B
So across the forum, lot's of people claim others are locationcels because they haven't been to Thailand, Cambodia etc. Is there truth behind this? Let's explore. It may help first to check out my previous post: https://incels.is/threads/the-economics-of-inceldom.34184/
The line running through the graphs is the equilibrium price level across the world, the global normie. We'll take Importer B to be a Western country (USA/Europe) and Exporter A to be an Asian country (Thailand). We see that there is excess demand in the Western market, this is where Incels lie.
It's vital to note that the equilibrium price in Asian markets is significantly lower than in Western markets. This difference represents the idea that Western white men are of higher value than Asian men. Given one's price level a Western market, one could expect to purchase women with more relative ease in an Asian market which is evidenced on a daily basis. Essentially one can switch their market to where their price level is relatively higher than the market equilibrium in order to make purchases.
This graph also denotes that being incel in Asia (curry) means that there is very little scope to import from foreign markets, perhaps the truest of all incels given the difficulty to switch markets to gain an advantage.
Overall, I would conclude that most incels in Western countries could merely be considered locationcels due to the availability of the lower Asian market equilibrium. However, if someone were to argue that it is an impossibility to explore this option due to money/work then this is perhaps an indication that your price level is so low that you are below that of the Asian market equilibrium.
The line running through the graphs is the equilibrium price level across the world, the global normie. We'll take Importer B to be a Western country (USA/Europe) and Exporter A to be an Asian country (Thailand). We see that there is excess demand in the Western market, this is where Incels lie.
It's vital to note that the equilibrium price in Asian markets is significantly lower than in Western markets. This difference represents the idea that Western white men are of higher value than Asian men. Given one's price level a Western market, one could expect to purchase women with more relative ease in an Asian market which is evidenced on a daily basis. Essentially one can switch their market to where their price level is relatively higher than the market equilibrium in order to make purchases.
This graph also denotes that being incel in Asia (curry) means that there is very little scope to import from foreign markets, perhaps the truest of all incels given the difficulty to switch markets to gain an advantage.
Overall, I would conclude that most incels in Western countries could merely be considered locationcels due to the availability of the lower Asian market equilibrium. However, if someone were to argue that it is an impossibility to explore this option due to money/work then this is perhaps an indication that your price level is so low that you are below that of the Asian market equilibrium.
