You see this everywhere, there are articles about it weekly. JFL at it. The truth is, womens liberation means that they are under no obligation to pairbond. Coupled with the fact that a more sexually loose culture means the media's standard for men is getting harder and harder to achieve, women simply flock to the highest value man, and don't care if they are part of a harem.
The studies that "determine" that millennials are having less sex usually ask the question in the form "Howe many sexual partners have you had in the past year". Lets say that under normal circumstances that every woman matched to one distinct man and they had regular sex, then all 100 people in a sample of 100 have had a partner in the last year. But what if instead (as we see now days) that every woman is being shared by a couple Chads? Well then despite the fact that these women are slutting it the fuck up, most men end up coming out with no sexual partners, and Chad can only have a limited amount of sex in a given year, then the average is pushed down.
Think I'm just bullshitting? Well lets look at that study that all the major publications seem to be citing, and see what it actually says.
https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1...PGqP3wRtFu4g4n1hYYDlSQWzvsItjXhoxwSX7zAmSr2M=
From the second page of this study
Millenials aren't "having less sex" by choice, more and more of them are forcefully becoming incel. Lets also remember that this study is entirely self reported, so obviously women have an incentive to downplay their sexual partners while men have an incentive to exaggerate. To support this claim, I found an interesting passage buried in the middle of the study.
A few things to note. How is it, when every act of vaginal sex requires one man and one woman, that a full 4% fewer women in a sample of ELEVEN THOUSAND reported their sex involved penetration? Further more, how did a study from 2010 of reports from women result is a full 50% fewer reports of vaginal sex? I decided to seek out this Fielder and Carey study to try and get an answer, and found this is the procedure section.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933280/
There are a few things about this study that prove some unrelated incel theories. About the same number of men and women were in committed relationship, but THREE TIMES as many women were dating one person as men were. Moreover, supposidly both groups reported the same number of sexual partners (about 1.5). So let me get this straight. Women are three times as likely to be dating someone as men, despite the fact that for a woman to be dating a man needs to be dating. Women somehow are 4% less likely to have a hookup partner in a year (in a sample of 11,000) despite the fact they need to fuck a man for that to happen. And finnally, despite the fact that women are dating at three times the rate of men, they claim to have the same amount of sex. This can only lead to the conclusion that
1: Women are fucking a few Chads and deluding themselves into believing they are "dating"
2: Lie heavily on self reporting studies of sexual activity.
QED
The studies that "determine" that millennials are having less sex usually ask the question in the form "Howe many sexual partners have you had in the past year". Lets say that under normal circumstances that every woman matched to one distinct man and they had regular sex, then all 100 people in a sample of 100 have had a partner in the last year. But what if instead (as we see now days) that every woman is being shared by a couple Chads? Well then despite the fact that these women are slutting it the fuck up, most men end up coming out with no sexual partners, and Chad can only have a limited amount of sex in a given year, then the average is pushed down.
Think I'm just bullshitting? Well lets look at that study that all the major publications seem to be citing, and see what it actually says.
https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1...PGqP3wRtFu4g4n1hYYDlSQWzvsItjXhoxwSX7zAmSr2M=
From the second page of this study
Millenials aren't "having less sex" by choice, more and more of them are forcefully becoming incel. Lets also remember that this study is entirely self reported, so obviously women have an incentive to downplay their sexual partners while men have an incentive to exaggerate. To support this claim, I found an interesting passage buried in the middle of the study.
A few things to note. How is it, when every act of vaginal sex requires one man and one woman, that a full 4% fewer women in a sample of ELEVEN THOUSAND reported their sex involved penetration? Further more, how did a study from 2010 of reports from women result is a full 50% fewer reports of vaginal sex? I decided to seek out this Fielder and Carey study to try and get an answer, and found this is the procedure section.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933280/
There are a few things about this study that prove some unrelated incel theories. About the same number of men and women were in committed relationship, but THREE TIMES as many women were dating one person as men were. Moreover, supposidly both groups reported the same number of sexual partners (about 1.5). So let me get this straight. Women are three times as likely to be dating someone as men, despite the fact that for a woman to be dating a man needs to be dating. Women somehow are 4% less likely to have a hookup partner in a year (in a sample of 11,000) despite the fact they need to fuck a man for that to happen. And finnally, despite the fact that women are dating at three times the rate of men, they claim to have the same amount of sex. This can only lead to the conclusion that
1: Women are fucking a few Chads and deluding themselves into believing they are "dating"
2: Lie heavily on self reporting studies of sexual activity.
QED
Last edited:
