Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Study on Facial Dominance

TLDR and too low iq. Care to summarize?
 
what if ur dom and ugly boyo high t ogre
 
TLDR and too low iq. Care to summarize?

Indicators of dominance were better indicators of fucking than handsomeness. They were also indicators of promotion in the military. Guys also didn’t change much in terms of facial dominance from 21 to 41.
 
Indicators of dominance were better indicators of fucking than handsomeness. They were also indicators of promotion in the military. Guys also didn’t change much in terms of facial dominance from 21 to 41.
So high T ogres fare better than fuckboys?
 
why is it either high T ogre or pretty boy?

how about handsome masculine high T
or low T pretty boy?


how about make a non-retarded comparison
 
good, high T ogres > prettyboys
 
why is it either high T ogre or pretty boy?

how about handsome masculine high T
or low T pretty boy?


how about make a non-retarded comparison

Low-T pretty boys were outperformed in coital success and in getting promotions by handsome masculine guys.
 
wtf is "and", also MASC-DOM life ogre or not i still can whip most twinks' ass therefor im higher in the pecking order
 
OP where would you put men like O'pry and Lachowski on this scale:

y3WroV8.jpg


Also would you rather be an ugly high T ogre or a low T pretty boy?

I need to know where you stand on these two issues before I make a more detailed reply.
 
wtf is "and", also MASC-DOM life ogre or not i still can whip most twinks' ass therefor im higher in the pecking order

Androgynous.

OP where would you put men like O'pry and Lachowski on this scale:

y3WroV8.jpg


Also would you rather be an ugly high T ogre or a low T pretty boy?

I need to know where you stand on these two issues before I make a more detailed reply.

I’d rather be a high-T ogre. Lachowski is AND to me and O’Pry is LTM.
 
OP where would you put men like O'pry and Lachowski on this scale:

y3WroV8.jpg


Also would you rather be an ugly high T ogre or a low T pretty boy?

I need to know where you stand on these two issues before I make a more detailed reply.
It's hard to judge where you fall on this scale if you are non white
 
Androgynous.



I’d rather be a high-T ogre. Lachowski is AND to me and O’Pry is LTM.

.....you'd seriously rather be an ugly high-T ogre than LACHOWSKI!?
 
Facial dominance is 80 percent eye area 20 percent lower third tbh
 
.....you'd seriously rather be an ugly high-T ogre than LACHOWSKI!?

I honestly would. There’s a physicality there that I think helps in the day to day. Yeah, I’m not on the cover of magazines and doing runway shows but I could probably have a decent enough dating life and be feared.
 

Similar threads

ThisSongGoesVerHard
Replies
60
Views
2K
Izayacel
Izayacel
My Name Jeff
Replies
7
Views
567
DarkStar
DarkStar
WorthlessSlavicShit
Replies
21
Views
732
IceMan2000
IceMan2000
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
9
Views
545
Grodd
Grodd
Nordicel94
Replies
15
Views
525
BricABrac
BricABrac

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top