Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion The Implications of Paternity Fraud and Infidelity Rates

ResidentHell

ResidentHell

Veteran
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Posts
1,091
There are stats which show that between 30% to 40% of paternity tests turn out negative (although there are other studies that report paternity fraud rates as lower than 30%). The minority of men become victims of paternity fraud, but it is a significant minority. If you extrapolate the paternity fraud stats, you can assume that 1 in 3 children are born under paternity fraud relations. It’s also not a surprise that women tend to be outraged or hostile to the idea of mandatory paternity tests. If there was nothing for women to hide, there would be no reason for the outrage or hostility. Faith does not eliminate the possibility of betrayal, however small the chances may be

Last year when there was a sudden increase in the number of men in Uganda who wanted to seek paternity tests, it “stirred controversy” because “it could break families” and leave children “psychologically scarred”. How did the politicians respond? They basically said:

1. Ignorance is bliss. Truth hurts. No harm is done as long as you remain under the illusion that its your own child. Basically Matrix simulation shit; ignorance is bliss. I agree with this to a point, but not everyone wants to live in a delusional fantasy world. There are some people that would prefer to seek out their truth, and are prepared to be hurt or traumatized as a result of finding it​

2. Some men have “fertility issues” and don’t realize it, so their wives seek out a sneaky link to impregnate them, hoping their husband never finds out. (This is a gaslighting excuse IMO)​

In spite of how low Uganda may be on the world IQ map, even their men didn’t want to be subdued by the illusion of fatherhood. So they visited DNA test centers to find out whether or not they were cucks

Most worryingly, the privately owned Monitor newspaper reported that testing has caused domestic violence, with police arresting an Israeli national living in Uganda for allegedly killing his wife after DNA results showed that he was not the father of their six-month-old child. The man has not yet been charged.

Speaking in mid-July, Ministry of Internal Affairs spokesman Simon Mundeyi said there had been a 10-fold increase in requests for tests, which require taking the DNA of the father and child.

"We used to have on average 10 applicants daily at our government analytical lab. We are now averaging 100 daily and the numbers are still increasing," he added.

Private clinics also cashed in on the trend, putting up advertisements on the back of taxis and on billboards offering tests.
Microbiologist Freddie Bwanga said the state laboratory where he works has not seen a major increase in requests for testing, but greater awareness now exists around the issue.

His experience over the years shows that 60-70% of tests prove a biological link between the father and child.

As for the 30% to 40% who found they were not, the outcome was often beneficial in "helping children to be settled where they are born".
But Uganda's state minister for primary health care said there was no need for men to seek paternity tests.

"Anything that you don't know can't kill you (False. Mysterious objects can cause fatalities without being discovered by the victims). If you don't know that this is not your child, it won't break your heart. But when you find out your heart will be broken " Margaret Muhanga said.

Let’s face it - The only type of people who are against the idea that men should seek out paternity tests, are women and willingly cucked / extremely-bluepilled men. Current paternity fraud statistics are mostly for parents who were born as Boomers, Gen X or Millennials. But Gen Z is the most unfaithful generation in modern history, and some zoomers are still below age of consent. So imagine when zoomers start to reach their 30’s and 40’s. You can be pretty sure that the rate of paternity fraud in Gen Z will be higher than it was for previous generations


“Alpha slays, beta pays”; it was this way ages, and it still is. If you really wanna know whether a female likes you - Find out whether or not she’ll allow you to fuck when you’re broke and have nothing major going on for you in your economic / financial life. If she’s the type to allow you to fuck only when she’s also directly benefiting from your financial / economic situation - You most likely would be the one who she has relegated to the condition of the betabuxxer

The men who fuck women (who isn’t subhuman foid) without having to make any financial or economic expenses on her, are the superior alphas of the sex / dating realm. Most men who either (1) pay to fuck (escortbux), (2) pay women who they've fucked (girlfriendbux, childsupportbux), or (3) “cuff” a woman before having sex with her (aka marry or LTR), are the inferior betas (as well as incels)


Paternity fraud stats for Canada (10%) and Australia (25%) are in thread below:

Studies have shown that paternity fraud happens in 10% - 30% of all tests, which means between 1 to 3 in every 10 people who received a paternity test at birth turned out to be a "cucked baby". This indicates the female partner in 10% - 30% of all relationships that produce a child are guaranteed to cheat JFL :lul:. Also take extra consideration to the fact these stats are based on the relationships of Boomers and Gen X


An extract from the Bionity article which details the statistics about paternity fraud in Western countries:

According to Steve Scherer, a senior scientist in the department of genetics at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto), 10% of babies born in Canada are victims of paternity fraud. A 10% paternity fraud rate was cited during a science seminar for Canadian judges in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada in November, 2002 by a panel of medical experts.

Dr. Jeanette Papp, director of genotyping and sequencing in the University of California at Los Angeles department of human genetics is of the expert opinion that 15% of children born in the Western world are victims of paternity fraud.

Between 30 and 50 per cent of women cheat on their partners, compared with 50 to 80 per cent of men, according to Dr. Judith Eve Lipton, a psychiatrist with the Swedish Medical Center in Washington D.C. who, in 2001, co-wrote The Myth of Monogamy: Fidelity and Infidelity in Animals and People with her husband, David P. Barash Ph.D. (P.S Not sure if these particular stats are correct. I've seen data that shows otherwise)

Paternity fraud statistics for Australia provided on a TV show aired by the Australian Broadcasting Company stated that for the year 2003 more than 3,000 DNA paternity tests were ordered by men in Australian, and in almost 25% of those cases, the paternity test revealed that the children they thought were theirs were actually sired by another man.

A self-reporting national poll of 5,000 women in Scotland conducted in 2004 concluded that half of the women said that if they became pregnant by another man but wanted to stay with their partner, they would lie about the baby’s real father

Also a quote from Wikipedia on the incidence of paternity fraud around the world. It suggests paternity fraud rates are much lower than 30% in some countries like Mexico, Canada, France etc. But it's claimed this is because the studies only looked at couples who were undergoing a paternity dispute

It seems the reported rates of paternity fraud are relatively higher when it also accounts for cases that were not initially based on a dispute over paternal legitimacy (e.g., DNA or ancestry tests that were spontaneously taken by the father or by one of the sons / daughters on a future date)

This is an indicator that there could be more instances of paternity fraud where the supposed "father" is under the strong conviction that they're the biological father, than the instances of paternity fraud where the "father" suspected that he wasn't actually the father:

A 2005 scientific review of international published studies of paternal discrepancy found a range in incidence, around the world, from 0.8% to 30% (median 3.7%). However, as many of the studies were conducted between the 1950s and the 1980s, numbers may be unreliable due to the inaccuracies of genetic testing methods and procedures used at the time. Studies ranging in date from 1991 to 1999 quote the following incidence rates: 11.8% (Mexico), 4.0% (Canada), 2.8% (France), 1.4% and 1.6% (UK), and 0.8% (Switzerland). These numbers suggest that the widely quoted and unsubstantiated figure of 10% of non-paternal events is an overestimate. However, in studies that solely looked at couples who obtained paternity testing because paternity was being disputed, there are higher levels: an incidence of 17% to 33% (median of 26.9%). Most at risk were those born to younger parents, to unmarried couples and those of lower socio-economic status, or from certain cultural groups.
 
Last edited:
Fucking based to be honest. Go full rage, normies!
 
Every single mother who tries to fake paternity deserves everything bad that happens to them.
 
From what I've seen, the statistics on paternity fraud seem to range between 0% to 40%. But there are several sources that report a rate which lies between 20% - 35%

Based on available data, I think a balanced estimate for paternity fraud rate is between 1 in 3 children to 1 in 5 children

According to this study published in 2006, it seems the overall rate of paternity fraud in the United States is 28%, with African Americans having the highest rate of paternity fraud by ethnicity in the US (33%):
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

UglyBaldingManlet
Replies
19
Views
315
FrenchcelNeverbegan
FrenchcelNeverbegan
Monke
Replies
6
Views
161
Regenerator
Regenerator

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top