Toxic Femininity The Gender Gap in Censorship Support

[DarkStar]

Article: https://www.psychologytoday.com/int...t/202104/the-gender-gap-in-censorship-support

• In a 2019 study, 59% of women said protecting free speech was less important than promoting an inclusive society, while 71% of men felt opposite.

Foids serving as the perfect "ZOGbots" yet again.

"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.” -George Orwell, 1984.​

[Blackpill]How Foids Serve as the Perfect "ZOGbots"

"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.” -George Orwell, 1984. Re-read that quote again, it's originally from 1949, how does it hold up today? Notice...

incels.is

• Two recent studies of online adults revealed that women were more censorious than men.

With such a high in-group, who would guess?

This research found that while both women and men have more favorable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger[5]

Women-are-wonderful effect - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

These findings also really make stuff such as this quite interesting:

More than half of misogynistic posts by Twitter users in the UK and America are written by women, according to a new large-scale study. A report that analysed 19 million tweets over four years found three million posts including insults aimed at women. The users who had posted the insults were more likely to be female than male.

Women are more likely to use misogynistic language on Twitter

More than 60 per cent of offensive tweets posted by women used derogatory animal references

www.the-independent.com

In this latest study, 55% of the propagators were found to be women, and they were using the same language as men in their abuse.

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2016/05/this-research-reveals-the-full-extent-of-online-misogyny-and-a-surprising-fact-about-whos-responsible/

Foids As Equally Responsible For "Online Misogyny" Findings Show.

Obviously, it should be water to all of us here that males, especially "Incels" however the MSM defines it, are the main suspects whenever the topic of "online misogyny" is bought into question However, these recent findings are quite interesting: This report reveals that of over 100,000...

incels.is

• This gender gap appears smaller among young adults, with both young men and young women having censorship preferences similar to adult women.

This is quite disturbing to me, since it shows just how "soyified" most young males are starting to become nowadays. Whilst some other trends & patterns have been promising:

"Lookism" as a term is now where "sexism" was right at the start of second-wave feminism in the 60s

This article/study is surprisingly neutral on us and actually seems to understand a lot of what we are saying, but it's this graph they include that caught my attention: https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/95206 For context, that's from the Google Books Ngram Viewer, in which you can...

incels.is

These new findings make me think that sadly, "lookism" will be co-opted by foids for them to cry ": Muh oppression! Muh Patriarchy!" similar to how the online Autism/ND community is dominate by foids talking about how "hard" Autism has made their life.

It also kind of makes results such as these, seem a bit less promising:

Essentially, this showed that amongst the younger generations we have a polarizing political gap open up which ofc correlates heavily with gender.

And ofc, some of the most hypergamous countries on Earth happen to be where this gap is really opening up.

Women are more supportive of illegalizing insults of immigrants, homosexual individuals, transgender individuals, the police, African Americans, Hispanics, Muslims, Jewish people, and Christians, and are more supportive of banning sexually explicit public statements and flag burning.

Notice how that only applies to certain groups? White people? Asian people? Males? Heterosexual identified males & females?

Atp, it's them just saying the quiet part aloud- those who don't understand it are just braindead.

This is another certified "the fascists of the future will call themselves anti fascists" due to the fact right here, they're utilizing the same sort of censorship & stifling by targeting certain groups which they see as a threat & actually instituting oppression upon them. If foids can claim they are "oppressed" it's easier for males to believe they are, be manipulated, and simply just watch as they get inevitably cucked to the shadow realm.

Foids are essentially what some term as "cry bullies" due to the fact that they are able to successfully utilize their emotions & brain-power to coax others:

56% of the women's targets but only 25% of the men's target were friends or relatives. Men rather gossiped about public figures and distant acquaintances (M 46% vs F 16%). No sex difference in derogatory tone.

Thus, women likely engage in nasty, personal gossip (.71 × .56) / (.64 × .25) ≈ 2.5 times as often as men. Perhaps even more often because such gossip might occur more often in small groups and women are twice as talkative in that setting.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226231488_An_exploratory_analysis_of_ex_differences_in_gossip

Simply, foids are enabling for more of our free-speech rights to be curtailed in the name of an "inclusive" soyciety:

Women (54%) are more than 20 points more likely than men (36%) to support banning sexually explicit public statements.

A majority of women (57%) favor a law that would make it illegal to say offensive or insulting things about African Americans in public while 43% oppose. In contrast, only 36% of men would similarly favor this law while 64% would oppose it.

Majorities of women oppose similar laws for other groups. However, they are about 15 points more likely than men to favor banning hate speech against immigrants (46% vs. 33%), gays, lesbians, and transgender people (45% vs. 27%), the police (45% vs. 28%), Hispanics (45% vs. 30%), Muslims (44% vs. 30%), Jewish people (45% vs. 35%), and Christians (43% vs. 27%)

Once again, foids only known hypocrisy, double standards, and "rules for thee" as exhibited here.

Furthermore, this also shows foids should never have say in how a civilization is ran.

Moreover, 58% of college men said it is never acceptable to shout down a speaker, whereas only 41% of women agreed that it is never acceptable to do so.

Jfl, so they admit to turning everyone into a sensitive snowflake now?

Of greater consequence for the pursuit of truth and rigorous scholarship, this higher sensitivity to harm among women likely influences how women weigh the tradeoffs regarding academic freedom vs. the protection of vulnerable others.

For example, a majority of men believe that colleges should not protect their students from offensive ideas, whereas a majority of women believe colleges should. Male students rated advancing knowledge and academic rigor as higher in value and social justice and emotional well-being as lower in value relative to female students. And in a 2021 report by Eric Kaufmann, female scholars in the US and Canada were more likely than men to support firing a scholar for controversial research.

Overall, this concerns me the most

No doubt, a factor such as this will contribute substantially to that of behavioral sink. Simply, foids will utilize their nature of manipulation combined with their "oppressed" privilege in order to stifle any speech, thought, and potentially even scientific based research simply for the fact that they can claim it is "offensive" or is "exclusive" to some demographic.

This, however, is what is interesting:

I have observed similar patterns in some of my own work. For example, in a very recent study I conducted with 440 online adults (I will add a preprint link when it is available), participants rated the offensiveness of excerpts from the discussion sections of five published (and potentially or demonstrably controversial) scientific papers.

These papers included findings that (1) female protégés benefit more when they have male than female mentors; (2) there is no evidence of racial discriminationagainst ethnic minorities in police shootings; (3) activating Christian concepts increases racial prejudice; (4) children with same-sex parents are no worse off than children with opposite-sex parents; and (5) experiencing child sexual abusedoes not cause severe and long-lasting psychological harm. Note all these studies were published in high-impact scientific journals, but two of them have since been retracted and one was officially condemned by Congress.

Women found all scientific findings more offensive than men, except for the same-sex marriage findings (which both men and women rated as not at all offensive). And broadly, women reported stronger agreement with the statement that some scientific findings should be censored because they are too dangerous.

There you have it right there, foids admit they will deny facts which have been scientifically measures & tested because they deem it as too "dangerous"

Overall, I would say these findings have made me more pessimistic. Simply, foids will continue to utilize their manipulative nature to further behavioral sink, civilizational decline, and ofc stile our freedoms.

Spoiler

@Koomersarj @wereq @Diddy @Fevet @WorthlessSlavicShit @GeckoBus @Uggo Mongo @LeFrenchCel @proudweeb @Fat Link @Stupid Clown @Kerrigan Skelly @SupremeAutist @AnApparentMyth @A.M. @Uncle Death @Mystorious @Castaway @Grodd @based_meme @veryrare @OutcompetedByRoomba @reveries @PersonalityChad @AtrociousCitizen @Caesercel @PersonalityChad @Solid @Kamanbert @Lazyandtalentless @Spooky_Heejin @Flagellum_Dei @Sergeant Kelly @NeverGetUp @Regenerator @AutistSupremacist @daydreamER

 

[Grodd]

Foids make everything worse and are never held accountable for it

 

[A.M.]

High IQ thread, will read. Billions must read

 

[PersonalityChad]

Not surprising in the slightest, women are the NPC gender

 

[Lazyandtalentless]

High IQ thread, will read. Billions must read

 

[AnApparentMyth]

Thanks for another high quality thread @DarkStar! Love to read it brocel!


I find it incredibly interesting that women will deny any sort of race differences between us. Like, IQ, physical traits or just inherent behavior! They want to censor any sort of topics that go against the grain, in no small part because of the rise of feminism, and other ideologies. I might make a thread on the correlation between the two, censorship and feminism. But maybe another day. Anyway, any sort of topic that's "too much" or "Edgy" for them gets thrown to the waste-side, sadly. I've seen it happen a lot of times. It's happening in all of my favorite spaces too Like gaming or writing. Just lots of unintelligible choices. I also must call into question if this is to serve another grand purpose. This line here:

A majority of women (57%) favor a law that would make it illegal to say offensive or insulting things about African Americans in public while 43% oppose. In contrast, only 36% of men would similarly favor this law while 64% would oppose it.

Is interesting. Along with what was said below, I do wonder what can be considered offensive to them. They protect people who might not even want protecting! Just to serve their own selfish goal. This also aligns with what we see in media. At least to me, the rise of culture surrounding blacks and other races is massive. Like a big boom in the 21st century. They think their doing the right thing, but in reality. It's always to support themselves, not the people their with. Once again, thank you for making it man! Cheers!

 

[Kerrigan Skelly]

The whole post reminds me of this meme

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

The fact that women are more likely to support censoring scientific findings shows how emotionally driven they are. If reality doesn’t match their feelings, they’d rather erase it than deal with it. No wonder academia is becoming a joke.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Good post btw

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Nice effort thread But their hypergamy will ultimately lead, through the rot of the state, to societal collapse. Thus marxism-rodgerism, which is the only system that prevent this and solve the foid question, shall be stablished.

 

[Uncle Death]

I mean woman are annoying like jews so that checks off already. Gaslighting mtf, both the victim and the girl boss, coincidence? I think not.

Woman are pretty much just downgraded version of jews, now you wonder why most men this days are apathetic and without any prospect for life and hidden beneath irony and inherent weakness(check our testerone it’s not just chemical) because we are like cats being put on the hold by foids. We are meant to be free, but woman are the perfect tight leash to keep our inner chaotic catness let out.

 

[Uncle Death]

Things are so fucking shitty this days, violent revolution without mercy is the answers at this point. @DarkStar even Hitler spoke of this in Mein Kampft. When Tyranny is unprecedented all overseeing force, revolution is the answer. There is no peaceful solution anymore.

 

[SociallyStupid]

Nice!

Yeah, I think women value "feeling good" more than the truth, that's why they are more for censorship. If they would just stay at home and not be exposed to the political world they would likely be happier.

 

[Uncle Death]

Nice!

Yeah, I think women value "feeling good" more than the truth, that's why they are more for censorship. If they would just stay at home and not be exposed to the political world they would likely be happier.

That’s why they love communism. They don’t want to confront the reality of life, whether it’s because they don’t need to or because they are too weak to stared at the abyss and if I am being honest too stupid to even comprehend it. Their order is of mere weakness and control that upholds the vibe, that’s why they are bunch of kummbaya fucker.

 

[CHOoseWisely123]

Good thread

 

[GeckoBus]

Article: https://www.psychologytoday.com/int...t/202104/the-gender-gap-in-censorship-support



Foids serving as the perfect "ZOGbots" yet again.

"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.” -George Orwell, 1984.​

[Blackpill]How Foids Serve as the Perfect "ZOGbots"

"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.” -George Orwell, 1984. Re-read that quote again, it's originally from 1949, how does it hold up today? Notice...

incels.is

With such a high in-group, who would guess?

Women-are-wonderful effect - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

These findings also really make stuff such as this quite interesting:

Women are more likely to use misogynistic language on Twitter

More than 60 per cent of offensive tweets posted by women used derogatory animal references

www.the-independent.com

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2016/05/this-research-reveals-the-full-extent-of-online-misogyny-and-a-surprising-fact-about-whos-responsible/

Foids As Equally Responsible For "Online Misogyny" Findings Show.

Obviously, it should be water to all of us here that males, especially "Incels" however the MSM defines it, are the main suspects whenever the topic of "online misogyny" is bought into question However, these recent findings are quite interesting: This report reveals that of over 100,000...

incels.is

This is quite disturbing to me, since it shows just how "soyified" most young males are starting to become nowadays. Whilst some other trends & patterns have been promising:

"Lookism" as a term is now where "sexism" was right at the start of second-wave feminism in the 60s

This article/study is surprisingly neutral on us and actually seems to understand a lot of what we are saying, but it's this graph they include that caught my attention: https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/95206 For context, that's from the Google Books Ngram Viewer, in which you can...

incels.is

These new findings make me think that sadly, "lookism" will be co-opted by foids for them to cry ": Muh oppression! Muh Patriarchy!" similar to how the online Autism/ND community is dominate by foids talking about how "hard" Autism has made their life.

It also kind of makes results such as these, seem a bit less promising:

View attachment 1395471

Essentially, this showed that amongst the younger generations we have a polarizing political gap open up which ofc correlates heavily with gender.

And ofc, some of the most hypergamous countries on Earth happen to be where this gap is really opening up.


Notice how that only applies to certain groups? White people? Asian people? Males? Heterosexual identified males & females?

Atp, it's them just saying the quiet part aloud- those who don't understand it are just braindead.

This is another certified "the fascists of the future will call themselves anti fascists" due to the fact right here, they're utilizing the same sort of censorship & stifling by targeting certain groups which they see as a threat & actually instituting oppression upon them. If foids can claim they are "oppressed" it's easier for males to believe they are, be manipulated, and simply just watch as they get inevitably cucked to the shadow realm.

Foids are essentially what some term as "cry bullies" due to the fact that they are able to successfully utilize their emotions & brain-power to coax others:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226231488_An_exploratory_analysis_of_ex_differences_in_gossip

Simply, foids are enabling for more of our free-speech rights to be curtailed in the name of an "inclusive" soyciety:



View attachment 1395625

Once again, foids only known hypocrisy, double standards, and "rules for thee" as exhibited here.

Furthermore, this also shows foids should never have say in how a civilization is ran.

Jfl, so they admit to turning everyone into a sensitive snowflake now?


Overall, this concerns me the most

No doubt, a factor such as this will contribute substantially to that of behavioral sink. Simply, foids will utilize their nature of manipulation combined with their "oppressed" privilege in order to stifle any speech, thought, and potentially even scientific based research simply for the fact that they can claim it is "offensive" or is "exclusive" to some demographic.

This, however, is what is interesting:


There you have it right there, foids admit they will deny facts which have been scientifically measures & tested because they deem it as too "dangerous"

Overall, I would say these findings have made me more pessimistic. Simply, foids will continue to utilize their manipulative nature to further behavioral sink, civilizational decline, and ofc stile our freedoms.

Spoiler

@Koomersarj @wereq @Diddy @Fevet @WorthlessSlavicShit @GeckoBus @Uggo Mongo @LeFrenchCel @proudweeb @Fat Link @Stupid Clown @Kerrigan Skelly @SupremeAutist @AnApparentMyth @A.M. @Uncle Death @Mystorious @Castaway @Grodd @based_meme @veryrare @OutcompetedByRoomba @reveries @PersonalityChad @AtrociousCitizen @Caesercel @PersonalityChad @Solid @Kamanbert @Lazyandtalentless @Spooky_Heejin @Flagellum_Dei @Sergeant Kelly @NeverGetUp @Regenerator @AutistSupremacist @daydreamER

giga iq thread. I have nothing to contribute. Just fucking lol at over half of misogyny online being committed by foids lmfao.
Thread reminded of this study where they found that both boys and girls react more harshly to insults aimed at women than men:

Girls are more likely to target the opposite sex with aggression than boys

Abstract from the paper: Direct and indirect aggressive behaviors were studied using surveys and interviews of students in two public schools. The variables of “sex-of-aggressor” and “sex-of-target” were included. Claims in previous research that girls engage in far more indirect aggression than...

incels.is

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13684302221125182

Also this thread by @WorthlessSlavicShit

Girls are more likely to target the opposite sex with aggression than boys

Abstract from the paper: Direct and indirect aggressive behaviors were studied using surveys and interviews of students in two public schools. The variables of “sex-of-aggressor” and “sex-of-target” were included. Claims in previous research that girls engage in far more indirect aggression than...

incels.is

 

[BPJ]

High IQ thread, will read. Billions must read

 

[The Judge]

These college free speech rankings appear to corroborate your research.

2022 College Free Speech Rankings: Gender differences in censorship attitudes

2022 College Free Speech Rankings: Gender differences in censorship attitudes

www.thefire.org

Female students are more censorial than male students, regardless of whether the speaker is liberal or conservative.

This alone is proof that it is in fact women who are fundamentally incapable of handling views that oppose their own. They yearn for so-called "safe spaces" where they'll never be questioned or challenged in any way.

This table showcases the views of male and female students on the topic of allowing speakers with controversial views on campus.

Speaker	Percentage of female students who oppose speaker	Percentage of male students who oppose speaker
"Transgender people have a mental disorder."	85%	58%
"Black Lives Matter is a hate group."	85%	56%
"The 2020 Election was stolen."	77%	56%
"Abortion should be completely illegal."	72%	43%
"The Second Amendment should be repealed so that guns can be confiscated."	44%	38%
"Religious liberty is used as an excuse to discriminate against gays and lesbians."	42%	33%
"White people are collectively responsible for structural racism and use it to protect their privilege."	33%	35%
"Undocumented immigrants should be given the right to vote."	24%	24%
Getting rid of inequality is more important than protecting the so-called "right" to free speech.	35%	31%

(Notice the massive percentage of female students opposing speakers criticizing gender ideology and BLM)

What stuck out to me the most, however, is that more women than men CLAIMED to want to protect the right to free speech. However, a quick glance at the rest of this table will show you that this is not true in the slightest.

Never pay attention to what they say, only what they do.

 

[CHOoseWisely123]

These college free speech rankings appear to corroborate your research.

2022 College Free Speech Rankings: Gender differences in censorship attitudes

2022 College Free Speech Rankings: Gender differences in censorship attitudes

www.thefire.org

This alone is proof that it is in fact women who are fundamentally incapable of handling views that oppose their own. They yearn for so-called "safe spaces" where they'll never be questioned or challenged in any way.

This table showcases the views of male and female students on the topic of allowing speakers with controversial views on campus.

Speaker	Percentage of female students who oppose speaker	Percentage of male students who oppose speaker
"Transgender people have a mental disorder."	85%	58%
"Black Lives Matter is a hate group."	85%	56%
"The 2020 Election was stolen."	77%	56%
"Abortion should be completely illegal."	72%	43%
"The Second Amendment should be repealed so that guns can be confiscated."	44%	38%
"Religious liberty is used as an excuse to discriminate against gays and lesbians."	42%	33%
"White people are collectively responsible for structural racism and use it to protect their privilege."	33%	35%
"Undocumented immigrants should be given the right to vote."	24%	24%
Getting rid of inequality is more important than protecting the so-called "right" to free speech.	35%	31%

(Notice the massive percentage of female students opposing speakers criticizing gender ideology and BLM)

What stuck out to me the most, however, is that more women than men CLAIMED to want to protect the right to free speech. However, a quick glance at the rest of this table will show you that this is not true in the slightest.

Never pay attention to what they say, only what they do.

What’s more appalling is both Men and Female college educated would even entertain ideas that fundamentally go against the foundation of this country.

And people think I’m crazy for saying the USA is dead.

 

[The Judge]

What’s more appalling is both Men and Female college educated would even entertain ideas that fundamentally go against the foundation of this country.

And people think I’m crazy for saying the USA is dead.

You are far from crazy.

Most empires throughout history fell not to outside forces, but to internal struggles such as corruption, inflation, and a lack of unity. The USA is just the latest.

 

[CHOoseWisely123]

You are far from crazy.

Most empires throughout history fell not to outside forces, but to internal struggles such as corruption, inflation, and a lack of unity. The USA is just the latest.

Man I went to two different bars a couple nights ago with my friend and we kept getting shit on in both bars we went to, no fucking joke either. Like legit within 2 minutes of being inside the bar we were already harassed with people talking about us and calling us names.

We might as well have been transgender freaks walking into a Baptist church in the Deep South around 1950.

There’s zero respect for the undesirable men anymore, fuck this country and almost everyone in it.

 

[Stupid Clown]

The fact that women are more likely to support censoring scientific findings shows how emotionally driven they are. If reality doesn’t match their feelings, they’d rather erase it than deal with it. No wonder academia is becoming a joke.

 

[Stupid Clown]

High IQ thread, will read. Billions must read

 

[NeverGetUp]

Billions must read