Stoicism, as a philosophy, is one of the most retarded ideas to have grazed this world.
For those who somehow don't know, 'stoicism' is the idea that a man should 'control his emotions' and act indifferent about whatever goes on in his life—or to hide his emotions, at the very least. It has been a philosophy for some time, but only had a resurgence with the 'red-pill bro' wave that happened a few years ago. Since then, it has been fairly prevalent and there are a good chunk of young guys who grow up with this slop and unironically believe in it.
Just the sheer concept of stoicism is so utterly ridiculous that it makes me question how any guy looks at 'generic Little Dark Age stoicism edit video #111678109' and unironically thinks 'wow, I NEED to start doing this.'
The main reason I made this thread was because I randomly recalled this one short I watched on JewTube a long time ago that discussed the 'Father of Stoicism,' Marcus Aurelius. The video discussed how Aurelius caught his wife having affairs with multiple men, including a gladiator. As a response, Aurelius literally had the gladiator executed and forced his wife to BATHE IN THE BLOOD of the guy she cheated on him with.
I remember watching that and thinking, 'so cool...' but clearly the stoicfags in the comment section disagreed with me considering that the most liked comment was some mutt replying—'that is the least stoic thing ever.'
And you know what? He's right, it's NOT stoic—because stoicism is GAY and Aurelius needed to do something considering his pride as man had just been wounded.
Completely suppressing any sense of emotion so that you can 'control yourself' isn't masculine in the slightest—if anything it makes you look even MORE like a closeted faggot. That's why red-pillers always come off as secretly gay. Any normal heterosexual man will be capable of expressing and articulating emotion in a way that isn't needlessly whiny or pointless. If something is hilarious, you laugh and find it hilarious. If something is retarded, you say that it's retarded. If something is worth being angry about, you are ANGRY about it. If there is a reason to be ecstatic, you should be ecstatic.
Stoics, however, equate all emotion to being 'emotional' in the same way roasties are. Because, unfortunately, when you're a faggot, you lack the capacity to distinguish regular human emotion from whatever femroaches whine and 'manifest' about.
The truth is that these homosexuals are just either entirely gay, or incapable of expressing emotion altogether due to their lack of brain power and utter retardation. I can't imagine being a man and being afraid of expressing emotion. If you're not a foid or a troon, you'll regulate it just fine and it won't come off as overly dramatic. You are literally just resigning yourself to a philosophy where you are intentionally trying to become a dull, empty NPC who has nothing interesting to say nor any reason to live.
For those who somehow don't know, 'stoicism' is the idea that a man should 'control his emotions' and act indifferent about whatever goes on in his life—or to hide his emotions, at the very least. It has been a philosophy for some time, but only had a resurgence with the 'red-pill bro' wave that happened a few years ago. Since then, it has been fairly prevalent and there are a good chunk of young guys who grow up with this slop and unironically believe in it.
Just the sheer concept of stoicism is so utterly ridiculous that it makes me question how any guy looks at 'generic Little Dark Age stoicism edit video #111678109' and unironically thinks 'wow, I NEED to start doing this.'
The main reason I made this thread was because I randomly recalled this one short I watched on JewTube a long time ago that discussed the 'Father of Stoicism,' Marcus Aurelius. The video discussed how Aurelius caught his wife having affairs with multiple men, including a gladiator. As a response, Aurelius literally had the gladiator executed and forced his wife to BATHE IN THE BLOOD of the guy she cheated on him with.
I remember watching that and thinking, 'so cool...' but clearly the stoicfags in the comment section disagreed with me considering that the most liked comment was some mutt replying—'that is the least stoic thing ever.'
And you know what? He's right, it's NOT stoic—because stoicism is GAY and Aurelius needed to do something considering his pride as man had just been wounded.
Completely suppressing any sense of emotion so that you can 'control yourself' isn't masculine in the slightest—if anything it makes you look even MORE like a closeted faggot. That's why red-pillers always come off as secretly gay. Any normal heterosexual man will be capable of expressing and articulating emotion in a way that isn't needlessly whiny or pointless. If something is hilarious, you laugh and find it hilarious. If something is retarded, you say that it's retarded. If something is worth being angry about, you are ANGRY about it. If there is a reason to be ecstatic, you should be ecstatic.
Stoics, however, equate all emotion to being 'emotional' in the same way roasties are. Because, unfortunately, when you're a faggot, you lack the capacity to distinguish regular human emotion from whatever femroaches whine and 'manifest' about.
The truth is that these homosexuals are just either entirely gay, or incapable of expressing emotion altogether due to their lack of brain power and utter retardation. I can't imagine being a man and being afraid of expressing emotion. If you're not a foid or a troon, you'll regulate it just fine and it won't come off as overly dramatic. You are literally just resigning yourself to a philosophy where you are intentionally trying to become a dull, empty NPC who has nothing interesting to say nor any reason to live.
Last edited:
Perfect demolition, stoicism is aids. Along the lines of that Marcus Aurelius story, the stoic Seneca was also the richest man in Rome and advisor to the crazy emperor Nero. Stoic cucks again say "that wasn't very stoic of him," but those are the two most interesting things about him. Well at least the stoic freed slave Epictetus with his crutch and broken leg never did anything unstoic, how manly of him.
