The manosphere blog Chateau Heartiste once posted an article about how the male-to-female ratio of a country's population influences how desperate/beta men are. Article: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2019/02/25/war-sex-skew-beta-male-thirst-and-female-beauty/
From the article:
"The cause-and-effect arrows go like this:
War reduces the number of young men in a population
==>
Fewer men skews the sex ratio to favor men’s preferences
==>
A sex skew favoring men means more women available for each man
==>
More sexual market options means increased male choosiness for better-looking women
==>
Better-looking women produce better-looking daughters, ensuring more beauty in future generations.
Conversely, a sex skew that favors women (more men than women) intensifies beta male thirst, because there are fewer women for men to fight over. Men operating in such a parched sexual market will blast online fatties with horrible anti-Game and wife up sluts and single moms. Fertility will collapse from all the men “dropping out” to be one with their fapatoriums, and many ugly, fat, feminist women will find lsmv mates and bear ugly children, ruining the aesthetics of future generations.
Cochran provided a handy dandy graphic to drive home the point about sex skews as an under-appreciated factor in large-scale geopolitical events."
"In 1950 in Russia, there were 62 men for every 100 women in the 25-49 age bracket (prime reproduction years). This was the closest earth has come to a Poosy Paradise. An ugly, broke, charmless man in 1950 Russia could pick up 9s and 10s with no Game at all, and have them coming back begging for more of his situational alpha male love because he would have natural Dread Game from his near-limitless options.
In 2017 in Russia, that number had climbed up to 98 men for every 100 women in the 25-49 age bracket. Poosy Party’s over, but a Russia Enlightenment begins.
In 1950, there was a male-favoring sex skew in almost all of Eastern Europe, particular along the Eurasian steppe extending from the Baltics down to Crimea. Post-war Germany, unsurprisingly, also had a sex skew favoring men, although not as pronounced as that experienced by the Soviet Union and its satellites.
By 2017, the sex skew in almost all of Allied Europe has favored women (more men than women), and Russia has bounced back to near numerical reproductive-age parity between the sexes.
[...]
The male-heavy sex skew in most of Europe and America now is an ominous portent. Excess men, each with no (feminine) woman to call his own, suggests a present and future West dominated by beta male thirst, intra-tribal skirmishing, foreign entanglements, rampant polygyny and a consequent growing incel subpopulation, and ugly unfeminine women acting like hard 10s. Mass migration of third world males into the West only exacerbates the problem."
So what we see here is that during the 1950s, a period stereotypically known for partriarchal marriages and pie-cooking housewives, there was a extreme shortage of men in most of Eastern-Europe. This would explain why Eastern-European women have, for a long time, leaned towards being feminine and tradional, contrary to western women who became more and more masculine after the war. This is because most of Western-Europe never had to deal with a shortage of men so they couldn't be too picky when finding a wife while Eastern-European women had to improve themselves in every aspect in order to lock down someone because men had a shitton of options. Even when they did marry, they still had to be a loyal and productive wife because the man could just divorce her and find someone else quickly while a divorced woman is seen as leftovers in a society where men can be as picky as they want. The fact that Eastern-Europe is starting to have a higher male ratio again also explains why Eastern-European women are now becoming more degenerate and more like their western counterparts.
When considering this, it also becomes clear why some of the greatest empires of history became sexually degenerate and feminised during their most peaceful eras while the most masculine societies tend to be the one which are contantly engaging in warfare; the more men die in war => the lower the male population => the less desperate and beta the male population will be which means that women are not given a chance to destroy said society.
I think these factors also explain why in the past (during the 50s & 60s) it used to be more common in the west that men cheated while now, it's mainly western women who are cheating and cucking their husbands.
TL;DR Peace creates inceldom, war creates loyal wives who behave like anime characters
From the article:
"The cause-and-effect arrows go like this:
War reduces the number of young men in a population
==>
Fewer men skews the sex ratio to favor men’s preferences
==>
A sex skew favoring men means more women available for each man
==>
More sexual market options means increased male choosiness for better-looking women
==>
Better-looking women produce better-looking daughters, ensuring more beauty in future generations.
Conversely, a sex skew that favors women (more men than women) intensifies beta male thirst, because there are fewer women for men to fight over. Men operating in such a parched sexual market will blast online fatties with horrible anti-Game and wife up sluts and single moms. Fertility will collapse from all the men “dropping out” to be one with their fapatoriums, and many ugly, fat, feminist women will find lsmv mates and bear ugly children, ruining the aesthetics of future generations.
Cochran provided a handy dandy graphic to drive home the point about sex skews as an under-appreciated factor in large-scale geopolitical events."
"In 1950 in Russia, there were 62 men for every 100 women in the 25-49 age bracket (prime reproduction years). This was the closest earth has come to a Poosy Paradise. An ugly, broke, charmless man in 1950 Russia could pick up 9s and 10s with no Game at all, and have them coming back begging for more of his situational alpha male love because he would have natural Dread Game from his near-limitless options.
In 2017 in Russia, that number had climbed up to 98 men for every 100 women in the 25-49 age bracket. Poosy Party’s over, but a Russia Enlightenment begins.
In 1950, there was a male-favoring sex skew in almost all of Eastern Europe, particular along the Eurasian steppe extending from the Baltics down to Crimea. Post-war Germany, unsurprisingly, also had a sex skew favoring men, although not as pronounced as that experienced by the Soviet Union and its satellites.
By 2017, the sex skew in almost all of Allied Europe has favored women (more men than women), and Russia has bounced back to near numerical reproductive-age parity between the sexes.
[...]
The male-heavy sex skew in most of Europe and America now is an ominous portent. Excess men, each with no (feminine) woman to call his own, suggests a present and future West dominated by beta male thirst, intra-tribal skirmishing, foreign entanglements, rampant polygyny and a consequent growing incel subpopulation, and ugly unfeminine women acting like hard 10s. Mass migration of third world males into the West only exacerbates the problem."
So what we see here is that during the 1950s, a period stereotypically known for partriarchal marriages and pie-cooking housewives, there was a extreme shortage of men in most of Eastern-Europe. This would explain why Eastern-European women have, for a long time, leaned towards being feminine and tradional, contrary to western women who became more and more masculine after the war. This is because most of Western-Europe never had to deal with a shortage of men so they couldn't be too picky when finding a wife while Eastern-European women had to improve themselves in every aspect in order to lock down someone because men had a shitton of options. Even when they did marry, they still had to be a loyal and productive wife because the man could just divorce her and find someone else quickly while a divorced woman is seen as leftovers in a society where men can be as picky as they want. The fact that Eastern-Europe is starting to have a higher male ratio again also explains why Eastern-European women are now becoming more degenerate and more like their western counterparts.
When considering this, it also becomes clear why some of the greatest empires of history became sexually degenerate and feminised during their most peaceful eras while the most masculine societies tend to be the one which are contantly engaging in warfare; the more men die in war => the lower the male population => the less desperate and beta the male population will be which means that women are not given a chance to destroy said society.
I think these factors also explain why in the past (during the 50s & 60s) it used to be more common in the west that men cheated while now, it's mainly western women who are cheating and cucking their husbands.
TL;DR Peace creates inceldom, war creates loyal wives who behave like anime characters
