Serious The fundamental problem is that incels/incel traits are dehumanized.

[WeirdPanda]

Failo effect

The failo effect is opposite of the halo effect, a term used in the incelosphere, likely coined by the YouTuber FaceandLMS. The failo effect is also known as the...

incels.wiki

Incels are a targeted group for dehumanizing. We're vilified not for being bad but for being different. It is a form of prejudice against our very existences. In a sense we are disabled, but instead of being infantilized and accepting it we fight back with words and sometimes even rage.

Obviously this creates a battle, but in this sense it's one that cannot be won because we do not compose, altogether, a powerful group. We cannot influence people physically and charismatically.

That means I'm going to twist it and say that we are still capable of some things, such as talking back to the gaslighting that we constantly receive from normgroids. Doing so provokes a reaction from them that shifts the public opinion on us to a negative one. In this manner we are also capable of making them dislike us even more than they did, because in their views we have proved our vile nature.

The goal should be to destroy this dehumanizing caricature that our traits hold and aim for a more equitable social balance, instead of trying to get ahead of everyone which is clearly not going to happen.

What might happen if we do get ahead of everyone, that is the case of which feminism dies out and all men do get the power again, the lesser men are going to be subdued (in this case not only ideologically oppositional, but physically and mentally ill/disabled men as well). This perpetuates another cycle of darwinism, which at this point has gotten old.

What we should acknowledge is that it's not us who are evil and wrong as that is clearly being infiltrated into our minds by the works of intense normie society gaslighting.

The world is just simply not good enough.

 

[chudjak]

Speak for yourself, im evil

 

[WeirdPanda]

Speak for yourself, im evil

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

I feel like the dehumanization of incels is a defense mechanism. Normies hate us because we’re the manifestation of what they could become if they lose or if they don’t have, for some reason or another, the positive genetic traits that helped them get a partner. And this brings them fear. I'd say it is also because our existence, as well as the ideas that we present, disprove their idea of a just world and therefore takes away their ability to credit themselves for their 'success.'

The idea that all of the success that they attribute to their own efforts was random, and thus, not really due to their own effort—terrifies them.

 

[WeirdPanda]

I feel like the dehumanization of incels is a defense mechanism. Normies hate us because we’re the manifestation of what they could become if they lose or if they don’t have, for some reason or another, the positive genetic traits that helped them get a partner. And this brings them fear. I'd say it is also because our existence, as well as the ideas that we present, disprove their idea of a just world and therefore takes away their ability to credit themselves for their 'success.'

The idea that all of the success that they attribute to their own efforts was random, and thus, not really due to their own effort—terrifies them.

Reminds me of the colonizing of the americas in a sense then, atleast from what I've learned. Inceldom and discussion regarding it is more modern, but there's no way there could not be a pattern regarding this dehumanization.

To return on topic though, our existence basically breaks the state of complacency that they have at all times. However even that (in my personal belief) cannot win against pure and concrete proof that their worldview isn't real. It's the same with anything that we believed as a kid that cannot be believed anymore. They only retain theirs because it is constantly reinforced and validated.

 

[TingusKangas]

I feel like the dehumanization of incels is a defense mechanism. Normies hate us because we’re the manifestation of what they could become if they lose or if they don’t have, for some reason or another, the positive genetic traits that helped them get a partner. And this brings them fear. I'd say it is also because our existence, as well as the ideas that we present, disprove their idea of a just world and therefore takes away their ability to credit themselves for their 'success.'

The idea that all of the success that they attribute to their own efforts was random, and thus, not really due to their own effort—terrifies them.

This is probably the case for many normies who have had shaky dating success.

I think the main reason for the dehumanization (especially amongst women) is so that they don't have to feel bad for how utterly brutal they are to sub-5 men. If you whipped a slave back in the early USA nobody would bat an eye, infact many would cheer, but if it was a free white man or woman in the same position everyone would be screaming bloody murder. This is because they effectively dehuminized the africans. They probably felt little bits of guilt from time to time, but would quickly remind themselves "these people are not human" to set their minds at ease. It's also why the pro-choice movement is obsessed with not referring to a fetus as a human life, and will get mad at you if you do despite the fact that it obviously is. They're trying to officially cross the threshold of "not human" because once you reach that point it's free game to treat the organism however you wish.

You'll always see women making generalizations about men with bad genes. "Short men are always so mean and insecure ", in reality she probably has not experienced this, but she wants a reason to not feel bad for the absolute brutality that she shows to short men on a day to day basis.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

This is probably the case for many normies who have had shaky dating success.

I think the main reason for the dehumanization (especially amongst women) is so that they don't have to feel bad for how utterly brutal they are to sub-5 men. If you whipped a slave back in the early USA nobody would bat an eye, infact many would cheer, but if it was a free white man or woman in the same position everyone would be screaming bloody murder. This is because they effectively dehuminized the africans. They probably felt little bits of guilt from time to time, but would quickly remind themselves "these people are not human" to set their minds at ease. It's also why the pro-choice movement is obsessed with not referring to a fetus as a human life, and will get mad at you if you do despite the fact that it obviously is. They're trying to officially cross the threshold of "not human" because once you reach that point it's free game to treat the organism however you wish.

You'll always see women making generalizations about men with bad genes. "Short men are always so mean and insecure ", in reality she probably has not experienced this, but she wants a reason to not feel bad for the absolute brutality that she shows to short men on a day to day basis.

 

[Sir Silentium]

I feel like the dehumanization of incels is a defense mechanism.