W
You could go to an obscure video on youtube about one of these 'theories', and make a criticism, and you get butthurt soys who have taken the courses for many years who are 'debunking' what you said. I've seen many page debates between soy scientists arguing about interdimensional q-bits, neutrinos, quarks and all sort of completely made up things.
There isn't the slightest evidence that any of this stuff is real. In industrial science to actually make things, they use the chemistry and physics formulas that the real scientists created in the 1700's and 1800's.
An important aspect of science is that a theory has to be falsifiable. So say I had a theory that Neptune has elements in it that aren't on Earth. Its not falsifiable, so its not science. Something doesn't have to be science to be interesting but to get legitimacy the men coming up with the above stuff claim to be scientists and that this is scientific work. Now if it was just fools who were working on these theories its their own business. But they are on the public teat, they work in universities in high paid jobs getting tax money that could to go others.
There isn't the slightest evidence that any of this stuff is real. In industrial science to actually make things, they use the chemistry and physics formulas that the real scientists created in the 1700's and 1800's.
An important aspect of science is that a theory has to be falsifiable. So say I had a theory that Neptune has elements in it that aren't on Earth. Its not falsifiable, so its not science. Something doesn't have to be science to be interesting but to get legitimacy the men coming up with the above stuff claim to be scientists and that this is scientific work. Now if it was just fools who were working on these theories its their own business. But they are on the public teat, they work in universities in high paid jobs getting tax money that could to go others.
