
Capable_Onion
Member of The Akatsuki
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2019
- Posts
- 9,816
I'd do it for a bottle of water
ye i would make sure it dies instantly if you would ask any it memmber would u kill a incel for that amout they wouldnt think twiceI don't like animal cruelty but 18B...
BasedI'd do it for a bottle of water
yeah, wtf?who wouldn't?
idk many men are actually that low IQ and retardedyeah, wtf?
six people value the life of a puppy over their own?
they're clearly lying. no one worships animals this much.
If it was a real situation, of course they would accept.yeah, wtf?
six people value the life of a puppy over their own?
they're clearly lying. no one worships animals this much.
idk many men are actually that low IQ and retarded
if they thought about it for a few seconds, the answer is obvious.If it was a real situation, of course they would accept.
Also, people pay to eat animals, so why not be payed to kill one?
but the actual act of stomping on a puppy, you can disentangle your consciousness long enough to do this, easy.not sure if I'd be able to, it's like killing a baby
SameI'd do it for free![]()
legit pathetic cuckolds. literally like Jews who wanted peace with nazis
Yeah I get this, is just a personal thing, not sure if I'd be able to do that to a grown dog either, maby, just for 1 second is fine I guess, the thing with a puppy is that he's way more fragile though, not really a matter of innocencebut the actual act of stomping on a puppy, you can disentangle your consciousness long enough to do this, easy.
it will take less than 1 second.
[UWSL]it's not like abortion where you have to have malicious intent and sign a bunch of papers and have a lot of time to think about it.[/UWSL]
[UWSL]most people wouldn't even have to do this because we know a human baby is not comparable to a dog baby.[/UWSL]
i'm assuming you would stomp on a dog's head but not a puppy's?
why? this is kind of agecucked in a different way, since age shouldn't matter for "innocence," as dogs don't reach full consciousness ever, they are driven by instinct.
but fragility/sturdiness doesn't have anything to do with it.I guess, the thing with a puppy is that he's way more fragile though, not really a matter of innocence
but are these even comparable given the nature of the egg? I know where you coming from though, I'd step on a cockroach or any other insect without any remorsebut fragility/sturdiness doesn't have anything to do with it.
you would step on an egg for $18 billion, right?
If you voted for the puppy then you should click on that spoiler. If you didn't then this spoiler is not for you.
.
Meanwhile eating their steak, hamburgers, pulled pork and chicken wings.
What makes you think a dog is different than a sheep or a pig? Why kill one but save another? ""B..but muh dogs are friends"
View: https://youtu.be/s50vvwTystA
Is that not friendly enough?
"B.but muh dogs are smarter"
![]()
The Joy of Pigs ~ Pig Facts | Nature | PBS
Pig: any of the animals in the genus Sus. Kingdom: | Animalia Phylum: | Chordata Class: | Mammalia Order: | Artiodactyla Family: | Suidaewww.pbs.org
"B..but they are animals bro, who cares we are at the top of the food chain bro"
Okay so what makes us superior to these animals?
"Our IQ bro, we are smarter and more capable than animals bro"
So going by that logic would it be acceptable to kill, torture and eat a mentally ill wheelchair bound person?
"B..but meat tastes good tho"
So Jeffrey Dahmer was right then? Killing and eating of sentinent being regardless of species should be given the same treatment. If you don't believe in this then name the trait lacking in animals if it lacks in a human being justifies the killing and torture of a human being.
"B..but what about the mosquitoes and ants you crazy vegans kill everyday"
The fallacy you call "appeal to futility" is, "X is the ideal perfect goal; there is no possible perfect solution Y that completely achieves X; therefore X is not worth attempting." e.g. "World peace would be ideal; there is no conceivable peace treaty or other action that would completely achieve world peace; therefore, there's no point in working towards world peace."
"B..but my ancestors used to eat meat. That's how it works bro"
Your ancestors owned slaves, genocided and cannibalized people. I guess that's fine now huh?
If you save the puppy and you aren't a vegan then I exposed your moral inconsistencies and now that you've read all of this
View: https://youtu.be/UcN7SGGoCNI
And watched this video, if you are still eating meat then you are a Hypocrite.
I see you voted against the puppy so that spoiler was not for you. I explicitly mentioned in the first sentence.Its simple, its not human species, it shouldn't be humanized or given rights.
Animals can't follow laws and don't even have any duty, therefor they aren't going to have rights. A dog has much rights as a bacteria, none
I know, I'm just [UWSL]complementing [/UWSL]your ideasI see you voted against the puppy so that spoiler was not for you. I explicitly mentioned in the first sentence.
That spoiler was for guys like @RREEEEEEEEE
I didn't vote but you do have a point and I agree with you, I personally don't see dogs as any different than goats or cows, I just don't like unnecessary suffering and violence. For instance I don't see any moral problem with chinese people eating dogs except for the necessity of this act when we already have a huge market revolved around feeding humans with cattle.I see you voted against the puppy so that spoiler was not for you. I explicitly mentioned in the first sentence.
That spoiler was for guys like @RREEEEEEEEE
If you voted for the puppy then you should click on that spoiler. If you didn't then this spoiler is not for you.
.
Meanwhile eating their steak, hamburgers, pulled pork and chicken wings.
What makes you think a dog is different than a sheep or a pig? Why kill one but save another? ""B..but muh dogs are friends"
View: https://youtu.be/s50vvwTystA
Is that not friendly enough?
"B.but muh dogs are smarter"
![]()
The Joy of Pigs ~ Pig Facts | Nature | PBS
Pig: any of the animals in the genus Sus. Kingdom: | Animalia Phylum: | Chordata Class: | Mammalia Order: | Artiodactyla Family: | Suidaewww.pbs.org
"B..but they are animals bro, who cares we are at the top of the food chain bro"
Okay so what makes us superior to these animals?
"Our IQ bro, we are smarter and more capable than animals bro"
So going by that logic would it be acceptable to kill, torture and eat a mentally ill wheelchair bound person?
"B..but meat tastes good tho"
So Jeffrey Dahmer was right then? Killing and eating of sentinent being regardless of species should be given the same treatment. If you don't believe in this then name the trait lacking in animals if it lacks in a human being justifies the killing and torture of a human being.
"B..but what about the mosquitoes and ants you crazy vegans kill everyday"
The fallacy you call "appeal to futility" is, "X is the ideal perfect goal; there is no possible perfect solution Y that completely achieves X; therefore X is not worth attempting." e.g. "World peace would be ideal; there is no conceivable peace treaty or other action that would completely achieve world peace; therefore, there's no point in working towards world peace."
"B..but my ancestors used to eat meat. That's how it works bro"
Your ancestors owned slaves, genocided and cannibalized people. I guess that's fine now huh?
If you save the puppy and you aren't a vegan then I exposed your moral inconsistencies and now that you've read all of this
View: https://youtu.be/UcN7SGGoCNI
And watched this video, if you are still eating meat then you are a Hypocrite.
Well in that caseI know, I'm just [UWSL]complementing [/UWSL]your ideas
If we can't give them human rights then we should kill them??? I guess going by that logic Aliens would love to massacre us humans.Its simple, its not human species, it shouldn't be humanized or given rights.
I’d pay 18 billion to do it
your no vote more respectable than the others cause you actually did cut meat out and don't have the cognitive dissonance other voters do. praiseworthy.You are a cuck if you voted yes to this but would vote "no" if the question asked "would you step on a whore with a metal boot for 18 billion?"
Aliens probably don't even exist, if they did, they would visited us a long time ago. But assuming they exist, they couldn't kill us legally, because we can simply follow laws and we can have duties, animals can't. Also, we are a rational species.Well in that case
If we can't give them human rights then we should kill them??? I guess going by that logic Aliens would love to massacre us humans.