was still alive, they came again; and seeing that he was sitting in the meditation posture as before, they were furiously angry and stuck him with wooden sticks. Dragging him to the ground, they kicked and trampled on him with their heavy leather boots. As he lay there with blood streaming from his head, they thought he was dead, laughed brutally, and left. At night, his attendants again carried him to the bed and helped him to sit in the meditation posture. On the tenth day, early in the morning, he slowly reclined on his right side (in a position similar to that of the Buddha at his Parinirvana). As he was motionless for a whole day and night, his attendant took a lamp-wick and held it close to his nostrils; he was found to be breathless and was thought to have died. However, the Master’s mien was fresh as usual and his body was still warm. His attendants, Fa-yun and Kuan-shan, kept watch by his bedside. Early in the morning of the eleventh, the Master was heard to groan feebly. His attendants helped him sit up and told him how long he had sat in dhyana and lain on the bed. Slowly, the Master said: ‘I thought it was just a few minutes.’

Empty Cloud, The Autobiography of Chinese Master Xu Yun (thezensite.com)

The young renunciate Ramana Maharshi sought out places inside the temple where he could sit in spiritual absorption (dhyana-samadhi). He withdrew into a dark pit in an underground cave. Here his body was ravaged by vermin and poisonous insects viciously feeding on his blood. He sat for some weeks on a floor which was always infested by ants and, despite their constant crawling and biting, he sat for hours with eyes closed, leaning against the wall in samadhi (contemplation), which receieved the imprint of his back. The visitors could not endure for even a few minutes the ants which he endured for hours, days and weeks, losing his body consciousness. Further details about his life can be found in several excellent biography on his life.

Devotees – Sri Ramana Maharshi
What you are mentioning here is the Buddhist tradition.

This tradition is both inferior and superior to Christianity:
  • Superior because the maximum benefits you can derive from it (as described above) are higher than what you can get with Christianity.
  • Inferior because only a tiny fraction of its practitioners can reach these states. Buddhism (along with other Indian mental cleansing traditions) is elitist. First of all, only full-time practitioners benefit from the discipline. Furthermore, among these, only a small number of exceptional individuals reach the maximum benefits.
Christianity is in many respects an industrialized version of these Indian forerunners (which predate it by about 500 years). It does not reach the same peak performance as its hand-crafted Indian competitors, but it has perfectly adequate performance at a much cheaper price in terms of personal investment.

In other words, Indian disciplines are not a practical proposition for the average man, while Christianity is.

Do you have time to spend 20 years in a Buddhist monastery (all expenses paid), go for it. Otherwise, Christianity is the way to go
 
What you are mentioning here is the Buddhist tradition.

This tradition is both inferior and superior to Christianity:
  • Superior because the maximum benefits you can derive from it (as described above) are higher than what you can get with Christianity.
  • Inferior because only a tiny fraction of its practitioners can reach these states. Buddhism (along with other Indian mental cleansing traditions) is elitist. First of all, only full-time practitioners benefit from the discipline. Furthermore, among these, only a small number of exceptional individuals reach the maximum benefits.
Christianity is in many respects an industrialized version of these Indian forerunners (which predate it by about 500 years). It does not reach the same peak performance as its hand-crafted Indian competitors, but it has perfectly adequate performance at a much cheaper price in terms of personal investment.

In other words, Indian disciplines are not a practical proposition for the average man, while Christianity is.

Do you have time to spend 20 years in a Buddhist monastery (all expenses paid), go for it. Otherwise, Christianity is the way to go
Why Christianity over Buddhism?
 
What you are mentioning here is the Buddhist tradition.

This tradition is both inferior and superior to Christianity:
  • Superior because the maximum benefits you can derive from it (as described above) are higher than what you can get with Christianity.
  • Inferior because only a tiny fraction of its practitioners can reach these states. Buddhism (along with other Indian mental cleansing traditions) is elitist. First of all, only full-time practitioners benefit from the discipline. Furthermore, among these, only a small number of exceptional individuals reach the maximum benefits.
Christianity is in many respects an industrialized version of these Indian forerunners (which predate it by about 500 years). It does not reach the same peak performance as its hand-crafted Indian competitors, but it has perfectly adequate performance at a much cheaper price in terms of personal investment.

In other words, Indian disciplines are not a practical proposition for the average man, while Christianity is.

Do you have time to spend 20 years in a Buddhist monastery (all expenses paid), go for it. Otherwise, Christianity is the way to go
I see. What am I referring to is monasticism in Buddhism and Christianity (see Trappist monks). They are the so-called "elite", or more accurately, spiritually ripe disciples who receive the highest teachings, practices and renounce the world. However, like Christianity, there are also lower level doctrines and practices for the masses or laymen in Buddhism.
 
I see. What am I referring to is monasticism in Buddhism and Christianity (see Trappist monks). They are the so-called "elite", or more accurately, spiritually ripe disciples who receive the highest teachings, practices and renounce the world. However, like Christianity, there are also lower level doctrines and practices for the masses or laymen in Buddhism.
Monks are not "the elite" in Christianity. Btw the Reformation did away with them because they were no longer useful

Once again, If you are not familiar with all I have listed above, there is very little chance we can agree on anything because you literally do not know what I am talking about
 
latest
 
I always was?ted to have knowledge in those subjects but I'm too lazy and dumb and ADHD.
That is why you would need the help of a priest. But there are no reliable priests (or shrinks)

So, as all of us, you have to do it on your own
 
I am in constant state of confusion about whether i should look for a job or keep neetmaxing
A part of really wants to integrate back into the society and be normal, but i also know that there is nothing out there for someone like me .


I am literally counting seconds and watching weeks/ years go by

Wish GPU prices would come down so i could vidyagame max. . My current pc can't play any modern aaa titles. It's over

What is this life:feelswhat::feelsUgh:
 
I am in constant state of confusion about whether i should look for a job or keep neetmaxing
A part of really wants to integrate back into the society and be normal, but i also know that there is nothing out there for someone like me .


I am literally counting seconds and watching weeks/ years go by

Wish GPU prices would come down so i could vidyagame max. . My current pc can't play any modern aaa titles. It's over

What is this life:feelswhat::feelsUgh:
What qualifications do you have ?
 
All thay whitepill is fine but incels should never lose vision of what created this situation in the first place. And do everything they can, whatever little they can to undermine the forces of liberalism and gynocracy.
 
I know how to operate a computer and can google shit
That's about it
Do the minimal training to become a H/W technician (the dudes who move computers and plug cables in companies), then get hired as that. It will get you a foot in the door. Then you can do more training to become a sysadmin eventually.

On your computer, install Linux as a dual boot (you can do that even if it is an old one) and start learning Linux commands. That will get you into server administration eventually.

Why do all that? Because you need real life experience. Otherwise, you are feeding your brain only crap from the surrounding culture. That's bad for your mental health

Side benefit: you will be able to afford a new computer
 
Last edited:
All thay whitepill is fine but incels should never lose vision of what created this situation in the first place.
How could we ?
And do everything they can, whatever little they can to undermine the forces of liberalism and gynocracy.
Do you think venting on this forum achieves any of that? If you do not understand how human culture works, how effective can you be at changing it?
 
I am only interested in philosophy, literature, history, and religion.

Is there an archive of old historical, mythological, and religious works? Me thinks that the modern texts are inadequate.

I could always download books on Pirates Bay like I currently am...
You have this: https://archive.org/

And also this: https://www.gutenberg.org/

But don't forget Wikipedia. For recent subjects, they are hopelessly biased, but for pre-WWII subjects it is pretty good
 
To summarize, there are only two possibilities:
  1. Rope
  2. Make sense of the situation and become an oldcel.
before I do that I would sacrifice myself for my brocels giving the chads and stacys what they deserve :shhh:
 
What does Christianity offer?
Or rather what do you learn or practice from it?

"In my opinion, the teachings of the genuine Christian mystics are related to those of the New Testament as alcohol is to wine; in other words, what becomes visible to us in the New Testament as if through a veil and mist, stands before us in the works of the mystics without cloak or disguise, in full clearness and distinctness. Finally, we might also regard the New Testament as the first initiation, the mystics as the second.”

"In more developed Christianity, we see that seed of asceticism unfold into full flower in the writings of the Christian saints and mystics. Besides the purest love, these preach also complete resignation, voluntary and absolute poverty, true composure, complete indifference to all worldly things, death to one’s own will and regeneration in God, entire forgetting of one’s own person and absorption in the contemplation of God. A complete description of this is to be found in Fénélon’s Explication des maximes des Saints sur la vie intérieure. But the spirit of this development of Christianity is certainly nowhere so perfectly and powerfully expressed as in the writings of the German mystics, e.g. those of Meister Eckhart, and the justly famous book Theologia Germanica.”

Arthur Schopenhauer
 
I’m retardcel can’t do either :feelscry:
 
"In my opinion, the teachings of the genuine Christian mystics are related to those of the New Testament as alcohol is to wine; in other words, what becomes visible to us in the New Testament as if through a veil and mist, stands before us in the works of the mystics without cloak or disguise, in full clearness and distinctness. Finally, we might also regard the New Testament as the first initiation, the mystics as the second.”

"In more developed Christianity, we see that seed of asceticism unfold into full flower in the writings of the Christian saints and mystics. Besides the purest love, these preach also complete resignation, voluntary and absolute poverty, true composure, complete indifference to all worldly things, death to one’s own will and regeneration in God, entire forgetting of one’s own person and absorption in the contemplation of God. A complete description of this is to be found in Fénélon’s Explication des maximes des Saints sur la vie intérieure. But the spirit of this development of Christianity is certainly nowhere so perfectly and powerfully expressed as in the writings of the German mystics, e.g. those of Meister Eckhart, and the justly famous book Theologia Germanica.”

Arthur Schopenhauer
You can't trust a guy like Schop to say anything meaningful about Christianity. He does not know enough about it and he is not trying anyway. He is a poser and a fraud.
What does Christianity offer?
It offers the best available way to make your mind function properly again. It is a powerful tool to achieve and retain mental health. The way it does this is by removing mental pollutants from you mind, just like Buddhism does, but more effectively and efficiently.

I am not talking about traditional Christianity here, mind you, but what you can do with it if you remove all the obsolete vocabulary while staying true to its spirit.
 
Last edited:
I have concluded that:
  1. You have to practice a form of daily mental cleansing routine (what Indians call "a yoga"). Otherwise, your mental health is quickly compromised.
  2. The filth you need to cleanse from your brain are the result of "idolatry" (a concept from Judaism, much extended by Rene Girard)
  3. The biggest examples of idolatry today are foid worship and Chad worship
  4. The best ever mental cleansing routine was Christianity (although it pretended it was not a yoga, but a "free gift" from God)
  5. You have to practice the equivalent of Christianity without believing in God or Jesus Christ (who is most likely an invented character)
Please don't try to argue these points if you do not have the requisite level of familiarity with all the above subjects. If you try, we will be talking past each other.
High IQ.
 
There are goodlooking hookers out there, you just have to accept the fact that not only you're ugly. But you're also poor
Goodlooking hookers are disgusted by us and our body. This is the reason why many incels don't want to fuck them.
 
Goodlooking hookers are disgusted by us and our body. This is the reason why many incels don't want to fuck them.
Yeah that may indeed be possible, tho i don't knwo for sure yet. Better cope for a better future
 
Yeah that may indeed be possible, tho i don't knwo for sure yet. Better cope for a better future
I could fuck a hooker, since my father agreed to pay me an escort and a hotel room. I decided not to do it, because I would feel ridicule.
 
I have some irrational phobias of being recorded. In addition, I am ugly dressed, ugly naked, so I would disgust the hooker. There are not hookers of my age. I am afraid of spending too much money. I don't like the idea to have sex with a person who hates me.

I only wanted to be loved and be considered normal, i don't want so much physical pleasure.
 
I have some irrational phobias of being recorded. In addition, I am ugly dressed, ugly naked, so I would disgust the hooker. There are not hookers of my age. I am afraid of spending too much money. I don't like the idea to have sex with a person who hates me.

I only wanted to be loved and be considered normal, i don't want so much physical pleasure.
I'm sure hookers have fucked people older/uglier than you, you have to try and look for hookers with good reviews. It's the last bastion of hope for an incel after all
 
I'm sure hookers have fucked people older/uglier than you, you have to try and look for hookers with good reviews. It's the last bastion of hope for an incel after all
The last hope for incels is to find something to do other than sex

It is useless to try to do something which you are unfit to do.
 
True like everyday. It's get worst alot of times
 

Similar threads

ForeverGrey
Replies
28
Views
960
Nagger
Nagger
gymletethnicel
Replies
29
Views
1K
GeneticDysfunction
G

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top