Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion The Incel Scarecrow – The “Incel” Exists as a Figment of the Woman’s Imagination

ResidentHell

ResidentHell

Veteran
★★
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Posts
1,122
Inceldom doesn’t exist – By this I don’t mean that there’s no person who is unable to receive sexual intercourse from the opposite sex for reasons beyond their control

I mean what women THINK inceldom is, doesn’t exist

The Incel Scarecrow - The female’s conception of the incel is illusory

If or whenever women clashes with "incels", she is clashing with the scarecrow that she created, and the woman usually doesn't realize this is what she is doing



There are probably thousands if not millions of incels-in-denial (and bluepilled males) out there. But women will never diagnose them as “incel”, because it does not fit their design for their incel-ified scarecrow.
It does not fit the ideal shape and décor that women wish to conceive as their incel

The key issue here is not about the incel, it is about the BLACKPILL

The woman is not threatened by the existence of incels. The woman is threatened by the dissemination of the BLACKPILL


Bluepilled normies and women created the Incel Scarecrow because of the influence that “incel rhetoric” (i.e. the blackpill) has had over young males across the developed world, mainly for zoomers and alphas. Women have to misrepresent the incel in order to obscure the fact their fight is against the dissemination of the blackpill

I have little doubt that Andrew Tate is a grifter. But you must admit that Andrew Tate did extremely well in exposing young males across the world to :redpill: and :blackpill:. Prior to the rise of Andrew Tate in 2022, women gave little to zero fucks about “incel propaganda”, and incels were not publicly demonized and libelled as much as they are now. Andrew Tate brought widespread awareness to the issue of sexless zoomer males, and he received loads of backlash from triggered women and soyboys for it. This is a massive sign there are loads of frustrated young men in the outside world, both sexless males and not-sexless males

Andrew Tate supplied on a demand that had existed for a while but had no market for it – A counsellor for young zoomer men struggling to initiate and maintain sexual relations with women. Tate eventually turned out to be a grifter, but he did something that had not been done before – He spoke the blackpill to millions through the Internet in the most unapologetic and brutally honest way, and for this he was branded “incel”, “misogynistic”, promoter of “toxic masculinity”


Remember that incel forums historically have not accumulated as many members compared to other more socially accepted forums. This forum has existed for over 7 years. But only about 29,000 accounts have ever been created on it, and I would bet at least half of those accounts were infiltrators or / and normies. Looksmax has more than twice as many registered accounts. Incels were not as famous before 2022, and incel forums relatively speaking don't have many registered accounts

I am personally not a fan of Elliot Rodger or Alek Minassian, but ER and AM provided women and bluepilled normies with a reason to decorate their Incel Scarecrow as the boogeyman. Their acts of retribution were sensationalized by mainstream media. But ER and AM did not cause the "incel" to become famous internationally. ER and AM only created a foundation for women and normies to feel frightened and troubled by the existence of the incel scarecrow they were building and decorating over time. But grifters like Andrew Tate also played a larger part in causing incels to achieve international notoriety. He became more famous than ER or AM by miles, and Tate is well known for his beliefs which were painted as "incel propaganda" by mainstream media


You can look at it like this: ER and AM created the fear and notoriety factor, while Andrew Tate brought the fame and recognition

Nearly all femicides and sexual assaults on women are not committed by self-identified incels. But normies and women don’t care as much when other women are raped or murdered by Chads, because their actions are not seen as “motivated by incel ideology”. Normies and women only worry if they believe there’s an ideology behind it, because they know that ideologies have the potential to inspire others to reshape their behavior in support for the ideology, and it can sow the seeds for future social revolution - Even if those ideologies were initially advertised or sensationalized through acts of violence. The blackpill isn’t even an ideology, which makes it even worse, because it means bluepilled men and women will not be able to suppress the dissemination of this “ideology” without having to expose their own hypocrisy on the discriminatory and hostile treatment of unattractive and low-value males in society


There’s evidence that zoomer males are gradually becoming more blackpilled over time. They have been undeniably exposed to the blackpill in their own real-world experience over the past few years. Lingo that was only known in blackpill / redpill manosphere is now common among normies on social media services like TikTok and Twitter. You could even say that some manosphere terms (e.g., mogging, looksmaxing, mewing, Chad) have become part of alpha gen brainrot vocabulary. Around half of zoomer males in the United States have felt they’ve experienced discrimination for simply being male (American Survey Center, 2023), and around half of young men in the United Kingdom agreed that “feminism has gone too far and has made it harder for men to succeed” (HNH, 2020)



This is extract from a Vox article in 2018 about the online incel subculture, and its briefly mentions how “incels” can be to threat to the status quo by “radicalizing” other people (most likely other young men) in western society:
Thinking about incels purely as a criminal or terroristic threat is a mistake. They are also a political threat: a symptom of a broader radicalizing trend across the West.

Rodger and the incels who follow him aren’t just angry at individual women. Their critique is more systemic, extending to the basic structure of Western society itself. In their view, there would not be incels if women weren’t given the freedom to choose who they want to have sex with. The logical conclusion of the blackpill is, as one incels.co user writes, that “women should have never been given any rights.”

Women misdiagnose incels as the cause of more young men becoming “radicalized” by beliefs that correlate with misogyny, patriarchism and toxic masculinity. But we all know that neither Andrew Tate nor Fresh & Fit are incels. So why then are incels scapegoated? Women are scapegoating the incel that exists within their mind. They are not fighting the incel that exists in real life, because the female’s conception of the “incel” does not exist in real life

Women won’t admit their
real fight is against the dissemination of the blackpill, cause they know it can convince more men to stop supporting this new matriarchal order in society. So they purposely brand it as “ideology” and purposely misrepresent the blackpill as “incel propaganda” in order to maintain hold of their hypnosis over any bluepilled men that would become exposed to :redpill: / :blackpill: manosphere

@Fat Link @LeFrenchCel Pin request
 
read a couple of words
 
One hundred percent of truth
 
Women are on the only kind of crusade, the war on truth, and their greatest champions are states and shadowy elites.
 
Nothing but the truth.
Good post brother.
 
I bet my life savings IT will not touch this
 
There are probably thousands if not millions of incels-in-denial (and bluepilled males) out there. But women will never diagnose them as “incel”, because it does not fit their design for their incel-ified scarecrow. It does not fit the ideal shape and décor that women wish to conceive as their incel
If we're going by the definition of a literal involuntary celibate, it might be closer to billions lol.

I am personally not a fan of Elliot Rodger or Alek Minassian, but ER and AM provided women and bluepilled normies with a reason to decorate their Incel Scarecrow as the boogeyman.
You can also observe this to a smaller extent with the edgy GrAYs (ironic ik) on all platforms who post about how much they want to rape and kill all foids or whatever only to get screenshotted by an IT cuck who wants his wife's boyfriend's approval to sniff her panties.

Like you said with the scarecrow thing, anti-incel spaces don't just live off of those retarded troll posts, they encourage it so as to have "confirmation" about the true incel nature. Just look at any :blackpill:-adjacent subreddit, communities like IT unironically take pride in instigating whether it be through DM's, infiltration, or retarded :bluepill: advice that they themselves don't even follow.
 
Inceldom doesn’t exist – By this I don’t mean that there’s no person who is unable to receive sexual intercourse from the opposite sex for reasons beyond their control

I mean what women THINK inceldom is, doesn’t exist

The Incel Scarecrow - The female’s conception of the incel is illusory

If or whenever women clashes with "incels", she is clashing with the scarecrow that she created, and the woman usually doesn't realize this is what she is doing



There are probably thousands if not millions of incels-in-denial (and bluepilled males) out there. But women will never diagnose them as “incel”, because it does not fit their design for their incel-ified scarecrow.
It does not fit the ideal shape and décor that women wish to conceive as their incel

The key issue here is not about the incel, it is about the BLACKPILL

The woman is not threatened by the existence of incels. The woman is threatened by the dissemination of the BLACKPILL


Bluepilled normies and women created the Incel Scarecrow because of the influence that “incel rhetoric” (i.e. the blackpill) has had over young males across the developed world, mainly for zoomers and alphas. Women have to misrepresent the incel in order to obscure the fact their fight is against the dissemination of the blackpill

I have little doubt that Andrew Tate is a grifter. But you must admit that Andrew Tate did extremely well in exposing young males across the world to :redpill: and :blackpill:. Prior to the rise of Andrew Tate in 2022, women gave little to zero fucks about “incel propaganda”, and incels were not publicly demonized and libelled as much as they are now. Andrew Tate brought widespread awareness to the issue of sexless zoomer males, and he received loads of backlash from triggered women and soyboys for it. This is a massive sign there are loads of frustrated young men in the outside world, both sexless males and not-sexless males

Andrew Tate supplied on a demand that had existed for a while but had no market for it – A counsellor for young zoomer men struggling to initiate and maintain sexual relations with women. Tate eventually turned out to be a grifter, but he did something that had not been done before – He spoke the blackpill to millions through the Internet in the most unapologetic and brutally honest way, and for this he was branded “incel”, “misogynistic”, promoter of “toxic masculinity”


Remember that incel forums historically have not accumulated as many members compared to other more socially accepted forums. This forum has existed for over 7 years. But only about 29,000 accounts have ever been created on it, and I would bet at least half of those accounts were infiltrators or / and normies. Looksmax has more than twice as many registered accounts. Incels were not as famous before 2022, and incel forums relatively speaking don't have many registered accounts

I am personally not a fan of Elliot Rodger or Alek Minassian, but ER and AM provided women and bluepilled normies with a reason to decorate their Incel Scarecrow as the boogeyman. Their acts of retribution were sensationalized by mainstream media. But ER and AM did not cause the "incel" to become famous internationally. ER and AM only created a foundation for women and normies to feel frightened and troubled by the existence of the incel scarecrow they were building and decorating over time. But grifters like Andrew Tate also played a larger part in causing incels to achieve international notoriety. He became more famous than ER or AM by miles, and Tate is well known for his beliefs which were painted as "incel propaganda" by mainstream media


You can look at it like this: ER and AM created the fear and notoriety factor, while Andrew Tate brought the fame and recognition

Nearly all femicides and sexual assaults on women are not committed by self-identified incels. But normies and women don’t care as much when other women are raped or murdered by Chads, because their actions are not seen as “motivated by incel ideology”. Normies and women only worry if they believe there’s an ideology behind it, because they know that ideologies have the potential to inspire others to reshape their behavior in support for the ideology, and it can sow the seeds for future social revolution - Even if those ideologies were initially advertised or sensationalized through acts of violence. The blackpill isn’t even an ideology, which makes it even worse, because it means bluepilled men and women will not be able to suppress the dissemination of this “ideology” without having to expose their own hypocrisy on the discriminatory and hostile treatment of unattractive and low-value males in society


There’s evidence that zoomer males are gradually becoming more blackpilled over time. They have been undeniably exposed to the blackpill in their own real-world experience over the past few years. Lingo that was only known in blackpill / redpill manosphere is now common among normies on social media services like TikTok and Twitter. You could even say that some manosphere terms (e.g., mogging, looksmaxing, mewing, Chad) have become part of alpha gen brainrot vocabulary. Around half of zoomer males in the United States have felt they’ve experienced discrimination for simply being male (American Survey Center, 2023), and around half of young men in the United Kingdom agreed that “feminism has gone too far and has made it harder for men to succeed” (HNH, 2020)



This is extract from a Vox article in 2018 about the online incel subculture, and its briefly mentions how “incels” can be to threat to the status quo by “radicalizing” other people (most likely other young men) in western society:


Women misdiagnose incels as the cause of more young men becoming “radicalized” by beliefs that correlate with misogyny, patriarchism and toxic masculinity. But we all know that neither Andrew Tate nor Fresh & Fit are incels. So why then are incels scapegoated? Women are scapegoating the incel that exists within their mind. They are not fighting the incel that exists in real life, because the female’s conception of the “incel” does not exist in real life

Women won’t admit their
real fight is against the dissemination of the blackpill, cause they know it can convince more men to stop supporting this new matriarchal order in society. So they purposely brand it as “ideology” and purposely misrepresent the blackpill as “incel propaganda” in order to maintain hold of their hypnosis over any bluepilled men that would become exposed to :redpill: / :blackpill: manosphere

@Fat Link @LeFrenchCel Pin request
Pretty good post
 
It's funny because the strawman, or scarecrow in this case, of incels tend to inadvertently prove incels right.

When they construct this scarecrow, they depict it as an ugly man. Scrawny, fat, sometimes maybe a little fit with an unattractive face, but always with an unattractive face. That last detail they never miss proves the blackpill ideology right.

Normies and women's feet might as well be a big, red, flashing targets with how many times they shoot themselves in the foot with this.
 
Read every single letter

I don't have anything to add

Nice job, BlkPillPres-Lite
 
Great thread, well done brother

This is accurate, and it is 100% true that the conception which most foids, soy normies, SJWs, etc. have of Incels is that of someone such as Tate who clearly isn't Incel, or someone such as ER who many here don't consider really "incel" or even truly "blackpilled" for very valid points.

As I have said before, Incel is just an epithet flung around by the media to describe anyone who deviates from the established norms in regards to that of views on women & adjacent factors.

Incel is a state of being, and as you said, millions if not tens of millions of redpilled and bluepilled cels exist who would never be termed Incel but foids. However, plenty of guys who have fucked "Stacys" such as Tate will be slammed an Incel by soyfags online.
 
Extremely High IQ read, that vast, vast majority of people who throw around the term incel have no genuine understanding of what it means and it's pretty obvious that fear mongering by the media has been very effective in it's mission to demonize and make sweeping generalizations.

They always refer to incels as a "movement" or community, which one could argue forums like this are indeed communities, but involuntary celibacy is simply a state of being, these forums are by no means the only incels, we are a minority and you have to acknowledge that many people misinterpret what it means purposely.

They'll say that incel means a certain set of behavior or beliefs yet many of these said behaviors are commonly found in non involuntary celibate men, it has nothing to do with beliefs or a lifestyle, but you cannot argue with people on these things if they don't want to see it.
 
High IQ, Foids can only this of incels as this scarecrow because, by definition, truecels are invisible to foids
 
Tate's first big interview that's wasn't about fighting was in 2016 with PJW and Alex Jones. Interesting it's about usefulness of anti-depressants and being a self made man.

The blackpill is just conflated with coping/honkpill/Dionysus. Tate and his redpillers are meant to be Sigma male copers that are more productive than loser incels.

Scarecrow is a good analogy as normshits believe they can construct us to prevent societal decay. And if it doesn't work they can scapegoat us.



View: https://youtu.be/Wvvz4h_ZgdI


@ResidentHell
 
I'll never understand how incels are deemed as "radicals". We don't do anything outside of making shit posts to piss people off.

If anything it's the normies who people should be afraid of, because of their own false ideologies. Overtime this profound delusion will have a negative effect on their psyche.

Only further deluding themselves until it eventually comes crashing down on them.
 
Rare-W thread

@based_meme @GeckoBus @WorthlessSlavicShit @Flagellum_Dei @OutcompetedByRoomba gtifh
 
Rare-W thread

@based_meme @GeckoBus @WorthlessSlavicShit @Flagellum_Dei @OutcompetedByRoomba gtifh
Thanks for the tag. This is the kind of thread we need more of.

Bookmarked. Will read later.
 
Rare-W thread

@based_meme @GeckoBus @WorthlessSlavicShit @Flagellum_Dei @OutcompetedByRoomba gtifh
Blackpillism is inevitable at this point, it's a historical necessity that must happen. No normie reactionists can stop that.
 
Read every word:yes:.

Read every single letter

I don't have anything to add

Nice job, BlkPillPres-Lite
Extremely High IQ read, that vast, vast majority of people who throw around the term incel have no genuine understanding of what it means and it's pretty obvious that fear mongering by the media has been very effective in it's mission to demonize and make sweeping generalizations.
 
Inceldom doesn’t exist – By this I don’t mean that there’s no person who is unable to receive sexual intercourse from the opposite sex for reasons beyond their control

I mean what women THINK inceldom is, doesn’t exist

The Incel Scarecrow - The female’s conception of the incel is illusory

If or whenever women clashes with "incels", she is clashing with the scarecrow that she created, and the woman usually doesn't realize this is what she is doing



There are probably thousands if not millions of incels-in-denial (and bluepilled males) out there. But women will never diagnose them as “incel”, because it does not fit their design for their incel-ified scarecrow.
It does not fit the ideal shape and décor that women wish to conceive as their incel

The key issue here is not about the incel, it is about the BLACKPILL

The woman is not threatened by the existence of incels. The woman is threatened by the dissemination of the BLACKPILL


Bluepilled normies and women created the Incel Scarecrow because of the influence that “incel rhetoric” (i.e. the blackpill) has had over young males across the developed world, mainly for zoomers and alphas. Women have to misrepresent the incel in order to obscure the fact their fight is against the dissemination of the blackpill

I have little doubt that Andrew Tate is a grifter. But you must admit that Andrew Tate did extremely well in exposing young males across the world to :redpill: and :blackpill:. Prior to the rise of Andrew Tate in 2022, women gave little to zero fucks about “incel propaganda”, and incels were not publicly demonized and libelled as much as they are now. Andrew Tate brought widespread awareness to the issue of sexless zoomer males, and he received loads of backlash from triggered women and soyboys for it. This is a massive sign there are loads of frustrated young men in the outside world, both sexless males and not-sexless males

Andrew Tate supplied on a demand that had existed for a while but had no market for it – A counsellor for young zoomer men struggling to initiate and maintain sexual relations with women. Tate eventually turned out to be a grifter, but he did something that had not been done before – He spoke the blackpill to millions through the Internet in the most unapologetic and brutally honest way, and for this he was branded “incel”, “misogynistic”, promoter of “toxic masculinity”


Remember that incel forums historically have not accumulated as many members compared to other more socially accepted forums. This forum has existed for over 7 years. But only about 29,000 accounts have ever been created on it, and I would bet at least half of those accounts were infiltrators or / and normies. Looksmax has more than twice as many registered accounts. Incels were not as famous before 2022, and incel forums relatively speaking don't have many registered accounts

I am personally not a fan of Elliot Rodger or Alek Minassian, but ER and AM provided women and bluepilled normies with a reason to decorate their Incel Scarecrow as the boogeyman. Their acts of retribution were sensationalized by mainstream media. But ER and AM did not cause the "incel" to become famous internationally. ER and AM only created a foundation for women and normies to feel frightened and troubled by the existence of the incel scarecrow they were building and decorating over time. But grifters like Andrew Tate also played a larger part in causing incels to achieve international notoriety. He became more famous than ER or AM by miles, and Tate is well known for his beliefs which were painted as "incel propaganda" by mainstream media


You can look at it like this: ER and AM created the fear and notoriety factor, while Andrew Tate brought the fame and recognition

Nearly all femicides and sexual assaults on women are not committed by self-identified incels. But normies and women don’t care as much when other women are raped or murdered by Chads, because their actions are not seen as “motivated by incel ideology”. Normies and women only worry if they believe there’s an ideology behind it, because they know that ideologies have the potential to inspire others to reshape their behavior in support for the ideology, and it can sow the seeds for future social revolution - Even if those ideologies were initially advertised or sensationalized through acts of violence. The blackpill isn’t even an ideology, which makes it even worse, because it means bluepilled men and women will not be able to suppress the dissemination of this “ideology” without having to expose their own hypocrisy on the discriminatory and hostile treatment of unattractive and low-value males in society


There’s evidence that zoomer males are gradually becoming more blackpilled over time. They have been undeniably exposed to the blackpill in their own real-world experience over the past few years. Lingo that was only known in blackpill / redpill manosphere is now common among normies on social media services like TikTok and Twitter. You could even say that some manosphere terms (e.g., mogging, looksmaxing, mewing, Chad) have become part of alpha gen brainrot vocabulary. Around half of zoomer males in the United States have felt they’ve experienced discrimination for simply being male (American Survey Center, 2023), and around half of young men in the United Kingdom agreed that “feminism has gone too far and has made it harder for men to succeed” (HNH, 2020)



This is extract from a Vox article in 2018 about the online incel subculture, and its briefly mentions how “incels” can be to threat to the status quo by “radicalizing” other people (most likely other young men) in western society:


Women misdiagnose incels as the cause of more young men becoming “radicalized” by beliefs that correlate with misogyny, patriarchism and toxic masculinity. But we all know that neither Andrew Tate nor Fresh & Fit are incels. So why then are incels scapegoated? Women are scapegoating the incel that exists within their mind. They are not fighting the incel that exists in real life, because the female’s conception of the “incel” does not exist in real life

Women won’t admit their
real fight is against the dissemination of the blackpill, cause they know it can convince more men to stop supporting this new matriarchal order in society. So they purposely brand it as “ideology” and purposely misrepresent the blackpill as “incel propaganda” in order to maintain hold of their hypnosis over any bluepilled men that would become exposed to :redpill: / :blackpill: manosphere

@Fat Link @LeFrenchCel Pin request
good thread, nice read :feelsokman::feelsokman::feelsokman:
My favorite parts:

Women have to misrepresent the incel in order to obscure the fact their fight is against the dissemination of the blackpill
This 100%. They know this shit is true. And we know that they know it is true because women constantly talk about blackpill shit, just not in incel context - see "pretty privilege" for example, which is female version of the term "lookism" as used by incels.
If you follow female beauty advice, you also realize they know about jawlines, hollow cheeks, de-bloating your face etc - also, 90% of cosmetic surgeries are done on women.

We can also go no subreddits for jaw surgery, and we literally see women encouraging each other to get surgery while shitting on men trying to get surgery. Lest anyone here forget it, most humans have a natural drive to dominate others and get ahead in life. Competition, hierarchy etc is the name of the game. Sabotaging the competition by spreading harmful information ("go to gym to get women") is part of the game.

The blackpill isn’t even an ideology, which makes it even worse, because it means bluepilled men and women will not be able to suppress the dissemination of this “ideology” without having to expose their own hypocrisy on the discriminatory and hostile treatment of unattractive and low-value males in society
:bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain:
thank you so much for putting it this way. I have said this so many times before. The BP is completely value neutral. Anyone who interprets it as being value-laden, i.e. hateful, misogynistic or whatever - just exposes their own ideological bias. Hence I repeat ad nauseam, the people trying to debunk us prove us right by the very fact that they label us and the BP as a hateful ideology.

And we also know that they are not self-aware enough to realize this. How do we know this? Because these goobers literally publish papers titled something like "why are incels not violent A MYSTERY :feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:"
Their conclusion: "video games pacify incels." :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgwR7IxhtfM


They can't even conceive of the idea that maybe their starting assumption is wrong and incels are not the monsters they want them to be.
Just like they can't admit that 40% of people on this forum are self-identified "people of color." Because they can't deny le racism - even though racism is just an aspect of lookism :lul::lul::lul:
 
High effort post + 100% Agreed
 

Similar threads

SupremeAutist
Replies
27
Views
1K
Aku no Hana
Aku no Hana
Greypiller
Replies
10
Views
679
Greypiller
Greypiller
JollyGentleman
Replies
4
Views
482
JollyGentleman
JollyGentleman
AnApparentMyth
Replies
7
Views
460
WeirdPanda
WeirdPanda
Shaktiman
Replies
12
Views
1K
VλREN
VλREN

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top