Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The final racial hierarchy in terms of dating success

RREEEEEEEEE

RREEEEEEEEE

unattractive.
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
38,726
At the top, we have the white men simply because of their coloring competing with black men; whom have gotten an insane boost in terms of SMV thanks to the music industry. After these two come Asian men and much like black men, have gotten a boost thanks to the music industry as well but not as much as black men have enjoyed a boost. After Asian men, we have Latino men that have also seen a surge in popularity, mainly because of music. After all, the most watched YouTube video was a song made by Latino men. After Latino men come Arab men, who are a little bit similar in terms of SMV but ultimately lose to Latino men. Albino men come after. There aren't many races that albino men mog, but there are two that they do. The first of them are aboriginal men. While they have it bad, they don't have it as bad as the last group that is absolutely at the bottom: South Asian men. If you look like an Indian, you might as well kill yourself if you can't handle the fact that we are the most undesirable race of men to have ever existed. Whether you are a dark-skinned or light-skinned makes absolutely zero difference, even though South Asian men are prone to thinking they are somewhat better than their darker counterparts, when they're not.

Tl;dr: whites = blacks > Asians > Latinos > Arabs > Albinos > Abos > a pile of dog shit > South Asians
 
White > Black > the rest
 
Imagine the nazis won and whites would have a entertainment industry like hollywood that would promote white supremacy instead of diversity as they do now. Even aliens would probably land on earth to fuck the wh*te man.

South Asians > Abows tho
 
Tl;dr: whites = blacks > Asians > Latinos > Arabs > Albinos > Abos > a pile of dog shit > South Asians
It should be whites>latinos>blacks>arabs>asians> a pile of dog shit>abos>south asians.
 
White > Black > the rest
White and black men are absolutely equal. Every race of women wants them. The same cannot be said for anyone that comes after them.
Imagine the nazis won and whites would have a entertainment industry like hollywood that would promote white supremacy instead of diversity as they do now. Even aliens would probably land on earth to fuck the wh*te man.

South Asians > Abows tho
I wish the Nazis won. Then us non-white subhumans would never have existed in the first place.
It should be whites>latinos>blacks>arabs>asians> a pile of dog shit>abos>south asians.
Well life is unfair. But luckily for abos, they mog a pile of dog shit.
 
When you say black do you mean 100% african or do you mean mixed race part european blacks?
 
When you say black do you mean 100% african or do you mean mixed race part european blacks?
I purposely left out mixed race because it gets complicated since they can mog even whites and blacks. Some mixed blacks look subhuman, some are moggers (Jeremy Meeks). Some mixed curries look subhuman, some are moggers (Zayn Malik). Some mixed Asians look subhuman (Elliot Rodger), some are moggers.
 
I purposely left out mixed race because it gets complicated since they can mog even whites and blacks. Some mixed blacks look subhuman, some are moggers (Jeremy Meeks). Some mixed curries look subhuman, some are moggers (Zayn Malik). Some mixed Asians look subhuman (Elliot Rodger), some are moggers.
In that case im not sure that blacks could be equal to whites, I have seen data where mixed race african americans have similar success to whites but I have never seen any data regarding 100% africans versus whites
 
In that case im not sure that blacks could be equal to whites, I have seen data where mixed race african americans have similar success to whites but I have never seen any data regarding 100% africans versus whites
It's not solely about looks bro. It's about SMV. I see gl white girls, average ethnic girls with average black guys and even slightly below far too many times to brush it aside as an outlier.
 
For women it's:
Chad > dogs > incels
 
Latinos and Arabs are above asians, dogs are above whites
 
It's not solely about looks bro. It's about SMV. I see gl white girls, average ethnic girls with average black guys and even slightly below far too many times to brush it aside as an outlier.
Yes but those black guys you see are probably part white. Particularly in america blacks have an advantage not only because they are part white, but because they are taller and larger than west africans, as the Atlantic slave trade favored blacks who were larger and stronger than average. The average black man here or in europe is taller and better looking than the average west african black man so its an apples and oranges comparison.

Although I cant say anything for sure because there is no data so far as I know comparing races with 100% africans, its difficult for me to see how they would be on par with whites, although they would probably do better than other races
 
No one cares about what you think.

All of the data from various online dating sites/apps puts White men at the very top, no other race of men remotely comes close. Second comes Hispanic men (white looking ones [approx 15-25% of Hispanic men look white]), at a distant third comes Black men although thats not saying much cuz black men do VERY poorly along with Asian, then Arab, and finally Indian at dead last.

This also corroborates with what I've witnessed for 5+ observant years living and working here in SF. I swear by it and Its not something I take lightly. It is quite hell and it is reality.
 
Oh Lord, the Blasphemy!
Saint Elliot please forgive him.
despite calling himself a god, he was indeed a subhuman since he was rejected by human females
 
White > Black > Latino > Arab > SEA > Curry
 
Lmao no way arabs are below asians, latinos, and blacks. They're basically whites with a tan.
main-qimg-f25f95556bdb13e6cf09de9f82a60b02
 
at a distant third comes Black men although thats not saying much cuz black men do VERY poorly along with Asian, then Arab, and finally Indian at dead last.
Just wondering, do you think that blacks, arabs, asians and indians are all pretty close to each other in SMV?
 
No one cares about what you think.

All of the data from various online dating sites/apps puts White men at the very top, no other race of men remotely comes close. Second comes Hispanic men (white looking ones [approx 15-25% of Hispanic men look white]), at a distant third comes Black men although thats not saying much cuz black men do VERY poorly along with Asian, then Arab, and finally Indian at dead last.

This also corroborates with what I've witnessed for 5+ observant years living and working here in SF. I swear by it and Its not something I take lightly. It is quite hell and it is reality.
This is correct. Racial dating hierarchy is objectively established by statistics.
 
Just wondering, do you think that blacks, arabs, asians and indians are all pretty close to each other in SMV?
Yes. Blacks, Arabs, Asians, and Indians ALL have ugly faces (ugly white men mog ugly ethnic men, normie white men mog ethnic men). Black men only do slightly better than Asian men because of their muscularity and mass media propping up their image when the absolute truth is Black men have the worst reputation (violent, emotional, low IQ, get their GFs pregnant and leave)

I should say this is in America though as I've said over and over again on this forum that location makes a big difference. Black males do well in the UK/Austrailia. Somewhat ok in France.

Asian men have a good reputation in various European countries especially France/Poland. Euro foids don't look down on Asian/Indian men anywhere NEAR Anglo foids. The racial hatred and heat is directed towards Arab/Jewish/Gypsy men in Europe.

In North American Anglo countries the racial hatred is directed entirely on Asian/Indian/Black/Arab men/Mexican. Asian (Yellow peril + Pearl harbor). Black (slavery). Arab (9/11). Indian (Americans once referred to Indians as Hindus in the text of the law banning interracial marriage in the US). Mexican (illegal criminal prone).

Nowadays the racism is slowly going away for Black men (as they've fought for it) while their sisters will suffer a far worst undignified fate then ricecels as black males slowly get their way with obtaining white/non-black foids by making whites feel more guilty.(they are the true female ethnicels).
 
Last edited:
At the top, we have the white men simply because of their coloring competing with black men; whom have gotten an insane boost in terms of SMV thanks to the music industry. After these two come Asian men and much like black men, have gotten a boost thanks to the music industry as well but not as much as black men have enjoyed a boost. After Asian men, we have Latino men that have also seen a surge in popularity, mainly because of music. After all, the most watched YouTube video was a song made by Latino men. After Latino men come Arab men, who are a little bit similar in terms of SMV but ultimately lose to Latino men. Albino men come after. There aren't many races that albino men mog, but there are two that they do. The first of them are aboriginal men. While they have it bad, they don't have it as bad as the last group that is absolutely at the bottom: South Asian men. If you look like an Indian, you might as well kill yourself if you can't handle the fact that we are the most undesirable race of men to have ever existed. Whether you are a dark-skinned or light-skinned makes absolutely zero difference, even though South Asian men are prone to thinking they are somewhat better than their darker counterparts, when they're not.

Tl;dr: whites = blacks > Asians > Latinos > Arabs > Albinos > Abos > a pile of dog shit > South Asians

I think it's whites = Latinos > Blacks > Asians > Arabs > Albinos > Abos > a pile of dog shit > South Asians

This is just generally speaking, when taking the entire population. If you're talking about the Chad level tier, then the list is vastly different. Asians would be behind South Asians in this case.

Latinos are probably higher than Asians in general simply because Latinas don't betray their own race to ride the white cock, and many Latino men can pass as whites. There's a reason why there's a part in a lot of job applications, the census, any professional forms you fill out that involves putting in your ethnicity, there's a section where you say whether you are a white Latino or not.

Other than that I agree generally.
Yes. Blacks, Arabs, Asians, and Indians ALL have ugly faces (ugly white men mog ugly ethnic men, normie white men mog ethnic men). Black men only do slightly better than Asian men because of their muscularity and mass media propping up their image when the absolute truth is Black men have the worst reputation (violent, emotional, low IQ, get their GFs pregnant and leave)

I should say this is in America though as I've said over and over again on this forum that location makes a big difference. Black males do well in the UK/Austrailia. Somewhat ok in France.

Being violent makes foids pussy wet. You know how many Latinas want a masculine man? As a result they love black men more. So many BMLF relationships in all aspects. You barely see any AMLF relationships. Well, actually, you barely see any interracial relationships involving Asian men really. It's so rare it's like discovering a diamond in a cave like fuck.
 
Lmao no way arabs are below asians, latinos, and blacks. They're basically whites with a tan.
main-qimg-f25f95556bdb13e6cf09de9f82a60b02

If we're talking about Chad Arabs (Chaddams) then they are above Asians. Period. They can pass as whites like Latinos as well.
It should be whites>latinos>blacks>arabs>asians> a pile of dog shit>abos>south asians.

After more thought this is probably the most accurate.
 
I think it's whites = Latinos > Blacks > Asians > Arabs > Albinos > Abos > a pile of dog shit > South Asians

This is just generally speaking, when taking the entire population. If you're talking about the Chad level tier, then the list is vastly different. Asians would be behind South Asians in this case.

Latinos are probably higher than Asians in general simply because Latinas don't betray their own race to ride the white cock, and many Latino men can pass as whites. There's a reason why there's a part in a lot of job applications, the census, any professional forms you fill out that involves putting in your ethnicity, there's a section where you say whether you are a white Latino or not.

Other than that I agree generally.


Being violent makes foids pussy wet. You know how many Latinas want a masculine man? As a result they love black men more. So many BMLF relationships in all aspects. You barely see any AMLF relationships. Well, actually, you barely see any interracial relationships involving Asian men really. It's so rare it's like discovering a diamond in a cave like fuck.
It depends, the ghetto Latina types, usually third tier in terms of looks tend to be open to dating Black dudes (who are more than willing to settle for any non-black female as much as noodlewhores are willing to settle with the first non-Asian dude that hits on them [low self-esteem internalized racial hatred psyche]).

Nerdy/traditional latina types that are third tier in SMV are open to Asian dudes. You won't find them everywhere here in California but when you do see them from time to time in LA or SF you will know what I'm talking about. AMLF slightly more common than AMWF.
 
It depends, the ghetto Latina types, usually third tier in terms of looks tend to be open to dating Black dudes (who are more than willing to settle for any non-black female as much as noodlewhores are willing to settle with the first non-Asian dude that hits on them [low self-esteem internalized racial hatred psyche]).

Nerdy/traditional latina types that are third tier in SMV are open to Asian dudes. You won't find them everywhere here in California but when you do see them from time to time in LA or SF you will know what I'm talking about. AMLF slightly more common than AMWF.

I agree with your points, but I do have some questions:

1). Aren't the gigastacy standard Latinas mostly ghetto types too though? Some of the latinas with the most followers are usually mad ghetto as fuck. Some have more money and flaunt it, but like Jay Z says, you can't buy class. For example, this IG model Latina foid. She's prime fillet mignon steak for any black dude to fuck. Then again, I have a skewed view of rating foids so take my word with a grain of salt.

2). I will agree with you on the nerdy Latinas being open to Asian dudes. Would it be accurate to say that all Latinas, however, heaviliy prefer to date other Latino men? It's not like Rice foids who do ANYTHING to fuck a white Chad while spitting at the existence of Ricecels.

3). I always thought black dudes wanted a woman with a big ass really that had a lighter skin complexion than themselves. Is this accurate in the west coast? I hypothesize this because BBC interracial porn is such a huge genre in porn, and also the sight of a black dick going into a white/light skin foid makes the dick look bigger (because color contrast). I would assume black dudes want to be the dominant type (as they biologically are made to be bc aggression/violence in their blood and brain activity and low IQ) so they go for these foids.

4). AMLF being more common than AMWF I won't argue on that one. White foids HATE HATE HATE WITH A PASSION Ricecels. Is that the same in the west coast? In Southwest Indiana I'm publicly shamed, especially now with the chink virus, for looking like I do. I'm basically the Hunchback of Evansville, Indiana...except no Esmeralda and only white Chads and Frollo's everywhere.
 
Yes. Blacks, Arabs, Asians, and Indians ALL have ugly faces (ugly white men mog ugly ethnic men, normie white men mog ethnic men). Black men only do slightly better than Asian men because of their muscularity and mass media propping up their image when the absolute truth is Black men have the worst reputation (violent, emotional, low IQ, get their GFs pregnant and leave)

I should say this is in America though as I've said over and over again on this forum that location makes a big difference. Black males do well in the UK/Austrailia. Somewhat ok in France.

Asian men have a good reputation in various European countries especially France/Poland. Euro foids don't look down on Asian/Indian men anywhere NEAR Anglo foids. The racial hatred and heat is directed towards Arab/Jewish/Gypsy men in Europe.

In North American Anglo countries the racial hatred is directed entirely on Asian/Indian/Black/Arab men/Mexican. Asian (Yellow peril + Pearl harbor). Black (slavery). Arab (9/11). Indian (Americans once referred to Indians as Hindus in the text of the law banning interracial marriage in the US). Mexican (illegal criminal prone).

Nowadays the racism is slowly going away for Black men (as they've fought for it) while their sisters will suffer a far worst undignified fate then ricecels as black males slowly get their way with obtaining white/non-black foids by making whites feel more guilty.(they are the true female ethnicels).

Very interesting, do you think there's any place in the US where Indian/Brown men do better with women. I have noticed a lot more Indian guys get White women in conservative southern or mid-western states, where they seem to dislike Blacks more. On the other hand liberal White women absolutely despise Indian men, also they seem to like Blacks more. In these areas I have seen some good looking men successful with other ethnic women but even then they are still looked down upon in general.

Indians are the only racial group for whom it's acceptable for liberal Whites and the media to shit on, despite being the highest earners in the US and being well educated. I remember one White guy, said something about rape rates in India being higher, I tried to correct him saying that the rate is higher in the US, but he made some bs argument about population which was completely wrong, but I didn't bother to argue against it, there was another Indian guy in our group and he didn't even bother to defend it. Meanwhile the same guy was defending muslims, saying that mass shooting acts such as Omar Mateen didn't represent all muslims and that it was caused by islamophobia.
 
I agree with your points, but I do have some questions:

1). Aren't the gigastacy standard Latinas mostly ghetto types too though? Some of the latinas with the most followers are usually mad ghetto as fuck. Some have more money and flaunt it, but like Jay Z says, you can't buy class. For example, this IG model Latina foid. She's prime fillet mignon steak for any black dude to fuck. Then again, I have a skewed view of rating foids so take my word with a grain of salt.

2). I will agree with you on the nerdy Latinas being open to Asian dudes. Would it be accurate to say that all Latinas, however, heaviliy prefer to date other Latino men? It's not like Rice foids who do ANYTHING to fuck a white Chad while spitting at the existence of Ricecels.

3). I always thought black dudes wanted a woman with a big ass really that had a lighter skin complexion than themselves. Is this accurate in the west coast? I hypothesize this because BBC interracial porn is such a huge genre in porn, and also the sight of a black dick going into a white/light skin foid makes the dick look bigger (because color contrast). I would assume black dudes want to be the dominant type (as they biologically are made to be bc aggression/violence in their blood and brain activity and low IQ) so they go for these foids.

4). AMLF being more common than AMWF I won't argue on that one. White foids HATE HATE HATE WITH A PASSION Ricecels. Is that the same in the west coast? In Southwest Indiana I'm publicly shamed, especially now with the chink virus, for looking like I do. I'm basically the Hunchback of Evansville, Indiana...except no Esmeralda and only white Chads and Frollo's everywhere.
1. Sorry but thats no gigastacy latina to me. She'll be damn lucky to get any dances from any white/asian dude at a strip club. A gigastacy latina (like a gigachad latino) is white looking (even Latinos agree as most celebrities/mass media personalities in Latin America are very white looking). A ghetto gigastacy latina will most likely choose a ghetto latino chad 90% of the time.

2. Nerdy latinas are a rare thing to begin with (same with white foids). When was the last time you met a nerdy latina/white foid in general and/or that wasn't fat? The thing is as I'm sure you know, Asian dudes only pursue thin or relatively thin looking nerdy non-Asian foids if they do decide to go interracial. Most non-Asian foids subconsciously know that we Asian dudes don't hit on them because they're too fat and/or manly in behavior. Thats why when they do decide to take an interest and be open to Asian men (for whatever reason), they lose some weight and stop acting so degenerate.

3. The black foids in this very popular film in Black america are all light skinned. The white worship is very real. Its a long standing theme in the black community.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvV6z1OfTkI


4. Over the years here in SF, I've definitely noticed slightly more AMLF than AMWF although both are rare in general. I'm very familiar with LA as well and AMLF is even more frequent there. I can't speak on S Indiana but only SF. There are some ricecels in various Asian subreddits claiming that the midwest is the absolute worst for Asian men. I've never been to the midwest but I highly disagree imo. I travel about 30 miles east of SF to the suburb interior of the SF bay area and notice tons more AMWF/LF. The surburban inland culture of the bay area is a lot different than the actual city of SF. People there are conservative and the foids seem nowhere as degenerate as in SF.
 
actually I think it goes:

White > Latino > Black > Arab > Asian > Curry
 
1. Sorry but thats no gigastacy latina to me. She'll be damn lucky to get any dances from any white/asian dude at a strip club. A gigastacy latina (like a gigachad latino) is white looking (even Latinos agree as most celebrities/mass media personalities in Latin America are very white looking). A ghetto gigastacy latina will most likely choose a ghetto latino chad 90% of the time.

2. Nerdy latinas are a rare thing to begin with (same with white foids). When was the last time you met a nerdy latina/white foid in general and/or that wasn't fat? The thing is as I'm sure you know, Asian dudes only pursue thin or relatively thin looking nerdy non-Asian foids if they do decide to go interracial. Most non-Asian foids subconsciously know that we Asian dudes don't hit on them because they're too fat and/or manly in behavior. Thats why when they do decide to take an interest and be open to Asian men (for whatever reason), they lose some weight and stop acting so degenerate.

3. The black foids in this very popular film in Black america are all light skinned. The white worship is very real. Its a long standing theme in the black community.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvV6z1OfTkI


4. Over the years here in SF, I've definitely noticed slightly more AMLF than AMWF although both are rare in general. I'm very familiar with LA as well and AMLF is even more frequent there. I can't speak on S Indiana but only SF. There are some ricecels in various Asian subreddits claiming that the midwest is the absolute worst for Asian men. I've never been to the midwest but I highly disagree imo. I travel about 30 miles east of SF to the suburb interior of the SF bay area and notice tons more AMWF/LF. The surburban inland culture of the bay area is a lot different than the actual city of SF. People there are conservative and the foids seem nowhere as degenerate as in SF.


1). Fair fair. I was just wondering. As a oldcel there's a gap between what I like and what kids like these days.

2). Yes they are extremely rare. A lot of foids who like Rice culture are extremely ugly. Like look up any kpop reaction video on youtube and you'll see, literally, the DUNG PILE of foids in terms of looks who like kpop. Like FUCK THIS IS THE TYPE OF FOIDS THAT FIND RICE ATTRACTIVE? It never began for us. You wish a supermodel would like a Chang, but fuck no that's literal career suicide. She would not only lose fans, but sponsorships and contracts simply because she is seen with a Rice man.

3). Damn I didn't know it was THAT prevalent. Southwest Indiana is mostly white and KKK and full of Neo Nazis so it is what it is.

4). For some reason that makes me feel better and extremely sad at the same time. I wish I lived in SF. Maybe I would have had a better childhood and found myself a foid, but alas, it is what it is. Gotta use the life I'm dealt with, swallow the blackpill, and move the fuck on. Fuck me. FUCK me. FUCK ME.
 
Very interesting, do you think there's any place in the US where Indian/Brown men do better with women. I have noticed a lot more Indian guys get White women in conservative southern or mid-western states, where they seem to dislike Blacks more. On the other hand liberal White women absolutely despise Indian men, also they seem to like Blacks more. In these areas I have seen some good looking men successful with other ethnic women but even then they are still looked down upon in general.

Indians are the only racial group for whom it's acceptable for liberal Whites and the media to shit on, despite being the highest earners in the US and being well educated. I remember one White guy, said something about rape rates in India being higher, I tried to correct him saying that the rate is higher in the US, but he made some bs argument about population which was completely wrong, but I didn't bother to argue against it, there was another Indian guy in our group and he didn't even bother to defend it. Meanwhile the same guy was defending muslims, saying that mass shooting acts such as Omar Mateen didn't represent all muslims and that it was caused by islamophobia.
You pretty much nailed it before I could finish my reply to the other post. Indian/Asian men do a lot better in conservative places which for the most part means anywhere away from big coastal cities in the states.

Why that is? Its the locationpill imo. A lot of the stormfrontcels would say its because of ((((they)))). But I disagree to a certain extent, America was a high materialism degenerate country from the get go. Even before Henry Ford's perfection of assembly-line mass production. Think of the ladies in Boston already mass producing clothes before the 1900s.
 
Last edited:
That's like 0.000001% of sandniggers.
Maybe, maybe not. Ultimately, "arabs" are highly mutted group, so I think it's not accurate to even lump them together, due largely in part for being in the center of the world. You have semites with hooked noses, dark skinned descendants of Africans, and blonde arayn-looking arabs who are either remnants of Indo-Aryans or the descendants of European slaves brought to the Middle East. I myself have a blonde grandad and aunt, and many of the people in my family can easily pass as European, especially my sisters with their light brown hair and freckles.

This applies ESPECIALLY to Egyptians, Tunisians, Persians, and Turks, since they have a ton of European admixture, wheras the Arabian Peninsula mostly has African admixture in the south and Turkic admixture in the north.

 
Maybe, maybe not. Ultimately, "arabs" are highly mutted group, so I think it's not accurate to even lump them together, due largely in part for being in the center of the world. You have semites with hooked noses, dark skinned descendants of Africans, and blonde arayn-looking arabs who are either remnants of Indo-Aryans or the descendants of European slaves brought to the Middle East. I myself have a blonde grandad and aunt, and many of the people in my family can easily pass as European, especially my sisters with their light brown hair and freckles.

This applies ESPECIALLY to Egyptians, Tunisians, Persians, and Turks, since they have a ton of European admixture, wheras the Arabian Peninsula mostly has African admixture in the south and Turkic admixture in the north.

Doesn't matter for the most of us bruv, even Indians/Pakistanis are a highly mutted group.

If anything it makes it worse for us. We get racemogged by our own race of people.
 
I feel like rice is too high on that list, I think Latinos beat them definitely
 

Similar threads

Lv99_BixNood
Replies
8
Views
307
lifesucksandyoudie
lifesucksandyoudie
Shinichi
Replies
10
Views
273
Immolator
Immolator
Zhou Chang-Xing
Replies
20
Views
454
Made_In_Azania
Made_In_Azania
SmhChan
Replies
12
Views
285
lifesucksandyoudie
lifesucksandyoudie

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top