Discussion The Concept of "Age of Consent" and how is it applied.

[PassTheRope/Cope]

So to start off, here are a few important details you gotta know.
1. Age of Consent is a Social construct; as such it is permeable based on Culture and not nature.
2. It does not necessarily mean that it needs to be followed.
Now do not get it twisted, I am not advocating on taking girls within the ages of first visibly pubertal imprint. I am saying that our Sub human genome had to have come from marry younger down the line then in todays age. Just as Murder is morally reprehensible, its a social construct. Morals are social constructs that only seek to hinder us. Why follow the morals of a society that looks at us as little more then cogs in a machine that only serve to benefit the 20% of bigger and better looking cogs. Only once we let go of the bounds that are morals can we truly acheive anything short of our reproductive purposes. I feel as though this one of the main reasons Sub-human traits came to be. Our ancestors would either marry younger girls/women to foster a Stockholm Syndrome like relationship or Rape During Waring times to Reproductive functions. Why do you think many Men got away with this during WW2? I dub This Theory The "Window Pane" Effect for the tinted glass double standards this society holds. They want us to work but gain nothing in return from this degenerate society. Give me your thought Fellow cels

 

[jerrycan dan]

if you want to have sex with a woman 17 years and 11 months old you are a paedophile and need to turn yourself in at your local police station right now

 

[RoastieRipper]

Best 56th post anybody had EVER made here. Jesus so much basedness should be a per-requirement to usership!

AGE OF CONSENT IS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT. FACT!

 

[PassTheRope/Cope]

if you want to have sex with a woman 17 years and 11 months old you are a paedophile and need to turn yourself in at your local police station right now

Did you read? If not I suggest you do. All I am going to say.

 

[Deleted member 21504]

Did you read? If not I suggest you do. All I am going to say.

Bro, he was kidding.

 

[PassTheRope/Cope]

Bro, he was kidding.

Then, I am kidding

 

[jerrycan dan]

Did you read? If not I suggest you do. All I am going to say.

I did read your post afterwards and I think you are correct. If you accept the social constructs of what you can and can't do your actions are severely limited by soyciety. It pays to be a cheat, a criminal, a scammer or even a lazy asshole if you're smart about it, no matter how much boomer-brained retards who half of the time don't even follow the rules themselves insist you are doing the "wrong thing".
I think you're overestimating how much our subhuman traits were passed on by hardcore coercion though. Women not having contraceptives and not being able to fuck Chad constantly in their most fertile years in societies which generally gave average men women for work (except during the neolithic when the rate of men to women reproducing gets very lopsided, most likely because high-status men hoarded all the women as was recorded in parts of Africa and South America before colonisation). In a world where survival is much harder and men are harder to sort through, betabuxxing or running money/resources game holds a lot more weight. War rape is certainly high T though and there is a reason no religion prohibited it.

 

[Deleted member 21504]

Then, I am kidding

No, u

 

[BabyFuck McGirlsex]

So to start off, here are a few important details you gotta know.
1. Age of Consent is a Social construct; as such it is permeable based on Culture and not nature.
2. It does not necessarily mean that it needs to be followed.
Now do not get it twisted, I am not advocating on taking girls within the ages of first visibly pubertal imprint. I am saying that our Sub human genome had to have come from marry younger down the line then in todays age. Just as Murder is morally reprehensible, its a social construct. Morals are social constructs that only seek to hinder us. Why follow the morals of a society that looks at us as little more then cogs in a machine that only serve to benefit the 20% of bigger and better looking cogs. Only once we let go of the bounds that are morals can we truly acheive anything short of our reproductive purposes. I feel as though this one of the main reasons Sub-human traits came to be. Our ancestors would either marry younger girls/women to foster a Stockholm Syndrome like relationship or Rape During Waring times to Reproductive functions. Why do you think many Men got away with this during WW2? I dub This Theory The "Window Pane" Effect for the tinted glass double standards this society holds. They want us to work but gain nothing in return from this degenerate society. Give me your thought Fellow cels

History is always written & distorted by the victors. Just in the same way social construct rules are written by the people in charge of creating public opinion of which in this case its the post wall roasties. They cant compete with the young prime teen foids and want to shame and ostracize any Supreme Gentleman who follows his intrinsic natural urge to be with a teen lover. Very soon these retarded roastie cunts are going to raise the foid age of consent to 35 tbh ngl

 

[JestER]

all foids are "too young" for inkels

 

[PassTheRope/Cope]

all foids are "too young" for inkels

"Silly Inkwell, these chicks are for chads!"

 

[grondilu]

They want us to work but gain nothing in return from this degenerate society.

Let's be more accurate.

They want us to be content with the very little we get from society. Like security, for instance.

The problem is : we are not content.

 

[PassTheRope/Cope]

Let's be more accurate.

They want us to be content with the very little we get from society. Like security, for instance.

The problem is : we are not content.

Security from what? Ourselves? We get a sentence for failing to kill ourselves in some Countries... Point is...It ovER.

 

[Words2_live_bye]

if you want to have sex with a woman 17 years and 11 months old you are a paedophile and need to turn yourself in at your local police station right now

even just finding a 16 year old girl attractive makes you a filthy disgusting pedo who should be castrated and raped in prison

 

[Deleted member 16624]

if you want to have sex with a woman 17 years and 11 months old you are a paedophile and need to turn yourself in at your local police station right now

Disgusting good thing I go for a woman 30 and above
When they're in their prime