JFL The Media is Retarded. Sex Robot News

[Deleted member 5861]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...lthy-new-report-finds/?utm_term=.046f1224110f

New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is healthy

A recent New York Times column equated robots with human sex workers and suggested that self-described incels — meaning “involuntarily celibate” — will attempt to find fulfillment in having sex with machines.

“A lot of experts are saying it would not help with social isolation,” he said, “and might even make them more socially isolated.” Sharkey said he knew of at least one case in which a man left his wife and children for a silicone doll.

Sex robots have also been suggested as companions for the elderly or people with disabilities. That struck Cox-George and Bewley as “patronizing,” as they wrote in the article, and an argument “for a ‘lesser’ sexual experience when most people with disabilities can form mutually satisfying relationships.”

Kathleen Richardson, an ethics professor at De Montfort University in Leicester, England, grew so concerned about the intrusion of machines into human relationships — an area “traditionally off-limits to the market” — that she launched the Campaign Against Sex Robots in 2015.

“It offends me that they think a human woman is like a machine,” she said.

Now the comment section:

If it keeps the incels in their parents’ basements and not killing women or running for Congress them I’m all for it.
Question: will they all be named Stacy?

Guessing you haven't spent much time in the Bay area. Incels in areas with bustling economies are the last people to be living in their parents' basements. Tons are in IT, for example, making serious money. For obvious reasons, they have more time on their hands to put into career than most.

Kek props to our incel here for standing up for us.

No alimony/palimony
No charges of harassment/coercion
Reduced risk of STDs (might have relations with others with owner's consent)

Ever feel you've lived too long when an article like this is in a main stream newspaper? Or am I the only one to feel that way?

Really hoping this was not a tax payer funded study.

 

[Deleted member 126]

Our guy did a good vid on this.

 

[acnescarcel]

id like to share this article with you guys also written by the washington post. tell me which you think is more offensive sex dolls for lonely men or this article.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...944de66d9e7_story.html?utm_term=.125afde9cc2c

 

[Deleted member 5861]

id like to share this article with you guys also written by the washington post. tell me which you think is more offensive sex dolls for lonely men or this article.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...944de66d9e7_story.html?utm_term=.125afde9cc2c

I'm more offended at her stupidity of thinking that she isn't already encouraged to hate men. And of course she is a director for a colleges gender studies course.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Even if you wouldn't buy one it should disturb you to see how desperate women are to control mens sexuality.

They want total domination over mens sex lives and for them to have no alternatives.

Yet wanting to ban abortion makes you a sexist, woman controlling demon.

 

[acnescarcel]

I'm more offended at her stupidity of thinking that she isn't already encouraged to hate men. And of course she is a director for a colleges gender studies course.

I'm just saying these feminists think its ok to literally hate men, but its not ok to have sex with an inanimate object. feminism is against men hating them, but release articles called why can't we hate men? the washington post=fake news.

 

[Robo Sapien]

Kathleen Richardson

https://m.youtube.com/results?search_query=kathleen+richardson+robots