So, I just read that liberal darling George Takei has now been accused of "groping" some drunk dude once or whatever.
What feminists, conservatives and the alt-right all have in common is that they share different shades of the same rape and pedo hysteria. They can't quite agree on what specific kind of man it is that is largely responsible for this (Muslim men? Black men? Mexican men? Jewish men? White men? All men? Etc.) but they all do believe that there's a war on women and that women must be defended, that women are under attack.
A while ago, a Christian newspaper was heavily attacked because it ran an ad in which a father was looking for a husband for his daughter. The ad was attacked because the father mentioned, above other things, that his daughter was a virgin. What no one was bothered with, tho, was how he described his potential son-in-law: as being "unworthy" of marrying such an "educated, careered, travelled and bilingual" goddess.
Men are unworthy is a common theme you find both among feminists as well as among shotgun dads who share the same rape and pedo hysteria when they want to protect their wheatfield princesses and daughters from "unworthy" men:
[img=500x619]https://i.imgur.com/Abq5uFn.jpg[/img]
Now, as for Weinstein: Weinstein got some quick sex, the actresses got roles and a long-term career. This was pretty much an exchange; it’s not like he raped them at gunpoint. And at the end of the day, the women have profited more from that exchange than the guy. Weinstein only got some -probably lousy, pressured- sex in his office, the women a career and fame.
I mean, we could talk about economic vulnerability and how this can be exploited (the more the worse the economy is; the more, the more people compete for the same position – which is also why open borders and immigration is promoted: to import low-wage workers that drive down wages, but that’s another topic). But instead of talking about this, both liberals (because of feminism, sexism) AND right-wingers (because of Hollywood / Jews / liberals) are now totally in witch hunt mode. If you got to reddit, the chans, alt-right sites, tumblr – BOTH sides are hunting witches with torches in their hands now and are seeing rape, rape everywhere.
Western rape hysteria is just as bad as Western pedo hysteria. This is another thing both feminists and the right have in common: they both believe that soon pedophilia will be legalized, although the opposite is happening and the sexuality of teenagers increasingly criminalized. And the fucking media is all about how hawt pregnant adult women are, and how men should "man up" and marry some used-up single-mum, etc.
We're heading into high-tech dark ages again. Not only economically (the wealth gap between some minimum wage worker and some billionaire is larger than the gap between a medieval sun king and a peasant...) but also sexually.
"Sexist" is the new "sinful", and everything sex-related is now burdened with guilt and neuroses. Sex is icky and dangerous and only allowed for reproduction. At least for the majority of men. Since women are hypergamous, a gynocentric society must be both extremely slutty and extremely puritanic at the same time: slutty for the minority of high-status men women compete for, puritanic for the majority of "sexual proletarians" so to speak who are accused of being rapist just for daring to have a sexuality.
A sexually satisfied person, having tasted the blood of self-determination, will be more motivated, encouraged and willing to fight for the extension of this area of self-determination into the political realm, while sexual misery is a breeding ground for neuroses, violent revenge fantasies and an appetite for authoritarian misery. This is why the ruling classes of the past have always repressed sexuality and supported Catholic, Puritan, etc. sex negativity. And now they support feminist sex negativity while simultaneously supporting Islam and beginning to sell this idea that the hijab is a way to protect women from the sexist "male gaze"
The ruling class simply has no interest in sexually satisfied subjects since sexual misery and sex negativity (everything sin, everything sexist) is very helpful to create docile servants who support authoritarian misery. (The minority who just want racially pure authoritarian misery doesn't really pose an existential threat to the creation of a diverse, multi-cultural NWO-misery, etc.). And for women, it simply plays into their hypergamous nature and their borg-mind state of mind. Women don't really have individual preferences and fetishes etc. like men but all want the same. So they enjoy this state where they can compete for the minority of high-status men while the rest of men can be destroyed for daring to have a sexuality at all.
And just like all capital is getting monopolized in the hands of a tiny billionaire class, all sexual capital is getting monopolized either. And the little bit of sexual capital of the middle class is getting removed and transferred into the hands of the billionaire ruling class, just like the little bit of economic capital in the hands of the middle class is getting removed and transferred into the hands of the billionaire ruling class.
What feminists, conservatives and the alt-right all have in common is that they share different shades of the same rape and pedo hysteria. They can't quite agree on what specific kind of man it is that is largely responsible for this (Muslim men? Black men? Mexican men? Jewish men? White men? All men? Etc.) but they all do believe that there's a war on women and that women must be defended, that women are under attack.
A while ago, a Christian newspaper was heavily attacked because it ran an ad in which a father was looking for a husband for his daughter. The ad was attacked because the father mentioned, above other things, that his daughter was a virgin. What no one was bothered with, tho, was how he described his potential son-in-law: as being "unworthy" of marrying such an "educated, careered, travelled and bilingual" goddess.
Men are unworthy is a common theme you find both among feminists as well as among shotgun dads who share the same rape and pedo hysteria when they want to protect their wheatfield princesses and daughters from "unworthy" men:
[img=500x619]https://i.imgur.com/Abq5uFn.jpg[/img]
Now, as for Weinstein: Weinstein got some quick sex, the actresses got roles and a long-term career. This was pretty much an exchange; it’s not like he raped them at gunpoint. And at the end of the day, the women have profited more from that exchange than the guy. Weinstein only got some -probably lousy, pressured- sex in his office, the women a career and fame.
I mean, we could talk about economic vulnerability and how this can be exploited (the more the worse the economy is; the more, the more people compete for the same position – which is also why open borders and immigration is promoted: to import low-wage workers that drive down wages, but that’s another topic). But instead of talking about this, both liberals (because of feminism, sexism) AND right-wingers (because of Hollywood / Jews / liberals) are now totally in witch hunt mode. If you got to reddit, the chans, alt-right sites, tumblr – BOTH sides are hunting witches with torches in their hands now and are seeing rape, rape everywhere.
Western rape hysteria is just as bad as Western pedo hysteria. This is another thing both feminists and the right have in common: they both believe that soon pedophilia will be legalized, although the opposite is happening and the sexuality of teenagers increasingly criminalized. And the fucking media is all about how hawt pregnant adult women are, and how men should "man up" and marry some used-up single-mum, etc.
We're heading into high-tech dark ages again. Not only economically (the wealth gap between some minimum wage worker and some billionaire is larger than the gap between a medieval sun king and a peasant...) but also sexually.
"Sexist" is the new "sinful", and everything sex-related is now burdened with guilt and neuroses. Sex is icky and dangerous and only allowed for reproduction. At least for the majority of men. Since women are hypergamous, a gynocentric society must be both extremely slutty and extremely puritanic at the same time: slutty for the minority of high-status men women compete for, puritanic for the majority of "sexual proletarians" so to speak who are accused of being rapist just for daring to have a sexuality.
A sexually satisfied person, having tasted the blood of self-determination, will be more motivated, encouraged and willing to fight for the extension of this area of self-determination into the political realm, while sexual misery is a breeding ground for neuroses, violent revenge fantasies and an appetite for authoritarian misery. This is why the ruling classes of the past have always repressed sexuality and supported Catholic, Puritan, etc. sex negativity. And now they support feminist sex negativity while simultaneously supporting Islam and beginning to sell this idea that the hijab is a way to protect women from the sexist "male gaze"
The ruling class simply has no interest in sexually satisfied subjects since sexual misery and sex negativity (everything sin, everything sexist) is very helpful to create docile servants who support authoritarian misery. (The minority who just want racially pure authoritarian misery doesn't really pose an existential threat to the creation of a diverse, multi-cultural NWO-misery, etc.). And for women, it simply plays into their hypergamous nature and their borg-mind state of mind. Women don't really have individual preferences and fetishes etc. like men but all want the same. So they enjoy this state where they can compete for the minority of high-status men while the rest of men can be destroyed for daring to have a sexuality at all.
And just like all capital is getting monopolized in the hands of a tiny billionaire class, all sexual capital is getting monopolized either. And the little bit of sexual capital of the middle class is getting removed and transferred into the hands of the billionaire ruling class, just like the little bit of economic capital in the hands of the middle class is getting removed and transferred into the hands of the billionaire ruling class.
