Normies in the west have this irrational fear and insecurity of the "rich". they think gmo human or designer babies means the rich can all choose their offsprings to be high IQ, high tier look, tall, beautiful etc. while the poor remain dumb and ugly and cant compete
the truth is not so simple at all. in fact its the opposite
first of all, all tech would start expensive. mobile phones were expensive in the 90s and only rich could afford. same with computers, internet etc. now even niggers in africa can have mobile phones and access to internet. so its ridiculous to assume gmo will be rich only for extended period of time
second, i think thats even more important , is that the rich and upper mid class having designer baby is a good thing, EVEN AT THE BEGINNING when the poor and lower mid class can not afford it.
why? coz it leads to more economic productivity as well as elevated lookism level of the general society
why niggers in the US are fat? why white trashes r fat? fatness in the past were a symbol of richness, now its almost a symbol of poverty. its all coz of productivty. why the poor even have welfare and free $$$ in the first place..... thats coz the productivity in the economy is so far, that it can allow the poor to have it. coz the rich have enough to be taxe to transfer some of heir wealth to the poor
for the same reason gmo human would further boost productivty, meaning the poor can have better welfare since economy becomes better and more advanced. the poor should embrace the gmo human/designer baby idea rather than opposing it.
and in terms of lookism, it trickles down too. if all the new babies of the rich r chads and stacies ,evnetually the gene pool of the entire society improve. stacies woild be more and more common in the society, that eventuallly they'd not be so special any more and evne a neet-maxxed incel might get one.
but normies r afraid coz they always think of competition. they dont know whats good for their own good. a society dominated by normies and foids will stagnate, much like East Asian societies (which imo are typical examples of societies dominated by foid-think and normie-think, Asians r low T and intolerant of non-NT, much more so than the west), which fail to innovate and always stagnate (japan nowadays still stuck to fax machine, for example), and evnetually decline, like the chinks koreans and japs who got stuck in medieval society before they got new tech influx from the west/europeans starting in the last few hundred years.
the truth is not so simple at all. in fact its the opposite
first of all, all tech would start expensive. mobile phones were expensive in the 90s and only rich could afford. same with computers, internet etc. now even niggers in africa can have mobile phones and access to internet. so its ridiculous to assume gmo will be rich only for extended period of time
second, i think thats even more important , is that the rich and upper mid class having designer baby is a good thing, EVEN AT THE BEGINNING when the poor and lower mid class can not afford it.
why? coz it leads to more economic productivity as well as elevated lookism level of the general society
why niggers in the US are fat? why white trashes r fat? fatness in the past were a symbol of richness, now its almost a symbol of poverty. its all coz of productivty. why the poor even have welfare and free $$$ in the first place..... thats coz the productivity in the economy is so far, that it can allow the poor to have it. coz the rich have enough to be taxe to transfer some of heir wealth to the poor
for the same reason gmo human would further boost productivty, meaning the poor can have better welfare since economy becomes better and more advanced. the poor should embrace the gmo human/designer baby idea rather than opposing it.
and in terms of lookism, it trickles down too. if all the new babies of the rich r chads and stacies ,evnetually the gene pool of the entire society improve. stacies woild be more and more common in the society, that eventuallly they'd not be so special any more and evne a neet-maxxed incel might get one.
but normies r afraid coz they always think of competition. they dont know whats good for their own good. a society dominated by normies and foids will stagnate, much like East Asian societies (which imo are typical examples of societies dominated by foid-think and normie-think, Asians r low T and intolerant of non-NT, much more so than the west), which fail to innovate and always stagnate (japan nowadays still stuck to fax machine, for example), and evnetually decline, like the chinks koreans and japs who got stuck in medieval society before they got new tech influx from the west/europeans starting in the last few hundred years.
