I'd also argue that even if the exclusion of foids from education led to a shortage of "skilled laborers", men would be more than incentivized enough to fill in those gaps. The current gyno-fascist society literally holds men back from reaching their true potential. Men need a family and a female companion for their mental well-being. When you deny him that, that renders him half dead. If there are incentives, men will adapt and grow at an incredible rate. Male YTers and streamers adapt every week in order not to lose relevancy. Gamers adapt with every new patch.
This perspective is also correct, as female education—and the freedom it entails—weakens the family unit, which inevitably leads to the weakening of men themselves; without a proper incentive, and with the need to compete with women (which leads to gynocentrism on many strata), men simply don't soar as high as they possibly could. Further to that, this issue is also concerned with the fact men far exceed the capabilities of women in any of these fields, hence it is quite counterproductive to even try to include egalitarian nonsense (that even if executed properly, would lead to diminished returns), all at the expense of men.
When women are permitted to flood these spheres, the supposed “gain” is illusory. The labor pool expands superficially, but the long-term cost is a destabilized family unit, falling fertility, and the corrosion of male incentives to excel in the first place. A society that orients itself around its men, giving them responsibility, pressure, and the promise of family stability, will never lack for capable labor or innovation. Male ingenuity thrives under pressure, hence the burden of necessity only leads to flourishing.
The supposed “shortage” argument collapses when you realize that men have historically borne the weight of all meaningful innovation and adaptation.
Also, the mention of gamers is actually quite nice here, as the observable trend is, no matter how much the demographics shift—it is men who remain the best, and the most innovative.
With that said, even if society restored strict monogamy and excluded all the foids from the workforce, it'd still be deceptively empowering to foids. In times of emergency, like war, these foids would come out of the woods and openly shame men for dodging the draft like the "white feather" shit. Thus, not only should foids be excluded from the workforce, they should be outright excluded from men's society altogether. I believe the feminist cunt who started the white feather thing used foids' "lower status" in society as an excuse to justify shaming men for not literally dying in war. So, when you don't recognize foids as part of your society and just contractually bind them to be breeding holes, you don't owe them anything, by their own "low-trust" standard.
That also means men's needs would need to evolve. I sincerely believe that there's a very subtle difference in our love and hate for foids. We draw satisfaction from both their smiles and their suffering, obviously, depending on the kind of feelings we harbor for them. If we didn't draw satisfaction from their suffering or humiliation, all these "Woman/Feminist destroyed" or "When men fight back" videos on YouTube wouldn't be getting millions of views. Despite JBWs' hatred for ethnics, videos dunking on ethnics don't get nearly as much traction. Those videos literally serve as a form of therapy for men. Men should just embrace their instinctive hatred for foids and the fact that witnessing foids' suffering improves their mental health.
True. Even when they had "lower status," they still found ways to shame men to push them into the meat grinder. It proves that even when they appear powerless, they always find ways to socially manipulate and exploit. I suppose one could argue that even the so-called patriarchal society we had in the past was, in fact, highly gynocentric—as there are plenty of data, statistics, and women-centered ideas from that time that would corroborate this; perhaps it is human nature itself, inherently gynocentric, and unfixable. I think excluding them, like you said, could be a solution, but implementing it would be quite difficult, although it makes sense to reduce them even lower than in the past.
As for the schadenfreude part, I certainly agree that there's a psychological release when you watch them get hurt, albeit it's not necessarily their womanhood, but rather the behavior it entails that leads to that; it is satisfying to watch a whore who probably deems men such as myself subhuman—a wretched, superficial, and vile whore—getting exactly what she deserves.
