It is the most clear example of the Just World Fallacy in the incelsphere BY FAR. It shouldn't even be explained why saying "the world is mean to me and therefore it must fall" is narcissistic, but it deserves a cursory dive at least.
You can point to many social upheavals of the past where excess male populations took to the streets, but in all cases it is highly obvious that men ultimately gained nothing and women were never even vanquished as a class.
Before the 1917 Dysgenic Revolutions, Russian males of almost every background could enjoy land by themselves, start a large family, have access to European goods. The Communists seized the WWI shock and discontent and had managed to make things worse forever: Russia to this day is a degenerate hellhole with no family life, astronomic STD rates and staggering poverty. It deserves nothing but pure contempt and annihilation.
And guess what? The Regime liquified millions of said excess men in futile collectivization efforts and fights against righteous men (like Hitler) to feed their slavery apparatus and to expand their reach even further. The revolutionaries themselves weren't safe: most of the pre-1917 activists died by their comrades' hands.
Even something as flawed as this cannot be replicated under current conditions: the Regime can employ vast numbers of foreign mercenaries among highly divided hostile populations such as migrant men to put down any critical mass of the sexless. Loyalty won't be an issue like it was for Rome because the elites of today are themselves foreign parasites too.
The response to increasing male disgruntlement is to give women MORE RIGHTS so that the oppression could have a tighter chokehold and greater ability to navigate resistance.
A small counter-terror task force will break the back of the naturally meek but growing-in-numbers incel guerilla for reasons I've outlined here:
incels.is
You can point to many social upheavals of the past where excess male populations took to the streets, but in all cases it is highly obvious that men ultimately gained nothing and women were never even vanquished as a class.
Before the 1917 Dysgenic Revolutions, Russian males of almost every background could enjoy land by themselves, start a large family, have access to European goods. The Communists seized the WWI shock and discontent and had managed to make things worse forever: Russia to this day is a degenerate hellhole with no family life, astronomic STD rates and staggering poverty. It deserves nothing but pure contempt and annihilation.
And guess what? The Regime liquified millions of said excess men in futile collectivization efforts and fights against righteous men (like Hitler) to feed their slavery apparatus and to expand their reach even further. The revolutionaries themselves weren't safe: most of the pre-1917 activists died by their comrades' hands.
Even something as flawed as this cannot be replicated under current conditions: the Regime can employ vast numbers of foreign mercenaries among highly divided hostile populations such as migrant men to put down any critical mass of the sexless. Loyalty won't be an issue like it was for Rome because the elites of today are themselves foreign parasites too.
The response to increasing male disgruntlement is to give women MORE RIGHTS so that the oppression could have a tighter chokehold and greater ability to navigate resistance.
A small counter-terror task force will break the back of the naturally meek but growing-in-numbers incel guerilla for reasons I've outlined here:
If you go ER, you will accomplish nothing and no one will care
- the public is tired and can't remember a thing, mass shootings became a single blur long time ago - you're ugly, short and not the first, you will never reach Columbine levels of notoreity (they were GL) - you're subhuman and most likely have poor eye-hand coordination, you will never get a...
incels.is
