Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious The Celebration of My Ban Is A Classic Case Of Anti-Intellectualism

MENSA_IQcel

MENSA_IQcel

Banned
-
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Posts
1,171
I was recently banned and had my thread about homophobia removed. The reason for my ban was the promotion of homosexuality and transsexualism. My opinion on my ban is irrelevant as I am not a moderator of the forum and quite frankly I do not present myself here to discuss my previous thread; I stand here today to discuss the rampant anti-intellectualism on this forum in respect to celebratory posts regarding my ban. I believe with utmost sincerity that my ban had nothing to do with supposed breaking of the rules, but stemmed from intellectual suppression under the guise of collective visceral hatred. There is clearly an ""establishment"" present on incels.co, my posts posed a peril to this invisible hierarchy, and thus I had to be done away with. There is a significant portion of this site who has distasteful ill feelings towards me so it was not arduous for the mods to adduce this as their justification for suspension. This is noisomely similar to media and tech oligarchs (or their technocratic henchmen) censoring speech they consider offensive and using the general populance dislike of un-liberal ideas as their vindication for doing so when there is clearly a political conflict of interest behind the scenes. This happens in every social information system on the planet and incels.co is no exception.

It's important to note the history of anti-intellectualism to know where it stems from. This post is too short to go over a history of every incidence of anti-intellectualism so I'll briefly go over some past examples and state my conclusion. I'll use the Nazis as a perfect example (inb4 I'm called a leftist Jewish shill, the Nazis were NOT our friends and were very Chad-centric, I'll make a thread on this later if I'm not banned). When the Nazis took power in Nazi Germany, the left had general control over academia, for good or bad depending on where you stand politically. Magnus Hirschfeld was a Jewish intellectual, advocate for transexualism and performed gender-changing operations on his students who requested one. I'm not looking for another ban so I will state clearly and explicitly I THINK THAT IS DISGUSTING AND I DO NOT SUPPORT IT. However it's important to note the National Socialists, upon taking power, used Magnus Hirschfeld and his sexual deviancy as a scapegoat to attack all intellectuals. The Nazis set an order to print papers explicitly stating exactly what he's been doing, and asked for these papers to be put up in every major city before rounding up any left-leaning professors as political prisoners. What's interesting is the posters outlining what this man did NEVER GOT PRINTED DUE TO AN ERROR IN THE PRINTING PRESS where these posters were supposed to be printed. Professors, intellectuals, and any professor who opposed the philosophy of Nordic Supremacy, National Socialism, or were merely critical of the parties strategic viewpoints, were imprisoned and the public was left without any justification at all for why this happened.

1587108939971
1587108981002
1587109023538



Can you guess what the public reaction was? Keep in mind this was a fuck-up by the Nazis. They raided these universities, instituted immediate book turnings of prized academic literature and shut down entire colleges demeaned as promoting liberalism or degeneracy WITHOUT distributing the propaganda posters stating why they were doing it. People at the time knew the Nazis were critical of higher-education but it still was unthinkable they would take such drastic action. DESPITE THE LACK OF JUSTIFICATION FROM THE NAZIS, THE PUBLIC CELEBRATED THE "INTELLECTUAL CLENSING" OF INTELLECTUALS, EVEN LOW-CLASS UNEDUCATED GERMANS WHO DIDN'T KNOW A MICK OF WHAT WHEN ON BEHIND THE GATES OF THESE IVORY TOWERS.

Soon after this event, the Nazis (and world political class) realized intellectuals were the easiest group of people to scapegoat, even easier than the Jews or Bourgeois. After-all, the Jews could appeal to innocence as a widely oppressed poor minority, and the bourgeois can claim they are the wealth and job creators and without them life would be worse; intellectuals had a much harder time justifying their existence. Regardless of if you think psychology, sociology, or the humanities are a waste of time or not, it's much harder to convince the general public that these are important for civilization maintenance than it is for a factory owner to convince his direct employees that he is needed for them to have jobs. Keep in mind what was stated here wasn't exclusive to Germany, this is a widespread sociological phenomena in every society with a non-religiously based intellectual class (intellectuals in ancient Egypt or medieval Europe for example were not despised as they were gatekeepers to heaven). Joseph Stalin noticed this about Germany and turned the Soviet propaganda machines against the Universities for more broad and unconditional support. Post 1935 Soviet propaganda was directed against intellectuals than the bourgoise (even though """bourgoise"""" capitalists still existed in the USSR until well into the 40s. The United States further seized on this unprecedented knowledge. In the 1950s the U.S government issued BOOK BURNINGS from European intellectuals, both under the influence of Senator McCarthy and from leftist government bureaucrats who deemed the academic literature ("dangerously undemocratic). The public supported this, and even moderate leftists generally supported the McCarthy efforts until he turned his focus to Hollywood and the military.

Down Below IS AN AMERICAN BOOK BURNING SESSION
1587110299277
1587110405462
1587110465587
1587110483865


*This is why the first thing Pol Pot did when he came to power is wipe out all the intellectuals. Not only were they a threat to his regime but they were a perfect scapegoat. He knew the public would support anti-intellectual oppression without any rationale needed. It got to the point where his regime would kill anyone with glasses because it meant they knew how to read. IMHO I believe the classic sterotype of intellectuals being UGLY is one reason why the public is so quick to turn on them. Had intellectuals been stereotypical good looking, public would not shift against them so easily

Personally I've always seen myself as a Galileo, but after spending some time on incels.co and seeing my ban I'm seeing myself more and more like Giordano Bruno. Giordano Bruno was an Italian philosopher and intellectual who defied the teachings of the church and argued for cosmic pluralism, heliocentricism, existential nihilism. He was expelled from every country he visited, hated by the unworthy masses, and eventually charged, convicted, and executed for heresy by the Roman Inquisition. He was tortured publicly, and then burned at the steak for arguing for things which we see as common sense today. This is how I feel after my incels.co ban. I feel like I'm merely suppressed by the powers that be for analyzing the blackpill with an academic mindset, while being ravaged by a willful majority who hate me merely for being an intellectual.

1587110902738
1587110916976
1587110952061


Why Are People Universally So Anti-Intellectual?

Asides from basic lookism and the fact that intellectuals are typically seen as unattractive and physically unfit, the answer is really quite simple. Intellectuals remind them of their own inferiority. When one stumbles upon one of my threads, realizes they are too impatient or too low-IQ to read, understand, and critically analyze and respond to my thread, they become angry. They become angry at themselves for being the intellectual dwarf they are, but they put the blame on me for bringing up the fact with my work. In all honesty I don't blame many of the low-IQ members of this forum for their beliefs. Incels spend all day feeling inferior, seeing Chads kissing Stacies, seeing normies live normie lives, being subtly shunned in every social interaction; they come to incels.co because they can be equals here and relate to other people with similar problems. When they see my threads discussing history, politics, philosophy, law, game theory, psychology, etc, they realize how much I as a fellow incel, someone of whom I am suppose to be their equal, IQ-mog them into oblivion. This site is meant to be a safespace for incels where no one can out-class them in any way. This is why we ban bragging. I must admit it hurts me the same way when I see another incel talk about how rich they are. I come from a lower middle class background, when I see incels, people I assume lived similar lives to me, have luxurious wealth privilege, it irritates me. It makes me feel even more inferior because I realize I am even lower than this individual who believes they are as low as one can be.

However, I still think intellectualism is important if we incels are to have any discussion at all. It is unfortunate that our very nature as humans makes us spiteful and resentful to those who are better, but we can not hold down this forum for the low-IQ users. If we want to search for truth, if we want to discover the very essence of the blackpill in its purest and undisturbed version, we need to be having these conversations. Posts like "[BLACKPILL] YOUR ONEITIS IS FUCKING CHAD DURING THIS LOCKDOWN" is absolute garbage that will contribute NOTHING to this forum. If we continue this pathway towards anti-intellectual tyranny, BlackPilPres will be the only one making threads longer than a sentence and they'll be nothing but subtle bluepills wrapped in cosmic nihilism and fallacious evolutionary arguments.
 
Don't care. Didn't read. Plus you are a narcissist and a faggot worshiper
 
Last edited:
Don't care. Didn't read. Plus you are a narcissist and a faggot worshiper

A narcissist is someone who believes they are superior, when it comes to individuals like you, i KNOW I am superior. Your comment is all the proof I need.
 
We know it's you @Fontaine :feelsseriously: you're not fooling anyone
 
We know it's you @Fontaine :feelsseriously: you're not fooling anyone

This makes me very happy actually. Fontaine was a user I highly respected after reading their posts... but I am not him.
 
I was recently banned and had my thread about homophobia removed. The reason for my ban was the promotion of homosexuality and transsexualism. My opinion on my ban is irrelevant as I am not a moderator of the forum and quite frankly I do not present myself here to discuss my previous thread; I stand here today to discuss the rampant anti-intellectualism on this forum in respect to celebratory posts regarding my ban. I believe with utmost sincerity that my ban had nothing to do with supposed breaking of the rules, but stemmed from intellectual suppression under the guise of collective visceral hatred. There is clearly an ""establishment"" present on incels.co, my posts posed a peril to this invisible hierarchy, and thus I had to be done away with. There is a significant portion of this site who has distasteful ill feelings towards me so it was not arduous for the mods to adduce this as their justification for suspension. This is noisomely similar to media and tech oligarchs (or their technocratic henchmen) censoring speech they consider offensive and using the general populance dislike of un-liberal ideas as their vindication for doing so when there is clearly a political conflict of interest behind the scenes. This happens in every social information system on the planet and incels.co is no exception.

It's important to note the history of anti-intellectualism to know where it stems from. This post is too short to go over a history of every incidence of anti-intellectualism so I'll briefly go over some past examples and state my conclusion. I'll use the Nazis as a perfect example (inb4 I'm called a leftist Jewish shill, the Nazis were NOT our friends and were very Chad-centric, I'll make a thread on this later if I'm not banned). When the Nazis took power in Nazi Germany, the left had general control over academia, for good or bad depending on where you stand politically. Magnus Hirschfeld was a Jewish intellectual, advocate for transexualism and performed gender-changing operations on his students who requested one. I'm not looking for another ban so I will state clearly and explicitly I THINK THAT IS DISGUSTING AND I DO NOT SUPPORT IT. However it's important to note the National Socialists, upon taking power, used Magnus Hirschfeld and his sexual deviancy as a scapegoat to attack all intellectuals. The Nazis set an order to print papers explicitly stating exactly what he's been doing, and asked for these papers to be put up in every major city before rounding up any left-leaning professors as political prisoners. What's interesting is the posters outlining what this man did NEVER GOT PRINTED DUE TO AN ERROR IN THE PRINTING PRESS where these posters were supposed to be printed. Professors, intellectuals, and any professor who opposed the philosophy of Nordic Supremacy, National Socialism, or were merely critical of the parties strategic viewpoints, were imprisoned and the public was left without any justification at all for why this happened.

View attachment 238688View attachment 238690View attachment 238691


Can you guess what the public reaction was? Keep in mind this was a fuck-up by the Nazis. They raided these universities, instituted immediate book turnings of prized academic literature and shut down entire colleges demeaned as promoting liberalism or degeneracy WITHOUT distributing the propaganda posters stating why they were doing it. People at the time knew the Nazis were critical of higher-education but it still was unthinkable they would take such drastic action. DESPITE THE LACK OF JUSTIFICATION FROM THE NAZIS, THE PUBLIC CELEBRATED THE "INTELLECTUAL CLENSING" OF INTELLECTUALS, EVEN LOW-CLASS UNEDUCATED GERMANS WHO DIDN'T KNOW A MICK OF WHAT WHEN ON BEHIND THE GATES OF THESE IVORY TOWERS.

Soon after this event, the Nazis (and world political class) realized intellectuals were the easiest group of people to scapegoat, even easier than the Jews or Bourgeois. After-all, the Jews could appeal to innocence as a widely oppressed poor minority, and the bourgeois can claim they are the wealth and job creators and without them life would be worse; intellectuals had a much harder time justifying their existence. Regardless of if you think psychology, sociology, or the humanities are a waste of time or not, it's much harder to convince the general public that these are important for civilization maintenance than it is for a factory owner to convince his direct employees that he is needed for them to have jobs. Keep in mind what was stated here wasn't exclusive to Germany, this is a widespread sociological phenomena in every society with a non-religiously based intellectual class (intellectuals in ancient Egypt or medieval Europe for example were not despised as they were gatekeepers to heaven). Joseph Stalin noticed this about Germany and turned the Soviet propaganda machines against the Universities for more broad and unconditional support. Post 1935 Soviet propaganda was directed against intellectuals than the bourgoise (even though """bourgoise"""" capitalists still existed in the USSR until well into the 40s. The United States further seized on this unprecedented knowledge. In the 1950s the U.S government issued BOOK BURNINGS from European intellectuals, both under the influence of Senator McCarthy and from leftist government bureaucrats who deemed the academic literature ("dangerously undemocratic). The public supported this, and even moderate leftists generally supported the McCarthy efforts until he turned his focus to Hollywood and the military.

Down Below IS AN AMERICAN BOOK BURNING SESSION
View attachment 238697View attachment 238698View attachment 238699View attachment 238700

*This is why the first thing Pol Pot did when he came to power is wipe out all the intellectuals. Not only were they a threat to his regime but they were a perfect scapegoat. He knew the public would support anti-intellectual oppression without any rationale needed. It got to the point where his regime would kill anyone with glasses because it meant they knew how to read. IMHO I believe the classic sterotype of intellectuals being UGLY is one reason why the public is so quick to turn on them. Had intellectuals been stereotypical good looking, public would not shift against them so easily

Personally I've always seen myself as a Galileo, but after spending some time on incels.co and seeing my ban I'm seeing myself more and more like Giordano Bruno. Giordano Bruno was an Italian philosopher and intellectual who defied the teachings of the church and argued for cosmic pluralism, heliocentricism, existential nihilism. He was expelled from every country he visited, hated by the unworthy masses, and eventually charged, convicted, and executed for heresy by the Roman Inquisition. He was tortured publicly, and then burned at the steak for arguing for things which we see as common sense today. This is how I feel after my incels.co ban. I feel like I'm merely suppressed by the powers that be for analyzing the blackpill with an academic mindset, while being ravaged by a willful majority who hate me merely for being an intellectual.

View attachment 238702View attachment 238703View attachment 238704

Why Are People Universally So Anti-Intellectual?

Asides from basic lookism and the fact that intellectuals are typically seen as unattractive and physically unfit, the answer is really quite simple. Intellectuals remind them of their own inferiority. When one stumbles upon one of my threads, realizes they are too impatient or too low-IQ to read, understand, and critically analyze and respond to my thread, they become angry. They become angry at themselves for being the intellectual dwarf they are, but they put the blame on me for bringing up the fact with my work. In all honesty I don't blame many of the low-IQ members of this forum for their beliefs. Incels spend all day feeling inferior, seeing Chads kissing Stacies, seeing normies live normie lives, being subtly shunned in every social interaction; they come to incels.co because they can be equals here and relate to other people with similar problems. When they see my threads discussing history, politics, philosophy, law, game theory, psychology, etc, they realize how much I as a fellow incel, someone of whom I am suppose to be their equal, IQ-mog them into oblivion. This site is meant to be a safespace for incels where no one can out-class them in any way. This is why we ban bragging. I must admit it hurts me the same way when I see another incel talk about how rich they are. I come from a lower middle class background, when I see incels, people I assume lived similar lives to me, have luxurious wealth privilege, it irritates me. It makes me feel even more inferior because I realize I am even lower than this individual who believes they are as low as one can be.

However, I still think intellectualism is important if we incels are to have any discussion at all. It is unfortunate that our very nature as humans makes us spiteful and resentful to those who are better, but we can not hold down this forum for the low-IQ users. If we want to search for truth, if we want to discover the very essence of the blackpill in its purest and undisturbed version, we need to be having these conversations. Posts like "[BLACKPILL] YOUR ONEITIS IS FUCKING CHAD DURING THIS LOCKDOWN" is absolute garbage that will contribute NOTHING to this forum. If we continue this pathway towards anti-intellectual tyranny, BlackPilPres will be the only one making threads longer than a sentence and they'll be nothing but subtle bluepills wrapped in cosmic nihilism and fallacious evolutionary arguments.
Robin Hates Reading
 
Last edited:
yeah, I suggest reducing the length of your threads if you want an actual response from people here
 
This makes me very happy actually. Fontaine was a user I highly respected after reading their posts... but I am not him.

Are you a researcher? What do you study to consider yourself an intellectual?
Afaik MENSA members haven't actually accomplished much tbh. Why do you value your "HI IQ" ? I've never met a single Mathematician who believes in "Hi IQ" most of them credit their perseverance and passion for their succes not some number
 
A narcissist is someone who believes they are superior, when it comes to individuals like you, i KNOW I am superior. Your comment is all the proof I need.
I never said I am superior. You are the one who is always claiming that you are the most intellectual incel on this forum when in fact I don't see anyone agreeing with you. All the more reason to believe that you are a narcissist.
 
I never said I am superior. You are the one who is always claiming that you are the most intellectual incel on this forum when in fact I don't see anyone agreeing with you. All the more reason to believe that you are a narcissist.

About 70% disagree with me, and it's for preciously the reasons I specify in my post.
 
A narcissist is someone who believes they are superior, when it comes to individuals like you, i KNOW I am superior. Your comment is all the proof I need.
You should be promoted to dictator of the world
 
FREE @Fontaine
 
Incel news: Mensas back

will say tomrrow
 
I understand you are high IQ and all that but your posts are always so long to read brother
 
Your threads are too long tbh
 
:feelsseriously: dude this is an obscure forum where most people just shitpost, why get so worked up? of course it's gonna be garbage
 
To Op. 3 Words = Dunning-Krueger Effect.
cc: @PPEcel
 
:feelsseriously: dude this is an obscure forum where most people just shitpost, why get so worked up? of course it's gonna be garbage

I have said before and I will say again. This forum is not an "obscure forum", it's true destiny is to be a neo-Athenian forum of reason and logic. We could be philosophers if we wanted, but instead we are cyber-vagrants.

To Op. 3 Words = Dunning-Krueger Effect.
cc: @PPEcel

Big boy knows big words.

Fact, I'm a PHD. If anyone is genuinely intellectual, it's me.
 
I was recently banned and had my thread about homophobia removed. The reason for my ban was the promotion of homosexuality and transsexualism. My opinion on my ban is irrelevant as I am not a moderator of the forum and quite frankly I do not present myself here to discuss my previous thread; I stand here today to discuss the rampant anti-intellectualism on this forum in respect to celebratory posts regarding my ban. I believe with utmost sincerity that my ban had nothing to do with supposed breaking of the rules, but stemmed from intellectual suppression under the guise of collective visceral hatred. There is clearly an ""establishment"" present on incels.co, my posts posed a peril to this invisible hierarchy, and thus I had to be done away with. There is a significant portion of this site who has distasteful ill feelings towards me so it was not arduous for the mods to adduce this as their justification for suspension. This is noisomely similar to media and tech oligarchs (or their technocratic henchmen) censoring speech they consider offensive and using the general populance dislike of un-liberal ideas as their vindication for doing so when there is clearly a political conflict of interest behind the scenes. This happens in every social information system on the planet and incels.co is no exception.

It's important to note the history of anti-intellectualism to know where it stems from. This post is too short to go over a history of every incidence of anti-intellectualism so I'll briefly go over some past examples and state my conclusion. I'll use the Nazis as a perfect example (inb4 I'm called a leftist Jewish shill, the Nazis were NOT our friends and were very Chad-centric, I'll make a thread on this later if I'm not banned). When the Nazis took power in Nazi Germany, the left had general control over academia, for good or bad depending on where you stand politically. Magnus Hirschfeld was a Jewish intellectual, advocate for transexualism and performed gender-changing operations on his students who requested one. I'm not looking for another ban so I will state clearly and explicitly I THINK THAT IS DISGUSTING AND I DO NOT SUPPORT IT. However it's important to note the National Socialists, upon taking power, used Magnus Hirschfeld and his sexual deviancy as a scapegoat to attack all intellectuals. The Nazis set an order to print papers explicitly stating exactly what he's been doing, and asked for these papers to be put up in every major city before rounding up any left-leaning professors as political prisoners. What's interesting is the posters outlining what this man did NEVER GOT PRINTED DUE TO AN ERROR IN THE PRINTING PRESS where these posters were supposed to be printed. Professors, intellectuals, and any professor who opposed the philosophy of Nordic Supremacy, National Socialism, or were merely critical of the parties strategic viewpoints, were imprisoned and the public was left without any justification at all for why this happened.

View attachment 238688View attachment 238690View attachment 238691


Can you guess what the public reaction was? Keep in mind this was a fuck-up by the Nazis. They raided these universities, instituted immediate book turnings of prized academic literature and shut down entire colleges demeaned as promoting liberalism or degeneracy WITHOUT distributing the propaganda posters stating why they were doing it. People at the time knew the Nazis were critical of higher-education but it still was unthinkable they would take such drastic action. DESPITE THE LACK OF JUSTIFICATION FROM THE NAZIS, THE PUBLIC CELEBRATED THE "INTELLECTUAL CLENSING" OF INTELLECTUALS, EVEN LOW-CLASS UNEDUCATED GERMANS WHO DIDN'T KNOW A MICK OF WHAT WHEN ON BEHIND THE GATES OF THESE IVORY TOWERS.

Soon after this event, the Nazis (and world political class) realized intellectuals were the easiest group of people to scapegoat, even easier than the Jews or Bourgeois. After-all, the Jews could appeal to innocence as a widely oppressed poor minority, and the bourgeois can claim they are the wealth and job creators and without them life would be worse; intellectuals had a much harder time justifying their existence. Regardless of if you think psychology, sociology, or the humanities are a waste of time or not, it's much harder to convince the general public that these are important for civilization maintenance than it is for a factory owner to convince his direct employees that he is needed for them to have jobs. Keep in mind what was stated here wasn't exclusive to Germany, this is a widespread sociological phenomena in every society with a non-religiously based intellectual class (intellectuals in ancient Egypt or medieval Europe for example were not despised as they were gatekeepers to heaven). Joseph Stalin noticed this about Germany and turned the Soviet propaganda machines against the Universities for more broad and unconditional support. Post 1935 Soviet propaganda was directed against intellectuals than the bourgoise (even though """bourgoise"""" capitalists still existed in the USSR until well into the 40s. The United States further seized on this unprecedented knowledge. In the 1950s the U.S government issued BOOK BURNINGS from European intellectuals, both under the influence of Senator McCarthy and from leftist government bureaucrats who deemed the academic literature ("dangerously undemocratic). The public supported this, and even moderate leftists generally supported the McCarthy efforts until he turned his focus to Hollywood and the military.

Down Below IS AN AMERICAN BOOK BURNING SESSION
View attachment 238697View attachment 238698View attachment 238699View attachment 238700

*This is why the first thing Pol Pot did when he came to power is wipe out all the intellectuals. Not only were they a threat to his regime but they were a perfect scapegoat. He knew the public would support anti-intellectual oppression without any rationale needed. It got to the point where his regime would kill anyone with glasses because it meant they knew how to read. IMHO I believe the classic sterotype of intellectuals being UGLY is one reason why the public is so quick to turn on them. Had intellectuals been stereotypical good looking, public would not shift against them so easily

Personally I've always seen myself as a Galileo, but after spending some time on incels.co and seeing my ban I'm seeing myself more and more like Giordano Bruno. Giordano Bruno was an Italian philosopher and intellectual who defied the teachings of the church and argued for cosmic pluralism, heliocentricism, existential nihilism. He was expelled from every country he visited, hated by the unworthy masses, and eventually charged, convicted, and executed for heresy by the Roman Inquisition. He was tortured publicly, and then burned at the steak for arguing for things which we see as common sense today. This is how I feel after my incels.co ban. I feel like I'm merely suppressed by the powers that be for analyzing the blackpill with an academic mindset, while being ravaged by a willful majority who hate me merely for being an intellectual.

View attachment 238702View attachment 238703View attachment 238704

Why Are People Universally So Anti-Intellectual?

Asides from basic lookism and the fact that intellectuals are typically seen as unattractive and physically unfit, the answer is really quite simple. Intellectuals remind them of their own inferiority. When one stumbles upon one of my threads, realizes they are too impatient or too low-IQ to read, understand, and critically analyze and respond to my thread, they become angry. They become angry at themselves for being the intellectual dwarf they are, but they put the blame on me for bringing up the fact with my work. In all honesty I don't blame many of the low-IQ members of this forum for their beliefs. Incels spend all day feeling inferior, seeing Chads kissing Stacies, seeing normies live normie lives, being subtly shunned in every social interaction; they come to incels.co because they can be equals here and relate to other people with similar problems. When they see my threads discussing history, politics, philosophy, law, game theory, psychology, etc, they realize how much I as a fellow incel, someone of whom I am suppose to be their equal, IQ-mog them into oblivion. This site is meant to be a safespace for incels where no one can out-class them in any way. This is why we ban bragging. I must admit it hurts me the same way when I see another incel talk about how rich they are. I come from a lower middle class background, when I see incels, people I assume lived similar lives to me, have luxurious wealth privilege, it irritates me. It makes me feel even more inferior because I realize I am even lower than this individual who believes they are as low as one can be.

However, I still think intellectualism is important if we incels are to have any discussion at all. It is unfortunate that our very nature as humans makes us spiteful and resentful to those who are better, but we can not hold down this forum for the low-IQ users. If we want to search for truth, if we want to discover the very essence of the blackpill in its purest and undisturbed version, we need to be having these conversations. Posts like "[BLACKPILL] YOUR ONEITIS IS FUCKING CHAD DURING THIS LOCKDOWN" is absolute garbage that will contribute NOTHING to this forum. If we continue this pathway towards anti-intellectual tyranny, BlackPilPres will be the only one making threads longer than a sentence and they'll be nothing but subtle bluepills wrapped in cosmic nihilism and fallacious evolutionary arguments.
Tldr; op has the ego of 100 foids combined
 
The history of anti-intellectualism is irrelevant to the validity (or otherwise) of your posts. And, frankly, your post IS too long. Your post covers a myriad of topics, each of which requires hours of verifying research to corroborate, and each of which are only brought up in a fleeting way. Your post has no data and contains no structured argument of any kind to support your central claims.

Unless you count high-level and vague narrative history as data, these are all just your speculations. They are extremely long-winded speculations, and speculating on a forum is perfectly okay. However, they are not inherently better than the speculations (or even straight up shitposting) of anybody else on here, to be honest.

Why should you be regarded as an "intellectual" when it is clear that your only goal is to maintain the facade of "intellectuality" by writing giant posts dripping with the cliches of "intellectualism"; with common terms substituted needlessly with more abstract synonyms using a thesaurus? A wordless post just showing a data table or a graph is a thousand times more (substantively) intellectual than these (retarded) posts.
 
The history of anti-intellectualism is irrelevant to the validity (or otherwise) of your posts. And, frankly, your post IS too long. Your post covers a myriad of topics, each of which requires hours of verifying research to corroborate, and each of which are only brought up in a fleeting way. Your post has no data and contains no structured argument of any kind to support your central claims.

Unless you count high-level and vague narrative history as data, these are all just your speculations. They are extremely long-winded speculations, and speculating on a forum is perfectly okay. However, they are not inherently better than the speculations (or even straight up shitposting) of anybody else on here, to be honest.

Why should you be regarded as an "intellectual" when it is clear that your only goal is to maintain the facade of "intellectuality" by writing giant posts dripping with the cliches of "intellectualism"; with common terms substituted needlessly with more abstract synonyms using a thesaurus? A wordless post just showing a data table or a graph is a thousand times more (substantively) intellectual than these (retarded) posts.

:feelsokman::feelsthink::dab:
 
The history of anti-intellectualism is irrelevant to the validity (or otherwise) of your posts. And, frankly, your post IS too long. Your post covers a myriad of topics, each of which requires hours of verifying research to corroborate, and each of which are only brought up in a fleeting way. Your post has no data and contains no structured argument of any kind to support your central claims.

Unless you count high-level and vague narrative history as data, these are all just your speculations. They are extremely long-winded speculations, and speculating on a forum is perfectly okay. However, they are not inherently better than the speculations (or even straight up shitposting) of anybody else on here, to be honest.

Why should you be regarded as an "intellectual" when it is clear that your only goal is to maintain the facade of "intellectuality" by writing giant posts dripping with the cliches of "intellectualism"; with common terms substituted needlessly with more abstract synonyms using a thesaurus? A wordless post just showing a data table or a graph is a thousand times more (substantively) intellectual than these (retarded) posts.

You are clearly of a low IQ because my post contains clear structured arguments from start to finish and clearly ties the validity of the history of anti-intellectualism to its cause.

My outline of the history of anti-intellectualism is to demonstrate that anti-intellectualism is not based on any form of valid or rational inquiry but merely based on hatred of the the intellectually superior. That bit about Nazi Germany was to show that the German people supported the persecution of professors with ZERO reason behind it, and how that made the roots behind anti-intellectualism vivid to the whole world: IRRATIONAL HATRED OF THE INTELLIGENT FOR ITS OWN SAKE

My writing style is based on Caroll Quigley. His literary collection was bringing up different topics in a fleeting way to demonstrate his points. That's how you have to make arguments. I don't have time to write an essay on literally every topic I bring up, that's why I make quick references. You first complain my post is too long and then claim I don't delve into the topics enough.

If you wish to confirm or fact-check my work. Go right ahead. I can guarantee you you'll find truth in all the factual statements if you actually bothered to look. My interpretation and analysis is subjective, but that's where reasoning and logic come in. Maybe you should try adding something of your own to my work rather than criticize your obvious superiors.
 
I never said I am superior. You are the one who is always claiming that you are the most intellectual incel on this forum when in fact I don't see anyone agreeing with you. All the more reason to believe that you are a narcissist.
tbh op exhibits almost all if not all traits from a narcissist/arrogant person
He should go brag somewhere else where his IQ can really help him
oh, and inb4 who r u to say that hurr durr
 
We could be philosophers if we wanted, but instead we are cyber-vagrants.
astronomical cope

ugly people are stupider on average.

Plus we are too stressed out to become intellectuals. Our brains are destroyed by depression
 
astronomical cope

ugly people are stupider on average.

Plus we are too stressed out to become intellectuals. Our brains are destroyed by depression

I'm a literal deformed monster and I turned out to be a genius.

Cope to say you're too stressed to be intellectual.
 
The simple fact that you wrote this essay knowing that noone will actually bother to read it is proof that you don't want to discuss or anything, you just want to boast about your perceived intelligence on an obscure shitposting forum made for virgins

I geninuely don't see the point in this but a man gotta cope i guess
 
The simple fact that you wrote this essay knowing that noone will actually bother to read it is proof that you don't want to discuss or anything, you just want to boast about your perceived intelligence on an obscure shitposting forum made for virgins

I geninuely don't see the point in this but a man gotta cope i guess

What do you mean I know no one will actually read it? People have read my essays before and have attacked individually highlighted posts.
 
Giga post length aside, that was a pretty good look at the history of conflict against intellectuals. I don't think that this forum is very anti-intellectual, but I'll talk about suppression of information more broadly:

One thing to note here is that this goes beyond philosophy; through history we've seen constant mixing of knowledge and political interest in many areas. Science has been suppressed consistently, largely by religious societies that considered questioning the established world inherently offensive. Public opinion often painted scientists as dangerous individuals that would undermine the stable structure of society with ideas that challenged and changed the way people thought. As knowledge progressed, so did the idea that knowledge can be dangerous.

As much as we can blame people's lack of acceptance, it's a fact of life that won't go away. A more realistic approach to the problem is for scientists and philosophers to more carefully consider the implications of their work on social structures and plan how they will communicate their findings based on this. You have to accept that certain pieces of information could disturb people's lives, and if you want these to be accepted you must communicate them in a way that allows people do digest and accept them without feeling like their world has been totally shattered. Human denial is powerful, so it needs to be taken seriously and addressed.
 
you're incredibly stupid if you care so much about intelligence.
memories and beliefs have nothing to do with being smart, all the random informations you inserted in your thread are just telling me that you can read and rember what you read, but this doesn't make you smart.
 
What do you mean I know no one will actually read it? People have read my essays before and have attacked individually highlighted posts.
I don't mean literally 0 people will read it, but a lot of users surely won't because there's really no point imo.

I too like to discuss shit with other users here, but exchanging essays only makes you lose focus on the point making the discussion nothing more than a dick size contest (again imo)

Take for esxample Socrates, he didn't make big speeches or wrote books to teach his philosophy, he simply went to talk to random people on the streets and made them change idea discussing whatever topic they were talking about
 
Giga post length aside, that was a pretty good look at the history of conflict against intellectuals. I don't think that this forum is very anti-intellectual, but I'll talk about suppression of information more broadly:

One thing to note here is that this goes beyond philosophy; through history we've seen constant mixing of knowledge and political interest in many areas. Science has been suppressed consistently, largely by religious societies that considered questioning the established world inherently offensive. Public opinion often painted scientists as dangerous individuals that would undermine the stable structure of society with ideas that challenged and changed the way people thought. As knowledge progressed, so did the idea that knowledge can be dangerous.

As much as we can blame people's lack of acceptance, it's a fact of life that won't go away. A more realistic approach to the problem is for scientists and philosophers to more carefully consider the implications of their work on social structures and plan how they will communicate their findings based on this. You have to accept that certain pieces of information could disturb people's lives, and if you want these to be accepted you must communicate them in a way that allows people do digest and accept them without feeling like their world has been totally shattered. Human denial is powerful, so it needs to be taken seriously and addressed.

Machiavellian IQ. I completely agree with the main essence of this post, anti-intellectualism is innate and it will NOT go away. This is something that will follow us to the end of time, no matter how far we progress as a society, those one step ahead will always be despised or at least subconsciously seen as dangerous. Only the scientists who parrot knowledge already within the overton window like Neil Degrasse Tyson will be venerated.
 

Oh right that's why books never have had any historical significance, only stupid banners and slogans.

I don't mean literally 0 people will read it, but a lot of users surely won't because there's really no point imo.

I too like to discuss shit with other users here, but exchanging essays only makes you lose focus on the point making the discussion nothing more than a dick size contest (again imo)

Take for esxample Socrates, he didn't make big speeches or wrote books to teach his philosophy, he simply went to talk to random people on the streets and made them change idea discussing whatever topic they were talking about

The only reason we know of Socrates today is his knowledge was inscribed in books of lengths much greater than my posts.
you're incredibly stupid if you care so much about intelligence.
memories and beliefs have nothing to do with being smart, all the random informations you inserted in your thread are just telling me that you can read and rember what you read, but this doesn't make you smart.

Ok then. Being able to read and remember better than others is what makes me superior. Being """"""smart""""""" is irrelevant then.
 
Oh right that's why books never have had any historical significance, only stupid banners and slogans.
you're on an internet forum bro. No one cares about your whiny rants, in fact they unironically make you more disliked. But since you are a troll you already know that
 
If you were high IQ, you would have understood that by now that writing such long articles is pointless and you should try to keep it as short as possible.
 
you're on an internet forum bro. No one cares about your whiny rants, in fact they unironically make you more disliked. But since you are a troll you already know that

I am living rent free inside your head. For a person who's threads you don't read you whine a lot on them.
 

Similar threads

Logic55
Replies
9
Views
171
illumizoldyck
illumizoldyck
sinclair_silence
Replies
2
Views
206
sinclair_silence
sinclair_silence
samsamwin
Replies
15
Views
375
unwantedbysoyciety
U
sinclair_silence
Replies
13
Views
298
Efiliste
Efiliste
PERFECTWAVE
Replies
4
Views
182
Friezacel
Friezacel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top