I believe that we need to develop a clear and easily understandable ideology that can be essentially marketed to promote the growth of the forum and the spread of the truth to as many men as possible. I'm also aware that this would be too mentally draining for most users who only use this site to vent or shitpost, but still. This would come in four steps.
Step 1: Popular consensus on key topics such as importance of certain features like race, height, face, NT and so on; perfect ratios; feasibility of certain "solutions" (eg. looksmaxxing, geomaxxing etc.) as pertaining to one's situation in life and any other myriad of important factors that govern men's position in society and solutions for the formerly mentioned. This "consensus" would be achieved by an agreement by forum members with utilization of readily available data as it pertains to a specific topic, be it academic, indirect or by dating apps.
Step 2: Collecting and categorizing this data into a consistent, factual and easily readable form that can be understood by even the most retarded and ADHD-ridden of people. Now, some of you might mention that the wiki makes this redundant, but the wiki has countless junk or irrelevant articles and those articles that are actually on subject are of a varying quality, writing style and factuality. This would also resolve the conflict when it comes to controversial subjects such as JBW, the importance of face and height, the NT questions and the like.
Step 3: Closing the forum to non-members (ie. lurkers), expect the part where the previously mentioned information is stored. Adding a timer to accounts which will disable them if no posts are made by the user in the specific time (the time could increase as the person's post-count increases for an example). Replicating the upvote, donwvote and karma system of Reddit. Creating what some would call a "circle jerk" (which is a good thing, if the ideology that is being circle jerked is correct.)
Step 4: Due to the jannies being too pre-occupied with eating hot-pockets and warning/banning users for nothing, I propose that an ability would be given to certain trusted users to essentially "censor" posts that contain offensive content (humble bragging or the bluepill for an example) and that posts which are heavily "downvoted" are simply removed from the forums.
The most common attack on this would be muh (((free-speech))), but what those people fail to understand is that free-speech is a bad thing as it allows people who are wrong or malicious to spread corruption. The same way (((elites))) censor our speech on main-stream platforms, we should censor the speech of our ideological enemies and corruption-spreaders on our own platforms as it is only fair to do so.
Step 1: Popular consensus on key topics such as importance of certain features like race, height, face, NT and so on; perfect ratios; feasibility of certain "solutions" (eg. looksmaxxing, geomaxxing etc.) as pertaining to one's situation in life and any other myriad of important factors that govern men's position in society and solutions for the formerly mentioned. This "consensus" would be achieved by an agreement by forum members with utilization of readily available data as it pertains to a specific topic, be it academic, indirect or by dating apps.
Step 2: Collecting and categorizing this data into a consistent, factual and easily readable form that can be understood by even the most retarded and ADHD-ridden of people. Now, some of you might mention that the wiki makes this redundant, but the wiki has countless junk or irrelevant articles and those articles that are actually on subject are of a varying quality, writing style and factuality. This would also resolve the conflict when it comes to controversial subjects such as JBW, the importance of face and height, the NT questions and the like.
Step 3: Closing the forum to non-members (ie. lurkers), expect the part where the previously mentioned information is stored. Adding a timer to accounts which will disable them if no posts are made by the user in the specific time (the time could increase as the person's post-count increases for an example). Replicating the upvote, donwvote and karma system of Reddit. Creating what some would call a "circle jerk" (which is a good thing, if the ideology that is being circle jerked is correct.)
Step 4: Due to the jannies being too pre-occupied with eating hot-pockets and warning/banning users for nothing, I propose that an ability would be given to certain trusted users to essentially "censor" posts that contain offensive content (humble bragging or the bluepill for an example) and that posts which are heavily "downvoted" are simply removed from the forums.
The most common attack on this would be muh (((free-speech))), but what those people fail to understand is that free-speech is a bad thing as it allows people who are wrong or malicious to spread corruption. The same way (((elites))) censor our speech on main-stream platforms, we should censor the speech of our ideological enemies and corruption-spreaders on our own platforms as it is only fair to do so.
