Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [STUDIES] Women are lesbian and they would rather fuck animals than you

veryrare

veryrare

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Aug 20, 2024
Posts
896
Studies are gold mines If done correctly they will expose human nature, An example of this is INSANE female in-group bias 4.5 times the one men have, men have ZERO (https://sci-hub.ru/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494) (copied from this thread https://incels.is/threads/masculinity-is-an-actual-social-construct-and-more-studies.481353/)

But we aren't talking about that even though It indirectly impacts what I'm talking about anyway

Ok you read the title now let's review the literature

Let's just start with this => https://sci-hub.ru/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21409712/

This is a meta analysis of female sexual behavior and researchers measuring it via vagina bloodflow
There are very interesting and funny quotes like these ones below:
The research reviewed here indicates that many gen-der differences in sexuality are smaller than researchersonce thought. The majority of gender differences in sex-ual behaviors and attitudes are small, indicating thatwithin-gender variation is larger than between-gendervariation in reported sexual behaviors and attitudes.When gender differences do exist, research suggests that they are a product of gender differences in biological factors, societal power differentials
However, someresearch suggests that women may be sexually arousedby a wider variety of sexual images than men are (Chivers, Seto, & Blanchard, 2007).
First we get an Idea of how women have more fludity in terms of sexual arousal Ok let's keep going....
A gender difference has been consistently reported with respect to sexual response. Whereas men are almost exclusively genitally aroused to their preferred sex, women are genitally aroused to both sexes, independent of preference. (https://www.researchgate.net/public...n_sexual_response-_moderations_by_measurement)
Studies with volunteers in sexual arousal experiments suggest that women are, on average, physiologically sexually aroused to both male and female sexual stimuli. (https://www.researchgate.net/public...l_Arousal_and_Masculinity-Femininity_of_Women)
Now this is very interesting because when you talk about this with normies they will just dismiss it even though the studies clearly show that women have lesbian tendencies

They also showed genital arousal when watching sexual activity from both men and women and even showed genital arousal when watching bonobo intercourse (https://sci-hub.ru/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21409712/)
:feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelspuke::feelspuke:
She would rather fuck a bonobo than you


Now lets combine this with research with women admitting kissing their best friends, fantasizing about them etc
In this study, analysis of survey data from 436 self-identified heterosexual females from two southeastern universities reveals that almost half (47.9%) reported having kissed another woman out of sexual experimentation/curiosity, almost one-third (31.3%) reported having had a sexual dream of being with another woman, and almost one-fourth (23.2%) reported having had a sexual fantasy of being with another woman. Same-sex kissing, dreaming, and fantasizing were significantly associated with pro-gay attitudes, including approval of gay people having their own children and gay people adopting their own children. Theoretical explanations (contact hypothesis), implications, and limitations of the study are suggested. (https://www.researchgate.net/public...al_Women_Who_Report_Same-Sex_Kissing_and_More)

This gives you a nice conclusion wrapped in a nice bow tie


- Women are lesbian
- Women love their own gender and have insane bias towards themselves sometimes to the point of sexually wanting to be with other women
- Bonobopilled again (Indirect dogpill)
 
This adds more evidence to a given
 
Studies are gold mines If done correctly they will expose human nature, An example of this is INSANE female in-group bias 4.5 times the one men have, men have ZERO (https://sci-hub.ru/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494) (copied from this thread https://incels.is/threads/masculinity-is-an-actual-social-construct-and-more-studies.481353/)

But we aren't talking about that even though It indirectly impacts what I'm talking about anyway

Ok you read the title now let's review the literature

Let's just start with this => https://sci-hub.ru/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21409712/

This is a meta analysis of female sexual behavior and researchers measuring it via vagina bloodflow
There are very interesting and funny quotes like these ones below:


First we get an Idea of how women have more fludity in terms of sexual arousal Ok let's keep going....


Now this is very interesting because when you talk about this with normies they will just dismiss it even though the studies clearly show that women have lesbian tendencies


:feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelspuke::feelspuke:
She would rather fuck a bonobo than you


Now lets combine this with research with women admitting kissing their best friends, fantasizing about them etc


This gives you a nice conclusion wrapped in a nice bow tie


- Women are lesbian
- Women love their own gender and have insane bias towards themselves sometimes to the point of sexually wanting to be with other women
- Bonobopilled again (Indirect dogpill)
mfw women are literally attracted to anything, from doorknobs to fucking monkeys, but still wont hop on my sub5 noodle

1724765807799

anyway
:bigbrain: :bigbrain: :bigbrain: high iq greycel post
a smile from the gecko shall be your reward :)
tagging high iq users that may be interested to look at studies :feelshehe::feelshehe::feelshehe:

@Cybersex is our hope
@WorthlessSlavicShit
@DarkStar
@NearEnd
@Stupid Clown
@SmhChan
@Limitcel
 
Give me one good reason as to why men and foids shouldn't be separated. They are closer to animals than us.
 
Do the most attractive women even have sex or date anyone anymore? Seems like they just set up a way for simp money to flow into their account, then they just travel the world and eat a lot of expensive food and drink expensive wine. I've often considered the possibility that women literally don't want to have sex with ANY man, not even Chad.
 
Do the most attractive women even have sex or date anyone anymore? Seems like they just set up a way for simp money to flow into their account, then they just travel the world and eat a lot of expensive food and drink expensive wine. I've often considered the possibility that women literally don't want to have sex with ANY man, not even Chad.
Uh! They do. They just don't post pics with their hook-ups on social media. Actually, foids don't really post pics with their partner in general. Conversely, men like to do that. The difference in behavior might be why you think that.
 
They are so in loved in themselves that they want to fuck others who look the same as they are. Notice how similar they look to their partners
IMG 20240827 154400IMG 20240827 154522IMG 20240827 154437IMG 20240827 154627IMG 20240827 154600
mfw women are literally attracted to anything, from doorknobs to fucking monkeys, but still wont hop on my sub5 noodle
:yes:4/10 5'8 man is too short, ugly and disgusting but 5'1 fat butt ugly short haired dyed lesbian is OK for sex jfl
 
mfw women are literally attracted to anything, from doorknobs to fucking monkeys, but still wont hop on my sub5 noodle

View attachment 1237574
anyway
:bigbrain: :bigbrain: :bigbrain: high iq greycel post
a smile from the gecko shall be your reward :)
tagging high iq users that may be interested to look at studies :feelshehe::feelshehe::feelshehe:

@Cybersex is our hope
@WorthlessSlavicShit
@DarkStar
@NearEnd
@Stupid Clown
@SmhChan
@Limitcel

Now I can die in peace
 
They are so in loved in themselves that they want to fuck others who look the same as they are. Notice how similar they look to their partners
View attachment 1237577View attachment 1237578View attachment 1237579View attachment 1237580View attachment 1237581

:yes:4/10 5'8 man is too short, ugly and disgusting but 5'1 fat butt ugly short haired dyed lesbian is OK for sex jfl
even the buxxers they pick look like them, look into womb imprinting and sexual imprinting and stuff. Redpillers used to talk about the womb imprint, how the first guy they fuck or they are sexually attracted to, or maybe the first guy they manipulated, usually an extend male family member, like the uncle, becomes the template for future buxxers. It is very interesting. I think there may be something to it.
 
Women need to be genocided and replaced with egg-cell bearing sex robots

Any foid is a foid worth killing. They’re all mentally corrupted and unstable
 
Somehow gets aroused by literal primates but blackcels is a step to far
 
Do the most attractive women even have sex or date anyone anymore? Seems like they just set up a way for simp money to flow into their account, then they just travel the world and eat a lot of expensive food and drink expensive wine. I've often considered the possibility that women literally don't want to have sex with ANY man, not even Chad.
They see men from a spectrum of money <====> penis
If you don't fulfil her in any way, she will leave you. Briffault's law
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.
 
even the buxxers they pick look like them, look into womb imprinting and sexual imprinting and stuff. Redpillers used to talk about the womb imprint, how the first guy they fuck or they are sexually attracted to, or maybe the first guy they manipulated, usually an extend male family member, like the uncle, becomes the template for future buxxers. It is very interesting. I think there may be something to it.
Interesting.
 
God created the essence of woman being a lesbian and liking her appearance, does God like to see women ending up with men?Is God a misandrist?
 
even the buxxers they pick look like them, look into womb imprinting and sexual imprinting and stuff. Redpillers used to talk about the womb imprint, how the first guy they fuck or they are sexually attracted to, or maybe the first guy they manipulated, usually an extend male family member, like the uncle, becomes the template for future buxxers. It is very interesting. I think there may be something to it.
:bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain::bigbrain:
 
And the cuckold, self-hating coomers will say that this is actually good and hot. Sure, some chads will get some threesomes but in practice this means you have to compete with women to get women.


And btw their arousal to female and male stimuli is not equal. The women who identify as "straight" have an arousal that is almost equal BUT STILL they slightly get more aroused by watching female stimuli. The rest of women, including openly bisexual women who state a preference for men, get substantially more aroused by watching women.


I've read many of these studies and some explanations are about the women self-inserting as the female in the video and mirroring her pleasure instead of wanting to fuck her, their arousal being more about the sexual positions of the porn actors rather than the actors themselves, or the vagina getting aroused not meaning that their brain is actually aroused, but their explanations fall short. Many studies suggest that these women who still identify as straight aren't really aware of their own sexuality or aren't being honest.

Is not that men are terribly ugly and inherently unappealing, is that the women are pseudo homosexual. I think the lesbian pill is the biggest blackpill of them all.


There's also the possibility that endocrine disruptors have been influencing female (and male) sexuality, even permanently altering the brain during fetal development. This would have been going on for many decades (some edcs have been present for more than a century) and there are studies on animals that suggests that edcs can have a masculinization effect on females and a feminization effect on males.
 
Last edited:
Werewolf is one of the most popular literary genres among women, it is no secret that women are zoophiles, at least much more than men.
 
And the cuckold, self-hating coomers will say that this is actually good and hot. Sure, some chads will get some threesomes but in practice this means you have to compete with women to get women.


And btw their arousal to female and male stimuli is not equal. The women who identify as "straight" have an arousal that is almost equal BUT STILL they slightly get more aroused by watching female stimuli. The rest of women, including openly bisexual women who state a preference for men, get substantially more aroused by watching women.


I've read many of these studies and some explanations are about the women self-inserting as the female in the video and mirroring her pleasure instead of wanting to fuck her, their arousal being more about the sexual positions of the porn actors rather than the actors themselves, or the vagina getting aroused not meaning that their brain is actually aroused, but their explanations fall short. Many studies suggest that these women who still identify as straight aren't really aware of their own sexuality or aren't being honest.

Is not that men are terribly ugly and inherently unappealing, is that the women are pseudo homosexual. I think the lesbian pill is the biggest blackpill of them all.


There's also the possibility that endocrine disruptors have been influencing female (and male) sexuality, even permanently altering the brain during fetal development. This would have been going on for many decades (some edcs have been present for more than a century) and there are studies on animals that suggests that edcs can have a masculinization effect on females and a feminization effect on males.

Very interesting, Thanks for replying
May I ask for those studies that you read that don't include mine on female sexuality (especially the foids having more arousal) and the endocrine disruptors ones?
 
Oh and this doesn't end here, women are attracted TO THEIR OWN bodies. Perhaps their attraction for their own bodies is what makes them sexually attracted to other women.


They get aroused from feeling sexy, wearing skimpy clothes/lingerie, being sexualized and lusted after, turning on their partner and knowing that the arousal of the partner comes from how hot she is, etc. Even the women who suck dick (and many women don't enjoy blowjoba at all) report that what they enjoy about sucking is not the dick itself, like a gay/bisexual dude would, but the thought of being the cause of arousal for the dude.

Female sexuality is basically extraordinarily narcissistic. Check this out:

In the ranking of attraction:
Her own body>GigaChad>GigaStacy>Chad>Stacy>Their dog>A vibrator>The corner of a table>Paying taxes>Jumping off a skyscraper>(you)

ih6sru.jpg
 
you just know
 

Attachments

  • 6d9ee322-c21d-49bd-8c12-daf4c043ecf4.mp4
    914.2 KB
Oh and this doesn't end here, women are attracted TO THEIR OWN bodies. Perhaps their attraction for their own bodies is what makes them sexually attracted to other women.


They get aroused from feeling sexy, wearing skimpy clothes/lingerie, being sexualized and lusted after, turning on their partner and knowing that the arousal of the partner comes from how hot she is, etc. Even the women who suck dick (and many women don't enjoy blowjoba at all) report that what they enjoy about sucking is not the dick itself, like a gay/bisexual dude would, but the thought of being the cause of arousal for the dude.

Female sexuality is basically extraordinarily narcissistic. Check this out:

In the ranking of attraction:
Her own body>GigaChad>GigaStacy>Chad>Stacy>Their dog>A vibrator>The corner of a table>Paying taxes>Jumping off a skyscraper>(you)

ih6sru.jpg
:bigbrain: :bigbrain: :bigbrain: :bigbrain:
 
Studies are gold mines If done correctly they will expose human nature, An example of this is INSANE female in-group bias 4.5 times the one men have, men have ZERO (https://sci-hub.ru/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494) (copied from this thread https://incels.is/threads/masculinity-is-an-actual-social-construct-and-more-studies.481353/)

But we aren't talking about that even though It indirectly impacts what I'm talking about anyway

Ok you read the title now let's review the literature

Let's just start with this => https://sci-hub.ru/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21409712/

This is a meta analysis of female sexual behavior and researchers measuring it via vagina bloodflow
There are very interesting and funny quotes like these ones below:


First we get an Idea of how women have more fludity in terms of sexual arousal Ok let's keep going....


Now this is very interesting because when you talk about this with normies they will just dismiss it even though the studies clearly show that women have lesbian tendencies


:feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelspuke::feelspuke:
She would rather fuck a bonobo than you


Now lets combine this with research with women admitting kissing their best friends, fantasizing about them etc


This gives you a nice conclusion wrapped in a nice bow tie


- Women are lesbian
- Women love their own gender and have insane bias towards themselves sometimes to the point of sexually wanting to be with other women
- Bonobopilled again (Indirect dogpill)
Women are bisexual, NOT lesbian.
 
mfw women are literally attracted to anything, from doorknobs to fucking monkeys, but still wont hop on my sub5 noodle

View attachment 1237574
anyway
:bigbrain: :bigbrain: :bigbrain: high iq greycel post
a smile from the gecko shall be your reward :)
tagging high iq users that may be interested to look at studies :feelshehe::feelshehe::feelshehe:

@Cybersex is our hope
@WorthlessSlavicShit
@DarkStar
@NearEnd
@Stupid Clown
@SmhChan
@Limitcel
Women are sexually immature men
Men don’t like other men
Women don’t like men

Giga over
 
Very interesting, Thanks for replying
May I ask for those studies that you read that don't include mine on female sexuality (especially the foids having more arousal) and the endocrine disruptors ones?
There are maaaaaany on them and I didn't save them. Search for terms like "gender/categoric specific/specificity arousal women" "female bisexuality research" "female sexual fluidity". There's a ton of it, and one of the most prominent researchers is Meredith L Chivers, who's, surprise surprise, not straight. I doubt any women who studies sexuality considers herself straight lol since they're more aware of their own (bi)sexuality.

Well, I saved this one study by a guy (very redpilled dude who also studies trannies) who considers the idea that women may not even have a sexual orientation:

I'd recommend you to not waste your time because you'll end up even more blackpilled.


I forgot to add that some researchers theorize that, since womem are so sexualized in the media and all women are exposed to this since they're very young, they end up sexualizing other women. This could be a small contributor to it, but it just falls short. Anecdotally, lurking female spaces and threads about female sexuality I've come across some comments of women claiming that they're not attracted to women at all, so actual straight women may exist but they're clearly a minority.


I'll probably make a thread about endocrine disruptors compiling the evidence. There's also the possibility that they could be influencing transsexuality.
 
Last edited:
There are maaaaaany on them and I didn't save them. Search for terms like "gender/categoric specific/specificity arousal women" "female bisexuality research" "female sexual fluidity". There's a ton of it, and one of the most prominent researchers is Meredith L Chivers, who's, surprise surprise, not straight. I doubt any women who studies sexuality considers herself straight lol since they're more aware of their own (bi)sexuality.

Well, I saved this one study by a guy (very redpilled dude who also studies trannies) who considers the idea that women may not even have a sexual orientation:

I'd recommend you to not waste your time because you'll end up even more blackpilled.


I forgot to add that some researchers theorize that, since womem are so sexualized in the media and all women are exposed to this since they're very young, they end up sexualizing other women. This could be a small contributor to it, but it just falls short. Anecdotally, lurking female spaces and threads about female sexuality I've come across some comments of women claiming that they're not attracted to women at all, so actual straight women may exist but they're clearly a minority.


I'll probably make a thread about endocrine disruptors compiling the evidence. There's also the possibility that they could be influencing transsexuality.

Yes the sources I cited were from Meredith L Chivers, I will look into the redpilled guy Thanks for the source
That anecdotal example is weak NGL but It makes sense ig

Also how would it be wasting time If I get more blackpilled JFL
Maybe you mean don't look into brutal shit you already know

On the transgender stuff, Robert Sapolsky has good lectures on it
Their brain is different, For example after surgery they don't have phantom limb syndrome Not a single case
It's very weird Just like any phenomenon like this It's a combination of genetics and enviroment
I don't think you can pin point what It Is exactly Maybe in the future they can tell who knows

Looking forward to the endocrine disruptors thread brocel
 
Saved:feelsokman:.

or maybe the first guy they manipulated, usually an extend male family member, like the uncle, becomes the template for future buxxers.
Damn, I didn't even consider this angle:shock:.
 
Yes the sources I cited were from Meredith L Chivers, I will look into the redpilled guy Thanks for the source
That anecdotal example is weak NGL but It makes sense ig

Also how would it be wasting time If I get more blackpilled JFL
Maybe you mean don't look into brutal shit you already know

On the transgender stuff, Robert Sapolsky has good lectures on it
Their brain is different, For example after surgery they don't have phantom limb syndrome Not a single case
It's very weird Just like any phenomenon like this It's a combination of genetics and enviroment
I don't think you can pin point what It Is exactly Maybe in the future they can tell who knows

Looking forward to the endocrine disruptors thread brocel
Yeah, I mean don't waste time into learning more about something you already know the final, disappointing conclusion of. I spent way too much time looking into it, hoping for some evidence that women are a little more heterosexual leaning than the data suggests, but overall it's just disappointing. I went through a long series of mental gymnastics to find some alternative theories but there's no good explanation: the truth is that women are very little attracted to men and on top of that, most of them are attracted to each other, especially physically, even though they generally prefer the dynamics of an heterosexual relationship. In general, female sexualitity and romantic inclinations are messy and unstable.

Oh and don't look into female related sites because it's all comments about being bisexual, praising each other's bisexuality, finding most men ugly while most women attractive, comments considering only dating women and giving up on men altogether, using ambiguous pronouns to refer to their partners, etc. You might say there's a selection bias or that they're lying out of spite, but you won't find men doing the same shit.

Thanks for the recommendation on the transgender stuff. I am convinced that part of the cause is due to endocrine disruptors preventing and/or altering the masculinization/feminization of the brain, and that more and more evidence will come from scientific studies in the following years.

I wonder what humanity will do if it's proven that a ton of chemicals used in the innumerable, convenient products that we enjoy in our modern civilization are altering our health and brain, including sexual orientation and gender identity. When researching this issue, I've come across with multiple papers by woke nutcases that suggest that it's transphobic, homophobic and cisheteronormative to even imply that such alterations are negative lol.

All the industries manufacturing the innumerable products and chemicals are also extremely invested into mudding the waters and covering up the truth. One example is a pesticide company harassing the scientist who uncovered the feminization of male frogs. Remember the "they're turning the freaking frogs gay" rant by Alex Jones? It's actually true, but they don't do it on purpose, it's just due to pure greed and incompetence.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top