Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Cope The best way to cope with your place in the world

Homegrownman326

Homegrownman326

Recruit
★★
Joined
May 24, 2025
Posts
170
We've all seen them: those guys who are just genetically superior and visibly mog you. Most of us here are chopped to shit, but I'm talking about what we call "chads" mostly. Normies just don't have the same effect that chads do; chads are imposing in such a way that you know they're superior just by being near them. We know these men live lavish lives, doing things and having experiences that we never could have done. What separates us and them is luck; it was never our choice to be who we are. We're created without our consent and given genes we can't control; they just got lucky, that's all that separates us and them. How do we deal with the resentment, the unfairness, and being mogged? Here's a Sun Tzu quote that encapsulates my view,

“If you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float by.”​

― Sun Tzu

My point is that we all age and die and return to dust, the chad problem, the mogging problem, the humanity problem will all solve themselves, this species and life on this planet will one day come to an end. No matter how dense your bones are, how tall you are, how harmonic your face is, or how big your dick is, you'll age, die, and rot in the ground to be forgotten forever. Just imagine a chad who had it all dying in a hospital bed, it doesn't matter if he copulated or not, the point is he's dying, his prestige is being ripped from him for good. The only thing that equalizes all of us is mortality, and it comes for you no matter who you are, no matter what experiences you have in life, or no matter how successful you are.
 
Chad dies, happy with his life decisions, surrounded by loved ones while hundreds cry at his funeral, you die with your head blown open at your desk with an incels.is tab open
 
Normies just don't have the same effect that chads do; chads are imposing in such a way that you know they're superior just by being near them
Was just gonna make a thread about this some 6'2 guy sat in front of me in my physics exam today and he walked in late without a care in the world but I could just feel the mog. Obviously his face and frame did the heavy lifting but some combination of facial microexpressions body posture and whatnot just made it obvious he had spent his whole life being sucked up too, it's not really something you can describe.
 
My point is that we all age and die and return to dust, the chad problem, the mogging problem, the humanity problem will all solve themselves, this species and life on this planet will one day come to an end. No matter how dense your bones are, how tall you are, how harmonic your face is, or how big your dick is, you'll age, die, and rot in the ground to be forgotten forever. Just imagine a chad who had it all dying in a hospital bed, it doesn't matter if he copulated or not, the point is he's dying, his prestige is being ripped from him for good. The only thing that equalizes all of us is mortality, and it comes for you no matter who you are, no matter what experiences you have in life, or no matter how successful you are.
Lost me here
 
Was just gonna make a thread about this some 6'2 guy sat in front of me in my physics exam today and he walked in late without a care in the world but I could just feel the mog. Obviously his face and frame did the heavy lifting but some combination of facial microexpressions body posture and whatnot just made it obvious he had spent his whole life being sucked up too, it's not really something you can describe.

:reeeeee: :reeeeee: :reeeeee:
 
Chad dies, happy with his life decisions, surrounded by loved ones while hundreds cry at his funeral, you die with your head blown open at your desk with an incels.is tab open
It's still death, there's no such thing as a good death, those same people gorge themselves with food after the funeral and forget he even existed within a week. If he dies young, his partner will find a new man within the month. Only his children and spouse would really care or remember him, but they, too, will die. Within only two generations, he'll be forgotten and dead to the world.
 
Yes, I think about this way too much. And not every Chad is going to die quickly or easily either which I also like.
 
Was just gonna make a thread about this some 6'2 guy sat in front of me in my physics exam today and he walked in late without a care in the world but I could just feel the mog. Obviously his face and frame did the heavy lifting but some combination of facial microexpressions body posture and whatnot just made it obvious he had spent his whole life being sucked up too, it's not really something you can describe.
It's hard to ignore when it's so blatant, that's what I was trying to get at.
 
Yeah we all return to dust in the end but it doesn't matter because Chad lived the most out of his life and you didn't; by thinking in terms of nihilism the most logical choice would be going in (((Emergency Room))) :feelsLSD:Living hedonistically while alive makes all the difference
 
Yeah we all return to dust in the end but it doesn't matter because Chad lived the most out of his life and you didn't; by thinking in terms of nihilism the most logical choice would be going in (((Emergency Room))) :feelsLSD:Living hedonistically while alive makes all the difference
I heavily disagree, but perhaps that's just because I have a high IQ. For normies, hedonism might be fulfilling, but for me, it's empty and doesn't do much for me. If anything, it confirms my assertions about life, and most of the time, there are consequences to hedonism. So, outside of my philosophical dissatisfaction with it, there are also physical ills. Eating unhealthy makes you fat and kills you, tons of casual sex can give you an STD and is bad for your brain, porn is very bad for your brain chemistry and is highly addicting. Hedonism solves none of the philosophical problems of life and gives you even more. You have to have a low IQ to enjoy it, but perhaps it's just me. I just can't see how living a hedonistic lifestyle will be fulfilling in such a way that it would make me okay with death. I just can't imagine myself wishing to have sex again in my final moments, over cherishing the few moments of happiness I've had, and my core memories.
 
It's still death, there's no such thing as a good death, those same people gorge themselves with food after the funeral and forget he even existed within a week. If he dies young, his partner will find a new man within the month. Only his children and spouse would really care or remember him, but they, too, will die. Within only two generations, he'll be forgotten and dead to the world.
This is shit cope for the following reasons:

1. You are basically proposing nihilism, the problem with nihilism is that it postulates that life is insignificant and meaningless compared to the infinite expanse of time. However, in death both us and chads are equal, it's a tie, meaning however small and insignificant our time alive is, it is the only tiebreaker between us and chad, of which chad wins easily, and yes I can say he wins objectively for the following reason.

Life is a function of the second law of thermodynamics which postulates that in a closed system (the universe) entropy will increase given an indefinite amount of time, life fulfils this as we massively increase the entropy of our surroundings, thus life is a function of the laws of the universe, and all drives to propogate more life (i.e. evolution) is a result of this literally 'universal' drive to increase entropy, thus the nature of life is designed to reward the act of fulfilling the universal law from which life is derived. The number 1 way of fulfilling this rise in entropy is by creating more life. Thus, by the laws pf physics, chad has lived a greater life than us.

Edit: @MRHK_57 made a great thread relating to this
 
Last edited:
I heavily disagree, but perhaps that's just because I have a high IQ. For normies, hedonism might be fulfilling, but for me, it's empty and doesn't do much for me. If anything, it confirms my assertions about life, and most of the time, there are consequences to hedonism. So, outside of my philosophical dissatisfaction with it, there are also physical ills. Eating unhealthy makes you fat and kills you, tons of casual sex can give you an STD and is bad for your brain, porn is very bad for your brain chemistry and is highly addicting. Hedonism solves none of the philosophical problems of life and gives you even more. You have to have a low IQ to enjoy it, but perhaps it's just me. I just can't see how living a hedonistic lifestyle will be fulfilling in such a way that it would make me okay with death. I just can't imagine myself wishing to have sex again in my final moments, over cherishing the few moments of happiness I've had, and my core memories.
You do have a fire in you telling you to be the best and surpass others, you want to have what Chad has,we all do, you just ignore it ; if you truly didn't you wouldn't be on .is, we are all on the same boat. :blackpill:
 
Chad's death day mogs the most successful day of my whole life
 
Your view sounds like nihilism, especially cosmic nihilism. It‘s a good cope, many incels use it. If your nihilistic you might see humans on a spectrum with other animals, who have their limitations, respectively. Humans just act within their nature and there‘s nothing special about them. They rely on favourable external circumstances and simply die if those are not met. ‚The universe‘ doesn‘t care.
 
They also drink water and breathe oxygen
This is shit cope for the following reasons:

1. You are basically proposing nihilism, the problem with nihilism is that it postulates that life is insignificant meaningless compared to the infinite expanse of time. However, in death both us and chads are equal, it's a tie, meaning however small and insignificant our time alive is, it is the only tiebreaker between us and chad, of which chad wins easily, and yes I can say he wins objectively for the following reason.

Life is a function of thermodynamics which postulates that in a closed system (the universe) entropy will increase given an indefinite amount of time, life fulfils this as we massively increase the entropy of our surroundings, thus life is a function of the laws of the universe, and all drives to propogate more life (i.e. evolution) is a result of this literally 'universal' drive to increase entropy, thus the nature of life is designed to reward the act of fulfilling the universal law from which life is derived. The number 1 way of fulfilling this rise in entropy is by creating more life. Thus, by the laws pf physics, chad has lived a greater life than us.
"This is a cope." Tell me what the thread is labeled as, of course it's a fucking cope, it's meant to be. Life itself is a fucking cope that's not a gotcha. I'm not promoting nihilism; nihilism doesn't need to be promoted. It's a fundamental truth for anyone who's intellectually honest; it's a core part of life. Death is nonexistence; no thing exists, therefore, it and another thing cannot be equal. You can't compare the lives of two dead people without prior knowledge of their lives. This refutes your idea that Chad lived better; it cannot be extrapolated as there's no evidence of it on a long enough timescale. We wouldn't be equal in death, as you cannot be in death, you're equally nonexistent, and again, with a long enough timescale, there's no evidence of either life to compare. You can say, based on the objective nature of life, that its purpose is to copulate. Chad wins, but when the entire species is extinct, does it matter? Reproducing or not doesn't make any difference toward our ultimate fate as individuals and as a species. On your thermodynamics point, life isn't a "function" of it moron. It's affected by properties of it like entropy, but entropy can exist on its own without life.
 
This is shit cope for the following reasons:

1. You are basically proposing nihilism, the problem with nihilism is that it postulates that life is insignificant and meaningless compared to the infinite expanse of time. However, in death both us and chads are equal, it's a tie, meaning however small and insignificant our time alive is, it is the only tiebreaker between us and chad, of which chad wins easily, and yes I can say he wins objectively for the following reason.

Life is a function of the second law of thermodynamics which postulates that in a closed system (the universe) entropy will increase given an indefinite amount of time, life fulfils this as we massively increase the entropy of our surroundings, thus life is a function of the laws of the universe, and all drives to propogate more life (i.e. evolution) is a result of this literally 'universal' drive to increase entropy, thus the nature of life is designed to reward the act of fulfilling the universal law from which life is derived. The number 1 way of fulfilling this rise in entropy is by creating more life. Thus, by the laws pf physics, chad has lived a greater life than us.

Edit: @MRHK_57 made a great thread relating to this
It‘s from your human perspective. Humans can‘t justify certainty because any justification of certainty would need certain preconditions. Without preconditions anything is arbitrary. You couldn‘t even derive certainty from your method of justification because it‘s uncertain as well.
 
chad dies in a harem while us in a shithole
 
You do have a fire in you telling you to be the best and surpass others, you want to have what Chad has,we all do, you just ignore it ; if you truly didn't you wouldn't be on .is, we are all on the same boat. :blackpill:
We all do, but we also all recognize it's not possible, no matter what we do, and it's not because of the competition in doing, but the limitations of genes. I don't "ignore it," I just recognize I'm powerless. But for me, hedonism isn't the greatest exercise of competition; many forms of hedonism are solo pursuits that have consequences. Sex requires things from you that are determined by your genes, so I lack the agency to compete, even if I were a normie, that would still be the case. But let's break this down. The goal of competition is to build power. What power do you get from casual sex? You get power over the woman in the moment, but that's it. Unless you're Chad, you won't have power over her, and as a normie, you'll have to beg her for sex and, outside the bedroom, put up with her BS until she cheats on you. In the modern world, unless you're Chad, sex doesn't bring power; it just forces you to tailor your life to women and, in doing so, give up your agency. But what's the purpose of sex, reproduction. Modern casual sex doesn't offer that, and marriages can only produce a handful of offspring. You don't even get the resulting power of spreading your genes; you just get fleeting moments of pleasure, that's it.
 
We all do, but we also all recognize it's not possible, no matter what we do, and it's not because of the competition in doing, but the limitations of genes. I don't "ignore it," I just recognize I'm powerless. But for me, hedonism isn't the greatest exercise of competition; many forms of hedonism are solo pursuits that have consequences. Sex requires things from you th at are determined by your genes, so I lack the agency to compete, even if I were a normie, that would still be the case. But let's break this down. The goal of competition is to build power. What power do you get from casual sex? You get power over the woman in the moment, but that's it. Unless you're Chad, you won't have power over her, and as a normie, you'll have to beg her for sex and, outside the bedroom, put up with her BS until she cheats on you. In the modern world, unless you're Chad, sex doesn't bring power; it just forces you to tailor your life to women and, in doing so, give up your agency. But what's the purpose of sex, reproduction. Modern casual sex doesn't offer that, and marriages can only produce a handful of offspring. You don't even get the resulting power of spreading your genes; you just get fleeting moments of pleasure, that's it.
Based :yes: you should try schziomaxxing with toys, accept the manchildmaxxer path :whitepill:
 
Chad has a parade of people mourning his death while im stuck hanging from a tree
 
Brutal luckpill, and basically this cope is nihilism.
 

Similar threads

Rapistcel
Replies
10
Views
576
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
boneless goblin
Replies
22
Views
858
Arkansasmentalcel
Arkansasmentalcel
finasscel
Replies
30
Views
674
Homegrownman326
Homegrownman326
AsiaCel
Replies
19
Views
558
LOLI BREEDING
LOLI BREEDING
M
Replies
15
Views
462
SilentScream
SilentScream

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top