Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion The elites are too scared to depict an incel-like character with any likability.

Shinichi

Shinichi

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
846
This is something that I have noticed for a while. There have been more and more incel characters in mainstream media but almost none of them have been portrayed as truly sympathetic or even noble. With the exception of Ken from the Barbie movie, who is still the technically the antagonist, most of these characters are either villains or just punching bags. The best example is Joker 2. Arthur in the first film becomes this strong fearless leader of all of Gothams downtrodden. He is a symbol of strength for incel, no matter what the filmmakers think. The director saw the Joker being used as an icon for low status men and needed to take him down. That’s why in the sequel they turn him into a complete weakling. He loses all the confidence he had from killing Murray and standing up for himself and reverts him into a a low T retard. This is to deter the very people who find naturally see themselves in the character. You didn’t see this in movies like 40 year old virgin. You actually are made to sympathize with Steve carrells character and he’s allowed to get a happy ending. Thing were different then since by in large incel didn’t exist then like how they do now. Those in power are shitting themselves cause they know a collapse is incoming.
 
This is something that I have noticed for a while. There have been more and more incel characters in mainstream media but almost none of them have been portrayed as truly sympathetic or even noble. With the exception of Ken from the Barbie movie, who is still the technically the antagonist, most of these characters are either villains or just punching bags. The best example is Joker 2. Arthur in the first film becomes this strong fearless leader of all of Gothams downtrodden. He is a symbol of strength for incel, no matter what the filmmakers think. The director saw the Joker being used as an icon for low status men and needed to take him down. That’s why in the sequel they turn him into a complete weakling. He loses all the confidence he had from killing Murray and standing up for himself and reverts him into a a low T retard. This is to deter the very people who find naturally see themselves in the character. You didn’t see this in movies like 40 year old virgin. You actually are made to sympathize with Steve carrells character and he’s allowed to get a happy ending. Thing were different then since by in large incel didn’t exist then like how they do now. Those in power are shitting themselves cause they know a collapse is incoming.
yeah. they need to demonize us at every turn.
 
most elites agree with IT ideas so its no surprise
yeah agreed. this is why they would only potray us with an certain point-of-view and characteristic. if we aren't anything except evil, rapist, racist, far-right extermists that are devoid of us, they reject it or ignore it. even though the fact that inkwells have more political diversity than most people.
 
yeah agreed. this is why they would only potray us with an certain point-of-view and characteristic. if we aren't anything except evil, rapist, racist, far-right extermists that are devoid of us, they reject it or ignore it. even though the fact that inkwells have more political diversity than most people.
i hope that one day people realize that we are not the bad guys
 
i hope that one day people realize that we are not the bad guys
their eyes are veiled and their hearts are sealed. they will take anything or anyone to keep/cling onto their current society.
 
their eyes are veiled and their hearts are sealed. they will take anything or anyone to keep/cling onto their current society.
one day the average guy will all be incel so they would need to take us seriously
 
I don't see any significant piece of media be it a movie, TV show, anime, etc. portraying an incel character as cool, admirable or even NT and normal. Like a character who is NT, socially normal, but just very ugly and that's why women all reject him (that's how most incels are in real life).

Any character who is written as incel (be it explicitly or strongly implied) is always either pathetic and socially awkward and meant to be laughed at, a sexual predator, or cartoonishly evil in that whiny/entitled/pathetic way (not in a badass way) or some combination of the three. Either that or they're basically fakecel since they're decent looking but just never talked to women (until the manic pixie dream girl shows up).

The only fictional character I'm aware of from the past century that even comes close to portraying an incel character accurately is Minoru Mineta. Turbo manlet who's unattractive and the girls are all creeped out by him. He even said the reason he wanted to become a hero was "so women will let [him] touch them". Though of course he has to be somewhat of a sexual predator. MHA has some blackpill moments though, a lot of the female characters really like the pretty boy (Shoto Todoroki) despite him being aloof and kind of autistic. Even one of the teachers (Mount Lady) aggressively flirts with Shoto (who's too autistic to understand). BRUTAL face > NT pill.

But back to the topic at hand, from my understanding, Quasimodo from the original novel (not the Disney adaptation) is also a somewhat accurate depiction since he's extremely ugly, not cartoonishly evil (or evil at all), not a bumbling aspie, has a love interest, and gets rejected by her in favor of a good looking, rich, high status guy. At least from my understanding, I haven't read it, so if anyone here has let us know what you think, because it actually sounds pretty blackpilled from the plot summary I read.
 
I don't see any significant piece of media be it a movie, TV show, anime, etc. portraying an incel character as cool, admirable or even NT and normal. Like a character who is NT, socially normal, but just very ugly and that's why women all reject him (that's how most incels are in real life).

Any character who is written as incel (be it explicitly or strongly implied) is always either pathetic and socially awkward and meant to be laughed at, a sexual predator, or cartoonishly evil in that whiny/entitled/pathetic way (not in a badass way) or some combination of the three. Either that or they're basically fakecel since they're decent looking but just never talked to women (until the manic pixie dream girl shows up).

The only fictional character I'm aware of from the past century that even comes close to portraying an incel character accurately is Minoru Mineta. Turbo manlet who's unattractive and the girls are all creeped out by him. He even said the reason he wanted to become a hero was "so women will let [him] touch them". Though of course he has to be somewhat of a sexual predator. MHA has some blackpill moments though, a lot of the female characters really like the pretty boy (Shoto Todoroki) despite him being aloof and kind of autistic. Even one of the teachers (Mount Lady) aggressively flirts with Shoto (who's too autistic to understand). BRUTAL face > NT pill.

But back to the topic at hand, from my understanding, Quasimodo from the original novel (not the Disney adaptation) is also a somewhat accurate depiction since he's extremely ugly, not cartoonishly evil (or evil at all), not a bumbling aspie, has a love interest, and gets rejected by her in favor of a good looking, rich, high status guy. At least from my understanding, I haven't read it, so if anyone here has let us know what you think, because it actually sounds pretty blackpilled from the plot summary I read.
It's pretty wild how a clear majority of fiction just follows the same character archetype formula. HTN/Chadlite/Chad heroes, male characters protecting female ones from villains, said villains are all-male with any female ones being redeemed or having an excuse for being a villain, and so on:feelsUgh:...
 
Incels are the byproduct of whatever the elites are doing. To acknowledge incels would be to admit they made a mistake.
 
It's pretty wild how a clear majority of fiction just follows the same character archetype formula. HTN/Chadlite/Chad heroes, male characters protecting female ones from villains, said villains are all-male with any female ones being redeemed or having an excuse for being a villain, and so on:feelsUgh:...
I mean 90% of media is made by jews so it makes sense in a way. It's all made to be normie propaganda.
 

Similar threads

Yournotcold0
Replies
20
Views
434
druid
druid
oraora_man
Replies
3
Views
376
PLS HALP ME
PLS HALP ME
RealSchizo
Replies
10
Views
462
RealSchizo
RealSchizo
Copium Powered Nero
Replies
6
Views
362
GreerTech Creations
GreerTech Creations

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top